Laser Plasma and Laser-Matter Interactions Laboratory Laser ablation plume dynamics and particulate generation M.

Download Report

Transcript Laser Plasma and Laser-Matter Interactions Laboratory Laser ablation plume dynamics and particulate generation M.

Laser Plasma and Laser-Matter Interactions Laboratory
Laser ablation plume dynamics
and particulate generation
M. S. Tillack
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
ECE Departmental Seminar
31 October 2003
Laser-produced plasmas have numerous
applications in science and industry.












Micromachining
Thin film deposition
Cluster production
Nanotube production
Surface modification
Surface cleaning
Elemental analysis
X-ray laser
Photolithography
EUV lithography
Medicine
Inertial fusion energy
Quick Time™ an d a TIFF ( Un compr ess ed ) de co mpr es sor are ne ede d to se e this picture .
However, several problems limit their use.
e.g., workpiece & equipment contamination
are important problems in micromachining
Contaminated surface
After cleaning
http://www.oxfordlasers.com
Polyimide laser ink-jet printer head (courtesy of HP)
Understanding and control of target emissions is
needed in order to develop inertial fusion energy.
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Target explosions yield ~50 MJ
of 0.1-10 MeV ions
Laser-produced plasma is a potential light
source for EUV lithography at 13.4 nm.
Achieving higher efficiency and
lower contamination are key
issues for EUV light sources
Understanding the dynamics, emission characteristics and mechanisms of particulate formation will
enable greater use of lasers in industry.
A wide range of physics is
involved in laser-matter
interactions:









0
Absorption, reflection
Heat transfer
Thermodynamics (phase change)
Plasma breakdown
8 ns
Shock waves (gas)
Stress waves (solid)
Laser-plasma interactions
Gas dynamic expansion
Atomic & molecular processes
Surface absorption
Thermal conduction
Surface melting
Vaporization
Plasma ignition
Explosive phase change
Plasma absorption
Self-regulating heat transfer
Collisional acceleration
Plume splitting
Ambient interpenetration
Rapid cooling
Condensation
Plume deceleration
Plume detachment
Stagnation and collapse
1 s
This seminar surveys several phenomena,
with emphasis on our research at UCSD.
0
Expansion dynamics of
plumes interpenetrating into
1. Ambient gases and
2. Magnetic fields
Surface absorption
Thermal conduction
Surface melting
Vaporization
Plasma ignition
Explosive phase change
8 ns
3. Homogeneous nucleation
and growth of clusters in
the presence of ions
Plasma absorption
Self-regulating heat transfer
Collisional acceleration
Plume splitting
Ambient interpenetration
Rapid cooling
Condensation
Plume deceleration
Plume detachment
Stagnation and collapse
4. Spinodal decomposition
1 s
0.01Torr
0.1Torr
1Torr
1. Experimental studies of the
expansion dynamics of
plumes interpenetrating into
ambient gases
10Torr
100Torr
S. S. Harilal, C. V. Bindhu, M. S. Tillack, F. Najmabadi and A. C.
Gaeris, "Internal Structure and Expansion Dynamics of Laser Ablation
Plumes into Ambient Gases," J. Applied Physics 93, 5 (2003) 2380-2388.
S. S. Harilal, C. V. Bindhu, M. S. Tillack , F. Najmabadi and A. C.
Gaeris, "Plume Splitting and Sharpening in Laser-produced Aluminum
Plasma," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 35 (2002) 2935-2938.
Experimental setup for time-resolved
studies of ablation plume dynamics
Target
: Al, Si
Laser Intensity : 107–5x109 W/cm2
Ambient
: 10-8 – 100 Torr air
Spectra Physics 2-J, 8 ns
Nd:YAG with harmonics
1064, 532, 355, 266 nm
Below 10 mTorr the plume expands freely
P = 10-6 Torr
P = 10-2 Torr
• Laser intensity = 5 GWcm-2, Intensification time = 2 ns
• Each image is obtained from a single laser pulse
• Plume edge maintains a constant velocity (~ 107cm/s)
The plume splits and sharpens at 150 mTorr
• Strong interpenetration of
the laser plasma and the
ambient low density gas
• Observed plume splitting
and sharpening.
• This pressure range falls in
the region of transition
from collisionless to
collisional interaction of the
plume species with the gas
• Enhanced emission from all
species
Instabilities appear at 1.3 Torr
 Plume decelerates
 Instability appears
 Intensity peaks in
slower component
Above 10 Torr the plume remains confined
P = 10 Torr air
P = 100 Torr air
Summary of plume dynamics vs. pressure
Fitting Models:
 Free expansion:
R~t
 Shock Model:
R ~ (Eo/ro)1/5 t2/5
 Drag Model:
R = Ro(1–e-bt)
 Best fit at 150 mTorr
R ~ t0.445
2. Magnetic confinement of
laser-produced plasma
M. S. Tillack, S. S. Harilal, F. Najmabadi and J. O'Shay, "Magnetic
Confinement of an Expanding Laser-Produced Plasma," Inertial
Fusion Science and Applications 2003, Monterey CA, Sept. 2003.
S. S. Harilal, M. S. Tillack, B. O'Shay, C. V. Bindhu, F. Najmabadi,
"Confinement and dynamics of laser-produced plasma expanding
across a transverse magnetic field," Phys Rev. E (accepted).
Magnetic fields can slow down or divert an expanding
high-beta plasma and thermalize directed ion energy
• The plasma “blows a high beta bubble”, which rapidly stalls
•
as the plasma cools
Other effects include enhancement of soft x-ray emission,
plasma instabilities, ion acceleration
R
b
Experiments were performed with NdFeB
permanent magnets
1.5 cm
3 cm
Stagnation length is determined from R-t plot
5 GW/cm2
free expansion
v=6x106 cm/s
The average electron temperature rises in
the vicinity of stagnation
Expansion in an axial magnetic field
exhibits tip sharpening
50 GW/cm2
fast ions:
~107 cm/s
plume front:
4x106 cm/s
Several mechanisms can create aerosol
from short-pulse lasers.
0
• Homogeneous nucleation and
growth from the vapor phase
–
the liquid phase
–
–
Surface melting
Vaporization
Supersaturated vapor, ion or
impurity seeded
• Phase decomposition from
Surface absorption
Thermal conduction
Plasma ignition
Explosive phase change
8 ns
Thermally driven phase
explosion
Pressure driven fracture
Plasma absorption
Self-regulating heat transfer
Collisional acceleration
Plume splitting
Ambient interpenetration
Rapid cooling
Condensation
Plume deceleration
• Hydrodynamic droplet
formation
Plume detachment
Stagnation and collapse
1 s
3. Modeling and experiments on
homogeneous nucleation and
growth of clusters
Shock
Condensed
Particulates
Contact
Surface
M. S. Tillack, D. Blair and S. S. Harilal, "The effect
of ionization on cluster formation in laser ablation
plumes,” Nanotechnology (accepted, Oct. 2003).
Target
Homogeneous nucleation:
Supersaturation drives rapid condensation.
4r3
G 
( L  v )  4r2
3Vm
r*= 2v
nDn
=k
Jh = Z  C*
p
DW
C*= kT exp e- kT k o
Si, n=1020 cm–3, T=2000 K
• High saturation ratios result from rapid cooling due to plume
•
•
expansion and heat transfer to the background gas
Very high nucleation rate and small critical radius result
Reduction in S due to condensation shuts down HNR quickly;
competition between homogeneous and heterogeneous
condensation determines final size and density distribution
Homogeneous nucleation:
Ions enhance the nucleation rate.
• Ion jacketing produces seed sites
• Dielectric constant of vapor
reduces free energy
Si, n=1020 cm–3, T=2000 K, Zeff=0.01
4 3 3
e2
2
2
G 
(r  ra )( L  v )  4 (r  ra )  (1   1 )(r1  ra1 )
3Vm
2
A 1-D multi-physics code was developed to
account for the highly dynamic plume behavior.
Target
: Si
Laser Intensity : 107–109 W cm-2
Ambient
: 500 mTorr He
 Laser absorption
 Thermal response
 Evaporation flux




