Thermodynamic Modeling of Condensed Salts and Silicates at High Temperatures Bing Liu, Larry L.

Download Report

Transcript Thermodynamic Modeling of Condensed Salts and Silicates at High Temperatures Bing Liu, Larry L.

Thermodynamic Modeling of Condensed
Salts and Silicates at High Temperatures
Bing Liu, Larry L. Baxter, John L. Oscarson, and Reed M. Izatt
Departments of Chemical Engineering and
Chemistry & Biochemistry
Brigham Young University
Ash Deposition
• Thermal converter slagging/fouling strongly
influences design and operation.
• .
Major Inorganic Compounds in Coals
1
4 13
22
55
26
Low Rank
1
12
Fusion temperature of
ash varies with coal
1
24
31
Sulfides
Halides
Hydroxides
Sulfates
Phosphates
Low Melting
16
Oxides and Hydroxides
Oxides
Carbonates
Silicates
High Melting
Mineraloids
3
16
32
28
High Rank
0.5
44
0.5
24
61 8
Measuring phase
equilibria of ash/slags
is difficult and costly
over a wide range of
compositions and
temperatures
Thermodynamic Models
Few ash deposits are in equilibrium,
but equilibrium represents an
important limiting behavior.
Thermodynamic models help describe
• Fusion temperatures
• Deposition rates and mechanisms
• Operating regime
Objectives
•Develop a thermodynamic model that
can be used to correlate or predict
phase behavior of coal-derived slag at
high temperatures.
•Given temperature (or total energy level)
and overall concentrations, calculate
numbers and types of phases and
compositions in each phase at equilibrium
•Provide a robust computer program with
high computational efficiency and ease of
incorporation into other simulation systems
•Validate the model using available
experimental data
Pure Component Properties Are Needed
1800
1600
Tsaplin et al.
Kracek
Kracek
Cracek
Zaitsev et al.
1124 ˚C
1090 ˚C
Na2SiO3
800
Na6Si2O7
1000
Liquid
875 ˚C
Na6Si8O19
1200
Cr
Na2Si2O5
1400
Na4SiO4
Temperature /C
1723 ˚C
Tr
Qu
600
0.32 0.4 0.48 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.8 0.88 0.96
Mole Fraction SiO 2
Na2O-SiO2 phase diagram.
•The melting point of the
mixture may lie several
hundred degrees below
pure component data
•Intermediate compound
properties may not have
been measured or be
available in a standard
thermodynamic database
Extrapolation is Unreliable
250
230
210
Extrapolated results using M&G Equation
Values Used in the Present Research
Cp /J/molK
190
170
150
• The overestimated
heat capacity results
may lead to errors in
the phase diagram
expectations.
130
110
90
70
50
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900 1000 1100 1200
T/K
Comparison of Liquid MgCl2 Heat Capacities
Pure Component Properties (Cont.)
• The FACTsage heat capacity equation form is used to calculate
the heat capacities of pure components
5
c

