Transcript Jim Fetzer Real Deal 3/23/15 THE NUCLEAR DEMOLITION OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ON 9/11 COMPILED BY DONALD FOX MARCH, 2015

Jim Fetzer
Real Deal
3/23/15
THE NUCLEAR DEMOLITION OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ON 9/11
COMPILED BY DONALD FOX MARCH, 2015
Observed Phenomena of the
Destruction of WTC1 and 2

Two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers pulverized in mid-air

Extremely rapid onset of “collapse.”

Destruction proceeds through path of greatest resistance at near
freefall speed.

90% of the debris landed outside of the building’s footprints.

No “stack of pancakes” as expected in a gravitational collapse.

Buildings destroyed from the top down and inside out with debris
ejected upward and outward.

Pyroclastic flow and mushroom clouds.
Observed Phenomena of the
Destruction of WTC1 and 2

A series of huge explosions before each tower “collapses.”

One chunk of debris was ejected up at a 45° angle and out 603 feet
from the North Tower into the Winter Garden.

1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized and a cloud of fine
dust consisting of gypsum, cement and steel covered Lower
Manhattan.

Human remains found in the Bankers Trust building.
Why Did the Twin Towers “Collapse”

Two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers pulverized in mid-air

Extremely rapid onset of “collapse.” (no sagging etc)

Destruction proceeds through path of greatest resistance at near
freefall speed.

90% of the debris landed outside of the building’s footprints.

No “stack of pancakes” as expected in a gravitational collapse.

Buildings destroyed from the top down and inside out with debris
ejected upward and outward.

Pyroclastic flow and mushroom clouds.

1/3 of the buildings were completely vaporized and a cloud of fine
dust consisting of gypsum, cement and steel covered Lower
Manhattan.
Jet Fuel Has No Explanatory Power for
the Destruction of the Towers





The mass of one Twin Tower is estimated to be 500,000 tons, a factor of
22,000 times greater than that of the jet fuel.
If 900 cubic feet of fuel was spread evenly over just one 40,000 square
feet floor of a Tower, it would result in a film 0.27 inches thick, about the
thickness of a pencil.
If 900 cubic feet of fuel was spread over all 110 floors of one Tower, if
would result in a film 0.00245 inches thick, which is less than the thickness
of one sheet of paper.
The belief that the kinetic energy of this inconsequential amount of fuel
arriving at 500 mph could cause significant structural damage to these
immense buildings is ludicrous.
Similarly, the belief that burning this inconsequential amount of jet fuel
(essentially kerosene) could cause any significant heating of the
structural steel of this building is preposterous.
North Tower
Gallons
Cubic Feet
Mass (lbs.)
Total Jet Fuel
8,684
1,161
57,922
20% Burned in
Fireball
1,737
232
11,586
Total Jet Fuel after
Fireball
6,947
929
46,336
Remaining on
Impact Floors
3,474
465
23,172
Flowed away
3,474
465
23,172
South Tower
Gallons
Cubic Feet
Mass (lbs.)
Total Jet Fuel
7,415
991
49,458
20% Burned in
Fireball
1,483
198
9,892
Total Jet Fuel after 5,932
Fireball
793
39,566
Remaining on
Impact Floors
2,966
397
19,783
Flowed Away
2,966
397
19,783
Intex Above Ground Pool is 1,017
Cubic Feet
The Destruction of WTC2
Chopper Spotted Over WTC2
Seconds Before “Collapse”
Top 25 Floors Tilt as “Collapse” Begins
The South Tower’s Mid-Air Miracles

It was struck at the 80th floor, so that its upper portion consisted of a 30floor block. As videos of the beginning of this building’s collapse show,
this block began tipping toward the corner that had been most
damaged by the airplane’s impact. According to the law of the
conservation of angular momentum, this section should have fallen to
the ground far outside the building’s footprint. “However,” Jim Hoffman
and fellow 9/11 researcher Don Hoffman have observed, “as the top
then began to fall, the rotation decelerated. Then it reversed direction
[even though the] law of conservation of angular momentum states
that a solid object in rotation will continue to rotate at the same speed
unless acted on by a torque.”

