I NDIA Leader… A G OD - GIVEN CAPACITY AND WITH A G OD - GIVEN RESPONSIBILITY TO INFLUENCE A SPECIFIC GROUP OF G OD.

Download Report

Transcript I NDIA Leader… A G OD - GIVEN CAPACITY AND WITH A G OD - GIVEN RESPONSIBILITY TO INFLUENCE A SPECIFIC GROUP OF G OD.

I NDIA
Leader…
A
G OD - GIVEN
CAPACITY AND WITH A G OD - GIVEN
RESPONSIBILITY TO INFLUENCE A
SPECIFIC GROUP OF G OD ’ S PEOPLE
TOWARD G OD ’ S PURPOSES
FOR THE GROUP.
PERSON WITH A
J. R OBERT C LINTON
L EADERSHIP
IS …..
A dynamic process over an extended
period of time in various situations
In which a leader utilizing leadership
resources
And by specific leadership behaviors
L EADERSHIP
IS …..
Influences the thoughts and
activity of followers
Toward accomplishment of
person/task aims
Mutually beneficent for leaders,
followers, and the macro context
of which they are a part
T HE S TUDY OF L EADERSHIP
Leadership
Basal Elements
WHAT
Leadership
Influence
Leadership
Values
HOW
WHY
Leadership Basal Element
The Leader
The Follower
The Situation
Leader Life
History
Leader
Follower
Relationship
Immediate
Context
Leader
Traits
Follower
History
Macro
Context
Follower
Maturity
L EADERSHIP I NFLUENCE
Individual/Personal
Means
Corporate/Group
Means
Leader
Behavior
Organizational
Cultural
Consideration
Structure
Structure
Initiation
Structure
Styles
History
Cultural
Leadership
Dynamics
Dynamics
Power/
Authority
Cultural
Power
L EADERSHIP VALUES
Philosophical
Motivation
Efficiency/
Effectiveness
Values
Ethics
Theological
Ultimate
Purpose
Cultural
Values
T HE M AKING

OF A
L EADER
God develops a leader over a lifetime. That
development is a function of the use of events
and people to impress leadership lessons upon
a leader. Processing is central to the theory.
All leaders can point to critical incident in their
lives where God taught them something very
important. Their growth as leaders is in direct
proportion to the willingness to respond to the
processing that God is doing something in a
person’s life.
A S HORT H ISTORY OF L EADERSHIP
T HEORIES ( FROM THE W EST )
T WO
MAJOR INFLUENCES ON ALL CHANGES
IN MODERN LEADERSHIP RESEARCH
A.
Scientific method of observation and
documentation to obtain “truth”.
B.
Modern communication form and
speed allowed information to be more
readily transmitted.
•
Plato, Caesar Plutarch discussed leadership.
•
Chinese and Egyptian writings are filled with
discussion of leaders.
•
Machiavelli’s The Prince is the scholarly highlight
of the Renaissance. While the word leaders
appeared in the English language about 1300,
leadership only appeared as a term in the early
19th century with reference to De British
Parliament.
P HASE 1 – G REAT M EN
(1841-1904)

Prior to 1840 – Highly theoretical –
study related to types of leadership
in relation to current events.

Great Men thesis forged on the
question- are leaders born or made?

Leadership studies are focused totally
on the leader.
P HASE II
(1904-1948)

Traits & Theory

Behavioral sciences become prominent
– scientific study dominates.

Traits identify and differentiate leaders
from followers.

Traits identified therefore can be traits
taught.

The belief leaders can be trained takes
root.
B EHAVIORAL P HASE
(1948-1967)

Ralph Stogdill – Ohio State Leadership
study

The identification of universal traits of
leadership questioned.

The most significant contribution of this
era is the investigation of interaction
between the leader and the group i.e.
focus on people relationship and task.

Notable players:




Ralph Stogdill
Rensis Likert
Blake & Mouton
Douglas McGregor
C ONTINGENCY ERA
(1967 – 1980)

Fred Fiedler dominates

To the study of leader and followers is
added particular traits of a context. The
most significant emergence of this era is
leadership style.

Notable players:




Edwin Hollander
Victor Vroom & P. W. Yetton
James Burns
Hersey/Blanchard
C OMPLEXITY (1980)

A further development of elements of
complexity.

J. R. Clinton – The Making of a Leader

Gary Yukl - Survey
E MERGING U NDERSTANDING
OF O RGANIZATIONAL R EALITY

Relationships are the basic organizing units
of life. Spiritual relationships (transcendent
awareness) is crucial to organizational and
leadership health. Chaos and change are not
to be avoided but are pathways to
transformation. (Margaret Wheatley)

Participants & connection are essential to
our interconnected world.

Chaordic realities must be acknowledged.
(Dee Hock)

Chaos and order co-exist.
L EADERSHIP D YNAMICS IN
T WO - THIRDS W ORLD
A PPLICATION OF D OUGLAS H ALL’ S
T HE E ND OF C HRISTENDOM & THE
F UTURE OF C HRISTIANITY

Christendom – The assumption that
Christianity as a religious form and prime
influence is dominant in a culture/region.

Christendom is on the decline in North
America – A defeat or a welcome
opportunity?

What are the implications for places
where vibrant Christianity has flourished?
“I F TO BE IS TO BE LIKE — THEN TO BE
IS TO BE LIKE THE OPPRESSOR ( THE
DOMINANT INFLUENCE ).”
PAULO F RIERE , P ED AGOGY


O F THE
O PPRESSE D
Many influences have brought about this
historiographic change: the decline of Christianity
in the West; the decline of the West itself; the
failure of the modern vision; the new
consciousness of their own worth on the part of
non-European peoples; a critical perception of the
technological society on the part of many who
have experienced its most advanced forms; the
impact of religious and cultural pluralism,
especially perhaps in North America; and (not least
of all) the self-criticism of serious Christianity, its
recognition of its own questionable triumphalism,
of patriarchalism, of the equation of the Christian
mission with Euro American imperialism, and so
forth.
D ISENGAGEMENT
FROM THE DOMINANT
INFLUENCES OF OUR CONTEXTS
MUST BE INTENTIONAL .



Not a new view of holiness – fundamentalistic
separatism.
A resistance to influence that domesticates the
gospel
A re-evaluation: Not Of /Yet In




Moral Authenticity – A quest for moorings.
Meaningful community – A quest for identity in relationship.
Transcendence – A quest to reconnect to Kingdom
awareness.
Meaning – a quest to beat the addiction to progress &
replace it with embracing the Presence.
C ULTURE M ATTERS
L EADERSHIP IS A FUNCTION OF A
PARTICULAR CULTURE . TO
UNDERSTAND HOW CULTURES ARE
CONSTRUCTED CAN BE A PREDICTOR
OF HOW LEADERSHIP TAKES SHAPE .

Edward Hall – Beyond Culture – our
understanding of time structures our culture and
subsequent patterns of interaction

Monochronictime – Time is a long ribbon on this
highway cut into segments. All tasks & activities
should be performed segmentally.

Completion of tasks – start & finishing is
important.
 Linear thinking is sequential – segmented
& orderly
 Polychronictime – tasks & activities occur
simultaneously not one at a time.
 Cognitive processes occur more in non-
linear pictures & configurations.
 Linear segmentation of activity & tasks is
not valued highly.
L INGUISTIC A SSESSMENTS

Benjamin Whorf – Language shapes
our culture – categorizes our world.

Basil Bernstein – Language is
constrained by cultural context.
Between language & speech is social
structure.
H ALL’ S C OGNITIVE A SSESSMENT
H IGH C ONTEXT C ULTURE – INFORMATION ABOUT
PROCEDURE IS MINIMAL – CULTURAL RULES ARE IMPLICIT.

Indirect communication

Relationship is valued over task

Focus on groups

People are not separate from task
L OW C ONTEXT –I NFORMATION IS EXPLICIT.
P ROCEDURES ARE EXPLAINED – RULES SPELLED OUT.

People are separated from task – “This
is business not personal”

People attempt to avoid uncertainty

Direct communication style – just the
facts “straight from the horse’s
mouth.”

Focus on individuals
H OFSTEDE ’ S C ULTURAL D IMENSIONS
I NDIVIDUALISM - C OLLECTIVISM
Individualists emphasize

Concern for clarity

Straight talk

Meeting personal needs & goals – not
group needs & goals

More I than We message

More independent

Linear pattern of conversation
Collectivists emphasize

Indirect communication

Saving face – not causing embarrassing
situations

Avoid negative evaluation from a listener

Less goal direction

More independent – group concerned

Fewer linear patterns of communication
M ASCULINE -F EMININE C ULTURES







Masculine Cultures:
Work is central to lives
Work is central to strength
Work is central to material success
Work is central to assertiveness
Work is central to competitiveness
Feminine Cultures:
Accept fluid gender roles
Embrace traits of affection, compassion,
nurturing interpersonal relationship.
P OWER - D ISTANCE

High power index accept inequality as a
cultural norm

Cultures are hierarchal and people accept

Oppressive behavior – ritual to honor &
respect rulers (Africa – Latin America)

Low power index – not organized around
hierarchal relationship (Western Europe)
U NCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE

Some cultures struggle with living with
uncertainty – they need information &
certainty – have direct styles of
communication. (Greece, Japan, Peru,
France, Chile, & Spain)

Some cultures seem comfortable with
diversity & ambiguity. (Singapore, Hong
Kong, Ireland, Philippines, & U. S.)
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLD V IEW

PCWV – how much control a person
believes characterizes his or her
communication encounters.

