Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills Vickie Mohnacky April 19, 2011 Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills Today’s Objectives • To identify personal, social and academic student outcomes.

Download Report

Transcript Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills Vickie Mohnacky April 19, 2011 Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills Today’s Objectives • To identify personal, social and academic student outcomes.

Assessing Higher Order
Thinking Skills
Vickie Mohnacky
April 19, 2011
Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills
Today’s Objectives
• To identify personal, social and
academic student outcomes in the
PreK-Grade 12 Programming
Standards
• To align student outcomes with
different types of assessments
What do you want your
students to learn as a result of
gifted education?
• http://www.twiddla.com/528716
What do I value the most? (As a
teacher – as a human being)
What do we value most?
• Following directions?
• Timeliness?
• Speed?
• Accuracy?
• Knowledge of content?
Test #1
Following Directions
LastName: _________________ 1stName:_____
Period: ___
__
Date:
_________
_________________________________________________________________________________
INSTRUCTIONS Read very carefully. Read over and understand this entire paper before
doing any of it. You may ask for clarifications.
1.
Stand up from your chair and stand behind it.
this line.
Stay that way until a teacher initials
2.
Sit down on your chair, facing its desk top.
3.
Count the number of students in the room and write the number here ____.
4.
Put this paper on top of your head and leave it there until the teacher initials this line.
5.
On the line below, write in the next two numbers in the series of numbers.
1, 3, 5, 7,
6.
At the bottom of the paper, write and solve this math problem: 1/2 + 3/8 = ?
7.
How many male humans in this room? ____.
8.
In the blank space below question 6, draw a stick-figure of a person.
9.
Add up the number of teachers plus the number of female students in this room.
Write your answer here
.
10.
Sit on your chair with your legs to the side, and the right side of your body towards
the your desk’s top.
Stay that way until a teacher initials this line.
INSTRUCTIONS Do not do any of the numbered questions. Instead, fill in the blanks at
the top of the paper (just below the title). Next, turn your paper over. Sit and watch the
fun. If a student asks you why you are not doing it, just say “I don’t want to look foolish.”
What do we value most?
Complex thinking
Originality
Research
Understanding systems
Seeing connections
Self Knowledge
Perspective
Abstract Concepts
Leadership
Civic Responsibility
Empathy
How will we use the
information?
Teachers’ responses:
How will we use the
information?
Grade?
Class rank?
Determine entrance to program?
Embarrass the student?
Punishment?
Predict success?
Determine coursework?
Measure growth/progress in
learning?
Plan instruction?
Assessment Uses
• Determines what the student
Pre-assessment already knows;
• Determines readiness
Formative
Assessments
Benchmark –
Summative
Assessments
• A process during learning
• As the learning is forming
• An event after learning
• Sums up learning
Formative Assessment
An assessment FOR learning. Occurs while
learning is forming.
Not high stakes/Not for accountability.
Used to adjust instruction/ improve student learning.
Not for report card grades.
Examples:
• Teacher informal questioning
• Warm-ups
• Homework
• K-W-L Chart
Benchmark/Interim Assessment
An assessment OF learning – Interim points
Not high stakes.
Examples
• End of chapter tests
 Acuity http://wvde.state.wv.us/oaa/acuity.php
 DIBELS
 Benchmark testing
Benchmark/Interim Assessment
An assessment OF learning – Interim points
Not high stakes.
Used to adjust overall curriculum, programming
More Examples:
• Attitude scales
• Interest Inventories
• Established rubrics for class product and performances
• Critical thinking tests/checklists (Cornell, WatsonGlaser, Test of Critical Thinking)
• AP/IB course taking and performance
Summative Assessment
An assessment OF learning; Sums up;
Occurs at set points
High stakes.
Reporting and accountability
Used to evaluate the overall effects of programming
Examples
• State Standardized Test (WESTEST 2)
•NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Perf.)
•PISA (Program of International Student Assessment
• Act Explore/ACT/SAT
Difference in Formative and
Summative Assessments?
How they are
used
Level of
student
involvement
What are the ultimate student
outcomes?
Critical
Consumers
Responsible
Producers
Brian Housand
What is the ultimate outcome?
Solve
Houston, we have a problem
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p
bBS8sHrDgA&NR=1
The point is that we
have to be clear in our
objectives before we can
differentiate instruction
and properly assess our
students’ attainment of
those objectives.”
Rick Wormeli 2006
Fair Isn’t Always
Equal
Look at Your Data
• What does it measure?
