Transcript Policy Development in RIPE & the RIPE NCC Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC Mirjam Kühne EC, Oct.

Policy Development in RIPE
&
the RIPE NCC
Mirjam Kühne
RIPE NCC
1
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct. 1999
Overview
• RIPE
– in the global context
• RIPE NCC
– in the global context
• Policy development
– how can you participate
• IPv4 & IPv6 Allocation Policies
2
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
What is RIPE?
• Reseaux IP Européens (1989)
– collaborative organisation of ISPs
– open to all interested parties
– voluntary participation, no fees
– works by consensus
– encourages face-to-face discussion
– “interest group” for Internet community in ‘Europe’
3
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
RIPE Meeting attendees for 1998
FR
FI BE
CH
AT
IT
US
DK
ES
GR
AE
PL
HU RU
NL
UA
CM
SK
GM
SI
EU
BA
JP
LU
PT
NO
DE
SE
UK
4
Mirjam Kühne
IE
CZ
Total: 669
EC, Oct.1999
Global Context
World-wide Internet
Technical Development & Standards Body
IETF
World-wide Operators Forum
IEPG
EU Operators
RIPE
USA Operators
Asian Operators
NANOG
APRICOT
5
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
What is the RIPE NCC?
• Co-ordination and support services for ISPs
• Not-for-profit association under Dutch law
– formal membership, Executive Board , yearly fee
• 7 years of history
• 1500+ members (mainly ISPs, but open to anyone)
6
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
RIPE NCC Membership
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1992
7
Mirjam Kühne
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
UK
DE
RU
IT
FR
CH
NL
AT
SE
BE
UA
ES
FI
EU
TR
DK
HU
CZ
NO
SK
PL
BG
PT
GR
IE
SI
EC,LV
Oct.1999
JO
Why an NCC ?
• Support for RIPE/ISP community
• Activities need continuity
– Database ...
• Neutrality and impartiality important
– to ensure fair distribution of resources
– neutral ground for ISPs to co-ordinate technical &
administrative issues
8
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
RIPE NCC Activities
• Registration Services
– IPv4 & IPv6 address & AS number allocation
– Reverse delegation
• Co-ordination & Liaison
– RIPE database maintenance
– Technical Projects
• Information Dissemination & Education
9
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Activity Development Process
RIPE Working Groups
– define requirements, suggest activities
RIPE NCC Staff
– produces activity plan & budget
RIPE NCC Executive Board
– submits to membership
RIPE NCC Membership
– approves and sets fees
10
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Global Policy Development
• Developed in open policy meetings
• Implemented by Regional Internet Registries
• Co-ordinated among RIRs
11
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
RIPE NCC in Global Context
Ultimate global numbers authority
IANA/ICANN
Sets policy and criteria for Regional Registries
Regional Registries: Policies and criteria aligned but
differences in local implementation
12
RIPE NCC
ARIN
APNIC
RIPE
ARIN Mtg
APRICOT
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Policy Development in RIPE
• Developed in RIPE LIR-WG
• open-open-open
• Implemented by RIPE NCC
– open; controlled by membership
13
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Policy Development Process
• Policy (changes) can be suggested by
– Members/Local IRs
– RIPE NCC
– Public at large
• Policy must be
– fair to all
– ‘good’ for the Internet
– consistent with global policies
14
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
How Can You Participate
• RIPE Working Groups
– LIR-WG
• Open Mailing Lists
– <[email protected]>
• Public Meetings
– next meeting in Amsterdam February 1999
• RIPE NCC membership
– AGM
15
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
IPv4
Facts & Information
16
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct. 1999
IPv4 Allocation Policies
• RIPE NCC Member
• Initial allocation: /19
• Next allocation based on usage rate
• Support and Training to ensure fair distribution
17
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
IANA Allocations
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
18
192.x.y.z:
1992/1993
193/8:
Sep. 1993
194/8:
Sep. 1993
195/8:
Mar. 1994
62/8:
Apr. 1995
212/8
Jan. 1998
213/8:
May 1999
B’s: 1993 (last assigned from in 1996)
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
80,000,000
60,000,000
Address Space Usage
213/8
212/8
62/8
195/8
194/8
193/8
40,000,000
20,000,000
Q
4/
95
Q
1/
96
Q
2/
96
Q
3/
96
Q
4/
96