Individuals organize a communication
construct around themselves & others
that reflects beliefs about perceived
control within communication contexts.
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLD V IEW
A NSWERS

SD= Strongly disagree

D= Disagree

N= being right in between
agreeing and disagreeing

A= Agreement

SA= Strongly agree
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
1.
No matter how much effort I make to
communicate clearly, it really seems my
level of happiness is not changed by what
I say or do.
2.
Both the bad things and the good things
that happen to me are beyond my
control.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
3.
In my view of the world, the future is already set
in motion, so my choices are limited; even if I
communicate convincingly, or use helpful
decision processes, it will not do much to
change the way my future looks now.
4.
Frequently, other people have more effect than I
do on whether or not I attain my goals.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
5.
Luck and circumstances play a major
role in my life, regardless of my
communication efforts for influencing
my situation.
6.
Many times I could be described as a
victim of people or circumstances
beyond my control.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
7.
There is not much use in trying too hard to
please people; if they like you, they like you,
and if they don’t like you, you can’t do much
to change the situation.
8.
My destiny depends mostly on the plans of
others, who alter many of my decisions.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
9.
Getting a job or being promoted in a job
depends on my being in the right place at the
right time, not on my personal ability or
personal communication skills.
10.
Many times I could describe myself as having
little influence over the things that seem to
happen to me or over the people in my life
right now.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
11.
The future lies before most people like a long
ribbon that cannot be altered or shaped very
easily but mostly just followed.
12.
With people who just don’t respond well to me,
even if I try to pay more attention, listen better,
and interact the best I can, my efforts don’t work;
the relationship seems already set and I can’t
seem to do much about it.
5
4
3
2
1
SD D N
A
SA
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
13.
I’ve found that when I make choices to help or
influence people, my decisions really do not
change them—usually it’s the circumstances
and not what I say or do.
14.
I wish I could take more control over the
direction of my life, but people, groups, and
circumstances regulate me too much.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
15.
It is not always wise to plan too far ahead
because many things turn out to be a matter
of good or bad fortune anyhow.
16.
The way I see it, I can try to communicate and
interact, but I’m finding that changing my
circumstances is not very likely.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
17.
In reality, I tend to think and do things the
way my family does things.
18.
I often think that few of us have a control or
predetermined purpose that we understand
clearly.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
P ERSONAL C OMMUNICATION
W ORLDVIEW
19.
My culture, friends, and circumstances usually
direct and influence me more than anything
else.
20.
What is going to happen will happen,
regardless of what I say or do.
5
4
SD D N
3
A
2
SA
1
S CORING
SD= 5
A=2
D=4
SA=1
N=3
S CORING

20-59 = Low communication control; personal
choices and communication management not
as strong as relationship, luck , circumstances

60-79 = Moderate communication control;
personal choices and communication
management equally as strong as relationship,
luck, circumstances

80-10 = high communication control; personal
choices and communication management
stronger than relationship, luck, circumstances
Leadership emerges with DNA
drawn from a culture’s intrinsic
values.
Economic development predictors
can be a key indicator of what kind
of leadership will emerge and be
valued.
T HE G RANDONA T YPOLOGY

Religion

Publican religion shows preference for the poor over the
rich and promotes values resistant to economic
development. The poor accept poverty as a fate largely
caused by the rich.

Pharasaic religion shows preference to the wealthy and
successful. The wealthy celebrate their success as
evidence of God’s blessing. Both rich & poor have strong
incentive to improve their condition through
accumulation & investment.
T RUST
IN THE I NDIVIDUAL

The principal engine of economic development is the
individual who is allowed to direct their own destiny. If
individuals feel others are responsible for them, the
effort of individuals will ebb. Submission eliminates
innovation. Rebellion diverts energies from
constructive behavior.

Trust of individuals includes risk that choices make by
individuals will be counter-productive where there are
no individuals only peoples & masses development
does not occur.
T HE
MORAL I MPERATIVE

When laws & norms exist that are realizable
people are not necessarily saints – but avoid
criminal behavior. They act in reasonable ways
seeking of personal well-being within reasonable
laws & social responsibility.

If there is a “Don Quixote” world of reality: a
separated world of exalted high standards and a
real world of immorality & generalized hypocrisy
the result is the law of cleverest & strongest.
T WO C ONCEPTS OF W EALTH

Wealth that exists to be conquered & hoarded. Wealth
that does not yet exist.

Spanish & Portuguese colonies in Latin America was
where wealth belonged to those in power. Wealth did
not derive from one’s own work but the ability to earn &
retain the favor of the kings.

For example in colonial history of the American British
colonies in North America were ultimately lands
available to those who would work them – wealth not
yet existing.
T WO V IEWS OF
C OMPETITION

Where competition is valued it is viewed as a
necessity, it is central to professional, political &
intellectual life. Competition is viewed as a form
of cooperation in which competitors benefit from
being forced to do their best.

Where competition is not valued it is condemned
as aggression. Envy is legitimized and loyalty is
demanded to established dogma. Only sports
allows for competition.
T WO N OTIONS ON
J USTICE /E QUITY

Where justice/equity is valued only for
the present, people tend to consume
rather than save.

Where justice/equity is viewed as
something that impacts the future as
well, consumption is a smaller priority so
as to save for future consumption.
VALUE
OF
W ORK

Work is to be avoided in progressresistant societies. To achieve is to be
exempt from work so as to rule.

Work is valued in progressive
societies.

Work’s reward is God’s blessing
R OLE

Innovation resistant societies ultimately
implode.


OF I NNOVATION
i.e. The USSR and Marxist-Leninist
totalitarianism.
Acceptance of innovation fuels
development.

i.e. Luther and the Reformation
R OLE
OF
E DUCATION

Education is pro-development.
Context is the creation of thinkers –
independent innovators.

Education in development resistant
contexts produces conformers &
followers
T HE I MPORTANCE OF U NITY

Pro-development prefers pursuing
reliable and useful information.

Development resistant contexts values
grand cosmic visions

i.e. Latin America – Don Quixote
L ESSER V IRTUES

Pro-Development societies value
courtesy, punctuality, tidiness, tasks
done well.

Development resistant cultures value
tradition’s emphasis on avoidance of
shame and acknowledgment of
inefficiency.
T IME

Pro-development cultures value the
control & planning for the future.

Development resistant cultures focus
on the past and a future that is
distant – in some apocalyptic
scheme
R ATIONALITY

Pro-development contexts value the
rationality of achievement.

Progress resistant cultures are littered
with unfinished monuments, roads,
industries, and hotels.

No need to worry about completing a
task – tomorrow is a new day for a new
dream.
A UTHORITY

In pro-development cultures power
resides. The law , natural law or
agreement upon foundations.

Resistant societies usually affirm that
the divine will of the “powers” is
arbitrary, therefore instability and
arbitrariness in leadership is
accepted as fate.
W ORLDVIEW /L IFEVIEW

Pro-Development Society Life is
something to make happen – active
participant.

Resistant cultures – life is something
that happens to me. I must be
resigned to it.
T HE I MPACT
OF
S ALVATION

In resistant cultures – salvation helps
us survive this world with the hope
of a better day one day.

Pro-development countries
transform this world in the way to be
next. We are active/purposeful/
empowered to not just survive, but
to influence.
O PTIMISM

Pro-development cultures create an
atmosphere where a person is
convinced that he/she can make a
difference.

In development resistant cultures –
people need luck & fate that the
gods will finally favor them.
V ISIONS
OF
D EMOCRACY

Resistant cultures have a tradition of
absolutism i.e. the absolute power of the
leaders accrues to the people – linked to
favor with the leader (passivity –
dependency)

Development cultures believe that we can
all participate in the strategy of
empowerment. We can all have a
meaningful share of participation
independent – enterprises.
God & Communications
74
Communication & Social Structure
 People communicate more with people of their
own class (horizontal).
 Prestigeful communication descends from
upper to lower classes.
 Effective communication is based on personal
friendship.
 Change of belief or action must be addressed
to persons and groups socially capable of
making such decisions.
75
 Response to the preaching of the Gospel may
at times reflect a social situation even more
than religious conviction.
 Opposition to the Gospel may be often more
social than religious.
 Changes in social structure may alter the
religious view of behavior.
 Effective communication follows patterns of
local social structure.
76
ICC axioms
 Assumes perceived cultural difference
 Relates to context and relationship
 Style affects first impressions
 Involves uncertainty reduction
 Culture & communication are
inseparable
77
Skill In ICC
 Look beyond the surface
 Develop a curiosity
 Look for ways the communication sources
mold perceptions
 Discover ways relationship & content affect
each other
 Broaden your views of culture to the notion of
collectives
 Question your own mis/lack of information and
78
negative attitudes about a group
79
80
Culture
 A conceptual design, the definitions by
which people order their lives, interpret
their experiences and evaluate the
behavior of others.
 The Lingenfelter-Mayers model of
Basic Values – examining the
underlying values/priorities which
impact interpersonal relations.
81
Application of your personal profile:
1. A basis of judgment against a person
who is “different”.
2. 2.A radar that signals inter-personal
conflict.
3. 3.Insights that help us create an
effective “Culture C”.
82
Point #Tensions About Culture
 Time oriented – schedule and punctuality are
priorities.
 Event oriented – the details of the event are
more important than its schedule.
 Cultures have predominant tendencies but
individuals within cultures vary.
 Adaptation of the time and event priorities of
the people we are with is crucial.
83
Tensions About Judgment
 Dichotomistic thinking – segmented thinking
that exhibits great concern over particulars of
problem and situation.
 Holistic thinking – whole is greater than the
parts – the whole is most important.
 Thinking patterns impact all cultural priorities.
 Cultural differences can cause us to talk past
each other and at very shallow levels.
84
Tensions Handling Crises
 Crisis orientation – look for potential problems
and solve them before they occur. Experts
identify crises to be avoided and how.
 Non-crisis orientation – cope with the crisis
when and if crisis occurs. Experts are treated
with skepticism.
 Solve problems based on the actual
occurrence.
 Don’t assume your crisis is the other person’s
crisis.
 The goal is not necessarily being right –
communication is always the goal.
85
Tensions Over Goals
 Task orientation – satisfaction in reaching
objectives and completing projects.
 Person orientation – satisfaction with personal
interaction.
 Live in such a way that we respect, love and
share our lives with those to whom we seek to
minister.
86
Tensions About Self-Worth
 Status/prestige orientation are
concerned with a person’s birth
and social rank.
 Achievement status –
achievement – success – that is
attained and must be maintained
for status to remain intact.
87
Tensions Regarding Vulnerability
 Some cultures view vulnerability as a
weakness. Avoidance of failure or error at any
cost.
 Some cultures demand that people expose
their vulnerability and risk failure.
 Acknowledge vulnerability, as a value is not
global. Communicate in keeping with patterns
of acceptable process.
88
Leadership Functions
Through Structural Means
The Importance of
Leadership Function
They serve others anonymously Our
structures and processes say as much
about our theology as any doctrinal
statement des
How Christian leaders motivate
believers towards God’s purposes is a
theological statement
Abundance Managers
They return often to the right sources,
such as principles and internal security
They seek solitude and enjoy nature
They sharpen the saw, that is, they
regularly exercise the body and the
mind
Abundance Managers
They serve others anonymously
They maintain a long-term intimate
relationship with another person
They forgive themselves and others
They are problem-solvers
Chronic Problems in
Organization
No shared vision and values
No strategic path
Poor alignment
Wrong style
Poor skills
Low trust
No self-integrity
Six Conditions of
Empowerment
1. Character