• Will it give you the information
you need?
2010 Gifted Education Programming
Standards
Standards Focus on Student Outcomes
Students identified with gifts and
talents demonstrate important learning
progress as a result of programming
and services (Assessment Criterion 2.5)
Learning and Development Student
Outcomes
1.1 – 1.3 Self-Understanding
• Demonstrate self-knowledge of interests,
strengths, identities and needs.
• Possess developmentally appropriate
understanding of how they learn and grow
and recognize the influences of their beliefs,
traditions and values on their learning and
behavior
• Demonstrate an understanding and respect
for similarities and differences between
themselves and their peer group and others
in the general population.
Learning and Development Student
Outcomes
1.4 – 1.5 Awareness of Needs
• Access resources from community to
support cognitive and affective needs.
• Receive support from family and
communities who understand similarities
and differences with respect to the
development and characteristics of
advanced and typical learners.
Learning and Development Student
Outcomes
1.6 – 1.8 Cognitive and Affective Growth
• Benefit from meaningful and
challenging learning activities.
• Recognize preferred approaches to
learning and expand their repertoire.
• Identify future career goals that match
their talents and abilities and resources
needed to meet goals.
Curriculum Planning and Instruction
Student Outcomes
2.4 -2.5 Assessment
• Demonstrate advanced and complex
learning as a result of using multiple,
appropriate and ongoing assessments
• Demonstrate important learning
progress as a result of programming and
services.
Curriculum Planning and Instruction
Student Outcomes
3.1 Curriculum Planning
• Demonstrate growth commensurate
with aptitude.
Curriculum Planning and Instruction
Student Outcomes
3.2 – 3.3 Talent Development
• Become more competent in multiple
talent areas and across dimensions of
learning.
• Develop their abilities in their domain of
talent and/or area of interest.
Curriculum Planning and Instruction
Student Outcomes
3.4 - 3.5 Instructional Strategies
• Become independent investigators.
• Develop knowledge and skills for living
and being productive in a multicultural,
diverse and global society.
Curriculum Planning and Instruction
Student Outcomes
3.6 Resources
• Benefit from programming that provides
a variety of high quality resources and
materials.
Learning Environments
Student Outcomes
4.1 Personal Competence
• Demonstrate growth in personal
competence and dispositions for
academic and creative productivity (selfawareness, self-advocacy, self-efficacy,
confidence, motivation, resilience,
independence, curiosity, risk taking).
Learning Environments
Student Outcomes
4.2 – 4.3 Social Competence - Leadership
• Develop social competence manifested
in positive peer relationships and social
interactions.
• Demonstrate personal and social
responsibility and leadership skills.
Learning Environments
Student Outcomes
4.4 Cultural Competence
• Value their own and other’s language,
heritage, and circumstance.
• Possess skills in communicating, teaming
and collaborating with diverse
individuals and across diverse groups.
• Use positive strategies to address social
issues, including discrimination and
stereotyping.
Learning Environments
Student Outcomes
4.5 Communication Competence
• Develop competence in interpersonal
and technical communication skills.
• Demonstrate advanced oral and written
skills, balanced biliteracy or multiliteracy,
and creative expression.
• Display fluency and technologies that
support effective communication.
• Specify clearly and exactly
what it is you want to
assess
• Design questions and
tasks that require
students to demonstrate
this skill or knowledge
Understanding By Design (UBD)
1. Identify desired results (what
the student will know)
2. Determine acceptable evidence
(how will the student
demonstrate knowledge)
3. Plan instruction; Implement
the design
“I began by seeing assessment
as judging performance, then
as informing teaching, and
finally as informing learning.”
• Carol Ann Tomlinson
Types of Assessment
• Standard • Selected Response (Multiple Choice)
• Constructed Response (Short Answer)
• Fill in the Blank
• True/False
• Performance-based or Product• Rubrics
• Rating scales
• Checklists
High School Entrance Exam
– 1928
http://wvde.state.wv.us/1928/
Standardized – Large Scale
•Mass produced
•Mass graded
Balanced Assessment System
•Content – Knowledge
•Reasoning
•Performance Skill
•Product
Standard/Objective:
Type:
 Knowledge
 Reasoning
 Performance Skill
 Product
Learning Targets
What are the knowledge, reasoning, skill or product targets underpinning the standard/objective?
Knowledge Targets
What
knowledge
would
students
need to
master this
skill?
Reasoning Targets
Performance Skill
Targets
What reasoning
proficiencies (if
any) would
students need to
master this skill?
