Leader… A person with a God-given capacity AND with a God-given responsibility to INFLUENCE a specific group of God’s people toward God’s purposes for the group. J.

Download Report

Transcript Leader… A person with a God-given capacity AND with a God-given responsibility to INFLUENCE a specific group of God’s people toward God’s purposes for the group. J.

Leader…
A person with a God-given
capacity AND with a God-given
responsibility to INFLUENCE a
specific group of God’s people
toward God’s purposes
for the group.
J. Robert Clinton
Leadership is…..
A dynamic process over an extended
period of time in various situations
In which a leader utilizing leadership
resources
And by specific leadership behaviors
Leadership is…..
Influences the thoughts and activity of
followers
Toward accomplishment of person/task
aims
Mutually beneficent for leaders, followers,
and the macro context of which they are a
part
The Study of Leadership
Leadership
Basal Elements
WHAT
Leadership
Influence
Leadership
Values
HOW
WHY
Leadership Basal Element
The Leader
The Follower
The Situation
Leader Life
History
Leader
Follower
Relationship
Immediate
Context
Leader
Traits
Follower
History
Follower
Maturity
Macro
Context
Leadership Influence
Individual/Personal
Means
Corporate/Group
Means
Leader
Behavior
Organizational
Cultural
Consideration
Structure
Structure
Initiation
Structure
Styles
History
Cultural
Leadership
Dynamics
Dynamics
Power/
Authority
Cultural
Power
Leadership Values
Philosophical
Motivation
Efficiency/
Effectiveness
Values
Ethics
Theological
Ultimate
Purpose
Cultural
Values
The Making of a Leader
God develops a leader over a lifetime. That
development is a function of the use of events and
people to impress leadership lessons upon a
leader. Processing is central to the theory. All
leaders can point to critical incident in their lives
where God taught them something very important.
Their growth as leaders is in direct proportion to
the willingness to respond to the processing that
God is doing something in a person’s life.
The Character of
Pentecostal Leadership
Are You A Theologian?
Historical Frameworks
Nicholas Wolterstorff
Yale Divinity School
 Two roles of theology in the Christian
community:

Non-engaged—an ideological component of life of
the religious community that asserts and
elaborates convictions about God

