Surveys, interviews, and focus groups

Lorrie Faith Cranor September 2009

C

yLab

U

sable

P

rivacy and http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/

S

ecurity Laboratory

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 1

Surveys, interviews, and focus groups

   Surveys – Ask people set list of questions (possibly with conditional questions or branching) with multiple choice or free response answers – Can be conducted in person, by postal mail, by phone, online Interviews – Ask people open-ended questions, with follow-up questions depending on their responses – Usually conducted in person or by telephone Focus groups – Group interview, usually with 5-10 participants – Usually conducted in person

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 2

What method should I use?

   Survey – Allows you to collect data from a lot of people relatively quickly – Easy to collect data in standardized format, ready for analysis – But, not very good for answering “why” questions unless you have already developed hypothesis through other studies – Useful for validating hypotheses from smaller studies with a larger population Interview – Allows you to probe mental models, what people think and why – Semi-structured interviews allow you to explore issues as they are raised – Allows you to clarify if people don’t understand a question Focus group – Many of the advantages of interviews, but more efficient as you can interview 5-10 people all at once – Less detail from any interviewee than you would get in an individual interview – Not that great for testing usability because participants probably won’t all get hands on experience with software – Sometimes an opinionated individual can dominate a focus group – Hard to publish papers unless focus groups are used along with other methods or you report on a large number of focus groups together

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 3

SURVEYS

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 4

Designing good survey questions

     Word questions clearly, without jargon or undefined abbreviations Avoid leading questions, ambiguous terms, or emotionally-loaded terms Design questions to evoke truthful responses – Non-threatening, don’t bias participants to provide what they think you want, protect confidentiality Probe one dimension at a time Design questions such that respondents are likely to provide a range of answers

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 5

Multiple-choice answers

     Make sure answer choices are clear, mutually exclusive, cover entire space of possible answers Make sure answer choices are at appropriate level of granularity Where appropriate, allow respondents to indicate they don’t know, don’t have an opinion, or the question is not applicable to them Use consistent rating scales throughout your survey Be aware that the rating scale can skew responses (people like to think they are normal)

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 6

More survey design tips

    Cluster similar questions together Do not ask respondents to perform cognitively difficult tasks (unless you are testing their ability to perform these tasks) such as ranking more than 5 items Use a clear and attractive layout Pilot, pilot, pilot!

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 7

INTERVIEWS

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 8

Developing an interview script

    Keep your questions fairly open-ended – You can follow-up with specific probes (“What files do you have on your computer that you consider valuable?” Follow up with “Do you have valuable photos? Videos? School work? Letters?”) Start with general questions and get more specific so you get their unbiased impressions before you direct their thinking to particular details A semi-structured approach allows you to adjust as needed Write-out all your questions and follow-up probes

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 9

Preparing for an interview

 The day before the interview: – Print out: • Protocol – including detailed interview script • Official consent form • Payment sheet – Prepare: • Compensation payment • Audio/video recording (devices, batteries, extension cords, etc.) • Additional material – Send an email to the interviewee to remind him/her of the date/time/place

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 10

During the interview

        Explain the purpose of the study (unless you need to hide that) Ask to read and sign the consent form If recording/video taping, turn it on!

Perform the study!

Debrief the person (if applicable) Ask to sign the signing sheet Give the payment Thank the person!

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 11

More interview recommendations

   Schedule meetings at least one week in advance Be mindful of your subject/interviewee time Keep a careful record of your interviews and keep it secure!

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 12

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 13

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 14

Analyzing interview data

    Interview can be formally analyzed through a coding process – Transcribe interview data (yourself or with hired transcription service) – Iteratively review transcripts and create code for concepts mentioned by participants – As new codes are added, check to see whether those concepts were mentioned in previously analyzed transcripts – Keep track of how many participants mentioned each concept to find concepts that resonate with a lot of participants – – Group similar codes together into categories Note interesting quotes Qualitative approach – Use concepts and categories to develop theory (Grounded theory approach, does not start with hypotheses) Quantitative approach – With large number of interviewees (~30), and questions that ask participants to provide numerical ratings, quantitative analysis may be feasible – Important to validate for coder reliability Can be used to develop mental models

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 15

FOCUS GROUPS

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 16

Advice on conducting focus groups

        Develop detailed script to guide you Pre-screen participants to get a good mix of people who meet your criteria Record everything, but don’t have cameras pointed in people’s faces so they feel like they are under surveillance Helpful to have at least 2 people, a moderator and a note taker Give people name tags with their first name only Make the session fun, informal, relaxed feel – Provide drinks and snacks Promote a free flowing conversation that engages all participants – Ask open ended questions – Show people multiple things and ask them to compare – Give demos or show videos to start-off discussion – Give people handouts and ask them to circle things they like/don’t like, or jot down first impressions before discussing with the group Plan to do multiple focus groups to mitigate effects of dominant participant steering conversation

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 17

Using videos in focus groups

 Videos can provide concrete scenarios for people to discuss  Videos from L. Little, E. Sillence and P. Briggs. Ubiquitous Systems and the Family: Thoughts about the Networked Home. SOUPS 2009

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 18

C ylab U sable P rivacy and S ecurity Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/

CyLab Usable Privacy and Security Laboratory http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/ 19