What
performance
skills (if any)
would students
need to practice
to master this
skill?
Product Targets
What products (if
any) would
students need to
practice creating
to master this
skill?
Example from real life:
Drive with skill.
Type:  Knowledge
 Reasoning
 Skill
 Product
Learning Targets
What are the knowledge, reasoning, skill or product targets underpinning the standard/objective?
Knowledge Targets
Reasoning Targets
•Know the law
•Understand informal
rules of the road
•Analyze road conditions,
vehicle performance, and other
driver’s actions
•Understand what
different parts of the car
do
•Read signs and
understand what they
mean
•Understand what
“creating a danger”
means
•Understand what
“creating a hazard”
means
•Compare/contrast this
information with knowledge and
past experience
•Other?
•Synthesize information and
evaluate options to make
decisions on what to do next
•Evaluate “Am I safe?” and
synthesize information to take
action if needed.
Performance Skill
Targets
•Driving actions such
as: steering, shifting,
parallel parking,
looking, signaling,
backing up, braking,
accelerating, etc.
•Fluidity/automaticity
in performance driving
actions.
•Other?
•Other?
Product Targets
None
Since the ultimate
type of target is a
performance skill,
there are no
embedded product
targets
Standard/Objective:
SS.O.06.05.04: Interpret quotes of famous Americans from
various periods of history
Type:
 Knowledge
 Reasoning
 Performance Skill
 Product
Learning Targets
What are the knowledge, reasoning, skill or product targets underpinning the standard/objective?
Knowledge Targets
What
knowledge
would
students
need to
master this
standard?
Reasoning Targets
What reasoning
proficiencies
would students
need to master
this standard?
Performance Skill
Targets
None?
Product Targets
None?
Standard/Objective:
SC.O.7.1.11: Construct . . . charts, graphs and tables for various
purposes . . .
Type:
 Knowledge
 Reasoning
 Performance Skill
 Product
Learning Targets
What are the knowledge, reasoning, skill or product targets underpinning the standard or benchmark?
Knowledge Targets
What
knowledge
would
students
need to
master this
standard?
Reasoning Targets
What reasoning
proficiencies
would students
need to master
this standard?
Performance Skill
Targets
Product Targets
What
performance
skills would
students need to
practice to
master this
standard?
What products
would students
need to practice
creating to
master this
standard?
Informal Questioning
Concept Questions •Why do we care about this? Why are we studying
this?
•Open ended
•Broad, over-arching, outcome oriented questions
•Will motivate students and target higher-order
thinking . What is the big concept you are trying to
uncover? Do the standards have any “big concept”
words?
Content Questions –
•What are the facts? What are the procedures?
• Closed ended.
• Will help strengthen and develop students’
understanding of the larger questions.
Informal Questioning
Concepts:
Conflict – How can conflict be resolved?
(How could this particular conflict have been
resolved?)
Change - How can we cope with change?
Friendship – What does it mean to be a
friend?
Freedom (of speech) – Is pure freedom of
speech desirable in today’s world? Why or
why not?
http://www.esldiscussions.com/index.html Questions Resource
Teachers who do not specifically
plan classroom discussion
questions ahead of time to tap
particular higher-order thinking
skills, but rather ask
extemporaneous questions “on
their feet,” are likely to ask recall
questions.
Susan M. Brookhart, 2010
Checklists
Checklist of items - the least complex form of assessment.
Yes or No – Is it present or not? There is no value attached
to the performance. All elements weighted the same.

Skill
On-task throughout time period
Participates in class discussions
Collaborates with other students
Score
To determine a score, the total number of checked items or the
percentage of total possible.
No quality is attached unless specified in the item. Example, “three
paragraphs required” or “neatly” or “500 words.”
Meaning is then attached to the score. For example, what is the
minimum score that would be considered proficient?
Checklists
Example of basic speech skills:

The student:
Maintains eye contact with the audience
Speaks loudly enough to be heard in all parts of the room
Enunciates clearly
Stands up straight (does not shift from foot to foot)
Does not go over the allotted time
Has notes
Uses notes sparingly
Score
Rating Scales
Graphic rating scale on a continuum –
example :
Never
Seldom
•Turns in lessons on time
•Uses correct capitalization
•Completes projects
Sometimes
Usually
Always
Rating Scales
Numerical rating scale – example : 1 to 10
with 10 being the highest
Performance
Rating
Time on task
Participation in class discussion
Developing a plan/Setting goals
Perseverance during project
Total:
Rating Scales
Numerical rating scale with descriptions example:
1 = typical for grade/age
2 = above average for
grade/age
3. Quite advanced for grade/age
4 = Remarkable for grade/age
(1 in 50)
Learns quickly
Shows power of concentration
Enjoys “adult” conversations
Has many and/or intense interests
Asks many questions
Invents, creates
Total:
Rating
Rubrics
A quality is attached to each skill.