And then, as if this were not miraculous enough: “We observe [wrote
physicist Steven Jones] that approximately 30 upper floors begin to
rotate as a block, to the south and east. They begin to topple over, not
fall straight down. The torque due to gravity on this block is enormous,
as is its angular momentum. But then – and this I’m still puzzling over –
this block turned mostly to powder in mid-air! How can we understand
this strange behavior, without explosives?
Doomed Structures Dancing and
Walking

If someone were to ask how even explosives could explain this
behavior, we could turn to a statement by Mark Loizeaux, the
president of Controlled Demolition, Inc. In response to an
interviewer’s question as to how he made “doomed structures
dance or walk,” Loizeaux said: “By differentially controlling the
velocity of failure in different parts of the structure, you can make it
walk, you can make it spin, you can make it dance. We’ve taken it
and moved it, then dropped it or moved it, twisted it and moved it
down further – and then stopped it and moved it again. We’ve
dropped structures 15 stories, stopped them and then laid them
sideways. We’ll have structures start facing north and end up going
to the north-west.”
Banker’s Trust Building Heavily Damaged
by South Tower Debris
Destruction of WTC1
Debris Ejected from WTC1 at 45 ° Angle
The Winter Garden: Where the DEWS and
Nanothermite Theories Go to Die
What Can Cause the Observed
Effects?

Jet fuel fires even if they burned hot enough and long enough
would cause the buildings to sag and gradually collapse.

Jet fuel would not be able to eject debris up at a 45° angle and out
600 feet into the Winter Garden.

To explode steel an explosive needs to have a detonation velocity
of 6,100 meters per second.

To explode cement a detonation velocity of 3,200 meters per
second is required.

Kerosene only has a detonation velocity of 1,600 meters per second.

There is no validity to the official NIST story.
The Official Story of 9/11 is Nothing
More Than a Public Myth
The 4 Major Alternative Theories of
the Destruction of the WTC

1. Dimitri Khalezov: Three 150 kt underground nukes took out the Twin
Towers and Building 7. The “big nuke” theory.

2. Nanothermite planted in the Towers presumably used in
conjunction with conventional explosives such as RDX or HMX. Steve
Jones, Richard Gage, Christopher Bollyn and Mark Bilk promote this
theory.

3. Tesla inspired directed energy weapon “DEW.” Judy Wood,
Andrew Johnson and Morgan Reynolds are associated with this
non-theory since Judy Wood claims to not have a theory.

4. Low-yield nuclear bombs the “mini-nuke” theory promoted by Dr.
Ed Ward, Jeff Prager, Dr. Bill Deagle, most of the staff at Veterans
Today and myself.
What is Thermite?

Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of metal powder fuel and
metal oxide. When ignited by heat, thermite undergoes an
exothermic oxidation-reduction reaction. Most varieties are not
explosive but can create brief bursts of high temperature in a small
area. Its form of action is similar to that of other fuel-oxidizer mixtures,
such as black powder. Thermites have diverse compositions. Fuels
include aluminum, magnesium, titanium, zinc, silicon, and boron.
Aluminum is common because of its high boiling point. Oxidizers
include boron(III) oxide, silicon(IV) oxide, chromium(III) oxide,
manganese(IV) oxide, iron(III) oxide, iron(II,III) oxide, copper(II)
oxide, and lead(II,IV) oxide.
Could Nanothermite Turn a 500,000
Ton Building Into Dust?

Detonation velocity only 895 meters per second

Thermite is an incendiary

Thermite gets very hot, it produces molten iron, it can melt steel, and
it can catch things on fire, but it is absolutely not an explosive.

895 m/s is obviously too low of a value to account for the explosive
effects observed in the catastrophic destruction of the WTC Twin
Towers, including turning concrete and other materials into dust or
separating and propelling steel members and other materials
outward
The Judy Wood DEW Non-Theory

Judy has no theory for the destruction of the WTC buildings.

Twin Towers destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall
speed “collapse.”

Twin Towers destroyed from the top down and pulverized in mid-air.

Seismic impact was minimal – too small to be a conventional
controlled demolition.

Denies explosives or high heat was involved.

Tritium levels in Building 6 due to cold fusion – no ionizing radiation
What is a Directed Energy
Weapon?

