Opportunities & Advantages of Intermodal Transport between Europe & Asia Kiev, 28 September 2004 Hubert Linssen General Delegate Page 1 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004
Download ReportTranscript Opportunities & Advantages of Intermodal Transport between Europe & Asia Kiev, 28 September 2004 Hubert Linssen General Delegate Page 1 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004
Opportunities & Advantages of Intermodal Transport between Europe & Asia Kiev, 28 September 2004 Hubert Linssen General Delegate Page 1 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Evolution of the IRU Structure • 1948 - IRU founded in Geneva • 1956 - IRU Liaison Committee established • 1973 - IRU Liaison Committee to the EU established in Brussels • 1998 - IRU Liaison Committee to the CIS established in Moscow Page 2 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Evolution of IRU Membership Created 1948 8 Founder States: 2004 174 Members 67 Countries Belgium Denmark France Netherlands Norway Sweden UK Switzerland Laeremans Page 3 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Main Areas of IRU Activity Representing Road Transport Industry (Employers) worldwide Leadership for the Road Transport Industry in key issues Managing the TIR system administration Commercial Services to the Road Transport Industry through separate companies, such as Vialtis Providing Information Services for Members, via www.iru.org Page 4 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Sustainable Development For the IRU, the promotion of sustainable development should include: Technical progress to build more efficient vehicles and less polluting fuels Improved logistics process Improved intermodal cooperation Page 5 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Intermodal transport Road is complementary and indispensable, with rail, maritime or inland waterways, for transport over long distances The importance of reinforcing links between Europe and Asia Page 6 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Combined Transport (1) The IRU supports combined transport as a complete transport management system supplementing traditional road transport There are no economically viable alternatives to road over short distances – road is always the indispensable partner in all types or road transport. Page 7 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Combined Transport (2) The transport of dangerous goods – a good example of combined transport using rail-road – especially over trans-continental distances Specific problems subsist at terminals which prevent more use of combined transport Page 8 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Intermodal transhipping (1) Lack of facilities for intermodal transhipping and red tape at border crossings are prejudicial to international trade and combined transport Rail is only an option if the following are avoided: • fractioning of shipments • delays • damage to goods Page 9 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Intermodal transhipping (2) Multi-modal platforms must be developed with: • Reception and information services • Parking areas for heavy goods vehicles • Freight office • Transit centre • Warehouses • Container loading and unloading installations Page 10 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Combined Transport risks Rail-road, sea-road, river-road combined services all incur increased costs through: • Load fractioning • Increased risk of damage to goods • Lengthy delays • Imprecise timings • Lack of technical harmonisation (boxes) • Lack of legal harmonisation • Red tape at borders Page 11 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Priorities for governments Governments must : • Encourage the establishment of international facilitation measures • Remove obstacles at borders • Establish a legal regime for multimodal transport with sea links • Flexible transit conditions • Harmonised and flexible border crossing conditions Page 12 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Conclusion (1) National Authorities, together with IRU Member Associations present in the Euro-Asian region, must take steps to promote road transport, as well as its modal partners, and remove remaining obstacles to respond to needs to develop commercial and economic relations between Asia and Europe. Page 13 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004 Conclusion (2) The IRU’s 3 “i” strategy: Innovations to develop ever more effective at source technical measures and operating practices Incentives to encourage transport operators to accelerate the introduction of the best available technology and practices for combined transport Infrastructure to remove bottlenecks and missing links on Euro-Asian transport corridors Page 14 © International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2004