JIBS Enhancement Groups Sue Cumberpatch JIBS Chair Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries.
Download ReportTranscript JIBS Enhancement Groups Sue Cumberpatch JIBS Chair Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries.
JIBS Enhancement Groups Sue Cumberpatch JIBS Chair Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries JIBS - history • Started as an enhancement group – BIDS User Group – in 1991 – Single provider • This is now one of the JIBS-supported enhancement groups – the Web of Science Enhancement Committee • Expanded to include all nationally-licenced databases and providers --- JIBS Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries JIBS - now • Represents users of resources available via various national agreements – JISC, CHEST, independent providers • Membership base is users and librarians in HE, FE and research councils • The types of resource JIBS represents have also extended beyond bibliographic material to all electronic content of interest to our user community Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries The Enhancement Groups • Some are called User Group • Some established by providers, who invite JIBS to take part. Others initiated by JIBS • Meet usually two or three times a year, also have active mailing lists. JIBS members request input via various lists e.g. lis-jibs-users, lis-link • JIBS representatives report to JIBS committee meetings • Summary reports on JIBS website Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries What the groups do • Have confidential access to pre-release versions of software and other updates - to comment on and suggest changes, which are taken on board • JIBS reps raise issues fed to them by users • Providers use JIBS reps as avenue to users, for suggestions and publicity • Don’t discuss pricing Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries Some examples of issues addressed • WoSEC – – Persuaded ThomsonReuters to tweak recent amendments to WoK, to make it clearer to users which database they are using, and to be able to select a database earlier in the session rather than starting off in All Databases Keep reminding ThomsonReuters to include export to RefWorks format in WoS/WoK – ongoing! • OvidSP Group – – Input to content and coverage of databases e.g. Evidencebased medicine reviews Protecting the needs of "power searchers" while end-user basic search is developing; incremental enhancements following original OvidSP release Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries Current Groups • • • • • • • • WoSEC – may become ThomsonReuters Group BSOL – British Standards EBSCO IBSS Intute – new chair needed. Volunteers? OvidSP MDL – Elsevier chemical databases Scopus Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries Potential new groups • Other providers (may already have a group) – Proquest – CSA • E-book providers? • Do not cover ejournals (leave that to UKSG) Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries Other JIBS liaison activity • Meets at least once a year with reps from JISC Collections, Eduserv CHEST, EDINA and MIMAS • JIBS reps sit on various JISC working groups and other national groups: – – – – – – Journals W G E-books W G Visual and Sound Materials Demo Project (ex Images W G) JISC Geospatial WG Library Advisory W G (Online Film & Sound WG - awaiting next stage of development) – JISC E-books Observatory Project – On Management Boards of MIMAS and EDINA – RESCOLINC and SCONUL representation Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries Comments/suggestions? • Should we be aiming towards standardisation in interfaces? • Is Googlisation inevitable? Lowest-common denominator? • Separation of data and software – is this possible or desirable? • Difference between undergrad and PhD level users – how to address this? Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries Let us know • Any suggestions for new groups or for interface standards, please email [email protected] Serving the interests of e-resource users in Research, Higher and Further Education Libraries