UNIVERSITY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE DECEMBER 2011 Overview- Recent Discussions on MUSC Excellence • External Review of the Provost’s Office- Recommendations Pertaining to MUSC Excellence • MUSC Excellence.
Download ReportTranscript UNIVERSITY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE DECEMBER 2011 Overview- Recent Discussions on MUSC Excellence • External Review of the Provost’s Office- Recommendations Pertaining to MUSC Excellence • MUSC Excellence.
UNIVERSITY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE DECEMBER 2011 Overview- Recent Discussions on MUSC Excellence • External Review of the Provost’s Office- Recommendations Pertaining to MUSC Excellence • MUSC Excellence Leadership- Survey Results • Framing MUSC Excellence Within the Context of Other Key MUSC Initiatives External Review Recommendation • The Provost Office Should “Broaden and Amplify the Focus on Strategy” • “Better explain the integration of the MUSC Strategic Plan, MUSC Excellence, Funds Flow so they are not viewed as competing priorities” • “If people can see how they work together there is greater likelihood of overall success” MUSC Excellence Leadership Survey • Benefits • Provided a framework for communicating across the university that had never been present • Excellence has created “a common language” and sense of “community” • Pillars create a sense of balanced goals • Brought a university-wide metric base to help evaluate institutional performance • Provides institutional data to monitor the climate of the university • Enhanced recognition of faculty/staff contributions and satisfaction • Deans believe it has helped MUSC Excellence Leadership Survey • Opportunities • Bringing a MUSC Excellence built for the clinical environment into the academic setting has been challenging in understanding and framing • Better integration of Strategic Plan, Funds Flow, and MUSC Excellence is needed • Improve accountability • Need to have more true Leadership Development in LDI • Need to improve data meaningfulness and validity Conceptual Integration of MUSC Excellence as a University Initiative • Origin of initiatives as we ponder integration • 2008 MUSC Excellence emerged from hospital. MUSC was the first university to transfer. “Branded” as a strong service and customer satisfaction. Many different groups (MUHA, COM, F&A, OCIO, University) • 2008 Funds Flow emerged from the Offices of the Provost and Administration & Finance to address finances in a targeted way. Became University-wide with Committee recommendation • 2010 Strategic Vision emerged from the Office of the President. Expanded through broad based strategic planning teams How Does MUSC Excellence Advance the Institutional Vision? • Ray Greenberg, M.D., Ph.D. Vision “MUSC should be a leading and transformative academic health center” Academic Leadership Retreat- February, 2011 The New Reality • Pre-2008: Growth • Design and Funding of Buildings • Secure Centers of Economic Excellence • Lobby for increased state appropriations • Grow Revenues in Clinical, Research, Tuition • Post-2008: Reorient to a Changed Economy • Loss of State Appropriations • Federal Deficit: Research & Clinical Revenues • Tuition Caps • Rising Expenses • Student Debt Load • Europe!!!! AAMC, November 2011- Focuses on Transformation • AAMC Board Chair Thomas Lawley, M.D.“Either you can let the sky come tumbling down or you can set about the ‘impossible’ task of holding up the sky and making changes that make progress.” What Does “Hold Up the Sky” Mean? Strategy for Institutional Change Data-Based Decision-Making on Resource Allocation Leadership Communication Monitoring Post 2008-MUSC Strategy • MUSC Strategic Plan• Become more entrepreneurial • Promote more innovation • Take advantage of the global economy • Advance interprofessionalism Data-Based Decision Making on Resource Allocation • Funds Flow- Responsibility Centers • Incentive based • Transparency in Funds Flow • Authority Tied to Responsibility • Accountability • Data Rich Leadership • Leadership vs Management • Transactional Leadership vs Transformative Leadership • Stages of Leadership Growth & Development Communication • Communicating institutional shared values • Communicating as a MUSC community Monitoring • As we transform is institutional quality changing for the Positive or Negative- “Institutional Climate”? • Faculty and Staff Satisfaction • Institutional Pass Rates • Student Satisfaction University Excellence Pillar Goals Create an environment that is conducive to high morale and productivity – reinforcing that MUSC is the right place to be! Provide high quality services to students, alumni, patients, families, each other and our community with compassion, respect, dignity and pride. Achieve the highest standards of excellence in education, research, and clinical and community service. Create new and expanding opportunities, emphasizing collaborative partnerships internally and externally, that benefit our research, educational and clinical enterprises. Maintain fiscally sound practices that will sustain our ability to operate and grow in all areas of our strategic mission. 11/6/2015 FY11-12 Pillar Goals University People Service Quality Growth Finance As we continue our pursuits in Excellence – we will be striving to reach or exceed the top 10% in most key areas (some yet unmeasured as indicated below). Once benchmark data are available, we will establish step goals to move us upwards at all times. Faculty made right choice in selecting MUSC at 90% or higher 90% of Staff pleased to be working at MUSC 90% believe the faculty & staff are respectful of one another. Improvement in recognition score from 82% to 85% for 2012 Graduating students believe they made the RIGHT choice in selecting MUSC at 90% or higher or would choose this experience again Develop Baseline - Current students believe they are receiving a high quality education at 90% or higher Each unit to develop a Service Assessment/Evaluation by Jan 2012, or raise existing scores to 90% overall satisfied. Achieve Pass Rate on licensure, credentialing, or board exams of 90% Achieve 90% graduation rate within each program Achieve EValue score of 4.2 (of 5) or higher for ‘students satisfied with faculty eff. as teacher’ Faculty ‘believe they have the tools and resources (infrastructure) to perform high quality, teaching, research and scholarship at 80% or higher Achieve top 50% ranking for total funding of research as compared to ‘peer institutions’ Align each College/Unit strategic plan as appropriate with University strategic plan (Entrepreneurship, Globalization, InterProfessional, Technology/Innovation) by Nov 2011. Develop core metrics for interprofessional behavior and outcomes for faculty, staff, students, and patients by Dec 2011 Colleges/RCs will have sustainability plans fully developed for new ‘Funds Flow’ model by July 1, 2012 Administrative and Support units will have fully developed benchmark data for services they provide by May 2012 MUSC Excellence Integration- One of Three Key Initiatives to Change the Culture • Post 2008- Necessity for Institutional Transformational Change • Strategic Plan • Strategy • Funds Flow • Decision-Making on Resource Allocation • MUSC Excellence • Leadership Development • Communication • Monitoring