Providing Assistance Via a Non-Profit Kim Trella, CT DEP NEWMOA, 9/28/05 What you may learn Why a Non-Profit? CT Green Building Council example Benefits.
Download ReportTranscript Providing Assistance Via a Non-Profit Kim Trella, CT DEP NEWMOA, 9/28/05 What you may learn Why a Non-Profit? CT Green Building Council example Benefits.
Providing Assistance Via a Non-Profit Kim Trella, CT DEP NEWMOA, 9/28/05 What you may learn Why a Non-Profit? CT Green Building Council example Benefits to CT DEP and Partners Hints on providing assistance using a non-profit Why a Non-Profit? If the goal is education, the 501(c)3 status makes the role clear Lobbying is not allowed Activities support a named goal Provides a neutral place for business, utilities, and government to meet Why a Non-Profit? Can serve mutual benefit for different groups Focuses the attention on the goal of education Requires participants to not be “selling services” Why a Non-Profit? Let’s the public know that profit-taking is not the goal Keeps the focus on actions that achieve the desired result CT Green Building Council EXAMPLE Formed in 2002 as a 501(c)3 CT DEP was a partner at the first discussions on if a CT group should be formed to promote green building CT Green Building Council Collaboration of State Agencies, Utilities, Businesses Brings the Wealth of Diversity to the Table What One group is just learning about – probably one of the others already knows Benefits of Partnering Expertise of Professionals working in their respective fields Ask them what is working – what isn’t Use their talents – increase your own Changes Agency role from “teacher” to “support staff” CTGBC Progress In 2001, when CTGBC was initiated – there were no LEED buildings in CT CTGBC Progress In 2005, there are 17 LEED-registered buildings – those completed: Mark Twain Museum Visitor Center Pfizer Clinical Research facility State college buildings (5) 3 dorms, 2 classroom/labs Benefits to CT DEP Green buildings are listed as one of the recommendations in the CT Climate Change Action Plan Meeting Climate Change goals Benefits to CT DEP Agency presence at events promoting green buildings, e.g., Mark Twain Museum Center opening – gave a CT DEP Green Circle award in addition to a CTGBC award Commissioner McCarthy spoke at the HP schools group first meeting Benefits to CT DEP Assisting with campaigns that are funded through grants not originating at CT DEP (additional resources) Example – High Performance Schools Initiative – to promote construction of HP schools – CTBGC grant funded Benefits to CT DEP Use of current private sector information and presentations Have most up-to-date information readily available What does a Building look like? Clearview Elementary School, Hanover, PA 3rd Creek Elementary School, Statesville, NC Blanchard Hall, Mount Holyoke College Environmental Studies Center, Oberlin College How does work? TM LEED Categories » Sustainable Sites » Water Efficiency » Energy and Atmosphere » Materials and Resources » Indoor Environmental Quality » Innovation and Design 22 32 15 Total Project Score Certified 26 to 32 points 3 9 2 Sustainable Sites Y ? N Y Prereq 1 1 Credit 1 1 1 1 1 1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 Credit 4.4 1 1 1 1 1 Credit 5.1 Credit 5.2 Credit 6.1 Credit 6.2 Credit 7.1 1 1 Y Credit 3 Credit 4.1 1 1 Credit 2 Credit 7.2 Credit 8 2 Water Efficiency ? N Credit 1.1 1 Credit 1.2 1 1 Credit 2 Credit 3.1 1 Credit 3.2 7 6 Energy & Atmosphere Y ? N Prereq 1 Prereq 2 Prereq 3 Credit 1.1 2 2 Credit 1.2 Credit 1.3 2 2 1 Credit 1.5 Credit 2.1 1 1 1 Credit 1.4 Credit 2.2 Credit 2.3 Credit 3 1 1 Credit 4 Credit 5 1 Credit 6 Possible Points 14 Possible Points Water Efficient Landscaping , Reduce by 50% Water Efficient Landscaping , No P o table Use o r No Irrigatio n Innovative Wastew ater Technologies Water Use Reduction , 20% Reductio n Water Use Reduction , 30% Reductio n 4 Y Y Y 2 Gold 39 to 51 points Erosion & Sedim entation Control Site Selection 1 Urban Redevelopm ent 1 Brow nfield Redevelopm ent 1 Alternative Transportation , P ublic Transpo rtatio n A ccess 1 Alternative Transportation , B icycle Sto rage & Changing Ro o ms 1 Alternative Transportation , A lternative Fuel Refueling Statio ns 1 Alternative Transportation , P arking Capacity 1 Reduced Site Disturbance , P ro tect o r Resto re Open Space 1 Reduced Site Disturbance , Develo pment Fo o tprint 1 Storm w ater Managem ent , Rate and Quantity 1 Storm w ater Managem ent , Treatment 1 Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands , No n-Ro 1 of Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands , Ro o f 1 Light Pollution