Credit Risks Associated With Nuclear Generation NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Sharon Bonelli Managing Director April 2, 2008 New Orleans, Louisiana.
Download ReportTranscript Credit Risks Associated With Nuclear Generation NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Sharon Bonelli Managing Director April 2, 2008 New Orleans, Louisiana.
Credit Risks Associated With Nuclear Generation NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Sharon Bonelli Managing Director April 2, 2008 New Orleans, Louisiana State of U.S. Nuclear Industry > Currently 104 nuclear projects supply 20% of power in U.S – Most existing nuclear plants licensed in 1960s and 1970s – Plants performing well – Nuclear fuel costs rising, but still quite low relative to fossil fuels – 48 license extensions granted, 38 pending and publicly announced – Share of energy from nuclear will diminish absent new construction www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 1 Drivers of Renewed Interest in Nuclear Construction High Fuel Prices Growing Base Load Demand Potential Carbon Regulations Investment Incentives in EPACT 2005 www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 2 U.S. Nuclear Plant Additions Years New Plants Completed Capacity in MW Average Size (MW) Pre-1970 4 1,269 316 1970-79 60 47,861 798 1980-89 46 50,295 1,093 1990-1996 5 5,614 1,123 1997-2006 None None None Current plans 30* * Planned additions www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 3 State of U.S. Nuclear Industry > 30 new U.S. nuclear projects currently proposed by 17 companies – Carbon free energy source – Promotes diversity and national energy security – Wide ranging cost estimates – On the high end, Turkey Point 6 and 7 ($6,000 - $9,000/kw) > $12 – 18 billion for 2,200 mw option > $18 – 24 billion for 3,040 mw option > Need certified by FPSC March 2008, permitting FP&L to get in the queue for large castings – On the low end, South Texas 3 and 4 (June 2006 estimate 2,000/kw) > $5,400 billion for 2,700 mw www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 4 Fitch Approach to Rating New Build Nuclear > Fitch has no preference for nor against nuclear generation – We focus on how the costs of building, operating and decommissioning nuclear facilities could affect a company’s overall financial health, and in particular its effect on bondholders > Fitch evaluates nuclear investments in a similar fashion to investments in other long-lived assets or capital outlays in the power sector – Regulated utilities - Mechanisms and timeliness of cost recovery – Gencos - Wholesale power market energy and capacity pricing forecast or contractual cash flows – Primary focus is on the adequacy of cash flow relative to debt and interest, capital adequacy and liquidity www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 5 Credit Risks Evolve Through Nuclear Plant Life Cycle > Construction and licensing period risk – Credit risk often at peak during construction period – Federal and state initiatives can limit associated risks – Massive scale of investment; access to capital > Operating period risk – Operating performance and outages – Power market effects of new capacity additions – NRC regulation – Storage/disposal of spent fuel > End of operating life risk – Decommissioning/license extension risks www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 6 Construction and Licensing: New Plant NRC Licensing Risk Problems in Prior Building Cycle Targeted Improvements this Cycle Non standard design – frequent change orders NRC design certification process for standardized modular plants Two stage licensing process One step combined Construction and Operating License (COL) to resolve issues upfront - Construction - Operation Inadequate documentation led to application delays at NRC Safety issues unresolved until construction completion Widespread community opposition to NRC licensing www.fitchratings.com Cooperation among nuclear developers using same design Community support in certain regions, particularly existing sites in the Southeast November 6, 2015 7 Construction and Licensing: NRC Design Certification > Westinghouse AP1000 – Design certified by NRC – Southern, SCANA, Progress, Duke, TVA/Nustart consortium > AREVA U.S. EPR – NRC application pending – Unistar consortia: CEG, AEE, PPL, Amarillo Power, Alternate Energy Holdings > Mitsubishi Heavy Industries US-APWR - NRC application pending – Luminant > GE/Hitachi US – ESBWR – NRC application pending – Dominion, Exelon, Entergy, Entergy/NuStart consortium > GE/Hitachi ABWR – Design certified – NRG > Other advanced designs from AREVA, Westinghouse, etc. may seek NRC design certification in the future www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 8 Construction and Licensing: EPACT 2005 Incentives