Air Source Heat Pumps Potential Changes in the RTF’s Specifications & Savings Estimates and Their Impact on C&R Discount Program Credits.
Download ReportTranscript Air Source Heat Pumps Potential Changes in the RTF’s Specifications & Savings Estimates and Their Impact on C&R Discount Program Credits.
Air Source Heat Pumps Potential Changes in the RTF’s Specifications & Savings Estimates and Their Impact on C&R Discount Program Credits 1 Why “Things” Are Changing – New Energy Star Specifications • Energy Star labeled air source heat pumps established new performance criteria effective October 1, 2002 – Split System Minimums • SEER – 13.0 • HSPF - 8.0 • EER – 11.0 – Package System Minimums • SEER – 12.0 • HSPF – 7.6 • EER – 10.5 2 Why “Things” Are Changing – PNW Climates Are Different • ARI performance ratings (SEER & HSPF) are based on climates that do not match the Northwest’s. – The “West Side” climates are warmer than the rating location – HSPF is higher than label – The “East Side” climates are colder than the rating location – HSPF is lower than label – All of the NW has lower humidity than the rating location – SEER is lower than label 3 Climate Adjusted HSPF The Impact of Climate on HSPF 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Portland Seattle Rated HSPF = 7.1 4 Boise Spokane Rated HSPF = 8.0 Missoula Climate Adjusted HSPF Percent of ARI Rating 100% 80% 104% 105% 92% 91% 89% Seattle Boise Spokane Missoula 60% 40% 20% 0% Portland 5 Why Things Are Changing – Control Practices Reduce Performance • Set-Back Thermostats (with or without “ramp up” features) often result in use of electric resistance heat • Timed-defrost controls (particularly on the “East Side”) operate even when relative humidity is too low to produce icing • Compressor “cut-out” temperatures are set too high, so compressor doesn’t operate even when it has a COP above 1.0. 6 The Impact of Controls on HSPF Control Adjusted HSPF 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Portland Seattle Rated HSPF = 7.1 7 Boise Spokane Rated HSPF = 8.0 Missoula Control Adjusted HSPF Percent of ARI Rating 100% 80% 97% 94% 60% 68% 65% 62% 40% 20% 0% Portland 8 Seattle Boise Spokane Missoula Why Things Are Changing Failure to Properly Commission Heat Pumps • Field studies of heat pump and air conditioner installations reveal – Over/Under Charging of Refrigerant – Low air flow across evaporator coils 9 Impact of Improper Commissioning on HSPF Commissioning Adjusted HSPF 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Portland Seattle Rated HSPF = 7.1 10 Boise Spokane Rated HSPF = 8.0 Missoula Commissioning Adjusted HSPF Percent of Rated HSPF 100% 80% 94% 94% 82% 82% 79% Boise Spokane Missoula 60% 40% 20% 0% Portland 11 Seattle Cumulative Adjusted HSPF Cumulative Impact on HSPF 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Portland Seattle Rated HSPF = 7.1 12 Boise Spokane Rated HSPF = 8.0 Missoula Cumulative Adjusted HSPF Percent of Rated HSPF 100% 80% 85% 88% 60% 60% 59% 56% Boise Spokane Missoula 40% 20% 0% Portland 13 Seattle SEER Doesn’t Match Label Either • High performance air conditioning equipment is designed to “de-humidify” by recovering latent energy (heat of condensation) • Preliminary research appears to show that SEER ratings, when adjusted for the PNW “drysummer” climate are about 65% of nameplate – Nominal 10 SEER => Real 6.5 SEER 14 Implications for C&R Discount Values • Difference Between “PTCS” Heat Pump (or CAC) Installations & Non-“PTCS” Installations Increases • Difference between Non-PTCS Heat Pump (or CAC) Installations and “Baseline” Installations Decreases 15 Example 1 – Pre80 Single Family w/Furnace in Heating & Cooling Zone 1 Case Current w/o PTCS Annual Savings (kWh) 6,839 C&R Discount Credit ($) $ 2,241 Current w/PTCS 8,055 $ 2,661 Proposed w/o PTCS 4,298 $ 1,407 Proposed w/PTCS 6,484 $ 2,155 Example 2 – Post79/Pre93 Single Family w/Furnace in Heating Zone 1 & Cooling Zone 2 Case Current w/o PTCS Annual Savings (kWh) 8,971 Current w/PTCS C&R Discount Credit ($) $ 3,036 10,308 $ 3,496 Proposed w/o PTCS 7,386 $ 2,514 Proposed w/PTCS 10,733 $ 3,673 Example 3 – Post92 Single Family w/Zonal Heat & No CAC in Heating Zone 1 & Cooling Zone 3 Case Current w/o PTCS Annual Savings (kWh) 2,944 C&R Discount Credit ($) $ 744 Current w/PTCS 4,045 $ 1,153 Proposed w/o PTCS 631 $ (136) Proposed w/PTCS 2,906 $ 699 Example 4 – Pre80 Single Family w/Furnace & w/o CAC in Heating & Cooling Zone 2 Case Current w/o PTCS Annual Savings (kWh) 9,633 C&R Discount Credit ($) $ 3,119 Current w/PTCS 11,178 $ 3,651 Proposed w/o PTCS 5,073 $ 1,601 Proposed w/PTCS 8,425 $ 2,739