Research on Lifestyle Redesign: An Occupational Science Approach to Combating Health Concerns of the 21st Century Health Collaborative Retreat October 21, 2004
Download ReportTranscript Research on Lifestyle Redesign: An Occupational Science Approach to Combating Health Concerns of the 21st Century Health Collaborative Retreat October 21, 2004
Research on Lifestyle Redesign: An Occupational Science Approach to Combating Health Concerns of the 21st Century Health Collaborative Retreat October 21, 2004 1 Occupational Science New Social Science Studies the relationship of occupation to health Study of the human as an occupational being: person engaged in his or her world of activity 2 What do we mean by occupation? 3 Definition of Occupation Activities that can be named in the lexicon of the culture: Physical activities Social activities Spiritual activities 4 II Health Promotion in the Elderly 5 The is upon us… 6 Our focus must shift from Quantity of Life to Quality of Life 7 Outstanding Quality of Life in Old Age IS a Realistic Outcome 8 Successful Aging “Growing old with good health, strength, and vitality” Rowe, Kahn. Successful Aging. 1998;23. 9 Usual Aging Elders who are functioning well, but are at heightened risk for ageassociated disease or disability Rowe, Kahn. Successful Aging. 1998;23. 10 III The USC Well Elderly Study 11 The USC Well Elderly Study was funded by National Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging (NIA) Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NCMRR) American Occupational Therapy Foundation Lumex, Inc. RGK Foundation Smith & Nephew Roylan 12 The USC Well Elderly Study Group Florence Clark, PhD, OTR Ruth Zemke, PhD, OTR Jeanne Jackson, PhD, OTR Michael Carlson, PhD Loren G. Lipson, MD Stanley P. Azen, PhD Joel W. Hay, PhD Barbara Cherry, PhD Deborah Mandel, MA, OTR Karen Josephson, MD USC Occupational Therapy USC Occupational Therapy USC Occupational Therapy Social Psychology, USC Occupational Therapy Geriatric Medicine, USC Keck School of Medicine Preventive Medicine, Biostatistics, USC Department of Biometry Pharmaceutical Policy & Economics, USC Pharmaceutical Economics Cognitive Psychology, USC Occupational Therapy USC Occupational Therapy Geriatric Medicine, USC Keck School of Medicine 13 Health Well-Being Occupation 14 Purpose/Goal of Research Prevent Illness Maintain Independence Efficacy Cost-Effectiveness 15 Target Population Independent Seniors Low-Income Multi-Ethnic 16 Design: Randomized Clinical Trial Three Experimental Conditions Occupational Social No Therapy - 122 Group Control - 120 Treatment Control - 119 361 17 Design: Measures Physical Health Cognition Functional Status Psychosocial Well-Being General Health 18 Design : Timeline 9 Month Program 6 Months 2 hr/week Small groups No Contact Pre Test Physical Exam Questionnaires Post Test Questionnaires Follow Up Physical Exam Questionnaires 15 Months Utilization of Health Services 19 USC Well Elderly Study RAND SF-36 8% 6% Occupational Therapy Subjects 4% Control Subjects 2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% Vitality General Health Absence of Health-Based Role Limitations Social Functioning General Mental Health Absence of Bodily Pain Physical Functioning Absence of Emotion-Based Role Limitations 20 LR: 6-Month Follow-up RAND SF-36 OT improvement initial 6mo No Health-based Role Limitations 14% No Emotional-based Role Limitations Physical Functioning Vitality General Mental Health Social Functioning Absence of Bodily Pain General Health 14% 10% 9% 8% 6% 6% 6% 4% 11% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% Clark et al. J Gerontology. Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2001. 21 LR: Cost Effectiveness Estimate of medical costs avoided as a result of occupational therapy intervention in relation to health related quality of life. Hay, et al, (2002) 22 Results Program Costs OT = $548 per subject Post intervention health care costs OT = $967 Active Control = $1,726 Passive Control = $2,593 Cost per QALY (OT) = $10,660 23 IV Health Mediating Effects of the Well Elderly Program # 1RO1 AG 021108-01A2, NIH $2,280,668 24 Investigative Team Principal Investigator: Florence A. Clark, Ph.D., USC Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy Co-Investigators: Stanley Azen, Ph.D., USC Department of Biometry, Keck School of Medicine Carolyn Ervin, USC Department of Biometry, Keck School of Medicine Michael Goran, USC Preventive Medicine, Physiology Joel Hay, USC Pharmaceutical Economics Howard Hodis, USC, Molecular Pharmacology/Toxicology Leslie Lytle, University of Minnesota, Epidemiology Virginia Quinn, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Kim Reynolds, USC Preventive Medicine 25 Aim To replicate our previous results on the positive effects of the lifestyle redesign intervention To examine the mediating mechanisms responsible for its positive effects 26 Design N=440: Ethnically diverse elders Randomized semi-crossover design Intervention: Six months lifestyle redesign 27 Measures (Assessed 4 – 5 times over an 18 – 24 month interval) Healthy Activity Coping Social Support Perceived Control Stress Related Biomarkers Perceived Physical Health Psychological Well-being Cognitive Functioning 28 Conceptual model of positive effects of activity-based interventions for elders Healthy Activity Intervention Reduced StressRelated Biomarkers Active Coping Social Support Potential Mediators: Subsidiary Analyses * Social Network * Domain-Specific Perceived Stress * Religious Coping * Mental Disengagement * Behavioral Disengagement * Acceptance * Volunteer Activity Perceived Control Perceived Physical Health Psychosocial Well-Being Cognitive Functioning Positive Reinterpretation-Based Coping 29 VI Weight Loss Randomized Clinical Trial 30 Customized Lifestyle Re-Engineering and Obesity: An RCT Principal Investigator: Florence A. Clark, Ph.D., USC Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy Co-Investigators: Stan Azen, Ph.D. Michael Goran, Ph.D. Joel Hay, Ph.D. Howard Hodis, M.D. Kim Reynolds, Ph.D. Virginia Quinn, Ph.D. Leslie Lytle, Ph.D. 31 Mediational Model for the Proposed Study Intervention-Based Knowledge Customized Lifestyle Re-Engineering Facilitative Social Support Increased Perceived SelfEfficacy Improved Diet Personalized Daily Lifestyle Change 32