Wind Energy Prediction Challenges of Opportunities William P. Mahoney III Branko Kosovic Research Applications Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research November 13, 2012 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use.
Download ReportTranscript Wind Energy Prediction Challenges of Opportunities William P. Mahoney III Branko Kosovic Research Applications Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research November 13, 2012 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use.
Wind Energy Prediction Challenges of Opportunities William P. Mahoney III Branko Kosovic Research Applications Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research November 13, 2012 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of UCAR-NCAR is strictly prohibited Weather Related Wind Industry Issues Financing • Wind energy resource estimates at wind farm sites are over-estimated on average Maintenance Costs • Wind turbines are failing faster than predicted (up to 40% earlier) Variability is Costly • Wind power variability complicates power integration and load balancing across the grid – requires reserves Prediction Errors Costly Extreme Weather Impacts • Wind energy prediction has typical errors of 10-15% (flat terrain) to 15-25% (complex terrain) • Wind turbines are not designed to handle extreme weather conditions (shear, ice, snow, high wind, etc.). More representative weather datasets are needed for turbine design 1 1 NCAR’s Renewable Energy Research Activities 2 2 Overarching Science Challenge • Boundary layer meteorology (0 to 200 m above ground) is not well understood nor is this layer well measured • The wind energy industry greatly under appreciates the complexity of the airflow in this layer • The wind industry has historically assumed less turbulence and more wind with height above the ground Image source: Wind Measure International 3 3 Current Meteorological Shortfalls for Wind Energy • Lack of measurements between 10 and 200 m above ground • Weather models not optimized for wind (or solar) energy prediction • Need improved data assimilation techniques to take advantage of wind farm and other local observations • Dearth of vertical observations offshore • Lack of understanding of complex flows near the Earth’s surface 4 4 Few Observations at Wind Turbine Hub Height Wind profiler radar Surface sensors A lot of critical details are missed between observations! Surface observations alone are not sufficient. Satellite s Satellites 5 5 Representative Winds GE 1.5 MW Wind Turbine 60-80 m 80 meter hub height 77 m blade diameter Assessments & Forecasts Standard surface weather station with a 10 meter high wind sensor. observation 10 m Satellites 6 6 Low-Level Jets of High Wind (U.S. Midwest) Lidar (laser radar) measured wind velocity toward lidar 10 ms-1 ribbon of high speed air Height (km) Distance (km) Courtesy, Robert Banta, NOAA Low-level jet streams can damage wind generators 7 7 Wind Variability at Turbine Height Can be Substantial Courtesy Ned Patton, NCAR 8 8 Xcel Energy Wind Prediction Project Forecast Requirements • 15-30 minute forecasts (predict rapid energy ramps) • 1-3 hour forecasts (anticipate power adjustments) • 24 hour forecasts (energy trading and planning) • 3-5 day forecasts (long term trading & resource planning) 3.4 million customers Annual revenue $11B Xcel Energy needed power forecasts for 55 “electrical connection nodes” representing 94 wind farms with 3283 turbines totaling 4000 MW of power generation capability. But …. The required forecasts need to be for POWER, not wind speed! 9 9 Optimizing Prediction by Blending Technologies Each technology has its own ‘sweet spot’ with respect to prediction skill. 10 Xcel Energy Wind Prediction System Predicting wind energy ramp events using a rapid cycle, highresolution weather model and Doppler radar data. Animation of the Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System (VDRAS) covering eastern Colorado wind farms. Wind vectors and Doppler radar reflectivity are shown. 