Reduction 1 2 1 Silver 33 to 38 points Possible Points 5 1 1 1 1 1 Possible Points 17 Fundam ental Building System s Com m issioning Minim um Energy Perform ance CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipm ent Optim ize Energy Perform ance , 20% New / 10% Existing Optim ize Energy Perform ance , 30% New / 20% Existing Optim ize Energy Perform ance , 40% New / 30% Existing Optim ize Energy Perform ance , 50% New / 40% Existing Optim ize Energy Perform ance , 60% New / 50% Existing Renew able Energy, 5% Renew able Energy, 10% Renew able Energy, 20% Additional Com m issioning Ozone Depletion Measurem ent & Verification Green Pow er 4 4 5 Materials & Resources Y ? N Y Prereq 1 1 1 1 1 Credit 1.2 Credit 1.3 Credit 2.2 1 1 1 Credit 3.1 Credit 3.2 Credit 4.1 1 Credit 4.2 1 1 Credit 5.1 Credit 5.2 1 1 7 8 Y ? Credit 6 Credit 7 Prereq 2 1 1 Credit 1 Credit 2 1 Credit 3.1 1 Credit 3.2 1 1 1 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 Credit 4.4 1 1 Credit 5 Credit 6.1 1 1 1 1 Credit 6.2 Credit 7.1 Credit 7.2 Credit 8.1 1 Credit 8.2 2 Y ? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Possible Points 15 Minim um IAQ Perform ance Environm ental Tobacco Sm oke (ETS) Control Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring Increase Ventilation Effectiveness Construction IAQ Managem ent Plan , During Co nstructio n Construction IAQ Managem ent Plan , B efo re Occupancy Low -Em itting Materials , A dhesives & Sealants Low -Em itting Materials , P aints Low -Em itting Materials , Carpet Low -Em itting Materials , Co mpo site Wo o d Indoor Chem ical & Pollutant Source Control Controllability of System s , P erimeter Controllability of System s , No n-P erimeter Therm al Com fort , Co mply with A SHRA E 55-1992 Therm al Com fort , P ermanent M o nito ring System Daylight & View s , Daylight 75% o f Spaces Daylight & View s , Views fo r 90% o f Spaces Innovation & Design Process Possible Points 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 N Credit 1.1 Credit 1.2 1 1 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Building Reuse , M aintain 75% o f Existing Shell Building Reuse , M aintain 100% o f Existing Shell Building Reuse , M aintain 100% Shell & 50% No n-Shell Construction Waste Managem ent , Divert 50% Construction Waste Managem ent , Divert 75% Resource Reuse , Specify 5% Resource Reuse , Specify 10% Recycled Content , Specify 25% Recycled Content , Specify 50% Local/Regional Materials , 20% M anufactured Lo cally Local/Regional Materials , o f 20% A bo ve, 50% Harvested Lo cally Rapidly Renew able Materials Certified Wood Indoor Environmental Quality Prereq 1 3 Possible Points 13 N Y Y 1 Credit 1.1 Credit 2.1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 69 Platinum 52 or more points Credit 1.3 Credit 1.4 Credit 2 Innovation in Design : Specific Title Innovation in Design : Specific Title Innovation in Design : Specific Title Innovation in Design : Specific Title LEED™ Accredited Professional 1 1 1 1 1 What are typical Strategies and Technologies? LEEDTM Sustainable Sites Credit 4: Alternate Transportation Credit 6: Stormwater Management TM LEED Water Efficiency Credit 1: Water Efficient Landscaping Credit 2: Innovative Wastewater Technologies Credit 3: Water Use Reduction Benefits to CT DEP CT DEP is building a new beach pavilion Unable to contract for “green” due to higher cost – is working with a contractor who is not familiar with green products An alternate roofing spec was allowed for the back-up bid Benefits to CT DEP Lead-coated copper suggested by nongreen contractor One e-mail to the CTGBC had two alternatives (without lead) with sources and price in half an hour Benefits to Partners CT DEP is seen as a neutral third party by many – so an endorsement of “green buildings” means more than an endorsement from someone who is trying to sell you services Assistance Via A Non-Profit Listen to Others about their needs Seek partners with similar goals Join forces Get out of the Regulatory mode Look for ways to assist the private sector - let them lead the way Assistance Via A Non-Profit Non-profits offer flexibility not usually available in government Focus on a mutual goal reduces the “politics” With existing funding constraints, is another way to continue providing assistance Assistance Via a Non-Profit Providing assistance and support to the efforts of the private sector moves their “ownership” of environmental stewardship to a higher level The more they “own” – the better stewards they will be What you may have learned Why a Non-Profit? CTGBC example Benefits to CT DEP and Partners Hints on providing assistance via a non-profit