Start with the skill you want to assess.
Example: Does the student reason inductively from the
examples to arrive at a clear, accurate description of physical
and chemical changes (example from book)?
Completely and clearly – Response
give clear evidence of reasoning
from the examples.
Partially – Response is accurate, but
reasoning from examples isn’t clear
or is only partial.
No – Response does not
demonstrate reasonable
conclusions from the examples.
Rubrics
A quality is attached to each skill. Very generalized
example of SCALE: Scale refers to numerical or word
ratings.
5
4
• Exceptional • Above
or
Mastery
Distinguished
3
2
1
• Proficient or
Mastery
• Below
Mastery or
Proficient
• Limited or
Novice
Scoring Performance Assessments:
Scoring is not always simple and straightforward.
Students generate their own responses.
Rubrics
Another example. Very generalized example of
Portfolio (Paulson & Paulson, 1996)
Developing
Competent
Proficient
• Preparation
• Organization of
the portfolio
Rubrics
•may have holistic areas or specific dimensions.
•may be used for self-monitoring and self-assessment
•may be used in authentic contexts
•may be used formatively, summatively or as interim
assessments
Rubrics
A quality is attached to each skill. More descriptive
example of Portfolio (Paulson & Paulson, 1996)
Developing
Competent
Proficient
• Reflection
• Does not
accurately self
assess
strengths and
weaknesses
Accurately self
assesses
strengths and
weaknesses
Focuses on
what and how
the knowledge
or skill was
learned
• Goal setting
• Goals vague;
takes no
responsibility
for planning
work
Accepts
responsibility/
describes
progress toward
goals
Identifies future
goals that link
to strengths and
weaknesses
Rubrics
Define the highest performance level first.
A three-level rubric is common, but five levels allow for
some “gray areas.”
Skill
Criteria
•Accuracy of
Information
100% accurate
information
•Craftsmanship
Well organized,
logical/ clear
(strong word
choices, good
sentence variety,
powerful images)
•Reasoning Skills
•Reasons are
relevant and to
the point the
writer is making.
Justifications
Criteria
Criteria
Inaccurate
information
4
3
2
1
Fluency
I can think of
many ideas.
I can think of
some ideas
If I get some
I have a hard
help, I can think time thinking
of ideas
of ideas
Flexibility
I notice what is
surprising and
unusual
I notice
unusual
things
around me
When someone I hardly ever
reminds me,
notice
notice
unusual
things
Evaluation
I know several
ways of
deciding
I can tell
which ideas
are worth
working on
With help, I can I cannot tell
tell which ideas which ideas
worthwhile
are
worthwhile
Risk-taking
I like to try new
ideas
I try new
ideas
Sometimes I try I do not try
new ideas
new ideas
Seeking
Challenges
Goal setting
(etc.)
Goal setting
Goal setting
(etc.)
I do not set
goals
Elaboration
When I have
I can usually
good idea, I add add details to
details to make make better
great
Sometimes, I
can think of
way to make
better
I do not know
how to make
better
Score
Criteria
Exemplary (4-5)
Good
(2-3)
Needs
Improvement
(0-1)
Initial Questions
Questions are
probing and help
clarify facts
All questions may not
be relevant
Few or no questions
formulated
Understanding the
problem
Clearly defines the
problem
Statement has some
vagueness or missing
information
Problem defined
incorrectly
Seeking
information
Identifies several
sources of
information
Relies on few sources
Not clear as to what
is needed
Risk-taking
I try new ideas
Sometimes I try new
ideas
I do not try new
ideas
Integration of
knowledge
Effectively applies
previous
knowledge
Applies limited
amount of prior
knowledge
Unable to connect
previous knowledge
General Rubric for Critical Thinking Involving Judgment
Criteria
2
1
0
Thesis (judgment
of credibility,
identification of
assumption or
persuasive tactic,
etc.)
Thesis is clear, is
complete, and
answers the
question posed by
the problem or
task.
Thesis is clear and at
least partially answers
the question posed by
the problem or task.