Integrity
Maturity
Abundance mentality
2. Skills



Communication
Planning/organization
Synergistic problem-solving
Chronic Problems in
Organization
3. Win-win agreement





Desired results
Guidelines
Resources
Accountability
Consequences
Chronic Problems in
Organization
4. Self-supervision

Plan-do-control cycle
5. Helpful structures and systems
6. Accountability or self-evaluation
Total Quality
You cannot continuously improve
interdependent systems and
processes until you progressively
perfect interdependent,
interpersonal relationships
Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly
Effective People
Be Proactive



Self-awareness
Personal vision
Responsibility
Begin with the end in mind


Leadership
Mission
Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly
Effective People
Put first things first

Managing time and priorities around roles and
goals
Think Win-Win

Seeking mutual benefit
Seek first to understand before being
understood
 Empathic communication
Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly
Effective People
Synergize

Creative cooperation
Sharpen the saw

Continuous improvement
Key Leadership Tasks
Planning
Motivating
Conflict management
Coordinating
Organizing
Staffing
Importance of Planning
Lee states that…
“…planning is a way of giving
expression to the dreams and
hopes, vision and commitment of
the congregation.”
Mission
Progression of
Planning
“Why”
Many times the planning
process is more important than
the plan
Vision
“Image”
Goals
“What” &
“When”
Action Plan
“Activities”
Lee’s Five Steps to
Conflict Management
Be assertive enough to express your views,
frustrations, dissatisfactions and pains
Acknowledge your own part in the problem
Be willing to work at it
Think reconciliation
Remember that your primary commitment is
to the cause of Christ
Lee’s Principles of
Coordination
Accountability
Interdependency
Balance
Communication
Participation
Organizing vs. Staffing
Organizing


The general process of structuring a
community for its life and work
Makes it possible for the church’s resources
to go toward the accomplishments of its
goals
Organizing vs. Staffing
Staffing involves the selecting, training, and
developing of people who lead and serve
the church
Staffing serves to build and edify the church
for its life and mission
The church is enhanced or stymied,
depending on how well these tasks are
executed.
Leader Response
to Power and
Authority
Definition of Power
 Power
is “the capacity of leaders (the
power holders) to produce intended
and foreseen effects on others (the
power subjects).” Clinton
 Power
is “the capacity to effect (or
affect) organizational outcomes.”
Mintzberg
Power vs. Authority

Power is the ability to do something or
to prevent something from being done

Authority is the right to do something
and often goes with a position
Three Important Leadership
Motives

The desire to affiliate

The desire to achieve

The desire for power
Five Kinds of Power

Exploitative

Manipulative

Competitive

Nutrient

Integrative
Lee
Importance of Trust and
Obedience

A leader must first learn to be a follower

In Scripture, “followership” appears as
servanthood

A leader listens to everyone's opinions and
debate regarding an issue and then stands to
announce the group’s consensus decision
about the issue

A leader builds his leadership potential
through trust and obedience
Elliston
Covey’s Three Types of Power

Coercive power

Utility power

Legitimate power
The root of most communication
problems are perception or credibility
problems

Covey’s Three Categories of
Influence

Model by example—Others see

Build caring relationships—Others feel

Mentor by instruction—Others hear
Summary

How leaders handle power or influence
is a most crucial element of ministry

There is no greater temptation for
Christian leaders than to abuse or
misuse their potential for influence or
power.
Summary
(cont.)

An unwillingness to submit to the
spiritual authority of Jesus Christ causes
the leader to be a danger to the
believers they are to serve