Beam Weapons, Energy Weapons, and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW):
I have used the terms "beam weapons" and "directed energy weapons" to refer to
unconventional weapons (exotic weapons) that are energy weapons. I broadly
define DEW as Energy that is Directed and is used as a Weapon. The full range of
these weapons is classified information, so I make no limits or distinction of categories
within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of
all that is available. In the following paragraph, I have listed some of the possibilities
we are aware of.
My critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from
outer space, yet I make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon
operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do I make any claim
about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it
involved interference of multiple beams, whether it involved sound waves, whether it
involved sonoluminescence, whether it involved antimatter weapons, whether it
involved scalar weapons, whether it involved HAARP, whether it involved a nuclear
process (e.g. NDEW), whether it involved conventional directed energy weapons
(cDEW), whether it involved improvised directed energy weapons (iDEW), nor what
kind of accelerator was used, nor do I claim to know what the serial numbers of the
parts that were in the weapon(s).

What I do claim is that the evidence is consistent with the use of energy weapons that
go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives and can be directed.
Hurricane Erin: Irrelevant to the
Destruction of the WTC Buildings

Andrew Johnson: “One of the most striking pieces of the data
presented is that from a set of magnetometers monitored by the
University of Alaska. Several instruments show significant deviations
from “background” or “normal” readings as the events of 9/11 were
unfolding. A further selection of this data is presented in relation to
variations during the hurricane seasons of 2001, 2004 and 2005. A
later part of the study examines some of the data relating to
patterns of earthquakes in 2008 and possibly associated unusual
weather patterns, which may be related to secret or partially
disclosed environmental modification technology (such as HAARP).
However, the study does not establish any clear links between
HAARP and the events in New York on 9/11.”
Erin Posed No Threat to Land

Several hundred miles out in the Atlantic, Hurricane Erin—the first
Atlantic hurricane of the 2001 season—was weakening as it began
to turn toward the north-northeast, away from the East Coast.
Though it posed no threat to land, Erin had been producing large
swells along local beaches and was one of the main headlines early
that morning. In fact, The New York Times weather report on
September 11 included a special “Focus” write-up on what it called
“Hurricane Day,” explaining how in “9 out of 10 years since 1886, at
least one tropical storm or hurricane has raged in the Atlantic on
Sept. 11.”

“For those heading to an airport,” the 9/11 Commission report
stated, “weather conditions could not have been better for a safe
and pleasant journey.” The 8:51 a.m. temperature reading was 68°F
at Central Park, 72°F at La Guardia, and 73°F at both JFK and
Newark Airports.”
Judy Wood: 9/11 Gatekeeper

Is Judy “merely a gatekeeper, feigning the role
of muckraker and champion of injustice, while
all the time carrying water for the very power
structures that she claims to rail against? Is she
really exposing government collusion in criminal
and treasonous behavior, or is she containing
the limits of that exposure within certain
'acceptable' corridors of public discourse?"
The WTC Buildings EXPLODED!

They did not somehow magically turn into dust.

Once you conclude the buildings did indeed explode that’s the
end of NIST, Judy Wood and Steve Jones.
Nuclear Physics Basics

Nuclear physics is the field of study that concentrates on
understanding the atomic nucleus.

The atomic nucleus is a tiny massive entity at the center of an atom.
Occupying a volume whose radius is 1/100,000 the size of the atom,
the nucleus contains most (99.9%) of the mass of the atom.

Along with neutrons, protons make up the nucleus, held together by
the strong force. The proton is a baryon and is considered to be
composed of two up quarks and one down quark.

The neutron is a baryon and is considered to be composed of two
down quarks and one up quark. A free neutron will decay with a
half-life of about 10.3 minutes but it is stable if combined into a
nucleus. The decay of the neutron involves the weak interaction.
Nuclear Density

The nucleus is composed of protons (charge = +1; mass = 1.007
atomic mass units ([μ]) and neutrons. The number of protons in the
nucleus is called the atomic number (Z) and defines which
chemical element the nucleus represents. The number of neutrons in
the nucleus is called the neutron number (N), whereas the total
number of neutrons and protons in the nucleus is referred to as the
mass number (A), where A = N + Z. The neutrons and protons are
referred to collectively as nucleons. A nucleus with a given N and Z
is referred to as a nuclide. Nuclides with the same atomic number
are isotopes, such as 12 C and 14 C, whereas nuclides with the
same N, such as 14 C and 16 O, are called isotones. Nuclei such as
14 N and 14 C, which have the same mass number, are isobars.

