Early Childhood Outcomes: Using Data for Program Improvement Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Robin Rooney and Christina Kasprzak ECO at Frank Porter Graham Institute Illinois October, 2008
Download ReportTranscript Early Childhood Outcomes: Using Data for Program Improvement Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Robin Rooney and Christina Kasprzak ECO at Frank Porter Graham Institute Illinois October, 2008
Early Childhood Outcomes: Using Data for Program Improvement Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Robin Rooney and Christina Kasprzak ECO at Frank Porter Graham Institute Illinois October, 2008 Objectives Understand the purposes of the child outcomes data collection Be familiar with key considerations related to accurately completing the Child Outcomes Summary Form Be able to evaluate child outcomes data for accuracy as part of supervision Understand the use of child outcomes data for program improvement, including for instruction, resource allocation, and professional development Early Childhood Outcomes Center 2 Why are we doing this? Early Childhood Outcomes Center 3 Keeping our eye on the prize: High quality services for children and families that will lead to good outcomes. Early Childhood Outcomes Center 4 Goal of early childhood special education “…To enable young children to be active and successful participants during the early childhood years and in the future in a variety of settings – in their homes with their families, in child care, in preschool or school programs, and in the community.” (from Early Childhood Outcomes Center, http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/pdfs/eco_outcomes_4-13-05.pdf) Early Childhood Outcomes Center 5 High Quality Data on Outcomes Data are a piece of a system that helps to achieve overarching goals for children and families Data yield Evidence that allows you to make an inference that should lead to specific actions to improve the system. Early Childhood Outcomes Center 6 System for Producing Good Child and Family Outcomes Adequate funding Good Federal policies and programs Good State policies and programs Good Local policies and programs Strong Leadership Prof’l Development •Preservice •Inservice High quality services and supports for children 0-5 and their families Good outcomes for children and families The Vision: Using Data as a Tool for Program Improvement Illinois will have quality data available on an ongoing basis about multiple components of the system Outcomes for children and families Programs and services provided Personnel (types, qualifications, etc.) Etc. Early Childhood Outcomes Center 8 Driving Force for Data on Child Goals Comes from the Federal Level Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Early Childhood Outcomes Center 9 Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) passed in 1993 Requires goals and indicators be established for IDEA Indicators and data collection further along for school age population than for EC Previously, for early childhood data had been collected on: • Number of children served • Settings Early Childhood Outcomes Center 10 PART evaluation results (2002) 130 programs examined in 2002; 50% programs had no performance data Programs looking at inputs, not results Part C and Section 619 No long-term child outcome goals or data Need to develop a strategy to collect annual performance data in a timely manner Early Childhood Outcomes Center 11 Federal Funding for Preschool Special Education Total U.S. Illinois 2004 $387,699,000 $17,943,956 2005 $381,385,691 $17,812,936 2006 $380,751,030 $17,650,453 Early Childhood Outcomes Center 14 Early Childhood Outcomes Center 15 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act SEC. 616. <<NOTE: 20 USC 1416.>> MONITORING, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT. ``(a) Federal and State Monitoring.….. ….. ``(2) Focused monitoring.--The primary focus of Federal and State monitoring activities described in paragraph (1) shall be on-- ``(A) improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities; Early Childhood Outcomes Center 16 How Office of Special Education (OSEP) responded Required states to submit outcome data in their Annual Performance Report (APR) Funded the Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center to do research, make recommendations, and assist states Early Childhood Outcomes Center 17 Where are we now: Federal reporting requirements Early Childhood Outcomes Center 18 OSEP Reporting Requirements: the Outcomes Positive social emotional skills (including positive social relationships) Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/ communication [and early literacy]) Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs Early Childhood Outcomes Center 19 OSEP Reporting Categories Percentage of children who: a. Did not improve functioning b. Improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers c. Improved functioning to a level nearer to sameaged peers but did not reach it d. Improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers e. Maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers 3 outcomes x 5 “measures” = 15 numbers Early Childhood Outcomes Center 20 Reporting Schedule Due February 2008 Data in reporting categories at exit for all children who have been in the program for at least 6 months Must be reported for the year beginning July 1, 2006 Repeat with next year’s data in 2009, etc. 2010 States must set targets Summary statements for targets recommended; not yet official* States must report data to public by school districts for these target numbers *See http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~ECO/meetings.cfm for more information on recommended targets Early Childhood Outcomes Center 21 Where are we now: State decisions and activities Early Childhood Outcomes Center 22 WHY? (State Version) Purpose To respond to federal reporting requirements Early Childhood Outcomes Center To have data for program improvement and to respond