Our understanding of the means and
purposes for which we exist as Christian
leaders must always center on the
eternal purposes of our Lord
Teaching: Considerations in
Cross-cultural Settings
Teachers and Power
• Power –potential for influence
• Power is reflected in two areas
– Skill authority—special preparation
– Role authority—a dominant role
• Cultural differences added to power issues
yields the potential for conflict
Culture as Palace and Prison
• Our culture serves us well when it is the
only culture in focus
• Our culture is a palace when nothing
contests our lives and context
Culture as Palace and Prison
(cont.)
• Our culture can become a prison when we are
pushed into relationships/contexts outside the
boundaries of our culture
– We are blind to other ways of seeing and doing things
– We are frustrated with those who break our rules
• All of us run the risk of becoming prisoners of our
culture when we can’t imagine relating to people
with other than the rules of our culture.
The 150 Percent Person
• Emic vs. Etic
• Us vs. Them
• A balancing of equation
–
–
–
–
–
–
Time
Crisis
Goals
Self-Worth
Vulnerability
Cognitive Processes
The Bottom-line of Making It
Cross Culturally
• Look beyond the surface
• Develop a curiosity
• Look for ways the communications sources mold
perceptions
• Discover ways relationship & content affect each
other
• Broaden your views of culture to the notion of
collectives
• Question your own mis/lack of information and
negative attitudes about a group
Learning Challenges
Formal Schooling vs.
Traditional Learning
• Traditional Patterns
– Observation and imitation
– Learning by doing or trial and error
– Verbal story vs. written story (group vs.
individual)
Formal Schooling vs.
Traditional Learning
• Formal Schooling Values
– Abstract thinking
– Rote learning
– Mastery of linear information
Stereotypes and a Double Bind
• Stereotypes exist about how and where
learning should take place
– While traditional patterns may be more
effective they may not be considered “school”
• The double bind for westerners is that even
if you are desirous of effective local
learning methods these methods may not be
considered worthy of school.
The World of Questions
• Westerners usually ask questions of
confirmation, digression—abstraction
Variables in the Use and
Non-use of Questions
• Age—some cultures are taught not to ask
questions of older people. Only ask
questions of peers or a lower status person
• Disrespect—challenging the authority of a
teacher
• Taboos—cultural taboos, i.e. never ask a
woman her age
Variables in the Use and
Non-use of Questions (cont.)
• Threat—asking a question of a person can
be construed as a threat
• Personal—the definition of personal
questions varies greatly
• What vs. why questions
Group vs. Individual Learning
• We are trained to work as individuals
• We must minister where group interaction
is a central skill in our effectiveness
Types of Intelligences
• Linguistic—varied facets of language
• Musical—pitch, rhythm
• Logical mathematical—manipulation of an
abstract world
• Spatial—producing and manipulating forms
• Bodily kinesthetic—exceptional centrality of
physical body to perform difficult and complex
tasks
• Internal/personal—access to one’s own feelings
• External/personal—the ability to relate to
external events and persons in meaningful ways
Learning Styles and the
Intelligences Valued
Traditional Learning
Formal Schooling
Relational Learning Style
Analytical Learning Style
•Visual
Verbal
•Global
Dichotomous
•Example
Question
•Narrative
Proposition
Learning Styles and the
Intelligences Valued
Traditional Learning
Formal Schooling
Valued Intelligences
• External personal
• Spatial
• Bodily kinesthetic
Valued intelligences
Linguistic
Logical/mathematical
Musical
Internal personal
Suggestions for Effective Teaching Methods
with Relational Sensitive Students
• Provide a course outline
• Give an oral preview of the entire course
• Preview the material to be learned in each
individual lesson
• Specify the important points in a lesson
• Provide frequent feedback and
reinforcement
Suggestions for Effective Teaching Methods
with Relational Sensitive Students (cont.)
• Give small units of work rather than large
ones
• Recognize that relational students are much
more sensitive to praise or criticism from
others
• Let students work in groups
• Provide structure and direction when
assigning a project
Suggestions for Effective Teaching Methods
with Relational Sensitive Students (cont.)
•
•
•
•
Provide a textbook or duplicated notes
Use visual aids of all kinds
Use external rather than internal motivators
Use visual models and examples
Suggestions for Effective Teaching Methods
with Relational Sensitive Students (cont.)
• Supplement lectures with handouts,
pictures, etc.
• Use material that is socially oriented
(related to people or situations)
• Use criterion-referenced grading
First Steps to Effectiveness in
Cross-cultural Teaching
1. Know your own culture of teaching and
learning
2. Become a learner of teaching learning in
host culture
3. What are the differences that are/will
produce conflict?
4. Grow to be a 150% person and never stop
learning—being a creator of culture C
Overview of Key
Concepts
Good to Great and
the Social Sectors
by
Jim Collins
The “Good to Great” Formula
Four Key Stages
1. Cultivate disciplined people
2. Engage in disciplined thought
3. Take disciplined action
4. Make the leap to greatness endure over time
Stage 1:
Cultivate disciplined people
• Select disciplined people who demonstrate
personal humility and professional will
– Get the right people “on the bus”
– Do not allow people to stay “on the bus” if they do
not have the right traits.
Stage 2:
Engage in disciplined thought
• Face the brutal facts about your business
• Have the faith to believe you will survive and
thrive
• Answer three pivotal questions:
1. What am I deeply passionate about?
2. What can I be the best in the world at?
3. What best drives my economic or resource
engine?
Stage 3:
Take disciplined action
• Doggedly stick to the hedgehog elements
• Don’t give up—the flywheel will spin!
Hedgehog Concept
Passion
Best At…
Resource Engine
3 Aspects of Hedgehog Concepts
• Passion —what your organization stands for and
why it exists
• Best at… —What your organization can uniquely
contribute to the people it touches—better than
any other organization on the planet
• Resource engine —Understanding what best
drives your resource engine
– Time
– Money
– Brand
Flywheel Effect
• Power and success that builds slowly at first
and then with increasing momentum over
time.
• Requires single-minded devotion to the
“hedgehog concept.”
Flywheel Effect in the Social Sectors
Attract Believers
Passion
Build Brand
Best At…
RELENTLESS FOCUS ON
HEDGEHOG CONCEPT
Resource Engine
Demonstrate Results
Build Strength
Flywheel Effect in the Social Sectors
Power of the Flywheel
• Success breeds support and commitment,
which breeds even greater success, which
breeds more support and commitment—
round and around the flywheel goes.
• People like to support winners!
Stage 4:
Build greatness to last
• Longevity of great organizations is related to
the successful transfer of power to exceptional
leaders over time.
• These leaders rely less on charismatic
personalities and more on strategies to
stimulate organizational progress.
• Lasting organizations are based on consistent
core values yet relentlessly assess themselves
to adapt to an ever-changing world.
5 Key Differences Between Business
and Nonprofit Sector
• “Great” had to be calibrated without using business
metrics.
• Excellent leaders had to be cultivated within the diffuse
power structures of nonprofits.
• The right people had to be recruited and the wrong
people let go within the particular constraints of the
nonprofit world.
• The “hedgehog concept” had to be rethought without
a profit motive.
• A new concept of the “flywheel” had to be developed
by building the brand.
Along the Road to Greatness
• Measuring greatness
• Getting things done
• Getting the right people
• Making the economic engine work
• Turning the flywheel and building momentum
Measuring Greatness
Business Sector
• Uses money as input
(means) and output
• Financial returns measure
greatness
• Asks, “How much did we
make?”
Nonprofit Sector
• Uses money as input only
• Financial returns not a
measure of greatness
• Asks three questions:
• “How well do we deliver
on the mission?”
• “Do we make a distinct
impact with our
resources?”
• What’s the qualitative
evidence that we area
success?
Getting Things Done
Business Sector
Nonprofit Sector
• Uses mostly executive
leadership
• Uses mostly legislative
leadership
• CEO employs
concentrated power to
make the right decisions.
• CEO employs persuasion,
political currency, and
shared interests.
Getting the Right People
Business Sector
Nonprofit Sector
• Can pay for talented
employees
• Cannot pay high salaries;
unpaid board
• The right people share
corporate vision and
passion
• Sometimes hard to get the
wrong people “off the
bus”; careful selection is
essential.
• The right people volunteer
to add meaning to their
lives and because of their
belief in the mission.
Making the economic engine work
Business Sector
• Single component to
measure success: Profit
Nonprofit Sector
• Multiple components to
measure success:
• Human capital—Do
we have enough time?
• Financial capital—can
we pay the bills and
break even?
• Brand capital—Are we
known as the best in
our field?
Turning the flywheel & building
momentum
Business Sector
• Success breeds success.
• With discipline, the slow
turning of the flywheel
yields financial success
over time.
Nonprofit Sector
• Success building on brand
reputation.
• Success comes when you
deliver tangible results
and people grow
committed to your
mission.
Levels of Leaders
LEVEL 5
LEVEL 4
Level 5
Executive
Effective Leader
LEVEL 3
Competent Manager
LEVEL 2
Contributing Team Member
LEVEL 1
Highly Capable Individual
Level 5 Leader
• The rare extraordinary executive who
transforms a good company or
organization into a great one through
personal humility and professional will.
Good to Great Diagnostic Tool
http://www.goodtogreat.com/pdf/Dia
gnostic%20Tool.pdf
Good to Great Lecture Hall
• Audio presentations by Jim Collins regarding
concepts presented in Good to Great—with a
special section devoted to Social Sectors
• http://www.goodtogreat.com/hall/index.html
LEADERSHIP ABOVE
THE LINE
By
Dr. Sarah Sumner
The People Model
Yields three types of decision-making power:
 Explanatory power—to interpret organizational
behavior
 Motivational power—to muster up people’s
willingness to forfeit stubborn habits that have
weakened their effectiveness in the past
 Creative Power —to imagine wise solutions for the
future
Above the Line Qualities = Assets
Below the Line Qualities = Liabilities
Three Basic Sets of Strengths
 Strategists
 Think primarily in terms of truth and reality
 Ask hard questions and face difficult problems head-on
 Humanitarians
 Tend to think in terms of goodness and humanity
 Feel unsettled when people are devalued or hurt
 Caring for people is an imperative
 Diplomats
 Tend to think in terms of beauty (perceptions) and public
relations
 Feel bothered when peace and public order is violated
 Natural desire to unify factions and add a creative touch to the
way things look
Strategists (Light)









Freedom
Authentic Community
Be Good
Clarity, Accountability
Integrity
Straightforward Message
Confrontational
Discerning, Analytical
Corrective
Humanitarians (Temp)









Compassion
Comfortable Community
Feel Good
Develop, Support People
Togetherness
Wise Approach
Forbearing
Patient, Kind
Loyal
Diplomats (Color)









Peace
Impressive Community
Look Good
Sense of Harmony and Order
Unity
Wise Timing
Nonconfrontational
Finesse, Artful Demeanor
Polished Refined
Three Basic Sets of Weaknesses
 Strategist

Self-righteous

Criticism, harshness
 Humanitarians

Self-serving

People pleasing
 Diplomats

Self-absorbed

Image Management
Strategist
• Freedom
Humanitarian

• Authentic Community 
• Be Good

• Clarity, Accountability 
• Integrity

• Straightforward

• Message

• Confrontational

• Discerning, Analytical

Compassion
Comfortable Community
Feel Good
Develop, Support People
Togetherness
Wise Approach
Forbearing
Patient, Kind
Loyal
• Corrective
Self-righteous
Criticism, Harshness
Self-righteous judgment
•Slander
•Presumption
•Impatience
Diplomat









Self-serving
People pleasing
Enablement
•Gossip
•Guilt trips
•Martyr Complex
Peace
Impressive Community
Look Good
Sense of Harmony and
Order
Unity
Wise Timing
Nonconfrontational
Finesse, Artful
Demeanor
Polished Refined
Self-absorbed
Image Management
Spin (Spin Club)
•Distorts, Redefines truth
•Political Intimidation
•Victim of Circumstances
Three Types of Executive
Leaders
OPERATIONAL
CULTURAL
POLITICAL
Strategists = Operational Leaders
 Prioritize by solving problems
 Like strategic plans
 Demand efficiency and effectiveness
 Set realistic goals
 Express vision with clarity and sound
rationale
Humanitarians = Cultural Leaders
 Develop
 Want
company’s ethos
everyone to feel they belong
 Create
traditions
 Motivate
by caring
 Memorialize

significant events
Lead the company by cultivating a deep
sense of ownership and loyality in every
individual who serves on the team
Diplomats = Political Leaders
 Lead by collaboration
 Unite unlikely forces and pool scarce and limited
resources by networking strategically with
gatekeepers
 Focus more on who than on how
 Mobilize people to work for a common cause
 Elevate people’s vision by helping them forget petty
squabbles
 Offer a sense of hope by painting a beautiful picture
of the future
Thinking Orientation
 Strategist—think in terms of “You”


Focus: Corrective
EX: What you need to do to correct issue.
 Humanitarians—think in terms of “he, she or they”


Focus: People developers
EX: How is he/she feeling? What they need to have done for them…
 Diplomats—think in terms of “I/We”


Focus: public relations
EX: What should I do to position myself? What we, as a company,
should tell the public about ourselves.
Three Aspects of a Company
INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICE
PUBLIC RELATIONS
Major Priority
Strategists
Humanitarians
INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICE
Spirited
Gentle
Diplomats
PUBLIC
RELATIONS
Calm
Proper Balance
 “Every business is more likely to succeed if proper
emphasis is placed on infrastructure, service, and
PR. When that emphasis doesn’t happen in each of
these three areas, the company runs into problems
because the company becomes imbalanced.”

Leadership Above the Line, p. 74.
Power of the Mix
 “When clusters of people from the same category fall
down into the basement, their ability to lead well is
impoverished. That’s why my theory is this—that a
first-rate leader and a first-rate team will always be a
mix of all three.”