Engaged role—an activity for the well-functioning
of the life of the religious community
“What the world needs is engaged
theology that uses the language the
world speaks.”
 Theology in service of communities of
faith
 Understands
its context socially and
historically
 Mines
 Is
its own rich traditions
both faithful and critical to the needs and
convictions of its faith community.
“Can the church tolerate the separation
of the theoretical task from the concrete
situation of its own existence? Will
theologians be permitted to do their
work in cool absentia while pastors
sweat out their own existence in the
steamy space of the Church in the
world? When theological thinking is
practiced in abstraction from the
Church in ministry, it inevitably
becomes as much unapplied and
irrelevant as pure….
When the theological mind of the
minister is educated primarily through
experience, an ad hoc theology
emerges which owes as much (or
more) to methodological and pragmatic
concerns as to dogma. The task to
work out a theology for ministry begins
properly with the task of identifying the
nature of and place of ministry itself.”
Ray Anderson (Theological Foundations for Ministry)
“Not everyone who says to me, Lord,
Lord, will enter the Kingdom of
heaven, but only he who does the will
of the Father who is in heaven. Many
will say to me on that day, Lord, Lord
did we not prophesy in your name and
in your name drive out demons and
perform many miracles? Then I will
tell them Plainly, I never knew you.
Away from me you evildoers!”
Matthew 7:21-23
 Success is rejected by the Lord as
having no kingdom legitimacy.
 Human efforts don’t even get a pat on
the back.
 We can actually think our usage of
strange fire/might-power/sign ministry
carries with it God’s seal of approval.
Success is viewed as selfauthenticating.
Is such a task the responsibility
of the pastoral leader?
 Matthew 7:21-23 as a case study for the
absence of pastoral theologians
 The What, Why and Who question must
precede the How questions.
Theology is informed
human reflection on the
activity of God in concrete
contexts.
The leadership task of
interpreting redemptive
history is desperately
needed.
Joseph and the Moral
Fabric of a Leader
 Genesis 39:6-9
 Destiny and leadership connected to
clear and fair representation of God.
Samuel and the reminding of
forgetful people about God’s
faithfulness.
 The vacuum created by the
phenomenon of post-modernity
must be a leadership concern.
 I Samuel 7:12
David and leaders who
understood the redemptive
trajectory of God
 Psalm 78: 52-55
 Psalm 70-72
 Psalm 95:6-7
Prophets who hear from God,
speak God’s words and stand
between the eternal and
human landscapes.
 Isaiah 6:1-11
 Jeremiah 11:1-5
 Daniel 10:7-14
Jesus’ alternative to the
“Gentile” paradigms of
leadership.
 Mark 10:35-45
 The task of replicating something
you’ve never seen.
The Early Church Fathers
 Clement of Rome—We must preserve our
Christian body in its entirety.
 Didaché—the manual of Christian morality
and church discipline
 Tertullian—What indeed has Athens to do
with Jerusalem? What concord between the
Academy and the church?
 The Councils that sharpened understanding
and the nature of Christ in response to
heretical doctrine.
St Columba and the Iona
Community
 Centers of missionary initiative that
served Christianity
 Scripture
 Community
 Discipline
 Prayer
 Evangelism
Reason and Aquinas
 The imago dei
 Reason supports faith
 The liberation of the masses to trust in
Christ as a response to contemporary
attempts to categorize people as
simple/ignorant versus learned/landed.
Reformers
 Rigorous minds—Luther and
Wittenberg
 Loosing the chains of oppressive
religion—Zwingli in Zurich
 Community and church experiments–
Calvin
German Pietism
 Community is with warm hearts—
compassionate action—missionary
zeal to counteract inordinate stress on
pure doctrine and formalism
 Nikolaus Zinzendorf and the Herrnhut
community as a living experiment.
 The Moravians as a community of
faith committed to intercessory prayer
and missionary endeavor.
Wesley—A Leader at the
confluence of four rivers
 Biblical primary—Thorsen, p. 127
 Hearts strangely warmed—Thorsen, p. 219
 Men of reason—Thorsen, p 169
 The religion of the primitive church—
Thorsen, p. 151
Winds that Shaped Early
Pentecostal Leaders
to See a New Day Coming
and the Shape of Ministry
Leadership that Ensued
Historical roots that shape North
American Pentecostal roots and
missionary efforts
Wesleyan/Holiness root
 A focus on sanctification and the belief
that God could intersect our lives with
a Spirit empowerment to live a holy
life.
 A supernatural intrusion in our lives to
take charge.
Keswick Root
 A focus on the second coming of Christ in
revelation to an urgency for evangelism.
This urgency required a higher life/deeper
life. This “Baptism” thrust people into a life
of commitment to world evangelism with
accompanying signs and miracles.
Millenarian Root
 The imminent return of Christ as the only
solution to the world’s dilemma. The
message is to radically reorder earthly
priorities. A power reality that creates a
people radically committed to the
redemptive cause of Christ.
Restoration/Primitivist Root
 What is needed is a radical return to the
simplicity of the Book of Acts.
 A separate from the world dynamic exists.
Anti-organization attitudes.
 This is the final chapter of harvest before
the Lord returns.
Multi-Cultural Root
 Participating in a new community that
rejects culture’s assumptions about human
relationships.
 Azusa St. is where the “color-line was
washed away in the Blood.”
The winds converge into an initial
rationale
1.
2.
3.



Baptism of the Spirit as an empowerment for service
(Acts 1:8)
A keen hope in the soon return of Christ
(1 Thess. 4:16)
Christ’s command to evangelize the world
(Mt. 28:19-20)
“Over and over messages were given in the Spirit that the
time would not be long and what was done must be done
quickly.” J. Roswell Flower
“The Pentecostal commission is to witness, witness,
WITNESS!” J. Roswell Flower
Commitment to the “greatest evangelism the world has ever
seen.” General Council – Fall 1914 –
 “Over and over messages were given
in the Spirit that the time would not be
long and what was done must be
done quickly.” J. Roswell Flower
 “The Pentecostal commission is to
witness, witness, WITNESS!” J. Roswell
Flower
 Commitment to the “greatest
evangelism the world has ever seen.”
General Council—Fall 1914
Revealing words of pioneers
 “When we go forth to preach the Full
Gospel, are we going to expect an
experience like that of denomination and
missionaries or shall we look for signs to
follow?” Alice Luce
 “Organization will kill the work, because no
religious awakening has ever been able to
retain its spiritual life and power after man
has organized it and gotten it under
control.” William Durham
The Nature of Practical
Theology
The world of the academy has
created “handwerkslehre” which is
little more than a trade school for
church workers AND theology that is
connected to biblical and systematic
theology with no attention to the
context.