11 Wind Shear vs. Turbine Efficiency Knowledge of the vertical wind profile is important for wind power conversion Cold Front Wind Ramp Shows several lower atmosphere stability Low-level Jet Stream Wind Ramp (vertical wind shear) intensities More shear = less power SOARS student T. Aguilar (2010) – Texas Tech 12 Xcel Energy Wind Prediction Project NCAR technology decreased Xcel Energy’s wind energy prediction error by ~40%! Xcel Energy Customer Savings 2009 2010: 2011: $5.87M (annualized) $6.26M (additional over 2009) $2.06M (additional over 2010) $14.4M (over first 3 years) Actual power (dots) and 20 hour power prediction for Northern States Power Also: saved > 238,000 tons CO2 (2011) 13 Potential Value of Improved Forecasts Western, eastern, and Electrical Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) wind integration study areas, DOE 2010 Source DOE/NREL 14 Research in Complex Flows Global Regional 4 103 Grid Cell Size [m] 10 107 Domain Size [m] 106 Adopted from Mike Robinson (DOE/NREL) 15 Research in Complex Flows Global Regional Local 4 103 Grid Cell Size [m] 10 107 Domain Size [m] 101 106 104 Adopted from Mike Robinson (DOE/NREL) 16 Research in Complex Flows Global Regional Local Turbine Blade 4 103 Grid Cell Size [m] 10 107 Domain Size [m] 100 101 106 104 103 Adopted from Mike Robinson (DOE/NREL) 17 Research in Complex Flows Global Regional Local Turbine Blade Grid Cell Size [m] Domain Size [m] 104 107 103 106 101 104 100 103 101 Adopted from Mike Robinson (DOE/NREL) 18 Influence of Stability on Boundary Layer Character Horizontal slices of vertical velocity Near neutral Zi/L~-10 Strongly Unstable Zi/L~-100 Atmospheric stability affects flow structures and turbulence in atmospheric boundary layers 19 Complex Flows – Terrain Effects Turbulence Intensity Flow and turbulence exhibit intermittency downwind from the hill 20 Complex Flows – Offshore Wind For offshore applications it is important to capture wind and wave interactions Moving waves Peter Sullivan, NCAR Waves generate their own wind field that persists to hub height 21 Complex Flows – Turbine Arrays Vorticity Magnitude Numerical simulations including effects of operating turbines are aiding us in studying the interaction between flow and wind turbine arrays 22 Complex Flows Turbine Wake Effects Wake effects impact turbine efficiency and reduce lifecycle 23 Fully-Coupled CFD/CSD for Turbine/Platform Interaction with the Atmosphere and Ocean Objective: To create a state-of-the-art High- Performance Computing “Cyber Wind Facility” for the renewable energy industry and researchers. Courtesy Jim Brasseur, Penn State 24 Required Atmospheric Science Research to Support Wind Energy • • • • • • • • • • Need multi-year field experiments (on and off-shore) Boundary layer meteorology (complex flow) Cloud physics & precipitation processes (icing, snow, etc.) Turbulence characteristics and prediction Computational science (improve model efficiency) Land surface condition prediction Ocean dynamics (waves, currents) Aerodynamic studies related to turbine design Multi-scale modeling (global to mm scales) Future climate modeling (effects on wind resources) 25 NCAR’s Wind Energy Partnerships • NCAR started the American Meteorological Society (AMS) Energy Committee • Member of: o o o o o American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) Utility Variable-Generation Integration Group (UVIG) Wind Energy Alliance Center for Research & Education in Wind (CREW) North American Wind Energy Academy • Collaborating with: o o o o o National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) Lawrence Livermore (LLNL) Technical University of Denmark (RISO) NOAA/NWS/ESRL Universities (University of Colorado, Penn State, Texas Tech, Colorado State, U. of Wyoming, etc.) 26 In Closing… Predicting Wind Power's Growth -- an Art That Needs More Science By PETER BEHR of Published: April 28, 2010 “More data, better weather and atmospheric models, and more powerful computer runs are the paths to the next generation of forecasting systems. Public-private partnerships between private forecasting firms and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Center for Atmospheric Research are crucial, industry officials say.” 27 Thank You 28 Copyright 2009 University Corporation for Atmospheric Sampling of Renewable Energy Funding Sources NSF DOE Offshore Wind Penn State (DOE) Xcel Energy Vestas ITRI (Taiwan) NASA NREL (DOE) CREW (CU) DOE Solar Boundary layer meteorology, vertical lidar Model state estimation for BL characterization Full-coupled Cyber Wind Facility Wind energy prediction Analog post-processing techniques Typhoon modeling for turbine design Wind resource assessment Inter-annual variability – wind/solar resources Modeling stochastic variability in wind power Advancements in solar energy prediction 29 Industry Power Curve Source: GE 30 NCAR’s New Solar Energy Partnerships DOE/EERE Award 19 October 2012 3-Year Performance Period Value: $4.5M (Federal) $6.2M (w/cost share) 31