Leadership Above the Line, p. 77
Strategist
Humanitarian
Diplomat
BEHAVIOR
Self-righteous
Criticism, Harshness
Self-righteous judgment
•Slander
•Presumption
•Impatience
Self-serving
People pleasing
Enablement
•Gossip
•Guilt trips
•Martyr Complex
Self-absorbed
Image Management
Spin (Spin Club)
•Distorts, Redefines truth
•Political Intimidation
•Victim of Circumstances
PROBLEM
PRIDE
FEAR
DECEITFULNESS
Solutions Chart
Strategist
Humanitarian
Diplomat
 Be Bold.
 Be Gracious.
 Be Calm.
 Identify the
 Empathize with
 Put the Problem in








problem.
Expose the
problem
Fix the problem.
Speak
up./Confront
Be Ethical
Be Real,. Offer
evidence.
Focus on the
facts.





Those involved.
Help the
Person/Team in
Need
Forbear the
problem.
Listen./ Be Patient
Be Supportive.
Be Kind./Do a
favor.
Focus on people’s
feelings.





Perspective.
Wait./ Be Sensitive
to the Timing.
Finesse the
Problem.
Preface & Nuance
Your Remarks
Be creative.
Be Generous. / Give
a gift.
Focus on the
Setting & Mood.
Three Fundamental
Temptations
THREATENING
WEAK
MANIPULATIVE
Strategist
Humanitarian
Diplomat
PERCEPTION
Seems threatening
Seems weak
Seems manipulative
IS THREATENING
IS WEAK
IS MANIPULATIVE
Three Kinds of Power
EXPLANATORY POWER
MOTIVATIONAL POWER
CREATIVE POWER
Leading Above the Line
“To lead above the line is to
live above the line.”
Below-the-line Leadership
 Typically infects the whole team
 Explains why good character is the key to good
leadership
Explanatory Power
Self-Awareness
 Analyzing and understanding personal tendencies
 Understanding patterns of behavior
 Recognizing personal responses/reactions based on
leaderships strengths and below-the-line deficits.
Motivational Power
Strategists
Humanitarians
 Motivated by the • Motivated by the
promise of
discovering their
blind spots
promise of
salvaging their
blunders
Diplomats
• Motivated by the
promise of
covering their
blemishes
Problem
 PRIDE
• COURAGE
DECEITFULNESS
Antidote
 Humility
• Courage
• Honesty
Creative Power
 Offers practical solutions to common problems
 Use the Solutions Chart as a means of ordering and
prioritizing plan of action.


Remember…you can move between the three forms of
leadership to create a holistic resolution to the current
situation
Above-the-line leaders learn how to lead in all three categories.
 The People Model is powerless unless you choose to
put into practice.
Final Insights
 Conflicts between people of different categories are
not mere clashes of values. Rather, they are conflicts
over values in which people take security.
 Key to leadership above the line: LOVE
The Character of
Pentecostal Leadership
Are You A Theologian?
Historical Frameworks
Nicholas Wolterstorff
Yale Divinity School
 Two
roles of theology in the
Christian community:


Non-engaged—an ideological component
of life of the religious community that
asserts and elaborates convictions about
God
Engaged role—an activity for the wellfunctioning of the life of the religious
community
“What the world needs is engaged theology
that uses the language the world speaks.”

Theology in service of communities of
faith



Understands its context socially and
historically
Mines its own rich traditions
Is both faithful and critical to the needs
and convictions of its faith community.
“Can the church tolerate the separation of
the theoretical task from the concrete
situation of its own existence? Will
theologians be permitted to do their work in
cool absentia while pastors sweat out their
own existence in the steamy space of the
Church in the world? When theological
thinking is practiced in abstraction from the
Church in ministry, it inevitably becomes as
much unapplied and irrelevant as pure….
When the theological mind of the minister is
educated primarily through experience, an ad
hoc theology emerges which owes as much
(or more) to methodological and pragmatic
concerns as to dogma. The task to work out
a theology for ministry begins properly with
the task of identifying the nature of and
place of ministry itself.”
Ray Anderson (Theological Foundations for Ministry)
“Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord,
will enter the Kingdom of heaven, but only
he who does the will of the Father who is
in heaven. Many will say to me on that
day, Lord, Lord did we not prophesy in
your name and in your name drive out
demons and perform many miracles?
Then I will tell them Plainly, I never knew
you. Away from me you evildoers!”
Matthew 7:21-23

Success is rejected by the Lord as having
no kingdom legitimacy.

Human efforts don’t even get a pat on the
back.

We can actually think our usage of strange
fire/might-power/sign ministry carries with
it God’s seal of approval. Success is viewed
as self-authenticating.
Is such a task the responsibility
of the pastoral leader?
 Matthew
7:21-23 as a case study
for the absence of pastoral
theologians
What, Why and Who question
must precede the How questions.
 The
Theology is informed human
reflection on the activity of
God in concrete contexts.
The leadership task of
interpreting redemptive
history is desperately needed.
Joseph and the Moral
Fabric of a Leader
 Genesis
39:6-9
 Destiny and leadership connected to
clear and fair representation of God.
Samuel and the reminding of forgetful
people about God’s faithfulness.
 The
vacuum created by the
phenomenon of post-modernity must
be a leadership concern.
 I Samuel 7:12
David and leaders who understood the
redemptive trajectory of God
 Psalm
78: 52-55
 Psalm 70-72
 Psalm 95:6-7
Prophets who hear from God, speak
God’s words and stand between the
eternal and human landscapes.
 Isaiah
6:1-11
 Jeremiah 11:1-5
 Daniel 10:7-14
Jesus’ alternative to the “Gentile”
paradigms of leadership.
 Mark
10:35-45
 The task of replicating something
you’ve never seen.
The Early Church Fathers

Clement of Rome—We must preserve our
Christian body in its entirety.

Didaché—the manual of Christian morality and
church discipline

Tertullian—What indeed has Athens to do with
Jerusalem? What concord between the Academy
and the church?

The Councils that sharpened understanding and
the nature of Christ in response to heretical
doctrine.
St Columba and the Iona
Community
Centers of missionary initiative that
served Christianity
 Scripture
 Community
 Discipline
 Prayer
 Evangelism

Reason and Aquinas

The imago dei

Reason supports faith

The liberation of the masses to trust in
Christ as a response to contemporary
attempts to categorize people as
simple/ignorant versus learned/landed.
Reformers

Rigorous minds—Luther and
Wittenberg

Loosing the chains of oppressive
religion—Zwingli in Zurich

Community and church experiments–
Calvin
German Pietism
Community is with warm hearts—
compassionate action—missionary zeal to
counteract inordinate stress on pure
doctrine and formalism
 Nikolaus Zinzendorf and the Herrnhut
community as a living experiment.
 The Moravians as a community of faith
committed to intercessory prayer and
missionary endeavor.

Wesley—A Leader at the
confluence of four rivers

Biblical primary—Thorsen, p. 127

Hearts strangely warmed—Thorsen, p. 219

Men of reason—Thorsen, p 169

The religion of the primitive church—
Thorsen, p. 151
Winds that Shaped Early
Pentecostal Leaders
To See a New Day Coming
and the Shape of Ministry
Leadership that Ensued
Historical roots that shape North
American Pentecostal roots and
missionary efforts
Wesleyan/Holiness root
 A focus on sanctification and the belief
that God could intersect our lives with
a Spirit empowerment to live a holy
life.
 A supernatural intrusion in our lives to
take charge.
Keswick Root

A focus on the second coming of Christ in revelation
to an urgency for evangelism. This urgency required
a higher life/deeper life. This “Baptism” thrust
people into a life of commitment to world evangelism
with accompanying signs and miracles.
Millenarian Root

The imminent return of Christ as the only solution to
the world’s dilemma. The message is to radically
reorder earthly priorities. A power reality that
creates a people radically committed to the
redemptive cause of Christ.
Restoration/Primitivist Root

What is needed is a radical return to the simplicity
of the Book of Acts.

A separate from the world dynamic exists. Antiorganization attitudes.

This is the final chapter of harvest before the Lord
returns.
Multi-Cultural Root

Participating in a new community that rejects
culture’s assumptions about human relationships.

Azusa St. is where the “color-line was washed
away in the Blood.”
The winds converge into an initial
rationale
1. Baptism of the Spirit as an empowerment for
service (Acts 1:8)
2. A keen hope in the soon return of Christ
(1 Thess. 4:16)
3. Christ’s command to evangelize the world
(Mt. 28:19-20)

“Over and over messages were given in the Spirit that the time would
not be long and what was done must be done quickly.” J. Roswell Flower
“The Pentecostal commission is to witness, witness, WITNESS!” J. Roswell

Commitment to the “greatest evangelism the world has ever seen.”

Flower
General Council – Fall 1914 –

“Over and over messages were given in the
Spirit that the time would not be long and
what was done must be done quickly.” J.
Roswell Flower

“The Pentecostal commission is to witness,
witness, WITNESS!” J. Roswell Flower

Commitment to the “greatest evangelism
the world has ever seen.” General Council—Fall 1914
Revealing words of pioneers

“When we go forth to preach the Full Gospel,
are we going to expect an experience like that
of denomination and missionaries or shall we
look for signs to follow?” Alice Luce

“Organization will kill the work, because no
religious awakening has ever been able to
retain its spiritual life and power after man has
organized it and gotten it under control.”
William Durham
The Nature of Practical
Theology
The world of the academy has created
“handwerkslehre” which is little more
than a trade school for church workers
AND theology that is connected to
biblical and systematic theology with no
attention to the context.
 Practical
theology has a
hermeneutical nature—interpretive
 It
takes seriously the contemporary
reality—empirical data
 It
takes authoritatively Scriptural
principles—the Bible
Practical theology—critical reflection
on the actions of the church in the light
of the Gospel and Christian tradition
and critical dialogue with secular
sources of knowledge with a view to
making the ministry of the Church most
faithful to the continuing ministry of
Jesus Christ in the world. (Ray Anderson)
“The reflective process by which
the church pursues its efforts to
articulate the theological grounds
of practical living in a variety of
areas of life. (Don Browning)
The Historic Case of Gustavo Gutierrez
and a Theology of Liberation
 Context
 Lima,
Peru
 Poverty-stricken
barrios
 Question
 Does
God care about the poor?
Assumptions

God has a plan for all people

Accept that plan

Some people will exploit their part of
the plan for personal gain

Some people will just have to be
patient and wait for their part of the
plan to materialize.
Result
God is not limited to abstract
conjectures
 God only makes sense if He cares
about the poor.