for Early Movers > EPACT 2005 provisions for new technology nuclear investment – Risk insurance for NRC or litigation related delays – DOE loan guarantee program for advanced technology clean energy projects > Nuclear solicitation round expected later this year > Program designed to stimulate investment in new clean energy technologies that may not otherwise be able to attract capital on economic terms > Companies will need to raise substantial equity for their investment even with incentives www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 9 Construction and Licensing: Nuclear Construction Risk Problems in Prior Build Cycle Potential Mitigant this Cycle Construction delays Standard design Rising material and labor costs Allocation of cost over-run or delay risk to EPC contractor (the bid/ask seems to be still wide) Rate shock when plant entered operation and was added to rate base Entire construction cost borne by owner(s) Joint venture with manufacturer CWIP in rate base or other mechanism to ease costs in rates Federal incentives such as FFB funding under DOE program to reduce costs www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 10 Construction and Licensing: Procurement Risks for Major Components and Labor > Global competition for components increasing costs and lead times > 35 plants under construction worldwide (6 China, 6 India, 7 Russia…), China announced plans for 30 reactors at multiple sites – Japan Steel Works is only maker of large forgings needed for reactor vessels – Other pinch points may develop for equipment such as steam generators, turbine generators, nuclear-grade pumps and heat exchangers – Prices of steel, concrete and other materials very high > Intense competition for design and craft skills – Up-rates – Maintenance needs for aging plants www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 11 11 State Initiatives to Reduce Construction and Licensing Risks > Run the gamut – Minnesota - 2007 law: repealed ban on certificate of need for new nuclear plant – Georgia – 2006 regulation: Allows Georgia Power to capitalize costs incurred for development and licensing of a new unit at Plant Vogtle – NC – 2007 law: allows NCUC to add approved costs to rate base prior to completion or even if canceled – More credit supportive models > SC > FL > VA www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 12 SC Legislation > South Carolina Base Load Review Act (May 2007) – Intended to allow a utility to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs for new nuclear or coal plants larger than 350 mw – Utility files application to build plant, SC PSC reviews and rules on prudence of decision to build – If decision is determined prudent, this finding is binding on all future proceedings so long as construction proceeds in accordance with the schedule, and budget estimates in the application – Utility can file revised rates each year of construction for CWIP based on updated cost of debt and capital structure – Utility can use project specific ROE or use the return from proceedings less than 5 years old www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 13 FL Legislation and Regulation > Enabling legislation (SB888) enacted June 2006 > Florida’s Nuclear Power Plant Cost Recovery Rules promulgated to promote investment in new nuclear plants by establishing alternate cost recovery mechanism for such investments > Phases in cost recovery to avoid rate shock > Nuclear Cost Recovery Rule allows recovery of “all prudently incurred” costs associated with siting, designing, licensing, constructing and operating new nuclear power plants > First units certified under this rule by FPSC March 2008, permitting FP&L to get in queue large castings for Turkey Point 6 and 7 and uprate of St. Lucie and Turkey Point > Progress Energy Florida expected to seek certification for new Levy unit later in 2008. www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 14 Virginia Legislation > Acknowledges need for baseload generation and provides enhanced return on those investments > New generation riders provide for recovery of financing costs, operating costs, and investments through rate adjustment clause separate from base rates > Annual request to SCC for rider recovery of next year’s projected revenue requirement – Rider provides stability through forward looking approval – Phases in the costs to avoid rate shock > Annual true-up for actual vs. projected costs > 200 basis point enhanced return on nuclear for 12 – 25 years of service life; ROE floor based on peer group www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 15 Operating Stage: Nuclear Operating Risks > Nuclear operator credit rating considerations – Quality of nuclear assets > Performance track record > Outage history > Age of unit/License extension status – Safety