Transcript EEC Board Policy and Research Committee Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) May 6, 2013

EEC Board Policy and Research Committee
Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS)
May 6, 2013
1
Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS)
Massachusetts has developed high quality benchmarks, which are
aligned with state early childhood standards (MA Early Learning
Guidelines for Infants & Toddlers, Preschool Learning Guidelines and
the Pre-K Common Core of the MA Curriculum Frameworks), as well
as some Head Start, National Association of Educating Young
Children accreditation, and other early learning and development
standards.
2
QRIS is a Comprehensive Assessment
that Encompasses All Programmatic Aspects
There are five categories in QRIS:
1.) Curriculum and Learning
a. Curriculum, Assessment and Diversity
b. Teacher/Child Relationships and Interactions
2.) Safe, Healthy Indoor and Outdoor Environments
3.) Workforce Qualifications and Professional Development
a. Designated Program Administrator Qualifications and
Professional Development
b. Program Staff Qualifications and Professional Development
4.) Family and Community Engagement
5.) Leadership, Management and Administration
3
Three Different Program Types
The five categories and two sub-categories remain consistent ,
however the individual standards have been adapted for
effectiveness in three different program types:



4
Center-Based and School Based (CBSB)
Family Child Care (FCC)
After School and Out of School Time Programs (ASOST)
QRIS Timeline
2008
 EEC began conducting early research to set the stage for the design of the
MA QRIS.
 EEC received guidance from EEC Board and EEC Advisory Team (February March 2008)
 Anne Mitchell presented overview of the QRIS Systems to EEC Board (March
2008)
 Initial QRIS stakeholder team developed the scope, purpose and mission of
MA QRIS. Evolved into MA QRIS
 EEC presents at CAYL QRIS Roundtable (July 2008)
5
2009
 QRIS Standards presentation to Board (January 2009)
 ASOST Stakeholders Group convened
 Draft posted for public input- 377 survey respondents (March -June
2009 )
 EEC conducted presentations to over 900 members of the field
about QRIS
 EEC reconvened the QRIS External Stakeholder team (June 2009)
 Initial QRIS Standards were reviewed and revised – evidence based
and measurable (November 2009 – January 2010)
 Feedback gathered from stakeholders at events with The CAYL
Institute (December 16, 2009)
6
2010
 Feedback provided on QRIS Standards at Advisory Team Meeting &
Stakeholders Meeting (January 2010)
 EDC hired to review and streamline standards (reduce duplication, remove
criteria with no research base)
 QRIS Standards-Provisional Version Approved by EEC Board (February 17,
2010)
 QRIS Pilot launched
2011
 On-line application launched- QRIS Program Manager (QPM) (January 2011)
 Program supports established; training, coaches and resources through T4Q
 Financial Incentives Implemented
2012
 3,494 programs created 3,803 applications in the Program Manager
 Six Program Quality Specialists were hired and trained on the Quality Rating
and Improvement System
 Pilot for the QRIS Validation Study begins
Recent QRIS Successes

FY13 QRIS Improvement Grants are awarded for durable goods and
program planning

Many Center-Based and School Based, Family Child Care, and After
School and Out of School Time programs sharing with PQS that they
have been reflectively reviewing their program practices in a more
comprehensive and thoughtful manner

Programs have become more familiar with the use of research-based
measurement tools

Pilot study in development with NAEYC to reduce duplication of effort by
accredited Center-Based programs

Work has started on a more user-friendly version of the QRIS Program
Manager

Communication and collaboration with national organizations has
improved

Approval granted to reassess RTT benchmarks

Coordination of QRIS and QRIS related programs will be managed within
the EEC Policy Department
Program Quality Specialists
and Education Specialists Support QRIS
In collaboration, EEC staff has:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Reviewed over 1,400 QRIS applications between October 1, 2012 and
May 1, 2013
Verified over 700 Level 2 applications between October 1, 2012 and May
1, 2013
Completed approximately 200 site visits
Facilitated QRIS Training Sessions throughout the state
Provided daily QRIS support via the telephone and email
Created resources for QRIS users
Presented QRIS information at dozens of early education venues
throughout the state to educators, administrators and stakeholders
Held monthly TA with EPS Coaches/Mentors working with programs on
QRIS
Quality Rating and Improvement System
Program Engagement
Since the launch of the on-line, QRIS Program Manager (QPM) in January 2011 5,149
programs (unique count) have created a total of 6,704 QRIS applications (final
status) using the QPM system. 5,571 of those applications have been granted a
QRIS Level. (Data as of May 3, 2013).
Additional QRIS Data: There are 363 Programs that have participated in QRIS that
have since closed for business.
Note: Metro (region 4) has been dissolved and towns have been reallocated to
regions 2, 3, 5 and 6.
Current Challenges