The Pastoral Cycle
Experience
Response
Situational Analysis
of Theology
Situational
Analysis
Theological
Analysis
“Christian affections are objective, relational
and dispositional. To say that Christian
affections are objective means that affections
take an object. In this case the object is also
the subject: God is the source and object of
Christian affections. The God who proves
righteous, commands righteousness. The God
who is love and has ‘so loved’ evokes love. The
God who has acted powerfully to deliver, gives
power and strength. What God has said and
done, is saying and doing, will say and do is
the source and telos of the affections.
God’s righteousness, love and power are the
source of correlative affections in the
believers. The narratives describing these
attributes of God evoke, limit and direct the
affections of the believer. God as righteous,
loving and powerful is also the telos of
Christian existence and thus of the
affections. To believe God is to receive the
kingdom of righteousness, peace and joy in
the Holy Spirit and to await its coming
consummation.”
(Steve Land as quoted in
Practical Theology: Charismatic and Empirical Perspective
by Mark J. Cartledge)
Interpretive paradigms
God the Father
Holy
Experimental probes
Spirit
action
Inner
core
Christopraxis
Outer
envelope
reflection
Holy
Spirit
God the Son
Theology for Ministry

The task of working out a theology for
ministry begins properly with the task of
identifying the nature and place of
ministry itself taking the Bible
authoritatively and the context seriously.
Nature of Ministry
Ministry precedes and produces
theology, not the reverse.
 All ministry is God’s ministry


Every act of revelation is a ministry
of reconciliation
Nature of Ministry
(cont.)

The act of God is the hermeneutical
horizon for the being of God.

The Incarnation signals that every
ministry activity has theological
objectivity in and of itself.
Nature of Ministry
(cont.)

The act of God is the
hermeneutical horizon for the
being of God.

The Incarnation signals that every
ministry activity has theological
objectivity in and of itself
Assumptions in
Theological Reflection

Making sense of this mess? How?

God’s Word is authoritative


The context must be taken seriously


It reveals God’s character and His mission
It is legitimate because it is the place that God
revealed Himself most clearly in Jesus Christ
That revelation has eternal intent-reconciliation
Assumptions in
Theological Reflection (cont.)


Ministry must be an act of God to be
legitimate

All ministry is God's ministry

It cannot be taken on a life/purpose of its own
The mission of God comes most clear in
Jesus Christ and its continuation is
guaranteed by Pentecost
Assumptions in
Theological Reflection (cont.)

The ongoing ministry of Jesus
Christ exemplifies God’s purposes

That ministry (it’s purpose,
power/pattern/character) is the
standard we are co-missioned to
participate in
What has God done?
What is God doing?
DISCERN
VISION
II Cor. 5:17-20
 Capacity to acknowledge
the significance of Christ
in the world
 To make sense of life
John 5:17; Acts 1:8; 2:4


What is my purpose?
The process of
affirming the Christ
of Scriptures at
work in our local
contexts
Agent of
Transformation
What is the
source of my
power?
Theology for Ministry

Takes Scriptures authoritatively

Views the context seriously

Affirms that God is at work in ministry
contexts

Acknowledges that orthodox doctrinal
conceptualizations do not guarantee ministry
effectiveness or orthodoxy

That ministry has theological objectivity in
and of itself
Theology for Ministry (cont.)

John 1:12



Revealer of God and His mission
Jesus legitimates the context with
His presence
It is worthwhile; it counts.
Theological Reflection
Theological Reflection, Spirituality
and Church Leadership
Theological
Reflection

What is God up to?

Reconciling world

Gives church reason for being
 Discernment
 Integration
 Credibility
Spirituality
Church
Leadership
 Process the identity and fulfill
God-given vision
 Sum of human experiences in gifted
relationship with living God
 Wholistic people
 Being real before the Lord
 Theology is action-hear and
see the Word of God. Process
the identity and fulfill Godgiven vision
 Theology is action-hear and
see the Word of God.
 Prophet/Priest/O.L
Reflection Cycle
Descriptive
Statement
Evaluation
Action Steps
Affective
Expression
MINISTRY
REFLECTION
CYCLE
Informed
Understanding
Discernment
Priestly
Role
Prophetic
Role
MINISTRY
EVENT
Organizational
Role
Three Questions

Discernment


Integration


How is the Christ of Scripture present as the
Christ in this ministry event?
Are you proclaiming and practicing the Word in
order to touch human need and be touched
with compassion for the human need?
Credibility

Will your action make Christ worthy of belief
and evident in the ministry event?
Steps in the Discernment Process
1.
List all of your options in this ministry event
2.
Pray for indifference to all options but the will of
God
3.
How has the over-arching purpose/goal in the
event changed?
4.
Write down how your understanding of God’s
ministry and the mission of the church relate to the
ministry event.
5.
Write down how ministry roles—priest, prophet,
organizational leader—relate to the ministry event.
Discernment
A 21st Century Necessity for
 Pentecostal Leaders

Can the church tolerate the separation of the theoretical
task from the concrete situation of its own existence? Will
theologians be permitted to do their work in cool absentia
while pastors sweat out their own existence in the steamy
space of the Church in the world? When theological
thinking is practiced in abstraction from the Church in
ministry, it inevitably becomes as much unapplied and
irrelevant as pure. When the theological mind of the
minister is educated primarily through experience, an ad
hoc theology emerges which owes as much (or more) to
methodological and pragmatic concerns as to dogma. The
task to work out a theology for ministry begins properly
with the task of identifying the nature of and place of
ministry itself.
Ray Anderson (Theological Foundations for Ministry)
The Achilles Heel of
Pentecostals
Pragmatism

Leviticus 10:1 – “Strange fire”

“Aaron’s sons Nadab & Abihu took their
censers, put fire in them and added incense;
and they offered unauthorized fire before the
Lord, contrary to His command.”

A divine task attempted with reliance on
human design alone.
“Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit,”
says the Lord Almighty.” Zech. 4:6
Might – human resources
 Power – human resoluteness


Spirit – divine initiative and power
for God’s eternal purposes

The temptation to offer our
resources to the service of God
believing that they are an adequate
substitute for God’s eternal resource.
“Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord,
will enter the Kingdom of heaven, but only he
who does the will of the Father who is in
heaven. Many will say to me on that day,
Lord, Lord did we not prophesy in your name
and in your name drive out demons and
perform many miracles? Then I will tell them
Plainly, I never knew you. Away from me you
evildoers!”
Matthew 7:21-23

Success is rejected by the Lord as having
no kingdom legitimacy.

Human efforts don’t even get a pat on the
back.

We can actually think our usage of strange
fire/might-power/sign ministry carries with
it God’s seal of approval. Success is viewed
as self-authenticating.
So What?
 How
do we counteract
bifurcation?
 How do we resist pragmatism?
 How do we challenge our
culture’s immunity to the Gospel?
Biblical Clues

God is at work! (John 5:17)

God continues to empower His redemptive
mission (Acts 1:6-8)

Pentecost is the guarantee that the Jesus of the
Gospels is the Jesus who continues His ministry
empowered by the Holy Spirit. (Acts 2:22-24)

Our ministry is the continuing ministry of Christ
working through us by the presence and power
of the Spirit of Christ. (II Cor.5:20)
Discernment of Ministry

Ministry action as “poiesis”.

An action that produces a result.

The end product of the action completes the
act regardless of what the future of the
product may be i.e. a ministry action can be
viewed as effective simply because it added
more people or people were supportive
(fiscally) or people were “blessed,” or it
most effectively facilitated a program’s
success.

Ministry action as praxis-telos (discernment
of ultimate purpose)

A ministry action that includes the ultimate
purpose of that action as part of the action.


No ministry action, program or ministry
structure is incidental.
It either reveals the redemptive purpose of
Jesus or it has no contribution to make to God’s
eternal concerns (Mt. 7:21-23).
Discernment as an act of Church
Leadership is the minimal expectation
for our 21st century church leader
(Acts 2:11-21)

Discernment – spiritual maturity to know the
difference between works of human effort and
the continuing ministry of Jesus empowered
by the Spirit.

Discernment assumes the present tense of
Jesus redemptive ministry.

Discernment assumes that Christ’s Kingdom
rule extends over all human structures and
efforts.

Discernment strives to “see” the presence of
Jesus in all ministry actions & structures. (Not
as an act of piety, but as a biblical necessity).
Discerning true ministry requires
A connectedness to the life of Jesus (John
15)
 An affirmation that holiness and ethics are
never mutually exclusive (II Cor. 5:20)
 A willingness to exegete ministry contexts
with the same rigor we exegete biblical texts
(Mt. 7:21-23)
 A commitment to evaluating ministry
methodology by whether or not it facilitates
Jesus continuing redemptive ministry.

