Future technology using full body simulation: What educators and evaluators want to know. 2020 and beyond Richard M.
Download ReportTranscript Future technology using full body simulation: What educators and evaluators want to know. 2020 and beyond Richard M.
Future technology using full body simulation: What educators and evaluators want to know. 2020 and beyond Richard M. Satava, MD FACS Professor of Surgery University of Washington School of Medicine and Program Manager, Advanced Biomedical Technologies Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Special Assistant, Advance Medical Technologies US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command IMMS Futures Panel International Conference Human Machine Interfaces Miami, FL January 16, 200 Classical Education and Examination Opportunity This is a unique moment in history to: • Begin defining Surgical Education with clean slate • Integrate modeling and simulation into the curricula • Establish an international consensus for uniformity Fundamental Principles to Revolutionize Medical Education and Training 1. Assume the student knows everything 2. Person specific image for Electronic Health Record 3. Integrate education and assessment into clinical care 4. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies 5. All education must be criterion (proficiency)-based 1. Assume the student knows everything Battlefield Medical Information Systems – Tactical (BMIS-T) Point-of-care ubiquitous knowledge 2. Person specific image for Electronic Health Record Holomer (HOLOgraphic Medical Electronic Representation) Total body-scan for total simulation From visible human to Virtual Soldier Multi-modal total body scan on every person in 15 seconds Satava March, 2004 2. Person specific image from the Electronic Health Record Vascular Interventional System Trainer – VIST Pre-operative planning Surgical rehearsal Disease-specific training Courtesy Mentice, Inc. Gothenborg, Sweden 2001 2. Person specific image from the Electronic Health Record Pre-operative Planning - AAA Courtesy Medical Media Systems, Inc, Lebanon, NH 2003 6. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies Pre-operative Planning – Facial Deformity Courtesy David Altobelli, Brigham Womens Hospital, Boston MA 2. Person specific image from the Electronic Health Record Virtual Autopsy Wound Tract • Patient and disease (injury) specific lessons • Less than 2% of hospital deaths have autopsy • Statistics from autopsy drive national policies 3 Integrate education and assessment into clinical care Why robotics, imaging and modeling & simulation • Healthcare is the only industry without a computer representation of its “product” •A robot is not a machine . . . it is an information system with arms . . . • A CT scanner is not an imaging system it is an information system with eyes . . . thus • An operating room is an information system with . . . 3 Integrate education and assessment into clinical care Engines of Change Total Integration of Surgical Care Minimally Invasive Surgery Remote Surgery Simulation & Training Pre-operative planning Intra-operative navigation Joel Jensen, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 3 Integrate education and assessment into clinical care Quantified objective assessment “Blue Dragon” passive recording device Correlation of motion analysis with qualitative assessment- OSATS Courtesy Blake Hannaford, University of Washington, Seattle Courtesy Richard Reznick, Toronto, CANADA 3 Integrate education and assessment into clinical care Tissue Properties Measurements a E fz 2a z Mark P. Ottensmeyer, Ph.D. CIMIT, MIT/MGH, Boston 3(1 ) 8a 3 (1 2 ) f z Eslip 2a z Daniel Kalanovic, M.D., Joachim Gross, Ph.D. University of Tübingen, Germany 3 Integrate education and assessment into clinical care Objective Assessment Novice Intermediate Expert Hand motion tracking patterns Ara Darzi, MD. Imperial College, London, 2000 3 Integrate education and assessment into clinical care Train in a Virtual Hospital on virtual patients Virtual Battlefield for Medic (NCAMSC) COL Boyer Operating room of the Future - DARPA 6. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies The 6 Competencies 2001 Consensus by the AGCME & ABMS • Knowledge • Patient Care • Interpersonal and communication skills • Professionalism • Practice-based learning and improvement • Systems-based practice 6. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies Surgical Proficiency Levels of Proficiency • • • • • Novice Competent Proficient Expert Master 6. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies The 5 Conferences • Metrics • Errors • Methodology • Curriculum • Outcomes 6. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies Standardized Curriculum • Anatomy • Steps of the Procedures • Errors TEST • Skills Training • Outcomes 6. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies Validation Methodology • Validities Face Content Construct Concurrent Predictive • Reliabilities Test - retest Inter-rater (IRR) 6. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies Abstract mimics real tasks Laparoscopic hysterectomy Surgical Simulators Courtesy Michael vanLent, ICT, Los Angeles, CA LapSim simulator tasks - abstract & texture mapped Courtesy Andres Hytland, Sugical Science, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2000 Laparoscopic Simulator with tactile feedback Courtesy Murielle Launay, Xitact, Lausanne Switzerland 6. Must be standardized and tied to the 6 competencies Totally integrated curriculum Full System ENT Sinusoscopy Simulator Haptics Lockheed Martin 1999 Paradigm Change Traditional • Halstedian - “See one, do one, teach one” • • • • Determined by patient flow “Conventional” fixed didactic lectures Subjective personal evaluation Specific time and place Next Generation • • • • • Simulation – “Do many, mentored always” Each student every variation at own pace Interactive, updated (web based) lecture Standardized, objective, criterion based evaluation Continuous at point of clinical care The Message Simulators are only a tool, and must be integrated into a comprehensive curriculum that integrates into daily clinical care Only through stringent validation of simulators and their curricula will it be possible to have acceptance by the training and regulation bodies It is not “Build it and they will come …” but “… validate it and they will come. Critical foundation for surgical education Criterion – based training Conclusions It’s all about curriculum Training must be objectively assessed The new paradigm is “criterion-based” Validation is key to acceptance Do Robots Dream ?