Review of the recent decision to “remove” QRIS standards, as voted on
by the Board in February 2013

QRIS Exemption Policy

QRIS Level 2 and Level 3 participation requirements and EEC funding
opportunities (excluding UPK, 391 Programs, IT Rate Increase and
recent Opening Access)

Professional Development Requirements vs. Continuing Education Units
Additional Issues for Future Consideration
Comprehensive review and potential revision of some QRIS policies, including;

Creation of QRIS manuals for both the programs and EEC specialists
supporting the programs

Programs’ use of the measurement tools

QRIS Standards

Timelines for moving up levels in QRIS

Additional training needed for EEC staff supporting QRIS

Continued discussions around workforce qualifications- financial impact to
programs as educators continue to increase their professional qualifications,
and educator attrition rates

Review of contracts for PD and support with consideration to creating better
quality and more efficient delivery of QRIS trainings and QRIS support.

Level 3 Reliable Rater visits – policy, and planning for the financial impact

Monitoring of QRIS Program Quality Grants and assessment of effectiveness
QRIS Improvement Timeline
May and June
 Discussion and creation of policy around current challenges; review of the
recent decision to “remove” QRIS standards, QRIS Exemption Policy, QRIS
Level 2 and Level 3 participation requirements and EEC funding
opportunities, and Professional Development Requirements vs. Continuing
Education Units
 Work on revision of RTT benchmarks
 Create resources to support QRIS Program Manager 2.0
July
 Launch QRIS Program Manager 2.0
July and August
 Work with grantees and contractors to increase availability of trainings
 Create a QRIS policy manual for programs and EEC Staff
July 2013
 Begin comprehensive review of QRIS standards with working group
 Begin comprehensive review of assessment tools
Fall 2013
 Begin discussions and planning for QRIS sustainability
Resources
QRIS Exemption Policy:
http://www.eec.state.ma.us/docs1/qris/20110330_qris_exemption_qpm.pdf
Standards Removal Documents:
http://www.eec.state.ma.us/docs1/qris/20110330_qris_exemption_qpm.pdf
http://www.eec.state.ma.us/docs1/qris/20110330_qris_exemption_qpm.pdf
14
EMAIL SENT TO PROVIDERS ON NOVEMBER 8, 2012
Dear Provider:
This email gives providers information on the training requirement in specific areas of QRIS standards. EEC
defines training as that which meets the guidelines for Continuing Education Units (CEUs), Competency Education
Credits (CECs), or college coursework. In response to several questions from providers who offer in-house
training, including some scheduled for November 12, 2012 (a day we understand when many trainings are
scheduled because it is a Holiday), this email strives to answer questions specifically about upcoming in-house
training and the type of training provided.
Workshops and trainings that have taken place or will take place prior to December 31, 2012, do not require the
assignment of CEUs if an educator has not already secured them. These workshops and trainings will be
grandfathered in as meeting the training standard. However, effective January 1, 2013, EEC requires that all
training have either CEUs, CECs, or college credits associated with it. The goal is to ensure high quality
training. Training must meet the guidelines for Continuing Education Units (CEUs), Competency Education Credits
(CECs), or college coursework as stated within EEC Professional Development Policy P-EEC-13 for regulations.
EEC accepts CEUs awarded by:
1.
Accredited colleges or universities (See http://www.ope.ed.gov/accreditation/);
2.
Training organizations with the International Association for Continued Education and Training (IACET)
accreditation (See http://www.iacet.org/);
3.
Massachusetts Association for the Education of Young Children (MAEYC) (See http://www.massaeyc.com) ;
4.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) (See http://www.naeyc.org/);
5.
The National Coalition for Education and Cultural Programs (NCECP) (See http://www.ncecp.org/);
EEC accepts CECs issued by Early Intervention at the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
EEC accepts college courses offered by an institution that has been accredited by an accrediting agency or state
approval agency recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education. (To access the database of accredited postsecondary institutions and programs, go to http://ope.ed.gov/accreditation/GetDownloadFile.aspx)
15