Q
1/
97
Q
2/
97
Q
3/
97
Q
4/
97
Q
1/
98
Q
2/
98
Q
3/
98
Q
4/
98
Q
1/
99
Q
2/
99
Q
3/
99
0
19
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Address Space Usage
APNIC
3 5 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
3 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
2 5 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
2 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 5 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
5 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
0
20
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Jun-99
Feb-99
Oct-98
Jun-98
Feb-98
Oct-97
Jun-97
Feb-97
Oct-96
Jun-96
Feb-96
Oct-95
Jun-95
Feb-95
y = 51 6699x - 6E +08
RIPE NCC Allocations
• 1,500 Members
– mainly ISPs
– also Telcos, Gov., Associations, Academic
• Initial allocation: /19
– Next allocation based on usage rate
• Support and Training to ensure fair distribution
• 85 Countries
21
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Service Regions of the
Registries
ARIN
22
Mirjam Kühne
RIPE NCC
APNIC
EC, Oct.1999
1,5 New Members a Day
Aug-99
Jun-99
Apr-99
Feb-99
UK
Germany
Austria
France
Italy
Netherlands
Russia
SaudiArabia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Others
Dec-98
Oct-98
Aug-98
Jun-98
Apr-98
Feb-98
0
23
Mirjam Kühne
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
EC, Oct.1999
RIPE NCC Charging Model
• 3 Categories
– pre-1997: self-determined
– now based on allocations and aging
Small
Medium
Large
Sign-up
24
Mirjam Kühne
2000 (prelim.)
2400
3350
4400
2100
1999
2650
3700
4900
2100
1998
2450
3400
4500
2000
EC, Oct.1999
LIR Charging Model
• RIPE Community agreement
– Service charge
– no per-address charge
• See ‘Charging by Local Internet Registries’
– Authors: RIPE NCC & LIR-WG chair
http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-152.html
25
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
IPv6
Information & Experiences
26
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct. 1999
IPv6 Allocation Policies
Peering with 3  subTLAs
AND either
Plan to provide IPv6 services within 12 months
OR
 40 SLA customers
27
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
IPv6 Allocation Policies
(Bootstrap Phase)
Peering with 3  ASes
AND
Plan to provide IPv6 services within 12 months
AND either
 40 IPv4 customers
OR
6bone experience
28
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
IPv6 Allocations
• Initial Allocation: /35 subTLA
• Entire /29 reserved (aggregatable)
• APNIC:
3 sub-TLAs allocated
• ARIN:
2 subTLAs allocated
• RIPE NCC: 6 subTLAs allocated
29
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
IANA Allocations
• APNIC:
2001:0200::/23
• ARIN:
2001:0400::/23
• RIPE NCC: 2001:0600::/23
30
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Database Object
inet6num:
netname:
descr:
descr:
country:
admin-c:
tech-c:
status:
mnt-by:
changed:
source:
31
Mirjam Kühne
2001:0600::/23
RIPE-NCC
RIPE Network Co-ordination Centre
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NL
NN44-RIPE
MK16-RIPE
ASSIGNED PA
LIR-MNT
[email protected] 19990820
RIPE
EC, Oct.1999
TLA/NLA/SLA Relationship
• NLA & SLA database registration
• Review before next TLA allocation
• No additional charges for IPv6 in 1999/2000
• Part of existing charging scheme in 2001
– review by membership
32
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Open Issues
• Multihoming
– IETF IPng WG
– Current solution: multiple SLAs
• Renumbering
– outside the IP layer
33
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
ASO & ICANN
34
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct. 1999
Global Aspects
• All addresses are global
• Co-ordination among RIRs and IANA
• Dependent on topology
– one backbone?
– Local connection?
• IANA does not allocate addresses directly
35
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Interaction with other
Technologies
• Difference to dynamic dial-up?
– addresses don’t move, user moves
• Co-operation with Telco Operators and ETSI
– started
– continue in the future
36
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
Pointers & References
• RIPE Meetings
http://www.ripe.net/meetings/ripe/index.html
• IPv4 Allocation Policies
http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-185.html
• IPv6 Allocation Policies
http://www.ripe.net/lir/registries/ipv6.html
• Presentation
http://www.ripe.net/meetings/pres/index.html
37
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999
QUESTIONS?
http://www.ripe.net
38
Mirjam Kühne
EC, Oct.1999