Thesis is not clear or
does not answer the
question posed by
the problem or task.
Evidence
Evidence is
accurate, relevant
and complete.
Evidence is mostly
clear, relevant and
complete.
Evidence is not
clear, relevant or
complete.
Reasoning and
clarity
The way in which
the evidence
supports the thesis
is clear, logical and
well explained.
The way in which the
evidence supports the
thesis is mostly clear
and logical. Some
explanation is given.
The way in which
the evidence
supports the thesis
is not clear, is
illogical or is not
explained.
The Crow and the Pitcher
A crow, dying of thirst, came upon a
pitcher which had once been full of water. When
the crow put his beak into the mouth of the
pitcher, he found that only very little water was
left in it, and he could not reach far enough
down to get at it. He tried and tried, but at last
had to give up in despair.
Then a thought came to him. He took a
pebble and dropped it into the pitcher. Then he
took another pebble and dropped it into the
pitcher. Then he took another pebble and
dropped it into the pitcher. At last he saw the
water rising toward him, and after casting a few
more pebbles into the pitcher, he was able to
drink and save his life.
Consequences and Implications
A
3
 What would have happened if the crow had done the following:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Kept putting his beak in the bottle?
Flown away?
Broken the bottle?
Waited for rain?
A
2
 What caused the water to reach the crow? What overall effect
did it have on the crow?
Sequencing
 What steps did the crow use to get water? Outline them below
A
1
in order:
1. _________________
2. _________________
3. _________________
4. _________________
The Crow and the Pitcher
Cause and Effect
Main Idea/Theme
What main idea(s) did you get from this story?
Inference
C
2
 What made the crow successful in getting a drink of water? Why
did his plan work?
Characterization
C
1
 What are the crow’s most important qualities? What other
characters have you read about that show similar life qualities?
How were their situations similar or different from the crow’s
situation?
The Crow and the Pitcher
C
3
Assessment/Response Form
A3 B3
C3 D3
Circle One:
A2 B2
C2 D2
Circle One:
A1 B1
C1 D1
Circle One:
Main Idea
Crows get thirsty. Crows are smart. The crow kept
putting pebbles in the water until it could drink. I didn’t
even know that.
Student Score: 0 1 2
Teacher Score: 0 1 2
Inference
The crow was successful because when you put the
pebbles in the water, the water came up. That helped
him to get water. He had to get pebbles and keep
doing that until water came up.
Student Score: 0 1 2
Teacher Score: 0 1 2
Characterization
There’s not a book I read about that was similar
to this one. The crow’s most important qualities
are water and food.
Student Score: 0 1 2
Teacher Score: 0 1 2
Scoring: 0 = Needs Improvement 1 = Satisfactory 2 = Exceeds Expectations
Students score their work in the top part of the scoring box.
Teachers score the work in the bottom part of the scoring box.
Student Comments: Is there anything you would like your teacher to know about your work on this reading?
Teacher Comments:
Selection Title: ________________________________________________________
Name:____________________________________________ Date: ____________
Learning – Thinking Skills Rubric
Assess How?
Many people may be
surprised that higherorder thinking can be
assessed with “wellwritten” multiple
choice test items.
Susan M. Brookhart
(2010)
NAEP (reasoning with data)
The table below shows information about the weather in four
cities on the same day.
High Temperature
Low Temperature
Precipitation – Rain or
Snow (inches)
City 1
City 2
City 3
65 ◦
56 ◦
2 inches
80 ◦
48 ◦
66 ◦
38 ◦
0 inches 1 inch
City 4
25 ◦
10 ◦
1 inch
In which city did snow most likely fall at some time during the day?
A. City 1
B. City 2
C. City 3
D. City 4
WESTEST 2
Do you use your phone to access your e-mail? Do you make a lot of calls on your cell
phone? Do you spend a lot of time on your cell phone? Do you IM with your friends?
Have you ever thought about reading a book on your phone? It’s all the rage in Japan!
Cell phone novels, called keitai shosetsu, are becoming increasingly trendy in Japan
and are starting to gain popularity in China and South Korea. The spread of cell phone
novels is mainly due to their appeal to young adults, the same audience with whom
blogging, IMing, text messaging, and cell phone use are all the rage.
Since cell phone screens are so small, only about a …
What is the effect of the series of rhetorical questions at the beginning of this article?
A. They draw readers into the article by making them think about their answers to the
questions.
B. They illustrate the point that so many people now have cell phones at their disposal.
C. They point out that the article’s main purpose is to talk about the many uses of cell
phones.