to federal reporting requirements 23 WHY? (Local Version) Purpose To provide data to the state Early Childhood Outcomes Center To have data for program improvement and to provide data to the state 24 State approaches Most states have embraced outcomes measurement and are collecting outcomes data for their own purposes. Many states are building bigger systems than needed to produce the federal data. Go to www.the-eco-center.org for more information about what other states are doing Early Childhood Outcomes Center 25 How are states collecting child outcomes data? Possible state approaches to collection of child data Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) Publisher’s online assessment system Single assessment statewide Other approaches Early Childhood Outcomes Center 26 State Approaches to Measuring Child Outcomes Approach One tool statewide Multiple Publishers’ online tools COSF 7 pt. scale Other Part C Preschool (56 states) (59 states) 8/56 (14%) 13/59 (22%) 2/56 (4%) 3/59 (5%) 40/56 (71%) 36/59 (61%) 6/56 (11%) 7/59 (12%) Checking in – How is it going? Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Form Process What is going well? What is not going well? Are there other issues or concerns that need to be addressed about the process? Early Childhood Outcomes Center 28 Let’s Review: Child Outcome Summary Form Early Childhood Outcomes Center 29 Learning from Each Other 1. 2. Did you attend a training on the COSF? Have you participated in a COSF team rating process? 3. 4. 5. For more than 10 children? 20? 30? Have you reviewed COSF forms completed by others? Have you provided training on the COSF? How confident are you in your knowledge of the COSF process? Early Childhood Outcomes Center 30 Essential Knowledge for Completing the Child Outcomes Summary Form Between them, team members must: 1. Know about the child’s functioning across settings and situations 2. Understand age-expected child development 3. Understand the content of the three child outcomes 4. Know how to use the rating scale 5. Understand age expectations for child functioning within the child’s culture Early Childhood Outcomes Center 31 Important point It is not necessary that all team members be knowledgeable in all 5 areas Especially, no expectation that parents understand the rating scale or typical child development But the professionals have to! Early Childhood Outcomes Center 32 Essential Knowledge for Completing the Child Outcomes Summary Form Between them, team members must: 1. Know about the child’s functioning across settings and situations 2. Understand age-expected child development 3. Understand the content of the three child outcomes 4. Know how to use the rating scale 5. Understand age expectations for child functioning within the child’s culture Early Childhood Outcomes Center 33 1. Know about the child’s functioning across settings and situations How we learn about the child’s functioning across settings and situations: Good assessment Early Childhood Outcomes Center 34 DEC* recommended practices for assessment Involve multiple sources Examples: family members, professional team members, service providers, caregivers Involve multiple measures Examples: observations, criterion- or curriculumbased instruments, interviews, norm-referenced scales, informed clinical opinion, work samples *Division for Early Childhood Early Childhood Outcomes Center 35 Assessment practices appropriate for outcomes measurement: ASHA* ASHA recommended practices: Gather information from families, teachers, other service providers Collect child-centered, contextualized, descriptive, functional information (*American Speech-Language-Hearing Association) Early Childhood Outcomes Center 36 Assessment instruments Assessment the tool vs. assessment the process Assessment tools can inform us about children’s functioning in each of the three outcome areas Early Childhood Outcomes Center Challenge: There is no assessment tool that assesses the three outcomes directly 37 Essential Knowledge for Completing the Child Outcomes Summary Form Between them, team members must: 1. Know about the child’s functioning across settings and situations 2. Understand age-expected child development 3. Understand the content of the three child outcomes 4. Know how to use the rating scale 5. Understand age expectations for child functioning within the child’s culture Early Childhood Outcomes Center 38 Resources for understanding ageexpected child development ECO link http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/pdfs/Age-expected_child_dev_9-5-07.pdf (under “ECO Tools”) New course coming soon Watch ECO web site www.the-eco-center.org Early Childhood Outcomes Center 39 Essential Knowledge for Completing the Child Outcomes Summary Form Between them, team members must: 1. Know about the child’s functioning across settings and situations 2. Understand age-expected child development 3. Understand the content of the three child outcomes 4. Know how to use the rating scale 5. Understand age expectations for child functioning within the child’s culture Early Childhood Outcomes Center 40 Outcomes Jeopardy Pointing to the cabinet $100for cereal Reading the letter$100 “S” on the Stop sign Washes hands $100 before lunch Biting $200 Plays by himself $200 in the classroom Plays with $200 rhyming words Building a castle from blocks $300 with a friend Problems $300 sleeping Sharing a cookie $300 at lunchtime Early Childhood Outcomes Center 41 Children have positive social relationships Involves: Relating with adults Relating with other children For older children, following rules related to groups or interacting with others Includes areas like: Attachment/separation/autonomy Expressing emotions and feelings Learning rules and expectations Social interactions and play Early Childhood Outcomes Center 42 Children acquire and use knowledge and skills Involves Thinking Reasoning Remembering Problem solving Using symbols and language Understanding physical and social worlds Includes: Early