record – NRC inspection results > Liquidity – Cash and committed facilities – Outage insurance www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 16 Operating Stage: Nuclear Operating Risk > Track record of U.S. nuclear fleet is improving – Capacity factors rising – Re-fueling outages getting shorter – Shared best practices – Concentration of nuclear ownership – Strong worker safety record (low incidence of lost time accidents) www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 17 Operating Stage: Economic Incentives Under EPACT 2005 > Production tax credit of $18/mwh for first 6,000mw of new nuclear capacity (8 years with annual cap of $125mm/unit) > Risk mitigation: 20 year extension of Price-Anderson Act www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 18 Operating Stage: Cost of Prolonged Outage > Risks of prolonged outage – low incidence/high consequence – Significant costs for replacement power, repairs – May need NRC approval to re-start – 45 reactors have had outages of one year or more (7 more than two years) since TMI in 1979 according to the Union of Concerned Scientists > Most outages for component repair/replacements or safety restoration > 1,000 mw XYZ Nuclear unit replacement power costs for estimated cost of 1 year outage 1,000 mw x 8,760 (hours) x 90% (capacity factor) x $50 mwh (spot market price) = $394.2 million per year or about $7.5 million per week www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 19 First Energy Case Study > Davis Besse Outage – 883 mw nuclear unit – 2 Year outage (Feb. 2002 – April 2004) Capital O&M Replacement pwr. Total 2002 63 115 120 298 Outage Costs ($ Mil.) 2003 21 93 196 310 2004 0 1 64 65 > Ratings Impact – July 2002 - Rating Outlook revise to Negative from stable – September 2003 – Ratings lowered to ‘BBB-’ from ‘BBB’ www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 20 U.S. Nuclear Refueling Outage Days Average 104 106 95 88 92 81 66 66 51 40 44 37 40 33 42 38 39 40 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: 1990-98 EUCG, 1999-2007 Energy Velocity / Nuclear Regulatory Commission Updated: 2/08 U.S. Nuclear Industry Capacity Factors, 1971- 2006 100 89.6 90 80 70 60 50 40 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 Source: Global Energy Decisions / Energy Information Administration Updated: 10/07 1996 2001 2006 End of Operating Life Risks > Community opposition to license extensions in certain locales > Most decommissioning funds are over-funded; license extensions provide additional time for funds to grow > Spent fuel disposal is a federal problem, not a credit risk www.fitchratings.com November 6, 2015 23 New Nuclear Plant Status Company Alternate Energy Holdings / Unistar Amarillo Power / Unistar AmerenUE / Unistar Constellation / UniStar Constellation / UniStar Detroit Edison Dominion Site(s) Owyhee County, ID Vicinity of Amarillo, TX Callaway County, MO (Callaway) Calvert County, MD (Calvert Cliffs) Oswego County, NY (Nine Mile Point) Fermi, MI (Fermi) Duke Louisa County, VA (North Anna) Cherokee County, SC (William States Lee) Davie County, NC Duke Oconee County, SC (Oconee) Entergy West Felciana Parish, LA (River Bend) Claiborne County, MS (Grand Gulf) Duke Entergy (NuStart ) www.fitchratings.com Early Site Permit Construction / Operating (ESP) License Submittal FY 2009 - FY 2009 FY 2008 - Partial - Under Review, Full - FY 2008 FY 2009 Not yet determined Approved November 2007 - FY 2008 November 2007 December 2007 Under consideration Under consideration - Not yet determined Approved April 2007 FY 2008 Not yet determined FY 2008 November 6, 2015 24 New Nuclear Plant Status, continued Company Exelon Site(s) Clinton, IL (Clinton) Exelon Florida Power & Light Victoria County, TX Miami-Dade County, FL (Turkey Point) Glen Rose, TX (Comanche Peak) Matagorda County, TX (South Texas Project) Luzerne County, PA (Susquehanna) Wake County, NC (Harris) Levy County, FL Fairfield County, SC (V.C. Summer) Burke County, GA (Vogtle) Luminant NRG Energy / STPNOC PPL Corp. / Unistar Progress Energy Progress Energy South Carolina Electric & Gas Southern Company TVA (NuStart ) Source Nuclear Energy Institute www.fitchratings.com Jackson County, AL (Bellefonte) FY=fiscal year Early Site Permit Construction / Operating (ESP) License Submittal Approved March Not yet determined 2007 FY 2008 Not yet FY 2009 determined FY 2008 - September 2007 - FY 2009 - February 2008 FY 2008 FY 2008 Under review, Approval expected early 2009 FY 2008 - October 2007 November 6, 2015 25 Fitch Ratings www.fitchratings.com New York One State Street Plaza New York, NY 10004 +1 212 908 0500 +1 800 75 FITCH The Fitch Group Fitch Ratings Algorithmics London Eldon House 2 Eldon Street London EC2M 7UA UK +44 207 417 4222 Fitch Training Singapore 7 Temasek Blvd. Singapore 038987 +65 6336 6801