10
d
6 2
9 3
Cp  a  b 103T 


e

10
T

f

10
T
2
T
T
• Heat capacities at unstable conditions (supercooled/superheated)
can be approximated using thermodynamic identities in the cases
where no literature data exist
trG  tr H  T tr S
 d 2  tr G 
CP  CP,L  CP,S  T 
0
2 
 dT 
• Properties of the intermediate compounds can be optimized based
on other kinds of measured thermodynamic properties (e.g., phase
diagram data)
Liquids: Modified Quasi-chemical Model
• In a binary system composed of
components A and B, the mixing
Gibbs energy change can be
accounted for by a quasi-chemical
reaction:
(A-A) + (B-B) = 2 (A-B)
ΔgAB
•
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
+
BB BB
BB BB
BB BB
The Total Gibbs energy of the
system is:
G  ( xA gAo  xB gBo )  T S config  (nAB / 2)gAB
AB A
G: total Gibbs energy of the solution
T: temperature
AB A
xi: mole fraction of the components
AB A
gio: Gibbs energy of the pure component
ΔSconfig: configurational entropy accounting for mixing effect
nAB: number of AB pairs in the solution
ΔgAB: nonconfigurational gibbs energy change
B
B
B
Modified Quasi-chemical Model (Cont.)
• ΔgAB is the nonconfigurational Gibbs energy change
due to the reaction.
n
g AB   gi xA i
or
i=0
n
n
g AB  g 0   giYA + g jYB j or
i
i=1
j=1
n
n
g AB  g 0   gi xAA + g j xBB j
i
i=1
j=1
• The coefficients (g0, gi, gj) of ΔgAB are optimized using available
thermodynamic data (enthalpies, entropies, phase equilibrium
data etc.)
Binary Salt System Example I
Liquid solution is in equilibrium with pure solids
900
Temperature/C
850
QC Model
Literature
800
750
Liquid
700
Liquid+Solid Na 2SO 4
Liquid+Solid NaCl
650
Solid
600
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
1
Mole fraction of Na 2SO4
T-x phase diagram of the Na2SO4-NaCl system. The dashed line is calculated using
the smoothed data of Dessureault et al.’s
Binary Salt System Example II
Temperature/C
900
800
QC Model
Literature
700
600
500
Liquid+Solid K 2CO 3(b)
Liquid
Liquid+KOH(c)
400
Liquid+Solid K 2CO 3(a)
Solid
300
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
1
Mole fraction of K 2CO 3
T-x phase diagram of the K2CO3-KOH
system. The dashed line is calculated using
the smoothed data of Dessureault et al.
• Liquid solution is in
equilibrium with
pure solids
(different crystals)
• The minimum
melting point of the
system is near the
KOH side resulting
because of the
relatively large
absolute Gibbs
energy value of
K2CO3
Eutectic Point Comparisons
•A eutectic or eutectic mixture is a mixture of two or more
phases at a composition that has the lowest melting point.
•Agreement of the eutectic points (calculated using the model
and literature data) shows the ability of the model to correlate
phase diagrams
System (A−B) Model
xB
Literature
xB
Model Teu ,
˚C
Literature Teu,
˚C
Reference
NaCl-Na2CO3
0.449
0.41−0.47 632.96
632−645
8-10, 12, 13, 15-17
KCl-K2CO3
0.358
0.35−0.38 629.69
623−636
8, 11-13, 15, 16, 18
KCl-K2SO4
0.260
0.23−0.29 690.89
688−694
17, 19, 20
NaCl-Na2SO4
0.481
0.45−0.48 627.80
623−634
13, 17, 19
KOH-K2CO3
0.091
0.09−0.10 362.48
360-367
21-23
Binary Salt System Examples II
Liquid solution is in equilibrium with solid solution
1040
Temperature/C
Temperature/K
1400
1300
Liquid solution (L)
1200
S+L
1100
S+L
1000
Reisman
Reisman
Rolin and Recapet
960
880
Liquid Solution(L)
800
S+L
S+L
720
Solid Solution(S)
Solid solution (S)
900
640
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Mole fraction of K 2S
Liquid-solid solution phase diagram
of the K2S-Na2S system. ● from
