Functional Progressions and Functional Testing in Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Techniques for Sports Medicine and Athletic Training William E.

Download Report

Transcript Functional Progressions and Functional Testing in Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Techniques for Sports Medicine and Athletic Training William E.

Functional Progressions and
Functional Testing in Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Techniques for Sports Medicine and Athletic
Training
William E. Prentice
Introduction
 To reduce lasting effects of injury, athletic trainer should
direct rehabilitation toward improving neuromuscular
coordination and agility as well as strength and
endurance
 Return athlete to pre-injury activity levels
 Function refers to patterns of motion that use multiple
joints acting with various axes and multiple planes
 Focus on functional rehabilitation will ready patient for
activity and competition
Role of Functional Progressions in
Rehabilitation
 A.T. must adapt rehabilitation to the sports specific
demands of each individual sport and position
 Functional Progression
 Succession of activities that simulate actual motor and
sport skills
 Enable patient to acquire or reacquire skills needed to
perform athletic endeavors safely and effectively
 Places stresses and forces on each body system in a
well-planned positive and progression fashion
 Improves patients overall ability to meet the demands of daily
activities as well as sport competition
Role of Functional Role of Functional
Progressions in Rehabilitation
 A.T. breaks down activities involved in a given sport
into individual components
 Patient concentrates on components in a controlled
environment before combining them together in an
uncontrolled environment
 Essential in the rehabilitation process
 Tissues not placed under performance level stresses do
not adapt to the sudden return of such stresses when full
activity is resumed
Benefits of using Functional Progressions
 Assist patient and A.T. in reaching the goals of the
entire program
 Restoration of joint ROM
 Strength
 Proprioception
 Agility
 Confidence
 Allow patient to reach desired level of activity safely and
effectively
Physical Benefits
 Improving functional stability
 Maintained by neuromuscular control mechanisms involved in
proprioception and kinesthesia
 Performance during functional task can be evaluated and corrected
 Functional testing can be used to provide objective measure of ability
 Muscle strength
 Muscles involved will be strengthened dynamically under stresses similar
to those encountered in competition
 Using SAID and Overload Principles
 Endurance
 Muscular and cardiorespirtaory endurance can be enhanced with
functional progressions
 Through repetition of of individual activities and their combination into one
general activity
Physical Benefits
 Flexibility
 Injured area stressed within a controlled range during functional
progression
 Improved mobility and flexibility crucial to patient return to
activity
 Strength and endurance do not mean much if injured area
cannot move through normal ROM
 Muscle relaxation
 Functional progression can teach an individual to recognize
muscle tension and eventually control or remove it by relaxing
muscles after exercise
 Relieve muscle guarding that may inhibit normal ROM
Physical Benefits
 Motor Skills
 Coordination, agility and motor skills are complex aspects
of normal function
 Needed to transform strength, flexibility and endurance
into full-speed performance
 Repetition and practice are are important to learning
motor skills
 Rehabilitation exercises must stress neuromuscular
coordination and agility to increase performance and
decrease chance of reinjury
 Develop automatic reactions needed during activity
Psychological Benefits
 Functional progression can help reduce common
emotions found after injury
 Anxiety
 Athlete gradually placed into more demanding situations.
 Experience success and not be as concerned with failure
 Deprivation
 Athlete can engage in activity during practice to remain close
in proximity and socially feel little loss in team cohesion
 Apprehension
 Enable patient to adapt to imposed demands of their sport in
a controlled environment
 Restore confidence
Components of a functional
progression
 Four principles
 Individuality of the patient, sport and the injury
 Activities should be positive not negative; no increase in
signs or symptoms
 Orderly progressive program
 Program should be varied to avoid monotony
 Vary exercise techniques
 Alter the program at regular intervals
 Maintain fitness base
 Set achievable goals , reevaluate, and modify regularly
 Use clinical, home and on field programs
 Use sport specific activities to enhance patients return to activity
Designing a Functional
Progression
 No cookbook, be creative and specific to athletes goals
and injury status
 Progressions should start early in rehab
 Start with low impact and progress to high impact
 Assess athlete periodically to determine ability to
progress to next exercise
 Achieving a certain skill level occurs when a the skill
can be completed at functional speed with high
repetition without increase in pain, swelling or a
decrease in ROM
Functional Testing
 Patient performs certain tasks appropriate to their stage in
rehab
 Isolate specific deficits
 A.T. able to determine current functional level and set functional
goals
 Indirect measure of muscular strength and power
 Uses maximal performance of an activity
 Provide A.T. with objective data
Functional Testing
 Three purposes
 Determine risk of injury due to limb asymmetry
 Provide objective measure of progress during rehab plan
 Measure the ability of the individual to tolerate forces
Functional Testing
 A.T. must evaluate what test will be used
 Validity : test should measure what it intends to measure
 Reliability: Test should consistently provide similar results
regardless of evaluator
 Observe unilateral and bilateral function to determine
compensation patterns
 A.T. should also consider stage of healing, strength,
patients ability and physician approval
Functional Testing
 Preseason baseline measurements are preferred so
A.T. has data to compare post injury activity levels
 Not always obtained by A.T., however individual sports
may do baseline testing
 With or without baseline measurements a score of 85% or
better compared to noninjured side is recognized as
standard for limb symmetry scores
Functional Testing
 Uses functional progression drills for the purpose of
assessing the athlete’s ability to perform a specific
activity
 Entails a single maximal effort to gauge how close the
athlete is to full return
 Pre-season baseline testing for comparison post injury
 Variety of tests
 Shuttle runs
-Vertical jumps
 Agility runs
-Balance
 Figure 8’s
-Hopping for distance
 Carioca tests
-Co-contraction test
Lower Extremity Functional
Progression
 Walking: Normal Gait
 Walking: Heels walks
 Walking: Toe walks
 Side step/Shuffle
 Lunge 90° to Lunge 180°
 Step ups forward to lateral step ups
 Increase speeds
 Jogging
 Begin straight ahead, gradually increase intensity 50%100%
 Introduce curves: Oval,“S” course, figure “8” course, “Z”
course
 Sprint
 Straight ahead varying intensities
 Add acceleration/deceleration drills
 Box Runs
 Carioca
 Hopping:
 Double Leg to Single Leg to Alternate
 Jumping:
 Plyometrics
 Progress intensities
 Sport specific
 Speed and Agility drills:
 Sport specific
 Ladder drills
 Cutting, jumping on command
 Position specific activities
Upper Extremity Functional
Progression
 Assisted PNF techniques
 T-band exercises simulating specific sport/position
motions
 Strength and endurance
 Closed chain exercises: Push up progression
 Upper Body Plyometrics
 Interval throwing program
 Focus on mechanics and biomechanical dysfunctions
 Begin with general warm up
 Step 1: 45 ft. phase





Warm up throwing
25 throws
Rest 10 minutes
Warm up throwing
25 throws
 Step 2: 45 ft. phase








Warm up throwing’
25 throws
15 minute rest
Warm up throwing
25 throws
Rest 10 minutes
Warm up throwing
25 throws
 Repeat steps 1 & 2 for 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 ft.
 Only progress if pain free and no signs or symptoms
develop
 When program completed move to position specific
throwing
 For example: pitcher throw off mound
Designing a Functional
Progression
 Full Return to Play






Physicians release
Pain free
No Swelling
Normal ROM
Normal strength (in reference to contralateral limb)
Appropriate functional testing completed with no adverse
reactions