Practical theology has a
hermeneutical nature—
interpretive
It takes seriously the
contemporary reality—empirical
data
It takes authoritatively Scriptural
principles—the Bible
Practical theology—critical
reflection on the actions of the
church in the light of the Gospel
and Christian tradition and critical
dialogue with secular sources of
knowledge with a view to making
the ministry of the Church most
faithful to the continuing ministry
of Jesus Christ in the world. (Ray
Anderson)
“The reflective process by which
the church pursues its efforts to
articulate the theological
grounds of practical living in a
variety of areas of life. (Don Browning)
The Pastoral Cycle
Experience
Response
Situational Analysis
of Theology
Situational
Analysis
Theological
Analysis
Theology for Ministry

The task of working out a theology
for ministry begins properly with the
task of identifying the nature and
place of ministry itself taking the
Bible authoritatively and the context
seriously.
Nature of Ministry
Ministry precedes and
produces theology, not the
reverse.
 All ministry is God’s ministry

• Every act of revelation is a
ministry of reconciliation
Nature of Ministry (cont.)


The act of God is the
hermeneutical horizon for
the being of God.
The Incarnation signals
that every ministry activity
has theological objectivity
in and of itself.
Nature of Ministry (cont.)


The act of God is the
hermeneutical horizon for the
being of God.
The Incarnation signals that
every ministry activity has
theological objectivity in and of
itself
Assumptions in
Theological Reflection

Making sense of this mess? How?

God’s Word is authoritative
• It reveals God’s character and His mission

The context must be taken seriously
• It is legitimate because it is the place that
God revealed Himself most clearly in Jesus
Christ

That revelation has eternal intent-reconciliation
Assumptions in
Theological Reflection (cont.)

Ministry must be an act of God to be
legitimate
• All ministry is God's ministry
• It cannot be taken on a life/purpose of its
own

The mission of God comes most clear in
Jesus Christ and its continuation is
guaranteed by Pentecost
Assumptions in
Theological Reflection (cont.)

The ongoing ministry of Jesus
Christ exemplifies God’s
purposes
• That ministry (it’s purpose,
power/pattern/character) is the
standard we are co-missioned to
participate in
What has God done?


What is God doing?
VISION
DISCERN
II Cor. 5:17-20
Capacity to
acknowledge the
significance of Christ
in the world
To make sense of life
John 5:17; Acts 1:8; 2:4


What is my
purpose?
The process of
affirming the Christ
of Scriptures at
work in our local
contexts
Agent of
Transformation
What is the
source of my
power?
Theology for Ministry

Takes Scriptures authoritatively

Views the context seriously



Affirms that God is at work in ministry
contexts
Acknowledges that orthodox doctrinal
conceptualizations do not guarantee
ministry effectiveness or orthodoxy
That ministry has theological objectivity in
and of itself
Theology for Ministry (cont.)

John 1:12
• Revealer of God and His mission
• Jesus legitimates the context with
His presence
• It is worthwhile; it counts.
Theological Reflection
Theological Reflection, Spirituality
and Church Leadership
Theological
Reflection

What is God up to?