The Character (Fabric) of
Pentecostal Leaders
I.
Eschatological People
• Living in the reality that we are
eschatological people—we have a
destiny that is played in space and
real time.
The Holy Spirit’s work fully actualized at
Pentecost ushers in an era where:
“The Spirit is the experienced, empowered
entrance of God’s own personal presence
in and among us, who enables us to live
as a radically eschatological people in the
present world while we await the
consummation. The fruit and gifts of the
spirit permeate the ethical life and
charismatic dynamic of the community’s
life to that end.”
Gordon Fee—Paul, the Spirit and the People of God
II.
Holy Spirit Validation
• Affirming that the empowerment of
the Holy Spirit is valid only as it is
connected to the mission for which
it was intended.
• Acts 1:6-8
III.
Reason and Spirituality are not
mutually exclusive
• Affirm the rigor of reason and the
dynamic of spirituality are not
mutually exclusive.
• The Spirit that leads us into all truth
is the same Spirit that empowers
Jesus in His redemptive mission.
– John 16:7-15
– John 20:19-22
IV.
Epistemology Rooted in Jesus Christ
• Affirm that epistemological
pathways are all rooted in Jesus
Christ.
• Affective and cognitive dimensions
of human experience need not
compete with other, but are created
to enrich a human being for
maturity.
V.
Validity of mission and ministry
• Contemporary mission and ministry
is only valid as they replicate the
mission and ministry of Jesus Christ
is:
• Purpose
• Character
• Source of empowerment
• Hebrews 1
VI.
Role of Created Order
• Christ’s Kingdom rules over all created
order and thus created order deserves
to be taken seriously.
• Because God sent His Son to redeem all
creation, His Church must seek to
represent Him fairly in all facets of
created order.
• Ephesians 1:18-21
Wesley—A Proto-Pentecostal Case Study
• Wesley was a practical theologian
with a balanced equation for
leadership
World of Wesley
• A growing empire
• A revolution in the “colonies”
• Royalty as God’s servant
• The Church of England and England as
a nation-state joined at the hip
The Shaping of Wesley
• Epworth
• Oxford—Lincoln College
• Holy Club (with brother Charles and George
•
•
•
•
Whitfield)
Georgia Missions
Moravians
Heart Strangely warmed at Aldersgate Street
The “vile thing”
The Wesleyan Influence
• The Church as a community of God’s
grace
• The Church’s unity is the koinonia of
the Spirit
• Pursuit of maturing Christian lives
sustained by grace is crucial
The Wesleyan Method
• Outside accepted boundaries, but connected
to the center.
• The Church is a system of discipline in
community:
– Class Meetings—once a week to inquire how our
souls prosper (house churches, seekers welcome)
– Bands/Small Groups—to confess your faults one
to another and pray for one another that ye may
be healed (had received assurance of sins forgiven)
– Select Society —those making progression
inward—outward holiness
Three Rules of a Select Society
• Let nothing spoken in this society be
spoken again.
• Submit to the appointed minister.
• Bring an offering for the “common
stock.”
Traveling Preachers
• Taught to manage difficulties in
societies
• Face mobs
• Brave any weather
• Subsist without means
• Rise at 4 a.m. and preach at 5 a.m.
• Die without fear
Daily Rules
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Preach
Study
Travel
Meet with bands—classes—societies
Exercise daily
Eat sparingly
Preach nowhere that could not be
followed up with organized “structures”
with adequate leadership
The Primacy of Scripture
• “I allow no other rule, whether of
faith or practice, than the Holy
Scriptures.”
• Scripture was the only all-sufficient
source commonly available to people
for investigating the nature of God
and life.
• “O give me that book! At any price
give me the book of God!”
• The personal character of humility
and reliance on grace gave Wesley
the freedom to see a dynamic interaction between sources to illuminate
and enrich biblical truths. This never
succumbed to a thoroughly
pragmatic approach that reduces
truth to relativity.
• Wesley affirms Reformation
treatise of sola fide and sola
scriptura.
• However, he interprets sola as
“primarily” rather than
“exclusively”.
• “Tis not enough to have Bibles,
but we must use them, yea, use
them daily. Our souls must have
constant meals of that manna,
which if well-digested, will afford
them true nourishment.”
Rule of Interpretation by John Wesley
•
•
•
•
Literal sense is emphasized
Importance of context
Comparing Scripture with Scripture
Christian experience has confirmatory
and correctional value
• Reason is the handmaiden of faith
• Practicality—for the plain unlettered
people
The Authority of Tradition
• Wesley’s concern for historical
continuity in an age of distrust in
Christian tradition.
Old Religion
Religion—the Bible
Religion of the Primitive Church
Religion of the Church of England
Methodism
• Old Religion
– John 3:16—heart religion
• Religion—the Bible
– The only sufficient authority for religious life
• Religion of the primitive church
– It would be easy to produce a cloud of witnesses
testifying the same thing, were not this appoint
which no one will contest who has the least
acquaintance with Christian antiquity
• Religion of the Church of England
• Methodism
• “If any doubt still remains, I consult
those who are experienced in the
things of God and then the writings
whereby being dead they yet speak.
And what I thus learn, that I teach.”
• Tradition as authority second only to
Scripture. To the extent that the
Holy Spirit continued to direct
decisions in the early church, Wesley
believed tradition was an essential
extension of the witness of the
Scripture.
The Authority of Reason
• Desired a religion founded on reason
and in every way agreeable to it.
Passion and prejudice rule the
world…it is our part with religion and
reason joined to counteract them all
we can.
• The image of God persisted in the
human race after Adam’s fall, effaced
but not obliterated.
• Human reasoning was a part of
humanity’s original constitution.
• Although the heart was prone to evil,
the mind was free to reason and
respond to God by faith.
• An era where the Enlightenment is
in full sway.
– Natural theology present in the Church of
England
– Navigates philosophical influences from
Aristotle’s rational (scientific) sensory
perspective to Plat’s intuition.
– This explains his both-and posture
integrating the empirical with the
experiential and mysticism.
• His “both-and” perspective draws
criticism from all sides.
• Wesley concludes that:
– “No man is a partaker of Christ until he
can clearly testify the life I now live…I
live by faith in the Son of God—revealed
in my heart.”
Acknowledge Tension
• Let reason do all that reason can.
Employ it as far as it will go. But, at
the same time, acknowledge it is
utterly incapable of giving faith, or
hope or love and consequently of
producing real virtue or substantive
happiness. Expect these from a
higher source, even from the spirits
of all flesh.
The Authority of Experience
• Considered by many as Wesley's
greatest contribution to the
development of Christian theology.
• “I’m not afraid that the people called
Methodists should ever cease to
exist…I am afraid lest they should
only exist as a dead sect having the
form of religion without the power.”
“It is necessary that you have the
hearing ear and the seeing eye, that
you have a new class of senses opened
to your soul not depending on organs of
flesh and blood to be ‘evidence of
things not seen’ as your bodily senses
are of visible things, to be avenues to
the invisible world, to discern spiritual
objects and to furnish you with ideas of
what the outward ‘eye has not seen,
neither the ear heard.’”
• Wesley was deeply concerned about
“enthusiasm.”
• While he acknowledged excesses,
Wesley still believed in the
supernatural, immediate gift of God,
which “He commonly gives in the use
of such means as he hath ordained.”
Outward Experiences
• Empirical experiences with creation
were a source of evidence for
religious experience.
Inward Experiences
• Knowledge derived from a personal
experiential encounter with God is
objective in the sense if establishing
contact with a real, albeit hidden
reality.
• Wesley believe that the reality of God
and of God’s salvation is hidden from
our natural senses though not from
spiritual senses.
• Spiritual senses were created by
God and reactivated by His grace
that gives potential for discovering
religious insights that were
previously inconceivable.
• The personal conversion experience
as well as assurance of salvation are
two places people experience a
direct awareness of God.
• “The testimony of the spirit is an
inward impression on the soul
whereby the Spirit of God directly
witnesses to my Spirit.”
• “Now there is properly the
testimony of our own spirit even the
testimony of our own conscience
that God has given us to be holy of
heart and holy in outward
conversation.”
A Heart Strangely Warmed
• In the evening I went very unwillingly to a
society in Aldersgate Street, where one was
reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the
Romans. About a quarter before nine, while
he was describing the change which God
works in the heart through faith in Christ, I
felt my heart strangely warmed. I felt I did
trust in Christ, Christ alone for salvation:
And an assurance was given me, that he had
taken away my sins, even mine, and saved
me from the law of sin and death.”
The Wesleyan Quadrilateral by Donald A. D. Thorsen, p. 129
• Experience is the appropriation of
authority and confirms the
truthfulness of Scripture,
tradition and reason.
Contemporary Applications of Wesley’s
Understanding of Experience
• Pentecostals experience the sacred
in the midst of the profane, divine
guidance for both personal and
institutional concerns, standing in
contrast to rational and
beaureacratic methods, a reticulate
organization that refuses to
immortalize tradition and the past.
In addition, it refuses to routinize
the charismata.
Margaret Poloma in The AG at the Crossroads
• Pentecostals insist that it is not enough for
truths—even biblical truths, to be
precipitated in the mind and viewed
philosophically. There must be a submission
to the truth in faith and reverential adoration
in worship. This is worship of truth that is
not merely imprisoned in the mind, but is
personified transcendentally over the mind in
the glorious person of Christ. This is an
experience—certified theology where an
experience of Christ as subject and not just
object constitute genuine experience.
William McDonald in Perspectives on the New Pentecostalism
S OME T HOUGHTS ON P ENTECOST
P ENTECOST A S
A
C OMPASS

Pentecost orients us biblically to the inner logic of God’s
revelation of Himself in the world through Jesus Christ and
experientially to the eschatological vision of redemption of the
world.

