Effects of Crystal Elasticity on Rolling Contact Fatigue Neil Paulson Ph.D. Research Assistant Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013
Download ReportTranscript Effects of Crystal Elasticity on Rolling Contact Fatigue Neil Paulson Ph.D. Research Assistant Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013
Effects of Crystal Elasticity on Rolling Contact Fatigue Neil Paulson Ph.D. Research Assistant Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 2 Outline • • • • • • • Motivation and Background Crystal Structure Definitions Polycrystalline Material Model Steel Material Stiffness Model Hertzian Contact Modeling RCF Relative Life Study Future Work Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 3 Background and Motivation • Material heterogeneity can play a role in rolling contact fatigue failure, o Microstructure Topology • • Raje, Jalalahmadi, Slack, Weinzapfel, Warhadpande, Bomidi o Voids or inclusions o Microstructure anisotropy Microstructures are composed of many grains of multiple crystal phases The relation between stress and strain depend on how atoms are arranged in the crystal phase Grain Micrograph from electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) scan showing grain orientations1 Objective Extend current RCF FE model to incorporate the effects of crystal elasticity on RCF 1“Bruker Quantax EBSD Analysis Functions” Bruker Corp., 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 4 Homogenous & Isotropic Material Models • • • • Model for the bulk material behavior Material stiffness does not depend on the direction Infinite planes of symmetry Only two independent elastic constants are needed to define the stress strain response Stress-Strain Equations 𝝈𝒙 𝝈𝒚 𝝈𝒛 𝝉𝒙𝒚 𝝉𝒙𝒛 𝝉𝒚𝒛 = 𝑪𝟏𝟏 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟏 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟏 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝑪𝟏𝟏 − 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝟐 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝝐𝒙 𝝐𝒚 𝝐𝒛 𝟎 𝟎 𝜸𝒙𝒚 𝟎 𝜸𝒙𝒛 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝑪𝟏𝟏 − 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝟐 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝑪𝟏𝟏 − 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝜸𝒚𝒛 𝟐 𝑬 𝟏−𝝂 (𝟏 + 𝝂)(𝟏 − 𝟐𝝂) 𝝂𝑬 𝑪𝟏𝟐 = (𝟏 + 𝝂)(𝟏 − 𝟐𝝂) 𝑬 𝑪𝟒𝟒 = 𝑮 = 𝟐(𝟏 + 𝝂) 𝑪𝟏𝟏 = Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 5 Cubic Crystal Structure • • • • Most widely used to incorporate crystal elasticity Elastic constants for many materials are available in literature Orientation of the crystal becomes important The shear modulus is decoupled from E and ν; otherwise the equations remain identical to isotropic material model • 3 elastic constants are needed to define the stress strain response Stress-Strain Equations 𝝈𝒙 𝑪𝟏𝟏 𝝈𝒚 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝝈𝒛 𝑪𝟏𝟐 = 𝝉𝒙𝒚 𝟎 𝝉𝒙𝒛 𝟎 𝝉𝒚𝒛 𝟎 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟏 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝑪𝟏𝟏 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝑪𝟒𝟒 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝑪𝟒𝟒 𝟎 𝝐𝒙 𝟎 𝝐𝒚 𝟎 𝝐𝒛 𝟎 𝟎 𝜸𝒙𝒚 𝟎 𝜸𝒙𝒛 𝑪𝟒𝟒 𝜸𝒚𝒛 𝑬 𝟏−𝝂 (𝟏 + 𝝂)(𝟏 − 𝟐𝝂) 𝝂𝑬 = (𝟏 + 𝝂)(𝟏 − 𝟐𝝂) 𝑪𝟏𝟏 = 𝑪𝟏𝟐 𝐂𝟒𝟒 = 𝑮 Shear modulus is independent of E and ν Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 6 Modeling Polycrystalline Aggregates Each individual crystal has a unique orientation Cubic Stiffness Matrix Isotopic Stiffness Matrix 𝟐𝟔𝟗 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟐𝟔𝟗 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟐𝟔𝟗 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟕𝟕 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟕𝟕 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟕𝟕 𝟐𝟎𝟓 𝟏𝟑𝟖 𝟏𝟑𝟖 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟑𝟖 𝟐𝟎𝟓 𝟏𝟑𝟖 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟑𝟖 𝟏𝟑𝟖 𝟐𝟎𝟓 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟐𝟔 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟐𝟔 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟐𝟔 Euler Angles rotate the local stiffness matrix into the global coordinate frame 𝑪𝒈 = 𝑹𝒛" (𝑹𝒙′ (𝑹𝒛 𝑪𝑹𝑻𝒛 )𝑹𝑻𝒙′ )𝑹𝑻𝒛" 𝟐𝟔𝟗 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟐𝟔𝟗 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟎 𝟎 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟏𝟏𝟓 𝟐𝟔𝟗 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟕𝟕 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟕𝟕 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 Isotropic stiffness matrix is identical after rotation 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟎 𝟕𝟕 𝟐𝟗𝟓 𝟏𝟐𝟓 𝟔𝟎 𝟒 𝟐𝟒 𝟐𝟓 𝟏𝟐𝟓 𝟔𝟎 𝟒 𝟐𝟒 𝟐𝟓 𝟐𝟓𝟎 𝟏𝟎𝟓 −𝟏𝟒 −𝟏𝟔 −𝟒𝟔 𝟏𝟎𝟓 𝟑𝟏𝟓 𝟏𝟎 −𝟖 𝟐𝟏 −𝟏𝟒 𝟎𝟏𝟎 𝟏𝟏𝟑 𝟐𝟓 −𝟏𝟔 −𝟏𝟔 −𝟖 𝟐𝟓 𝟒𝟗 𝟏𝟎 −𝟒𝟔 𝟐𝟏 −𝟏𝟔 𝟏𝟎 𝟗𝟒 Cubic stiffness matrix becomes fully anisotropic after rotation Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 7 Material & Model Verification 𝜹𝒙 = 𝟎 • A representative model of polycrystalline material was developed using Voronoi cells to represent individual grains • The stiffness matrix of each grain was rotated to the global coordinates 𝜹𝒙 = 𝒄 𝒚 𝒙 • Uniaxial Strain was applied • Reaction forces were measured 𝑭𝒙 𝒚 𝒙 𝜹𝒚 = 𝟎 • Global material properties of the model were evaluated1: 𝑬𝒃 = 𝝈 𝒙 + 𝟐𝝈 𝒚 𝝈 𝒙 − 𝝈 𝒚 𝝐𝒙 (𝝈𝒙 + 𝝈𝒚 ) 𝝂𝒃 = 𝑭𝒚 𝝈𝒚 𝝈𝒙 + 𝝈𝒚 1 Toonder, J, Dommelen, J, Baaijens, F. The relation between single crystal elasticity and the effective elastic behaviour of polycrystalline materials: theory, measurement and computation, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 Steel Material Model 300 200 150 Bulk Properties 0.45 Eavg 199.9 200 0.4 Estd 8.91 νavg 0.291 νstd 0.009 0 Voigt Bound Reuss Bound FEM 0.35 0.30 100 50 0.5 FEA results match isotropic constants Poisson's Ratio Young's Modulus (GPa) 250 FEA Model Voigt Bound Reuss Bound FEM 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Example Cases Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 9 Rolling Contact Fatigue Domain Strong stress gradients inside grains require modifications to FE domain Isotropic Domain Anisotropic Domain Voronoi Centroid Discretization Fixed Element Area Discretization Anisotropic Isotropic Linear Strain Elements Constant Strain Elements Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 10 Anisotropic Hertzian Contact Isotropic Material Hertzian Centerline Stresses Anisotropic Material Anisotropic stress profiles deviate from isotropic stresses Stress concentrations occur at grain boundaries due to orientation change Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 11 Rolling Contact Fatigue Life Equations Microstructures models simulate randomness from experimental testing Lundberg-Palmgren equation can be reduced for constant survivability and volume: 𝒛𝒉 𝑵~ 𝒄 𝝉 𝒄 = 𝟐. 𝟏𝟏 𝒉 = 𝟏𝟎. 𝟑𝟑 Three different numerical models have been proposed with Isotropic Voronoi Element microstructure 2D Discrete Element Model 2D Finite Element Model 3D Finite Element Model 𝝉 = 𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒂𝒍 𝝉 = 𝒊𝒏𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒂𝒍 𝝉 = 𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒂𝒍 𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒃𝒖𝒍𝒍 𝑺𝒍𝒐𝒑𝒆 3.36 𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒃𝒖𝒍𝒍 𝑺𝒍𝒐𝒑𝒆 2.65 𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒃𝒖𝒍𝒍 𝑺𝒍𝒐𝒑𝒆 4.55 𝐈𝐬𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐜 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐰𝐞𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞 the experiments of Lundberg and Palmgren Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 12 Modeling Rolling Contact • Hertzian Line Contact Load • 21 Loading Steps • Load Transverses Anisotropic Region 𝝉𝒙𝒚,𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝚫𝝉𝒙𝒚 • 𝚫𝝉𝒙𝒚 was evaluated for each element • Maximum 𝚫𝝉𝒙𝒚 value and location recorded 𝝉𝒙𝒚,𝒎𝒊𝒏 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 13 Shear Stress Reversal Results 33 crystal orientation maps were run for a given topological model Isotropic shear stress matches theory Anisotropic shear stress increased by orientation mismatch Experimentally Observed μ-crack Bounds1 Isotropic Shear Stress independent of grain boundaries Maximum Shear Stress on Voronoi Boundaries 1 Chen, Q., Shao, E., Zhao, D., Guo, J., & Fan, Z. (1991). Measurement of the critical size of inclusions initiating contact fatigue cracks and its application in bearing steel. Wear, 147, 285–294. Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 14 RCF Relative Life • Relative life equation was used to determine bearing fatigue life 𝝉𝒄 𝑵~ 𝒉 𝒛 𝒄 = 𝟐. 𝟏𝟏 𝒉 = 𝟏𝟎. 𝟑𝟑 • • Shear Stress results from crystal orientations were used to create Weibull plot of RCF life 33 Different topological microstructures Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 15 RCF Relative Life All topological domain results combined into one RCF relative life plot Weibull Distribution Function 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝐹𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑟𝑒 =1−𝑒 − 𝑁−𝛼 𝜖 𝛽 𝛼 = 𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑚𝑖𝑛. 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑) 𝛽 = 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ (𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒) 𝜖 = 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 (𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟) 2-Parameter Weibull 𝜷 = 𝟕𝟕. 𝟓 𝝐 = 𝟏. 𝟏𝟎𝟒 3-Parameter Weibull 𝜶 = 𝟑. 𝟐𝟒 𝜷 = 𝟕𝟕. 𝟓 𝝐 = 𝟏. 𝟏𝟎𝟒 Model Model Type 2-Weibull Slope LundbergPalmgren Experimental 1.125 Harris and Kotzalas Experimental Bounds 0.7-3.5 Raje 2D DEM 3.36 Jalalahmadi 2D FEA 2.65 Weinzapfel 3D FEA 4.55 Current Model 2D FEA Anisotropy 1.174 𝐀𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐜 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 16 Current Model Development • Implement damage mechanics coupled with crystal elasticity to model both crack initiation and propagation • Develop a multi-phase representative model for bearing steel microstructure • Model a nonuniform distribution of crystal orientations (texture) 𝜶-phase 𝜷-phase Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 Measurement of Skidding in Cam and Roller Follower • Skidding in Cam and Followers causes wear and premature failure • A test rig has been developed to study the causes of skidding • An analytical model is under development to model the causes of skidding Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 18 Cam and Follower Test Rig Shaft Coupling – rigidly connects the driven shaft and camshaft Flywheel – 700 mm flywheel to maintain constant shaft speed under alternating load conditions Test Cell – Assembly contains the camshaft, tappet, lubrication pathways and speeds sensor Speed Measurement - Tappets are machined to hold optical sensor - Rollers are laser etched with 20-60 divisions - Time between divisions is measured with optical sensor - Sensor is sealed from environment with sleeve One way Clutch Allows deceleration under flywheel inertia for Stribeck curve data Drive Motor – 55 HP provides power to camshaft with speeds up to 1800 RPM Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013 19 Test Rig Roller Skidding Roller Velocity (RPM) • Skidding created with modified roller follower • Skidding only apparent at low loads • Results show a transition from skidding into a pure rolling regime • Short skidding regions are seen after the transition to rolling regime 300 250 200 Cam shows initial stages of skidding wear 150 100 Skidding Region 0 300 250 150 2000 100 Intermittent Skid 50 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 1000 18 0 3000 Time (s) Rolling Region Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Normal Load (N) 3000 200 2000 al Load (N) Roller Velocity (RPM) 50 November 14, 2013 20 Analytical Roller Skidding Model I ∙ αroller W ∙ μaxle 2D roller skidding model under development – – – – W ∙ μcam W EHL of cam and roller interface (𝜇𝑐𝑎𝑚 ) HL of roller and pin joint (𝜇𝑎𝑥𝑙𝑒 ) Kinematics of cam and follower (𝐼𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 , 𝜔𝑐𝑎𝑚 ) Torque Balance to find angular velocity (𝛼𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 ) ωcam Cam Kinematics 𝝎𝒄𝒂𝒎 𝝎𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒓 EHL & Mixed EHL 𝝁𝒄𝒂𝒎 𝝁𝒂𝒙𝒍𝒆 Torque Balance HL 𝜶𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒓 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) November 14, 2013