Internet Futures Internet Futures Here I am channelling Anders Rockstrom of Telia Sonera, whose presentation at the .se event in October 2006 had.
Download ReportTranscript Internet Futures Internet Futures Here I am channelling Anders Rockstrom of Telia Sonera, whose presentation at the .se event in October 2006 had.
Internet Futures Internet Futures Here I am channelling Anders Rockstrom of Telia Sonera, whose presentation at the .se event in October 2006 had a profound impact on me – he stated the truth so clearly and simply it was an irresistible message. More folk should hear what he has to say – so this is your opportunity! I’ve made some changes to match whats been happening since 2006, but I think that the essential message remains the same – thanks Anders! Geoff Internet Futures use r s t echn ology purpose: use r s t echn ology share some musings about this industry and its future think about some of the major factors that will shape our future why This industry has a rich history why This industry has a rich history …of making poor guesses why This industry has a rich history …of making poor guesses and being taken by surprise! why This industry has a rich history …of making poor guesses and being taken by surprise! could we do a better job? One approach: 1. Observe the situation and what’s happening 2. Believe what we see !) (the most dif ficult one 3. Understand where this may lead us and what options may be presented on the way User forces on the Market From telephony to chat to mashups to p2p to ? From radio to tv to ? e b u T You active passiv ‘IP TV ’ Revenue Profile Revenue Profile How to fill the gap of the Internet’s revenue leak Service Profile How to fill the gap of the Internet’s revenue leak open vs walled garden Service Profile How to fill the gap of the Internet’s revenue leak open vs walled garden infrastruc. vs services/ content services Service Profile How to fill the gap of the Internet’s revenue leak open vs walled garden infrastruc. vs services/ content services user coach produced vs potatoe Service Profile How to fill the gap of the Internet’s revenue leak open vs walled garden infrastruc. vs services/ content services user coach produced vs potatoe e.t.c driver dimensions driver dimensions y g o l o n Tech+ + driver dimensions y g o l o n Tech+ + Usag e ‘empower e d user s’ penetration driver dimensions y g o l o n Tech+ + Busin ess ? Usag e ‘empower e d user s’ penetration technology ++ surplus fast refill enabling windows ‘Moore’-type of pace technology ++ ‘Moore’-type of pace surplus fast refill enabling windows ? see it ... ... seize it ! technology ++ ‘Moore’-type of pace surplus fast refill enabling windows ? see it ... ... seize it ! general trend shift network shared of end user power terminal technology new production paradigms technology new production paradigms network shared Over the top apps enduser terminal e.g Skype netw a ‘network- service‘ produced outside of the ‘network‘ technology new production paradigms network shared Over the top apps enduser terminal e.g Skype netw a ‘network- service‘ produced outside of the ‘network‘ mobility multi/broad-cast ... technology new production paradigms network shared Over the top apps enduser terminal e.g Skype netw Content is a commodity application that users do rather than a valuable service that is delivered by service providers a ‘network- service‘ produced outside of the ‘network‘ mobility multi/broad-cast ... technology surplus enables divergence for simplicity performance technology surplus enables divergence for simplicity performance QoS IMS Network VPNs technology surplus enables divergence for simplicity performance QoS IMS Network VPNs no nee IP- con d f or ver genc e technology surplus enables divergence for simplicity performance IMS Network VPNs no nee IP- con d f or ver genc e Web enabled user generated content wikipedia QoS technology surplus enables divergence for simplicity performance QoS IMS Network VPNs no nee IP- con d f or ver genc e Web enabled user generated content heterogeniety convergence complemented with divergence interoperability wikipedia when there is a use for it usage penetration who and how usage penetration who and how passive 1: st gener at i on demand c/ s onpeephol e usage penetration who and how passive 1: st gener at i on 2: nd gener at i on al l ways on p/ p ser vi ces demand c/ s onpeephol e usage penetration who and how passive 1: st gener at i on 2: nd gener at i on al l ways on p/ p ser vi ces 3:d generation network resident active demand c/ s onpeephol e usage penetration Internet_paradigm(t) a penetration detour? “pure” Internet -2 n ge ing k c ba ny twilight zone gen-3 back to s? the r oot te le ph o ngn yg g pi ims gen-1 t/ r cliene s r ve usage critical infrastructure sustainability envir o nmen t economy sustainable Infrastructure roles t ´ n o d want l socia want Users (Dataföreningen) have usage fuelling the usage growth fire usage fuelling the usage growth fire usage = scaling usage fuelling the usage growth fire Please send heaps more…. bandwidth storage switching fibre routes routing addressing delivering silicon density power memory speed storage efficiency heat dissipation usage = scaling usage fuelling the usage growth fire Please send heaps more…. bandwidth storage switching fibre routes routing addressing delivering silicon density power memory speed storage efficiency heat dissipation usage = scaling But is bigger always cheaper? usage fuelling the usage growth fire Please send heaps more…. bandwidth storage switching fibre routes routing addressing delivering silicon density power memory speed storage efficiency heat dissipation usage = scaling But is bigger always cheaper? Business modelling y g o l o n h c e T Usage Busin ess ? Legacy Culture Regulation convergence seemlessnet NGN - . . . ..today operators tend to be very hype driven .. Everone is talking about it Fewhaveactual experience ..andthe actual experiences are mostly failures Business modelling y g o l o n h c e T Usage Busin ess ? new operator roles new business logics .. involving users and other stake-holders Business modelling Packet pushing is a commodity utility activity Low margins Low barriers to entry No product differentiation Deregulation and competition Valued services are overlays to the network Business modelling Packet pushing is a commodity utility activity Low margins Low barriers to entry No product differentiation Deregulation and competition Valued services are overlays to the network Traditional revenue streams are vaporizing Wired telephony Local Access monopolies Business data products Mobile telephony Business today’s telco pressure points … Packet pushing is a commodity utility activity Low margins Low barriers to entry No product differentiation Deregulation and competition Valued services are overlays to the network Traditional revenue streams are vaporizing Wired telephony Local Access monopolies Business data products Mobile telephony Investors are getting very nervous about telcos Cost of capital is rising Consumers are fleeing legacy telcos in the face of price gouging Shareholder returns need to stay high No residual expertise left in-house So where are we heading? network commodity utility network operation high capacity packet pushing So where are we heading? network commodity utility network operation high capacity packet pushing user - drive, production p2p,content, .. User-centric applications, not network-centric services Value shift up the protocol stack So where are we heading? network commodity utility network operation high capacity packet pushing user - drive, production p2p,content, .. User-centric applications, not network-centric services Value shift up the protocol stack We are reinventing this industry on the fly Reinvention: involving users new partners and different business models thank you