D. They show how American readers can become successful novel writers using their cell
phones.
“How to Assess Higher Order
Thinking Skills” (example from book)
Which of the following scenarios describes behavior that is legal because of the
First Amendment?
A. Mr. Jones threw a rock through the front window of Mr. Smith’s house.
Around the rock was tied a paper that called Mr. Smith nasty names.
B. Mr. Jones waited until Mr. Smith left for work one morning, then got in his car
and followed him, honking and yelling.
C. Mr. Jones doesn’t trust his neighbor, Mr. Smith. Jones believes Smith is a
dangerous person and a threat to the peace of the neighborhood. Therefore,
Mr. Jones buys a gun.
D. Mr. Jones wrote a letter to the editor of the local paper. Mr. Smith heads a
local environmental committee, and Mr. Jones called his position
“disastrous.”
“How to Assess Higher Order
Thinking Skills” (example from book)
Essay questions assessing the ability to make deductive conclusions:
1. Select one of the amendments in the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution.
Describe a specific example of one of the rights in the Bill of Rights. The example
can be from a real event or something you make up yourself, but it must be a
clear illustration of one of the rights in the Bill of Rights. Tell the story of your
example. Then explain which right your story exemplifies, from which
amendment, and tell why.
Criteria for feedback or rubric:
•
•
•
•
Appropriate identification of a particular right and amendment.
Appropriateness of example.
Appropriateness of evidence.
Soundness of reasoning and clarity of explanation.
“How to Assess Higher Order
Thinking Skills” (example from book)
Questions assessing critical thinking involving judgment:
12. The poster shown above was made during the First World War.
What was the poster designed to do?
A. Make people feel that it would be easy to win the war.
B. Make people feel guilty for thinking that war is harmful.
C. Get people to join the army by making them feel responsible for starting the
war.
D. Get people to join the army by appealing to patriotic feelings.
“How to Assess Higher Order
Thinking Skills” (example from book)
Questions assessing critical thinking involving judgment:
12. The poster shown above was made during the First World War.
What was the poster designed to do? Explain how you came to
this conclusion.
Criteria for feedback or rubric:
• Clear, appropriate statement of the main point.
• Appropriateness of evidence.
• Soundness of reasoning and clarity of explanation.
Multiple Choice
Examples from PISA – Program for
International Student Assessment
http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/items.asp?sub=yes
Test Items from ACT
http://www.actstudent.org/sampletest/index.html
In Review:
• What is the primary aim
of assessment?
• Who will use the
information?
• How will the
information be used?
What other measures are
there?
How do we measure the football
program?
How do we measure the music/dance
program?
What other measures are
there?
Competitions/Games
Exhibits
Bulletin Boards
Websites
What other measures are
there?
Portfolio – of successes/best work.
Knowing that the “failures” along the way
were lessons learned on the way to
success.
Resources
• Julia Roberts NAGC’s WOW series
• Susan K. Johnson NAGC’s WOW series
• Brookhart, Susan M. (2010) Assess Higher-Order
Thinking Skills
• Dweck, Carol (2010) Even Geniuses Work Hard,
Educational Leadership, September 2010, Vol. 68 No.
1 www.ascd.org
• Tomlinson, Carol Ann, & Doubet, Kristina (2006)
SMART in the Middle Grades, Westerville, OH,
National Middle School Association
• Wormeli, Rick (2006) Fair Isn’t Always Equal; Assessing
& Grading in the Differentiated Classroom, p. 14,
Stenhouse Publishers, Portland, Maine.
Resources
New Online IEP Form: http://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/forms.html
Policy 2419 at http://wvde.state.wv.us/policies.html
Resources for teachers at http://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/gifted.html
Dweck, Carol (2010) Even Geniuses Work Hard, Educational Leadership September
2010, Vol. 68 No. 1 www.ascd.org
Pink, Daniel (2006) A Whole New Mind, Riverhead Books Published by the Penguin
Group. New York, NY.
Reis, Sally & Renzullli, Joseph Curriculum Compacting: A Systematic Procedure for
Modifying the Curriculum for Above Average Ability Students The National Research
Center on the Gifted and Talented - University of Connecticut .
Tomlinson, Carol Ann, & Doubet, Kristina (2006) SMART in the Middle Grades,
Westerville, OH, National Middle School Association
Van-Tassel-Baska, Joyce (2003) Content-Based Curriculum for High-Ability Learners,
Waco, TX, Prufrock Press, Inc.