Nuclear density is about 200,000 tons/mm 3 Imagine a cube that is 1
mm on a side. If filled with nuclear matter, it would have a mass of
about 200,000 tons. This demonstrates the enormous matter/energy
density of nuclei and gives some idea as to why nuclear
phenomena lead to large energy releases.
Radioactive Decay

Of the 6,000 species of nuclei that can exist in the universe, about
2,700 are known, but only 270 of these are stable. The rest are
radioactive, that is, they spontaneously decay. The driving force
behind all radioactive decay is the ability to produce products of
greater stability than one had initially. In other words, radioactive
decay releases energy and because of the high energy density of
nuclei, that energy release is substantial. Qualitatively we describe
radioactive decay as occurring in three general ways: α -, β -, and γ
-decay. Alpha-decay occurs in the heavy elements, and consists of
the emission of a 4 He nucleus. Beta-decay occurs in nuclei whose
N/Z ratio is different from that of a stable nucleus and consists of a
transformation of neutrons into protons or vice versa to make the
nucleus more stable. Gamma-decay occurs when excited nuclei
get rid of some or all of their excitation energy via the emission of
electromagnetic radiation, or via the radiationless transfer of energy
to orbital electrons.
Uranium-235 Fission

If a massive nucleus like uranium-235 breaks apart (fissions), then
there will be a net yield of energy because the sum of the masses of
the fragments will be less than the mass of the uranium nucleus. If
the mass of the fragments is equal to or greater than that of iron at
the peak of the binding energy curve, then the nuclear particles will
be more tightly bound than they were in the uranium nucleus, and
that decrease in mass comes off in the form of energy according to
the Einstein equation. For elements lighter than iron, fusion will yield
energy.

In one of the most remarkable phenomena in nature, a slow neutron
can be captured by a uranium-235 nucleus, rendering it unstable
toward nuclear fission. A fast neutron will not be captured, so
neutrons must be slowed down by moderation to increase their
capture probability in fission reactors. A single fission event can yield
over 200 million times the energy of the neutron which triggered it!
Fission Fragments
When uranium-235 undergoes fission, the
average of the fragment mass is about 118,
but very few fragments near that average
are found. It is much more probable to
break up into unequal fragments, and the
most probable fragment masses are around
mass 95 and 137. Most of these fission
fragments are highly unstable (radioactive),
and some of them such as cesium-137 and
strontium-90 are extremely dangerous when
released to the environment.
Cesium-137 and Strontium-90

Are the most dangerous radioisotopes to the environment in terms
of their long-term effects. Their intermediate half-lives of about 30
years suggests that they are not only highly radioactive but that
they have a long enough half-life to be around for hundreds of
years. Iodine-131 may give a higher initial dose, but its short half-life
of 8 days ensures that it will soon be gone. Besides its persistence
and high activity, cesium-137 has the further insidious property of
being mistaken for potassium by living organisms and taken up as
part of the fluid electrolytes. This means that it is passed on up the
food chain and re-concentrated from the environment by that
process.

Cesium-137 decay has a half-life of 30.07 years and proceeds by
both beta decay and gamma emission from an intermediate state.
Both the electron and gamma emissions are highly ionizing
radiation. The gamma radiation is very penetrating, and the beta
radiation, though very short range, is very dangerous when ingested
because it deposits all that energy in a very short distance in tissue.
Beta Decay

Beta particles are electrons or positrons (electrons with positive
electric charge, or anti-electrons). Beta decay occurs when, in a
nucleus with too many protons or too many neutrons, one of the
protons or neutrons is transformed into the other. In beta minus
decay, a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino: n Æ p + e – +. In beta plus decay, a proton decays into a
neutron, a positron, and a neutrino: p Æ n + e+ +n. Both reactions
occur because in different regions of the Chart of the Nuclides, one
or the other will move the product closer to the region of stability.
Cherenkov Radiation

Is there an equivalent of the sonic boom for light?

When a charged particle does move through a medium at a speed
higher than the speed of light in that medium, a faint radiation is
produced by the medium. In water, for example, the charged
particle excites the water molecules, which then return to their
normal state by emitting photons of blue light. Because the particle
is moving faster than the speed of light in water, it can trigger a
cascade of photons that are in phase with each other and can
interfere constructively to form a visible blue glow
Cesium-137 Glows Blue

Majia Nadesan has a blog post that discusses the Goiânia accident
where a scavenger punctured a radiotherapy device containing
cesium-137 with a screwdriver. A deep blue light came out of the
hole.
Cesium and Strontium Found in the
USGS dust samples