Reconciling world

Gives church reason for being
 Discernment
 Integration
 Credibility
Spirituality
Church
Leadership
 Process the identity and fulfill
God-given vision
 Sum of human experiences in gifted
relationship with living God
 Wholistic people
 Being real before the Lord
 Theology is action-hear and see
the Word of God. Process the
identity and fulfill God-given
vision
 Theology is action-hear and see
the Word of God.
 Prophet/Priest/O.L
Reflection Cycle
Descriptive
Statement
Affective
Expression
Evaluation
Action Steps
MINISTRY
REFLECTION
CYCLE
Informed
Understanding
Discernment
Ministry Event
Priestly
Role
Prophetic
Role
MINISTRY
EVENT
Organizational
Role
Three Questions
• Discernment
– How is the Christ of Scripture present as
the Christ in this ministry event?
• Integration
– Are you proclaiming and practicing the
Word in order to touch human need and
be touched with compassion for the
human need?
• Credibility
– Will your action make Christ worthy of
belief and evident in the ministry event?
Steps in the Discernment Process
1. List all of your options in this ministry
event
2. Pray for indifference to all options but the
will of God
3. How has the over-arching purpose/goal in
the event changed?
4. Write down how your understanding of
God’s ministry and the mission of the
church relate to the ministry event.
5. Write down how ministry roles—priest,
prophet, organizational leader—relate to
the ministry event.
Discernment
A 21st Century Necessity for
Pentecostal Leaders
Can the church tolerate the separation of the theoretical task
from the concrete situation of its own existence? Will
theologians be permitted to do their work in cool absentia while
pastors sweat out their own existence in the steamy space of
the Church in the world? When theological thinking is
practiced in abstraction from the Church in ministry, it
inevitably becomes as much unapplied and irrelevant as pure.
When the theological mind of the minister is educated primarily
through experience, an ad hoc theology emerges which owes
as much (or more) to methodological and pragmatic concerns
as to dogma. The task to work out a theology for ministry
begins properly with the task of identifying the nature of and
place of ministry itself.
Ray Anderson (Theological Foundations for Ministry)
The Achilles Heel of Pentecostals
Pragmatism
• Leviticus 10:1 – “Strange fire”
• “Aaron’s sons Nadab & Abihu took
their censers, put fire in them and
added incense; and they offered
unauthorized fire before the Lord,
contrary to His command.”
• A divine task attempted with
reliance on human design alone.
“Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit,”
says the Lord Almighty.
Zechariah 4:6
• Might – human resources
• Power – human resoluteness
• Spirit – divine initiative and power for God’s
eternal purposes
• The temptation to offer our resources to the
service of God believing that they are an
adequate substitute for God’s eternal resource.
“Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord,
will enter the Kingdom of heaven, but only
he who does the will of the Father who is in
heaven. Many will say to me on that day,
Lord, Lord did we not prophesy in your
name and in your name drive out demons
and perform many miracles? Then I will
tell them Plainly, I never knew you. Away
from me you evildoers!”
Matthew 7:21-23
• Success is rejected by the Lord as having
no kingdom legitimacy.
• Human efforts don’t even get a pat on the
back.
• We can actually think our usage of
strange fire/might-power/sign ministry
carries with it God’s seal of approval.
Success is viewed as self-authenticating.
So What?
• How do we counteract
bifurcation?
• How do we resist pragmatism?
• How do we challenge our
culture’s immunity to the
Gospel?
Biblical Clues
• God is at work! (John 5:17)
• God continues to empower His
redemptive mission (Acts 1:6-8)
• Pentecost is the guarantee that the
Jesus of the Gospels is the Jesus
who continues His ministry
empowered by the Holy Spirit. (Acts
2:22-24)
• Our ministry is the continuing
ministry of Christ working through
us by the presence and power of
the Spirit of Christ. (II Cor.5:20)
Discernment of Ministry
• Ministry action as “poiesis”.
• An action that produces a result.
• The end product of the action completes the
act regardless of what the future of the
product may be i.e. a ministry action can be
viewed as effective simply because it added
more people or people were supportive
(fiscally) or people were “blessed,” or it most
effectively facilitated a program’s success.
• Ministry action as praxis-telos (discernment
of ultimate purpose)
• A ministry action that includes the ultimate
purpose of that action as part of the action.
– No ministry action, program or ministry structure
is incidental.
– It either reveals the redemptive purpose of
Jesus or it has no contribution to make to God’s
eternal concerns (Mt. 7:21-23).
Discernment as an act
of Church Leadership
is the minimal
expectation for our
21st century church
leader (Acts 2:11-21)
• Discernment – spiritual maturity to know the
difference between works of human effort and the
continuing ministry of Jesus empowered by the
Spirit.
• Discernment assumes the present tense of Jesus
redemptive ministry.
• Discernment assumes that Christ’s Kingdom rule
extends over all human structures and efforts.
• Discernment strives to “see” the presence of Jesus
in all ministry actions & structures. (Not as an act
of piety, but as a biblical necessity).
Discerning true ministry requires
• A connectedness to the life of Jesus
(John 15)
• An affirmation that holiness and
ethics are never mutually exclusive
(II Cor. 5:20)
• A willingness to exegete ministry
contexts with the same rigor we
exegete biblical texts (Mt. 7:21-23)
• A commitment to evaluating
ministry methodology by whether or
not it facilitates Jesus continuing
redemptive ministry.