Transient gasdynamics
Radiation transport
Condensation
Ionization/recombination
absorption Ioe–lx, w/plasma shielding
cond., convection, heat of condensation
M 
pv
p 
 c
j
  e sat 
2 
RTv
RTf 
2-fluid Navier-Stokes
simple Stephan-Boltzmann model
modified Becker-Doring model
modified Saha, 3-body recombination
In addition, plume spectroscopy and posttest examination of witness plates was used.
500 mTorr He
5x107 W/cm2
5x108 W/cm2
5x108 W/cm2
5x109 W/cm2
5x109 W/cm2
As laser intensity increases, ionization
increases but saturation ratio decreases.
Maximum charge state at 50 ns, 1 mm from
Al target, as derived from spectroscopy
and assuming LTE.
Saturation ratio at 1 mm, derived from
spectroscopy and assuming LTE.
Smaller particle sizes confirm the dominant
influence of ionization.
Model prediction of mean cluster size
with the effect of ionization “turned off”
Comparison of experiments and modeling
of mean cluster size vs. laser intensity.
4. Modeling of explosive phase
change (spinodal decomposition)
G
G < 0
2G/v 2 < 0
v
A rapid rise in temperature or drop in pressure
will drive materials into a metastable state.
p = -dU/dv
P(v)
dp/dv=0
spinodal!
Compression
Tension
Ucoh
Pth
U(v)
• Heating faster than the homogeneous vapor nucleation rate can superheat
a liquid beyond equilibrium.
• The metastable liquid has an excess of free energy (2G/v 2 < 0), so it
decomposes rapidly into liquid and vapor phases.
The nucleation rate grows exponentially as the
material approaches its critical temperature.
• As T/Ttc  spinodal, Becker-Döhring theory predicts an avalanche-like
explosive growth of the nucleation rate (by 20-30 orders of magnitude)
This has been observed as a threshold
phenomenon for modest laser fluences
V. Craciun, et al., “Laser-induced explosive
boiling during nanosecond laser ablation of
silicon,” Applied Surface Science 186 (2002)
288-292.
N. M. Bulgakova and A. V. Bulgakov,
“Pulsed laser ablation of solids: transition
from normal vaporization to phase
explosion,” Appl. Phys. A 199-208 (2001).
Example result: depth of material removed
by x-rays in liquid Flibe wall at R=6.5
Energy deposition (J/m 3)
1x10 12
1x10 11
Cohesion energy (total evaporation energy)
1x10 10
0.9 Tcritical
Sensible energy (energy to reach saturation)
1x10 9
1x10 8
1x10 7
Evap.
region
0
Explosive
boiling
region
2-phase region
2.5
4.1
5
10 10.4
Penetration depth (micron)
15
Acknowledgements
• Expansion dynamics
– S. S. Harial, C. V. Bindhu
• Magnetic diversion
– S. S. Harial, Beau O’Shay, Farrokh Najmabadi
• Cluster condensation
– Dustin Blair
• Phase decomposition
– Brian Christensen, Rene Raffray, Mofreh Zaghloul
• Funding
– US Dept. of Energy Office of Science, Defense Programs
– Hewlett Packard, General Atomics