Both cesium and strontium were found in abundance in the USGS
dust samples. Both cesium-137 and strontium-90 undergo β− decay.
Cesium-137 decays into barium-137m and strontium-90 decays into
yttrium-90. Barium and yttrium were also found in abundance in the
USGS dust samples. There can be little doubt that the ominous blue
glow observed at Ground Zero is from Cherenkov radiation.
USGS Dust Sample Evidence

We follow the various elements found in the dust samples taken
in lower Manhattan by the USGS team across over a dozen sample
locations which then provide a snapshot of the events that took place
on 9/11.
It is critical to remember that we follow over a dozen elements across
even more locations and these elements must be viewed as they
interact together, not as separate elements. The elements we’re about
to examine work together, as we should expect. Thus, one might
expect to see the presence of uranium refuted. One might expect to
see the presence of strontium or the other elements refuted individually.
Yet when the elements are studied together as they increase and
decrease predictably across a dozen locations the outcome is clear.
The elements as they interact together and the tale they tell cannot be
refuted.

Fission occurred in NYC on 9/11.
Barium and Strontium
Thorium and Uranium
Thorium vs. Lithium
Zinc Sodium and Potassium
Zinc, Lead and Copper
Copper vs. Zinc
Zinc vs. Strontium
Ternary Fission

is a comparatively rare (0.2 to 0.4% of events) type of nuclear fission in
which three charged products are produced rather than two. As in
other nuclear fission processes, other uncharged particles such as
multiple neutrons and gamma rays are produced in ternary fission.

Ternary fission may happen during neutron-induced fission or in
spontaneous fission (the type of radioactive decay). About 25% more
ternary fission happens in spontaneous fission compared to the same
fissioning system formed after thermal neutron capture, illustrating that
these processes remain physically slightly different, even after the
absorption of the neutron, possibly because of the extra energy present
in the nuclear reaction system of thermal neutron-induced fission.

True Ternary Fission: A very rare type of ternary fission process is
sometimes called “true ternary fission.” It produces three nearly equalsized charged fragments (Z ~ 30) but only happens in about 1 in 100
million fission events. In this type of fission, the product nuclei split the
fission energy in three nearly equal parts and have kinetic energies of ~
60 MeV.
What is Tritium?

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, comprising
approximately 90% of the luminous universe by weight. Ordinary hydrogen
(1H) accounts for greater than 99.985% of all naturally-occurring hydrogen,
whereas deuterium (2H) comprises approximately 0.015%. By comparison,
tritium (3H) represents only approximately 10-16 percent of hydrogen naturally
occurring. Tritium is a rare but natural isotope of hydrogen (H), and is the only
natural hydrogen isotope that is radioactive. The tritium atom is sometimes
designated T to distinguish it from the common lighter isotope.
Notwithstanding the difference in mass, tritium can be found in the same
chemical forms as hydrogen. The most important forms, from the perspective
of atmospheric behavior of tritium, are tritiated hydrogen gas (HT) and
tritiated water (HTO). These tritiated forms behave chemically like hydrogen
gas (H2) and water (H2O).
Natural Sources of Tritium

Tritium is generated by both natural and artificial processes. Tritium is
naturally produced primarily through the interaction of cosmic
radiation protons and neutrons with gases (including nitrogen,
oxygen and argon) in the upper atmosphere.
Anthropogenic Sources of Tritium

In addition to its natural sources, tritium also has a number of
anthropogenic sources which account for the dominant proportion
of the global tritium inventory. Anthropogenic tritium sources include
fallout from nuclear weapons testing, nuclear reactors, future fusion
reactors, fuel reprocessing plants, heavy water production facilities
and commercial production for medical diagnostics,
radiopharmaceuticals, luminous paints, sign illumination, selfluminous aircraft, airport runway lights, luminous dials, gauges and
wrist watches, and others.

Commercial uses of tritium account for only a small fraction of the
tritium used worldwide. Instead, the primary use of tritium has been
to boost the yield of both fission and thermonuclear (or fusion)
weapons, increasing the efficiency with which the nuclear explosive
materials are used.
Thermonuclear Detonation During
Nuclear Weapons Testing