Pentecost is the pivotal point from which we can look back to the
incarnation of God in Jesus of Nazareth and look forward into our
contemporary life and witness to Jesus Christ in our world.
Pentecost is more than a historical and instrumental link between
a theology of the incarnation and a theology of the church.
Pentecost is more than the birth of the church, it is the indwelling
power of the Spirit of Christ as the source of the church’s life and
ministry.”
Ray Anderson, The Soul of Ministry, p.111
Pentecost – The mission of God seen
most clearly in Jesus continues
uninterrupted to this very day.
Acts 1:6-8 – Mission is redemptive – global – empowered by
the Holy Spirit.

Jesus ministry happens in real time & space.

God’s purposes are therefore realized in the ministries
we offer in His name and the organizations we create to
facilitate those ministries.

Structures and programs are theological statements.

The pragmatic demands of day to day ministry
often tend to overwhelm our vision (the capacity
to see what God has done in Jesus Christ II Cor.
5:17-20) and dull our discernment (the capacity
to see the congruence between the Christ of
Scripture and the Christ as work in current
ministry John 5:17)

A Pentecostal theology for ministry affirms the
context and activity of ministry is not merely the
place for the application of abstract principles or
professional skills. Ministry is the habitat of
Jesus’ continuing ministry that requires a
spirituality nurturing both vision and
discernment as necessary for ministry
effectiveness.
T HE B APTISM OF THE S PIRIT AND
R ECOVERING A M UTED V OICE

“The Baptism of the Spirit in Pentecostalism is rightfully
seen as empowerment for service impacting the believer
deeply by giving him/her a tremendous boldness, a
heightened sense of personal holiness and a new sense
of self worth and personal power. Yet, the narrow
individualistic focus and purpose implies the dissipation.
. .of so much energy and spiritual power that can and
should be “tapped” for the broader missional objective
of the church. The challenge which remains for
Pentecostals is to catch the vision of the broader
prophetic and vocation role of the Baptism of the Spirit.”
Eldin Villafane
“ P ENTECOSTALISM
ABERRATION .
IS NOT AN
. .
“What began as a despised and ridiculed sect is quickly
becoming both the preferred religion of the urban poor
and the powerful bearer of a radically alternative vision
of what the human world might one day become.”
Harvey Cox

Will the past be a true indicator of our future?

This is no time for triumphalism.

It is a time for humility and the recapturing of our central
core.
A N ATTEMPT AT FINDING THE
CORE OF P ENTECOSTALISM

Every human being struggles to find a
sense of destiny and significance.

Pentecostalism represents a spiritual
restoration of significance and purpose to
masses of people.
R ESTORATION OF BASIC
( PRIMAL ) SPEECH

In a world that can make people think as
if their “voice” does not matter or where
contrived rhetoric has emptied language
of any meaning.

Pentecostals participate in a language of
the heart that is understood in heaven,
and no particular tragedy can restrain.
(Rom.12:1-2)
R ESTORATION OF BASIC
( PRIMAL ) PIETY

Our relationship with God cannot be
contained in left-brained activity
alone, but is to be encountered face to
face.

We believe and expect God to act in
immanent and concrete ways. (Mark
16:15-18)
R ESTORATION OF A BASIC
( PRIMAL ) HOPE

An affirmation that the world we see is not all
there is and can be.

An orientation toward the future that persists
despite the failure of certain events to occur.

A sense of destiny that affirms in concrete
action that we are connected in history to the
God who is the Alpha & Omega. (Mt. 24:14
and II Thess. 4:13-18)
TO M AKE A L ONG S TORY S HORT

Our words – “deepest attempts at
communication” are heard by Someone
who understands.

Our address is known by God.

Our destiny is linked to the CreatorRedeemer God
T HE
BOTTOM LINE IS STILL

The Baptism of the Spirit connected to
empowerment for world evangelization.

A sense of destiny as part of the effort that
plants signposts of God’s redemptive
purposes.

Obedience to Christ’s command to make
disciples of all nations
U NDERSTANDING
P ENTECOSTALISM AS WE S TART
THE 21 ST C ENTURY







5% non-western Christians in 1900 to 66%
+ non-western in 2000.
The demise of colonialism
The rise of nationalism
The Cold War thaws
Emergence of global economy
Continuing gap between haves and have
nots
Religious militancy
T WO SECULAR VISIONS OF
CURRENT AFFAIRS

Globalization – Thomas Friedman, The Lexus
and the Olive Tree (1999)

Reflecting the tension between globalization
and ancient forces of culture, geography,
tradition and community

“The driving force behind globalization is free
market capitalization.”
C IVILIZATIONAL
APPROACH
The Clash of Civilizations – Samuel
Huntington,(1996)
Culture and cultural identities are shaping
the patterns of cohesion, disintegration and
conflicts in post Cold-War world.
 Colonial Era – Through WW II (nation states)
 Cold War Era – Post WW II through 1989
(nation states)
 The World of Civilizations – 1990 to present
(nation states present are shaping ever)

T HE C URRENT C IVILIZATIONS









Western – North America; Western Europe –
Australia, New Zealand
Latin America
African –Sub-Saharan
Islamic – Sub-Saharan Africa plus Middle East
Sinic
Hindu
Orthodox
Buddhist
Japanese
Minding God’s Business
by Ray S. Anderson
What in the World is God doing?
• The gospel is that God has entered into history in
order to accomplish the restoration and reconciliation
of his created world, including human society, to the
end that God is glorified and lost humanity become a
“people of God.”
• This gospel, which has been completed in the person
and work of Jesus Christ, is taken up by those
commissioned to be his apostles by the resurrected
Christ, as the power of God for salvation (Rom. 1:16).
• Through the ministry of these apostles, in the power of
the Holy Spirit received at Pentecost, the church is
born as the agent of the gospel and as a sign of the
kingdom of God in the world.
• God’s kingdom is his sovereign rule over and
within the world, which was manifest in Israel
and present in the fullness of power in Jesus
Christ (Matt. 12:28).
• Jesus proclaimed the “gospel of the kingdom”
through his own ministry of teaching and healing
(Matt 4:23).
• Christian organizations exist to carry out the
continuing apostolic task of the “gospel of the
kingdom” as part of the church of Jesus Christ.
What is my Purpose?
GOSPEL
CHURCH
MISSION
• This “gospel” is the substance of the work of God in
Christ by which he died for sinners and was raised up
by the power of God for our salvation (1 Cor. 15:3).
• The church is an agent of the work of the gospel, not the
final form of the gospel itself as an organization or an
institution. Nor is mission capable of sustaining itself
as an activity or organization except as it is grounded in
the life of the church through the power and authority
of the gospel.
• The church, then, comes into being as the power of the
gospel is born as the mission of the Holy Spirit
(Pentecost). The apostolic character of the church is its
role in the process of gospel taking formation through
mission.
What is My Source?
GOSPEL
CHURCH
MISSION
• “Theological reflection” is the task of the
church as it carries out the mission of
Christ in the world; that is, the church is
to ground that mission in the authority
of the gospel.
• The mission of God in the world,
broadly defined, is his finished
work of redemption through
Jesus Christ, which is proclaimed
as the gospel.
• Through Christ’s gift of his Spirit, this
work, which has been completed,
continues to accomplish its purpose
through the transformation of sinful
persons into a new community of social
and spiritual health: the church, the
body of Christ.
• The work of mission cannot make an “end
run,” as it were, and bypass the church as
the body of Christ. Nor should one
suppose that the apostolic mandate itself
could take the form of a mission without
being accountable to the body of Christ in
the process of the formation of the gospel.
• A Christian organization in this sense
can be said to be a gathering of Christian
persons in common cause, who have a
distinctively Christian identity and
mission.
• The function of directing such an
organization is what we mean by
“management.” What makes Christian
organizations distinctive is the content
of the common cause. We designated
this as the unique nature of a Christian
organization as being mission-specific.
• Development of Christian organizations,
therefore, is essentially the development of
a community of Christian people whose
organizational goal is mission-intensive.
Organization in the Christian organization
is the servant of the mission, which is the
creative power behind the organization.
• What happens when the leadership
function of management comes under
the mandate of the mission of God as set
forth in the world through incarnation?
• Management now becomes the servant of
God’s purpose and plan, and no longer is in
the relentless grip of the utilitarian and selfpreservationist drive of organizations under
the determinism of the Fall. Under the
Lordship of Christ, a new form of leadership
emerges called servant leadership.
• Its goal is not serving the organization’s
own ethics and purposes, but leading
the organization to fulfill God’s purpose
as a servant of God.
Management,
Megatrends,
and Methods
• Methods do not have the power in and of
themselves to fulfill the kingdom of God
or to move from an immediate objective
to an ultimate objective.
• Methods are neutral, not inherently good
or evil.
• Certain management principles or
methods are inherently Christian would
be a dubious approach.
Role of the Holy
Spirit in Managing
Christian
Organizations
1. Understand the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of
the Lord Jesus, directing, empowering,
and equipping Christians to accomplish
his will.
2. The Holy Spirit is not a substitute for
planning, nor is he the “missing piece” in a
puzzle by which God’s secret plan is made
known.
3. Plans are the human means for achieving
goals, that embody the promise of God and
complete the will of God.
4. The spiritual aspect of managing Christian
organizations is not itself the use of a spiritual
method or means as against any other method.
Rather, the spiritual dimension of managing is
represented by bringing all of the methods and
means used into the service of the spiritual
goal—that of achieving the will of the Lord
and glorifying him in the process.
5. One important role of the Holy Spirit in the
managing of Christian organizations, then,
is to invest the reality and freedom of Christ
as a living presence and power in the
dynamic process of leading an organization
to set goals, establish priorities, create action
plans, and work with all contingencies that
occur.
6. The Holy Spirit gives to an organization
a creative response to contingencies, so
that the “unforeseen” can be enfolded
into the planning process without
undercutting the validity of the plan.