Chapter 13 Social Cognition and Moral Development Theory of Mind Social cognition: ability to understand psychological differences in others Adopt other’s perspectives Theory of.
Download ReportTranscript Chapter 13 Social Cognition and Moral Development Theory of Mind Social cognition: ability to understand psychological differences in others Adopt other’s perspectives Theory of.
Chapter 13 Social Cognition and Moral Development Theory of Mind Social cognition: ability to understand psychological differences in others Adopt other’s perspectives Theory of Mind: False Belief Task Where will Sally look for marble when she returns? (See next slide) Used to predict and explain human behavior before 4 yrs of age “he wanted to. . .” “he intended to. .” Forerunners of Theory of Mind Joint attention Pretend play Imitation Emotional Understanding Nature and Nurture Nature: Theory of mind proved adaptive Functioning in a social group Gain resources and survive Bargaining, conflict resolution, cooperation Nature and Nurture cont. Nurture: Acquiring language and interaction Having siblings, sensitive parents Using mental states to explain behavior “How do you think she felt?” Factors that Influence Theory of Mind Maternal Factors: Maternal-mindedness Mothers talk about own feelings Mothers encourage perspective taking Cultural differences Factors that Influence Theory of Mind Child Factors: Secure attachment Ability to inhibit responses Sensory impairments Maltreatment and ToM Maltreated children were less likely to exhibit false belief understanding than both nonmaltreated children from lower SES and nonmaltreated from middle class. Timing: abuse that occurred during toddler period was related to problems in false belief understanding Type of Abuse: physical abuse because of harsh and unpredictable nature of abuse and uncertainty on part of child regarding expectations of parental behavior Person Perception Psychological Used By traits observed to explain behavior about age 7 or 8 Understanding Through Used personality adolescence to evaluate others Role-Taking Skills The ability to adopt another’s perspective Moving away from egocentrism Essential in thinking about moral issues Beginning of empathy – about age 2 3-6 yr olds – egocentric 8-10 yr olds - own and other’s thoughts 12+ - multiple perspectives Socially isolated older adults decline related to processing speed Perspectives on Moral Development Three components of morality 1) Cognitive: Distinguish right from wrong 2) Behavioral: Act accordingly (Prosocial) 3) Affective: Feel pride and guilt or shame Empathy: a vicarious experience Most are motivated to avoid negative emotions Psychoanalytic Theory Superego: Oedipus conscience Complex Internalization Emotion important in morality Responsive Gender of parental morals parenting important differences unsupported Cognitive-Developmental Theory Piaget’s views Premoral Period: not moral beings Heteronomous Morality: ages 6-10 Believe in rules from parents Consequences/amount of damage Autonomous: at ages10-11 Rules are agreements – not absolutes Intention more important than consequences Kohlberg: Reasoning about Moral Dilemmas Preconventional: egocentric Punishment and obedience Instrumental hedonism Conventional: consideration of others Good boy/girl morality Authority/social order maintaining Postconventional: consideration of all Morality of contract Individual principles of conscience Social Learning Theory Moral Behavior (Bandura) Cognitive self-regulation Anticipation, apply consequences to self Moral No disengagement self condemnation for immoral acts Situational context important Early Moral Training Children internalize moral standards By 18-24 mo. learn through experiences to: 1) Associate negative emotions with violating rules Positive relationship w/parent important 2) Exert self-control when tempted Prosocial behavior by age 2 (and earlier) Punishment must always be accompanied by an explanation Intentions and Rules: Research Piaget: consequences vs. intentions Nelson: Theory 3 yr. olds can judge intention of mind: “I didn’t mean it!” Piaget: questioning rules Turiel: Adult moral rules by age 2 1/2 rules often questioned Raising Moral Children Social Learning Theory R+ moral behavior Punish immoral behavior Model moral behavior Hoffman: Three Approaches to Discipline Love withdrawal: negative effects Power assertion: moral immaturity Induction: related to moral maturity Temperament and Moral Development Fearful, inhibited children Become more fearful when reprimanded Use gentle discipline Fearless, uninhibited children Relationship with parent important “Goodness of fit” What works for one child may not for another The Adolescent Changes in moral reasoning Shift to conventional reasoning Identity includes moral and values Two kinds of antisocial youth 1) Temporary in adolescence 2) Chronic/seriously aggressive Less empathy for distress of others Little remorse for criminal behavior Dodge’s Social Information-Processing Model Individual’s reaction to frustration, anger Not simply social cues Deficient information processing For most, accuracy improves with age Aggressive kids show a bias toward attributing hostile intent/motive Also choose aggressive response Rejection, abuse in upbringing Patterson’s Coercive Family Environments Ineffective parenting in childhood Family members in power struggle Try to control each other coercively Threatening, hitting, even abuse Unpleasant aggressive child Performs poorly in school Disliked by other children Chooses aggressive peer group Nature-Nurture Inherit predisposition for aggression Behavior evokes coercive parenting Parenting strengthens aggression Less opportunity to learn emotional control Exposure to violence in society Lower SES: violence to solve problems Both bullies and victims of bullies more likely to behave violently The Adult Postconventional reasoning is possible Stable through about age 75 Important moral lessons learned in life Spirituality: search for meaning in life Evident among reflective adults Religion: Little change even in old age Advanced Moral Reasoning Necessary cognitive skills Perspective-taking Formal operations Social learning experiences Interactions with parents Discussions with peers Higher education Democracy Kohlberg in Perspective Sequence supported Devalued parental influence not supported Emphasis on peer contributions supported Cultural bias Liberal bias Gender bias not supported