Nuclear tests have been conducted in the atmosphere since 1945,
producing tritium in amounts that greatly exceed the global natural
activity, particularly during 1954 to 1958 and 1961 to 1962 when a
number of large-yield test series were undertaken. The tritium activity
arising from atmospheric nuclear tests can be estimated from the
fission and fusion yields of the weapons tests or from environmental
measurements. For example, the tritium activity produced per unit
yield is dependent upon the attributes of the device, as well as on
the characteristics of the detonation site, and tritium generation
from fusion reactions is much higher than from fission. The tritium that
is produced by a nuclear explosion is almost completely converted
to tritiated water (HTO), which then mixes with environmental water.
Ed Ward’s WTC Tritium Breakdown
1. Trace definition as it applies to quantity: Occurring in extremely small
amounts or in quantities less than a standard limit (In the case of tritium,
this standard level would be 20 TUs – the high of quoted standard
background levels.) http://www.thefreedictionary.com/trace
 2. The stated values of tritium from the DOE report “Study of Traces of
Tritium at the World Trade Center”. “A water sample from the WTC
sewer, collected on 9/13/01, contained 0.164±0.074 (2ó) nCi/L (164
pCi/L +/- 74 pCi/L – takes 1,000 trillionths to = 1 billionth) of HTO. A split
water sample, collected on 9/21/01 from the basement of WTC Building
6, contained 3.53±0.17 and 2.83±0.15 nCi/L ( 3,530.0 pCi/L +/- 170 pCi/L
and 2,830 pCi/L +/- 150 pCi/L), respectively. https://ereportsext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf Pico to Nano converter –
http://www.unitconversion.org/prefixes/picos-to-nanos-conversion.html
Nano to Pico converter – http://www.unit-conversion.info/metric.html
 3. 1 TU = 3.231 pCi/L (trillionths per liter) or 0.003231 nCi/L (billionths per
liter) – http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q2282.html – (My
original TU calculations came out to 3.19 pCi/L, but I will gladly accept
these referenced minimally higher values.
http://www.clayandiron.com/news.jhtml?method=view&news.id=1022 )

Traces of Tritium Lie

4. In 2001 normal background levels of Tritium are supposedly around 20 TUs
(prior to nuclear testing in the 60′s, normal background tritium water levels were
5 to 10 TUs – http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q2282.html ). However,
groundwater studies show a significantly less water concentration: Groundwater
age estimation using tritium only provides semi-quantitative, “ball park” values: ·
<0.8 TU indicates sub modern water (prior to 1950s) · 0.8 to 4 TU indicates a mix
of sub modern and modern water · 5 to 15 TU indicates modern water (< 5 to 10
years) · 15 to 30 TU indicates some bomb tritium
http://www.grac.org/agedatinggroundwater.pdf But, instead of “5 to 15 TU”
(which would make the increase in background levels even higher), I will use 20
TUs as the 2001 environmental level to give all possible credibility to the lie of
“Traces”.

5. Let’s calculate the proven referenced facts. Tritium level confirmed in the DOE
report of traces of tritium = 3,530 pCi/L (+/- 170 pCi/L, but we will use the mean
of 3,530 pCi/L). 3,530 pCi/L (the referenced lab value) divided by the
background level of 20TUs (20 X 3.231 p (1 TU = 3.21 pCi/L) = 64.62 pCi/L as the
high normal background/standard level. 3,530 divided by 64.62 pCi/L = 54.63
TIMES THE NORMAL BACKGROUND LEVEL. 3,530 pCi/L divided by 3.231 pCi/L (1
TU) = 1,092.54 TUs
Massive Quantities of Tritium = Nukes

6. This is my ‘fave’ because lies tend to eat their young. Muon physicist Steven
Jones calls 1,000 TUs “The graphs below show that hydrogen-bomb testing
boosted tritium levels in rain by several orders of magnitude. (Ref.:
http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~eih/ch7/7tritium.htm ) –
http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-theHypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-stevenjones.pdf Yet, calls the EXACT SAME LEVELS quoted in nCi/L as “Traces” and
“These results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure”.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-theHypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-stevenjones.pdf Interesting isn’t it.

7. Thomas M. Semkowa, Ronald S. Hafnerc, Pravin P. Parekha, Gordon J.
Wozniakd, Douglas K. Hainesa, Liaquat Husaina, Robert L. Rabune. Philip G.
Williams and Steven Jones have all called over 1,000 TUs of Tritium, “Traces”.
Even at the height of nuclear bomb testing 98% – after thousands of Megatons
of nuclear testing – of the rainwater tests were 2,000 TUs or less. https://e-reportsext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf

8. It is also important to note that the tritium present was diluted by at least some
portion of 1 million liters of water accounting for BILLIONS of TUs.
Ed Ward’s WTC Rain and Fire Hose
Water Breakdown

WTC 6 = 1 acre (approx.)

