Programs and Research Moving to the network level: discovery and disclosure Lorcan Dempsey ALCTS ALA Midwinter, Seattle January 19 2007

Download Report

Transcript Programs and Research Moving to the network level: discovery and disclosure Lorcan Dempsey ALCTS ALA Midwinter, Seattle January 19 2007

Programs and Research
Moving to the network
level:
discovery and disclosure
Lorcan Dempsey
ALCTS
ALA Midwinter, Seattle
January 19 2007
The network rewrites
behaviors
Programs and research
2
A few things….
 Workflow and Attention
 Aggregation of demand and suppy: the long tail
Programs and research
3
~18 months old
No FaceBook, MySpace
Library?
Programs and research
4
University of Minnesota
http://www.lib.umn.edu/about/mellon/KM%20JStor%20Presentation.pps
Programs and research
5
Netvibes, onfolio, my yahoo, myspace, RSS aggregator, …
Self assembled digital identity
Prefabricated (e.g. CMS)
Database > website > workflow
Programs and research
6
Programs and research
7
Workflow
 Then
 Users built workflow around the library
 Now
 The library must build its services around user workflow
Get into the flow
Disclose into other environments
Programs and research
8
Attention
 Then
 Resources scarce, attention abundant
 Now
 Attention scarce, resources abundant
Competition for attention
Programs and research
9
Long tail information providers
Systemwide
efficiences
Aggregation of supply
•Unified discovery
•Low transaction costs
Aggregation of demand
Impact?
Programs and research
10
Libraries and the long tail dynamic
Each book
its reader
Each reader
his/her book


Aggregate supply?
 1.7% of circulations are ILLs
 (60% of aggregate G5
collection owned by one
library only)
Programs and research
11
Aggregate demand?
 20% of collection accounted
for 90% of use
 (2 research libraries over ~4
years)
Note: All statistics are
preliminary and subject
to change. Final report
forthcoming soon.
The Library Long Tail
Number of Holdings
(using holdings as measure of popularity)
“Head”
Figure not drawn to scale;
for illustration purposes only
“Long Tail”
Items ranked by system-wide popularity
Head:
Top 10% of WorldCat records (ranked by holdings)
account for 80% of total WorldCat holdings
Long Tail:
Bottom 90% of WorldCat records (ranked by holdings)
account for 20% of total WorldCat holdings
Programs and research
12
Note: All statistics are
preliminary and subject
to change. Final report
forthcoming soon.
ILL and the Long Tail
(FY 2005 OCLC ILL transactions)
Number of Holdings
~75% of ILL requests were
directed at the “Head”
~25% of ILL requests were
directed at the “Long Tail”
Items ranked by system-wide popularity
By comparison, Chris Anderson (The Long Tail, 2006) reports:
Amazon: ~ 25% of sales from the “long tail”
Netflix: ~ 20% of sales from the “long tail”
* Question: are current ILL systems adequately supporting
demand for the library long tail?
Programs and research
13
For many years,
Chinese people
cited a proverb:
if the wine
smells really
wonderful,
customers will
come in spite of
the length of the
lane.
Programs and research
14
The network rewrites the library:
discovery and disclosure
Programs and research
15
Chris Beckett
http://www.scholinfo.com/presentations/2006/8/10/the-new-world-order-in-collection-development-the-commercial-perspective.html
Programs and research
16
Discovery:
focus on catalog with some related …




Local Discovery Environments
Shared Discovery Environments
Syndicated Discovery Environments
Leveraged Discovery Environments
Programs and research
17
Local Discovery environment
 Some (not necessarily aligned) motivations
 Make data work harder
 Integrate access to locally managed resources
 Escape from ILS limitations






NCSU
Rochester
SOLR
Worldcat 2.0
Primo
Encore …
Programs and research
18
Programs and research
19
Programs and research
20
Programs and research
21
Programs and research
22
Programs and research
23
Programs and research
24
Programs and research
25
Some remarks
 How does MARC data play with other data
 Subjects, authors, ..
 Historic investment in structure?
 Duplicate cost?
 Relationship to Metasearch?
Programs and research
26
Shared discovery environment
 Increase impact
 Create gravitational pull
 Aggregate demand and supply
 Reduce costs
Programs and research
27
Programs and research
28
Programs and research
29
Some comments
 Integration of discovery to delivery becoming
essential
 A move to shared environments seems more
likely with increased ability to ‘view’ different
levels
 Increased gravitational pull: greater use of
collections
 Growing evidence
Programs and research
30
Syndicated discovery experience
 Syndicate data or service or links
Programs and research
31
Programs and research
32
Programs and research
33
Programs and research
34
Programs and research
35
Programs and research
36
Programs and research
37
Syndicating services
 RSS
 Portlets
 APIs, Protocol-based
 Projects
 Sakailibrary
 …
Not as rapid as one might expect?
Programs and research
38
Programs and research
39
Programs and research
40
Programs and research
41
Some remarks
 Syndication of data now common among data
providers
 Routing issue for non-unique materials
 Resolution
 Worldcat
 Libraries exposing licensed content holdings
interesting
 Google Scholar
Programs and research
42
 Service disclosure less common






APIs
Web services
Portlets
HTML fragments – ‘search boxes’
Toolbars
Widgets, extensions, …
Programs and research
43
The Leveraged discovery experience
 In some ways the most interesting
 Use another discovery service to connect back to
your resources
 Compare to the situation with article databases
and resolvers
Programs and research
44
Programs and research
45
Programs and research
46
Click
– look in OCLC Resolver Registry
– pass through to the relevant library
Programs and research
47
Some remarks
 Some of these are toy-like now, but indicate a
direction
 Increased capacity to ‘sense’ structure
(microformats) will improve ability.
Programs and research
48
So ….
 The library website is not the front door
 We need to connect multiple discovery environments to
library fulfilment options
 We need to put library resources in users’ workflow
 We need to place library resources in places which
aggregate demand
 Need more robust machine interfaces for the ILS
so that we can put its functionality in other places
(medium term)
Programs and research
49
And OCLC ….
Programs and research
50