Mäkipää and Backman
1
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Mole fraction of Na 2CO 3
Liquid-solid solution phase diagram of
the K2CO3-Na2CO3 system.
1
K2O-SiO2 Phase Diagram
1800
•The equation of Gibbs energy
of the K2Si2O5 is optimized
using the equilibrium T~x data
based on the following
reaction:
K2O(l )  2SiO2 (l )  K2Si2O5 (s)
1600
Kracek et al.
Cr
1400
Liquid
1200
600
0.45
767 C
0.55
K2Si4O9
K2Si2O5
1000
800
1046 C
977 C
K2SiO3
Temperature /C
•Properties of many
intermediate silicates cannot
be measured and must be
optimized based on data in
the regions where there is
no formation of these
compounds.
0.65
729 C
0.75
Tr
770 C
0.85
Mole Fraction SiO 2
 GK2Si2O5 ( s) (T )  uK2O(l ) ( x, T )  2uSiO2 (l ) ( x, T )
Qu
0.95
CaO-SiO2 Phase Diagram
2400
2200
2133 ˚C
2000
Davies
Greig
Tewhey and Hess
Hageman et al.
•The high melting
temperature of pure
CaO accounts for the
high melting point in
CaO-rich systems
•The thermodynamic
properties (e.g., Gibbs
1800
2 Liquids
energy and melting point
values) of the
Cr
1540 ˚C
1600
Tr
intermediate compounds
1400
are obtained by
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 optimizing the phase
Mole Fraction SiO 2
equilibrium data
1895 ˚C
CaSiO3
Ca3Si2O7
Ca2SiO4
Liquid
Ca3SiO5
Temperature /C
2600
AlO1.5-SiO2 Phase Diagram
1950
1858 ˚C
1850
Klug et al.
Aramaki & Roy
Liquid
1750
Al6Si2O13
Temperature /C
2050
1650
1550
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
1
Mole Fraction SiO 2
•More experiments are needed to better correlate the phase
diagrams in the intermediate compounds regions
•The intermediate compound Al6Si2O13 may account for the slow
decrease of the melting point with increasing SiO2 concentrations
FeO-SiO2 Phase Diagram
Allen & Snow
Schuhmann & Ensio
Bowen & Schairer
Greig
1900
1700
1500
1300
2 Liquids
Cr
Liquid
Fe2SiO4
Temperature /C
1928 ˚C
Tr
1205 ˚C
1100
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
1
Mole Fraction SiO 2
The relatively low melting point of Fe2SiO4 implies that the
association between FeO and SiO2 is not as strong as those
between many other metallic oxides (CaO, Al2O3 etc. ) and SiO2
Comparison of melting points of several
associated compounds in silicate systems
Component
Calculated MP (˚C)
Literature MP (˚C)
K2SiO3
977
976-977
K2Si2O5
1046
1045-1046
K2Si4O9
770
769-771
Na2SiO3
1090
1090-1100
Na2Si2O5
875
875
Na4SiO4
1085
1085
Na6Si2O7
1124
1124
Ca3SiO4
-
1800-2149
Ca2SiO4
2133
2130-2145
CaSiO3
1540
1540-1544
Eutectic Points in Silicate Systems
Type
Calculated EP
T (˚C)
x(SiO2)
Literature EP (˚C)
T (˚C)
x(SiO2)
K2SiO3 + K2Si2O5
767
0.569
780-781
0.567
K2Si2O5 + K2Si4O9
729
0.767
743
0.764-0.766
K2Si4O9 + Quartz
770
0.807
770
0.805
Na4SiO4 + Na6Si2O7
1029
0.367
1002
0.361
Na6Si2O7 + Na2SiO3
1015
0.442
1016
0.455
Na2SiO3 + Na4SiO4
839
0.623
841-847
0.614-0.63
Na6Si8O19 + Quartz
804
0.747
794-799
0.742
Ca3SiO5-Ca2SiO4
2023
0.295
2057-2060
0.273-0.30
Ca3Si2O7-CaSiO3
1467
0.422
1450-1460
0.42-0.445
CaSiO3-SiO2
1441
0.615
1441-1444
0.61-0.635
Summary of Current Progress
• A modified quasi-chemical model taken from
the literature has been used to correlate phase
diagrams of molten salts and silicates
• The validity of the model has been tested and
verified using many binary systems
• Optimal modeling parameters of many binary
systems potentially related to the coal ash
components have been found for use in later
multicomponent modeling
• Thermodynamic properties of many pure
compounds have been collected,
approximated, or optimized.