WTC site = 16 acres. Rain = 4 million liters. 4/16 = 1/4 of a million liters deposits in WTC 6 in its 40 ft.
(depth) by 120 ft. (diameter) crater.

WTC 6 was hot – see thermal images 2nd article on WTC Nukes.

Firemen = 12 million liters. Firemen would mostly be spraying the hot areas.

There are about 5 acres that gradually increase to maybe a total of 6 to 7 acres, but let’s be
generous and say they sprayed 8 acres (this will lower the total amount of Tritium Units estimate).

8/16 = 1/2 of 12 million liters = 6 million liters spread over 8 acres = 3/4 of a million liters per acre.

Rain plus Firemen = 1 million liters in WTC 6 in the 40 ft. (depth) by 120 ft. (diameter) crater.

1 liter of the pooled water = 1,106 TUs X 1 million liters of water = 1.1066 BILLION TUs JUST IN WTC 6
(no other places were checked.)

This completely ignores 104 Million Liters (30 Million Gallons) pumped out of the bathtub and the
drain water of 51 TUs. 120 million liters X 51 = 6.120 BILLION TUs.

This completely ignores the amount of Tritium in gas form that escapes into the atmosphere and
gets massive dispersal.
Neutron Bomb
A neutron bomb is a fission-fusion thermonuclear weapon (hydrogen
bomb) in which the burst of neutrons generated by a fusion reaction is
intentionally allowed to escape the weapon, rather than being
absorbed by its other components. The weapon’s X-ray mirrors and
radiation case, made of uranium or lead in a standard bomb, are
instead made of chromium or nickel so that the neutrons can escape.
The bombs also require amounts of tritium on the order of a few tens of
grams.
 The “usual” nuclear weapon yield—expressed as kt TNT equivalent—is
not a measure of a neutron weapon’s destructive power. It refers only
to the energy released (mostly heat and blast), and does not express
the lethal effect of neutron radiation on living organisms. Compared to
a fission bomb with the identical explosive yield, a neutron bomb would
emit about ten times the amount of neutron radiation. In a fission
bomb, the radiation pulse energy is approximately 5% of the entire
energy released; in the neutron bomb it would be closer to 50%. A
neutron bomb releases a much greater number of neutrons than a
fission bomb of the same explosive yield. Furthermore, these neutrons
are of much higher energy (14 MeV) than those released during a
fission reaction (1–2 MeV).

Through the Neutron Looking Glass

In a broad sense, the neutron bomb is an explosive version of the sun; that is,
the relevant energy it emits comes from thermonuclear, or fusion, reactions
involving the very lightest elements. To be specific, its fuel consists of the two
heavier nuclei of hydrogen, named deuterium and tritium. By means of a fission
trigger, a mixture of these two nuclei is compressed and heated, as happens in
a hydrogen bomb, to cause nuclear reactions whose principle output is in the
form of very high energy neutrons. Also produced will be blast and heat, but so
predominant are the neutron effects against human beings, who are a
hundred to a thousand times more vulnerable to radiation than blast and heat,
that by bursting the weapon high enough off the ground the only significant
effects at the surface will come from radiation. In so doing, the blast and heat
effects will not be strong enough to cause significant damage to most
structures. Hence, a bomb which, accurately but misleadingly, has been
described as a weapon that kills people but spares buildings.
Neutron Radiation and EMP Effects

Neutron radiation and EMP appears to be responsible for the “toasted cars”
found near Ground Zero. What is neutron radiation? From the Shots Across the
Bow Blog:

To understand neutron radiation, imagine a pool table set for the start of a
game. 15 balls are in the middle of the table, with the cue ball set for the break.
The cue ball is a free neutron. When the neutron hits the nucleus, one of three
things might happen. First, if the cue ball doesn’t have enough energy, or hits at
the wrong angle, it caroms off, barely disturbing the pack of balls. Second, if the
ball has too much energy, it slams through the pack, breaking it up. This is fission,
and results in fission products, more free neutrons, and energy. Third, if the ball
has just the right amount of energy, it just makes it to the pack and joins in,
becoming another neutron in the nucleus. Here is where our analogy breaks
down, because many times, when a nucleus gets another neutron, it becomes
unstable, and begins to decay, emitting alphas, betas, or gammas. This is
called ”activation” and is one of the trickier problems with neutron irradiation
and the physical properties of the irradiated matter can be quite different from
the original. (“A nuclear power,”)

