Balancing Cybersecurity and Trade Danielle Kriz Director, Global Cybersecurity Policy Information Technology Industry Council Digital Agenda Assembly Brussels – June 21, 2012

Download Report

Transcript Balancing Cybersecurity and Trade Danielle Kriz Director, Global Cybersecurity Policy Information Technology Industry Council Digital Agenda Assembly Brussels – June 21, 2012

Balancing Cybersecurity and Trade
Danielle Kriz
Director, Global Cybersecurity Policy
Information Technology Industry Council
Digital Agenda Assembly
Brussels – June 21, 2012
About ITI
• One of the main high-tech trade associations in
Washington
• 50 of the largest companies in the world
– Hardware, software, and services
– Mostly U.S., 4 European, 5 Japanese members
– Companies have facilities all over the world
• Expertise in cyber: Cybersecurity Committee
• Expertise in standards: Standards Policy Committee
• Expertise in trade: Trade Policy Committee
ITI Member Companies
Apple, Inc.
ITI Cybersecurity Principles
• Inform the public cybersecurity discussion
– Cybersecurity is rightly a priority for
governments
– Interests of industry and governments are
fundamentally aligned
• Principles provide an important lens for viewing
any efforts to improve cybersecurity
Six Principles
To be effective, any efforts to improve cybersecurity must:
• Leverage public-private partnerships and build upon
existing initiatives and resource commitments;
• Reflect the borderless, interconnected, and global nature
of today’s cyber environment;
• Be able to adapt rapidly to emerging threats, technologies,
and business models;
• Be based on effective risk management;
• Focus on raising public awareness; and
• More directly focus on bad actors and their threats.
Global Trends in
Cybersecurity & Commerce
• Governments often react to cybersecurity concerns
without fully considering the global context or
consequences of policy proposals
– Cybersecurity: Catch-all term for cybersecurity, network
security, information security, encryption, security
standards, etc
• Government actions on cybersecurity may create
commercial barriers – intentionally or unintentionally
– Mandating domestic standards or prescriptive
technologies, requiring use of domestic intellectual
property (IP), forcing technology transfer, source code
review
Global Trends in
Cybersecurity & Commerce
• We recognize the need for cyber / national security
– These concerns must be balanced with commercial
interests
– But many times proposed policies decrease security
• Unique security standards and other requirements
– Undermine security and resiliency
– Raise costs & slow industry’s ability to innovate and meet
current and future security challenges
– Impede global interoperability, fragment the Internet
• Governments may overlook the tremendous market incentive
that the private sector has to secure networks and systems
• Large concern to ITI member companies and others
U.S. Cybersecurity Policies - Congress
• Variety of legislative proposals in the Senate and House of
Representatives in last 12 months; none have passed
• We support proposals that would improve cybersecurity while
preserving industry’s ability to innovate
– Cyber threat information sharing, Federal Information Security
Management Act (FISMA) reform, cybersecurity R&D, cybercrime,
national data breach standard
• Some proposals are overly regulatory and would decrease
security- and also send the wrong message globally
– Giving Department of Homeland Security additional power (including
to write standards), government regulation of ICT supply chains
• We regularly urge the U.S. Congress to consider the global
implications of their proposals and to lead by example
U.S. Cybersecurity Policies Administration
• Variety of U.S. Government Departments and Agencies have
some responsibility related to cybersecurity
– White House, Department of Homeland Security, Department of
Defense, Department of Commerce, Department of State, National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), etc.
• These Departments/ Agencies have various roles now
• They also are considering new cyber policies
• ITI supports some policy ideas, not others
– We support the Commerce Department helping to promote voluntary
cybersecurity efforts in industry
– We support greater USG cybersecurity R&D
– We oppose DOD regulating the ICT supply chain
• Overall, we oppose a regulatory approach because it will
decrease security
China
• Encryption regulations (1999)
– Rules restrict or ban outright the use of
foreign encryption technology
• ZUC algorithm for 4G LTE telecom networks
– Although a globally accepted standard (3GPP), ZUC will
be mandatory for the China market, along with
invasive testing requirements (source code review)
• Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS)
– For information security in China’s “critical
infrastructure”
– Many requirements (e.g. domestic IP, testing) would
keep out foreign ICT products
India
• New Preferential Market Access (PMA) rules
– Procurement preference to domestically manufactured
electronic goods “due to security considerations and in
Government procurement”
– Assumption that “made in India” is more secure
• Telecom network security certification
– Overreach- required source code/ technology transfer,
in-country testing (partially resolved in 2011)
• Telecom Security Policy (draft)- 2012
– Includes important principles to effectively address
India’s telecommunications security concerns
– Simultaneously, a push toward Indian-specific security
standards and testing or linking security to domestic
products/local manufacturing…
EU – Working on New Policies
• Forthcoming European Strategy for Internet
Security
• Revision of Data Protection Directive and
inclusion of “security by design”
• Industry urges the EU to balance security and
commercial/trade interests
Recommendations for the EU, US
• Pursue policies that recognize the global dimension of
Internet security
– Aim to meet domestic security needs while recognizing the global
cyber marketplace
• The U.S., EU, and other governments should cooperate to
promote policies that are a model for rest of the world
– We don’t want to set bad examples (or decrease security)
• Pursue global standards and best practices, balance
security and economics
• The best path is via public-private partnerships
– The ICT industry seeks security – it is our bottom line
– Sharing of knowledge and experience and promoting cooperation
to enhance cybersecurity
Thank you
Danielle Kriz
Director, Global Cybersecurity Policy
Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
[email protected], +1-202-626-5731
www.itic.org