concepts—symbols, pictures, numbers Imitation Object permanence Expressive language and communication Early literacy Early Childhood Outcomes Center 43 Children take appropriate action to meet their needs Involves: Taking care of basic needs Getting from place to place Using tools (e.g., fork, toothbrush, crayon) In older children, contributing to their own health and safety Includes: Integrating motor skills to complete tasks Self-help skills (e.g., dressing, feeding, grooming, toileting, household responsibility) Acting on the world to get what one wants Early Childhood Outcomes Center 44 Essential Knowledge for Completing the Child Outcomes Summary Form Between them, team members must: 1. Know about the child’s functioning across settings and situations 2. Understand age-expected child development 3. Understand the content of the three child outcomes 4. Know how to use the rating scale 5. Understand age expectations for child functioning within the child’s culture Early Childhood Outcomes Center 45 The two COSF questions a. To what extent does this child show ageappropriate functioning, across a variety of settings and situations, on this outcome? (Rating: 1-7) b. Has the child shown any new skills or behaviors related to [this outcome] since the last outcomes summary? (Yes-No) Early Childhood Outcomes Center 46 7 – Completely The child shows behaviors and skills expected in all or almost all everyday situations that are part of the child’s life Home, store, park, child care, with strangers, etc. The child’s functioning is considered appropriate for his/her age No one has significant concerns about the child’s functioning in this outcome area Early Childhood Outcomes Center 47 6 – Between completely and somewhat The child’s functioning generally is considered appropriate for his or her age but there are some significant concerns about the child’s functioning in this outcome area Early Childhood Outcomes Center 48 5 – Somewhat The child shows functioning expected for his/her age some of the time and/or in some situations The child’s functioning is a mix of ageappropriate and not appropriate functioning The child’s functioning might be described as like that of a slightly younger child Early Childhood Outcomes Center 49 4 – Between a 5 and a 3 Child shows some age appropriate functioning some of the time or in some situations or settings but most of the child’s functioning would be described as not yet age appropriate. The child’s functioning might be described as like that of a younger child Early Childhood Outcomes Center 50 3 – Emerging The child does not yet show functioning expected of a child his/her age in any situation The child’s behaviors and skills include immediate foundational skills on which to build age-appropriate functioning The child’s functioning might be described as like that of a younger child Early Childhood Outcomes Center 51 2 – Between 3 and 1 The child does not yet show functioning expected of a child his/her age in any situation The child’s behaviors and skills does have some the immediate foundational skills on which to build age-appropriate functioning but these are not displayed very often The child’s functioning might be described as like that of a younger or even much younger child Early Childhood Outcomes Center 52 1 – Not yet The child does not yet show functioning expected of a child his/her age in any situation The child’s skills and behaviors also do not yet include any immediate foundational skills on which to build age-appropriate functioning The child’s functioning might be described as like that of a much younger child Children with 1 ratings still have skills, just not yet at an immediate foundational level Early Childhood Outcomes Center 53 Rating Scale Jeopardy Age appropriate functioning $100– no concerns Mix of age appropriate and not age $100 appropriate functioning No age appropriate functioning – not yet $100 showing immediate foundational skills Some age appropriate $200 functioning but very little No age appropriate functioning – lots of $200 immediate foundational skills Age appropriate functioning $200– some concerns Rarely shows age appropriate $300 functioning No age appropriate functioning – some $300 immediate foundational skills Age appropriate $300 functioning Early Childhood Outcomes Center 54 Early Childhood Outcomes Center 55 Essential Knowledge for Completing the Child Goals Outcome Form Between them, team members must: 1. Know about the child’s functioning across settings and situations 2. Understand age-expected child development 3. Understand the content of the three child outcomes 4. Know how to use the rating scale 5. Understand age expectations for child functioning within the child’s culture Early Childhood Outcomes Center 56 Point of clarification Process is NOT about comparing groups of children – it IS about asking how close children are to being able to do what is expected at their age Early learning guidelines Kindergarten and access to the general curriculum Early Childhood Outcomes Center 57 What we are learning nationally The process of training for child outcomes data collection has uncovered other areas of significant need related to professional development. Early Childhood Outcomes Center 58 Providers need to know more about: Assessment How to gather assessment data to reflect functioning across settings and situations, especially how to gather child functioning information from families Understanding the results of the assessment Sharing assessment results sensitively and honestly with families Early Childhood Outcomes Center 59 Providers need to know more about: Functional outcomes What are they? How do they differ from outcomes organized around domains? What do they mean for how professionals from different disciplines operate as a team? Typical child development What are the functional expectations for children at different ages with regard to each of the 3 goal statements? Early Childhood Outcomes Center 60 Let’s meet Ava Early Childhood Outcomes Center 61