A large quantity of high energy neutrons bombarding an object will cause the
atoms in the material to move i.e. heat up. This is why so few bodies were found
at Ground Zero – most of the people that were near the Towers were vaporized
either by the blast and heat effects of the bombs or the neutron radiation that
was released
The Toasted Cars

Ted Twietmeyer has a post on Rense’s website that goes a long way towards
explaining the toasted cars found near Ground Zero. Twietmeyer attributes the
damage to aluminum vehicle parts such as engine blocks and mirrors to strong
EMP eddy currents produced by nuclear detonations at Ground Zero: “and
what else do eddy currents create? HEAT if the currents are strong enough. The
stronger the eddy currents, the more heat which will be generated. Although
magnetic fields are being created, they are temporary in aluminum because it
is not magnetic, but paramagnetic. This means aluminum will be affected by
magnetism, but it cannot be magnetized.

A vector is simply a line that shows direction and usually has an arrow. Arrows
are not shown above, in an attempt to simplify the image. The direction of
force is from upper left to lower right. The notated image above provides a
possible explanation for the location of the source of the magnetic pulse, and
why some vehicles were damaged and others were not. This parking lot may
be the best evidence in support of my theory.
Cars were also Nuked

Yellow lines indicate the pulse(s) blocked by the rear row of vehicles. It appears the
entire outside of all rear vehicles were destroyed. Note how several hoods on the rear
row of vehicles have white dust or ash, indicating an intense heat originating from
under the hood. This is probably caused by the engine block vaporizing, and the
white dust may be aluminum oxide. If the vehicles are still around somewhere in a
junk yard, some simple lab tests will confirm this.

White lines show the pulses that reached the vehicles in the foreground. Orange
shapes around each car show the damage threshold line. The cars are
basically undamaged below these lines and some might be repairable. If it wasn’t for
“sacrificial” vehicles at the rear, those in the foreground would have been
completely burned.

Note that white and yellow lines are not meant to be a literal interpretation to show
size of the pulse, how many lines of force hit each vehicle, etc… Each line is intended
to show only the direction the pulse(s) came from. Regardless of whether this parking
lot is close to the WTC or not, it clearly shows that the nuclear device (or pulse source)
was high above the ground. If the pulse source were close to the Earth, then vehicles
in the foreground would have been completely shielded from the
pulse.” (Twietmeyer, 2007)

Ed Ward’s take: I believe some of what he attributes to EMP was done by neutrons –
in particular his linear evaluations (angle computations) would seem more neutron
than EMP. EMP should tend to flow around – seems to be a correlation of dust cloud
carrying EMP. So the linear blockage of cars protecting other cars would seem to be
more appropriate for neutrons. Other than that seems on the money, IMO
Vector Forces Show Source of Neutrons
was Above Ground
The Pile

Temperatures at Ground Zero were 600 to 1,500 °F or even higher for 6 months
after 9/11. Firemen were fighting fires at Ground Zero for 99 days after 9/11.
AVRIS data showed that temperature in one spot was 1,341 °F on 9/16/01. These
high temperatures could be attributed to neutron bombs that were detonated
underground in order to destroy the foundations of the Twin Towers. Some of the
hotspots may have been unexploded nuclear fissile material
reacting underground. The workers at Ground Zero experienced hellish working
conditions. One Ground Zero worker, Charlie Vitchers, describes the nightmare:

“The fires were very intense on the pile, the heat was very intense. In some
places you couldn’t even get onto it. In some areas where you could
walk, you’d travel another five feet and then you could just feel the heat
coming up and you would have to just back off. You’d say to yourself, “I can’t
see a fire, but I can feel the heat, so something’s wrong here,” and you’d back
off.

That was one of the concerns we had about putting equipment on the pile,
because the operators were sitting eight or ten feet up above the debris pile in
their cabs and couldn’t feel the heat. But they’re carrying a hundred gallons of
diesel fuel, hydraulic hoses, and other flammables, and there was nothing to
stop the heat from wrecking the machine. If they got stuck in a place where the
heat was so intense that it set his machine on fire, that operator wasn’t going to
make it out.
For More Info

http://donaldfox.wordpress.com/

http://www.veteranstodayradio.com

http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/

http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/fetzer/

http://webookyourshow.com

http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/

http://rense.com/