Programs and Research Moving to the network level: discovery and disclosure Lorcan Dempsey ALCTS ALA Midwinter, Seattle January 19 2007
Download ReportTranscript Programs and Research Moving to the network level: discovery and disclosure Lorcan Dempsey ALCTS ALA Midwinter, Seattle January 19 2007
Programs and Research Moving to the network level: discovery and disclosure Lorcan Dempsey ALCTS ALA Midwinter, Seattle January 19 2007 The network rewrites behaviors Programs and research 2 A few things…. Workflow and Attention Aggregation of demand and suppy: the long tail Programs and research 3 ~18 months old No FaceBook, MySpace Library? Programs and research 4 University of Minnesota http://www.lib.umn.edu/about/mellon/KM%20JStor%20Presentation.pps Programs and research 5 Netvibes, onfolio, my yahoo, myspace, RSS aggregator, … Self assembled digital identity Prefabricated (e.g. CMS) Database > website > workflow Programs and research 6 Programs and research 7 Workflow Then Users built workflow around the library Now The library must build its services around user workflow Get into the flow Disclose into other environments Programs and research 8 Attention Then Resources scarce, attention abundant Now Attention scarce, resources abundant Competition for attention Programs and research 9 Long tail information providers Systemwide efficiences Aggregation of supply •Unified discovery •Low transaction costs Aggregation of demand Impact? Programs and research 10 Libraries and the long tail dynamic Each book its reader Each reader his/her book Aggregate supply? 1.7% of circulations are ILLs (60% of aggregate G5 collection owned by one library only) Programs and research 11 Aggregate demand? 20% of collection accounted for 90% of use (2 research libraries over ~4 years) Note: All statistics are preliminary and subject to change. Final report forthcoming soon. The Library Long Tail Number of Holdings (using holdings as measure of popularity) “Head” Figure not drawn to scale; for illustration purposes only “Long Tail” Items ranked by system-wide popularity Head: Top 10% of WorldCat records (ranked by holdings) account for 80% of total WorldCat holdings Long Tail: Bottom 90% of WorldCat records (ranked by holdings) account for 20% of total WorldCat holdings Programs and research 12 Note: All statistics are preliminary and subject to change. Final report forthcoming soon. ILL and the Long Tail (FY 2005 OCLC ILL transactions) Number of Holdings ~75% of ILL requests were directed at the “Head” ~25% of ILL requests were directed at the “Long Tail” Items ranked by system-wide popularity By comparison, Chris Anderson (The Long Tail, 2006) reports: Amazon: ~ 25% of sales from the “long tail” Netflix: ~ 20% of sales from the “long tail” * Question: are current ILL systems adequately supporting demand for the library long tail? Programs and research 13 For many years, Chinese people cited a proverb: if the wine smells really wonderful, customers will come in spite of the length of the lane. Programs and research 14 The network rewrites the library: discovery and disclosure Programs and research 15 Chris Beckett http://www.scholinfo.com/presentations/2006/8/10/the-new-world-order-in-collection-development-the-commercial-perspective.html Programs and research 16 Discovery: focus on catalog with some related … Local Discovery Environments Shared Discovery Environments Syndicated Discovery Environments Leveraged Discovery Environments Programs and research 17 Local Discovery environment Some (not necessarily aligned) motivations Make data work harder Integrate access to locally managed resources Escape from ILS limitations NCSU Rochester SOLR Worldcat 2.0 Primo Encore … Programs and research 18 Programs and research 19 Programs and research 20 Programs and research 21 Programs and research 22 Programs and research 23 Programs and research 24 Programs and research 25 Some remarks How does MARC data play with other data Subjects, authors, .. Historic investment in structure? Duplicate cost? Relationship to Metasearch? Programs and research 26 Shared discovery environment Increase impact Create gravitational pull Aggregate demand and supply Reduce costs Programs and research 27 Programs and research 28 Programs and research 29 Some comments Integration of discovery to delivery becoming essential A move to shared environments seems more likely with increased ability to ‘view’ different levels Increased gravitational pull: greater use of collections Growing evidence Programs and research 30 Syndicated discovery experience Syndicate data or service or links Programs and research 31 Programs and research 32 Programs and research 33 Programs and research 34 Programs and research 35 Programs and research 36 Programs and research 37 Syndicating services RSS Portlets APIs, Protocol-based Projects Sakailibrary … Not as rapid as one might expect? Programs and research 38 Programs and research 39 Programs and research 40 Programs and research 41 Some remarks Syndication of data now common among data providers Routing issue for non-unique materials Resolution Worldcat Libraries exposing licensed content holdings interesting Google Scholar Programs and research 42 Service disclosure less common APIs Web services Portlets HTML fragments – ‘search boxes’ Toolbars Widgets, extensions, … Programs and research 43 The Leveraged discovery experience In some ways the most interesting Use another discovery service to connect back to your resources Compare to the situation with article databases and resolvers Programs and research 44 Programs and research 45 Programs and research 46 Click – look in OCLC Resolver Registry – pass through to the relevant library Programs and research 47 Some remarks Some of these are toy-like now, but indicate a direction Increased capacity to ‘sense’ structure (microformats) will improve ability. Programs and research 48 So …. The library website is not the front door We need to connect multiple discovery environments to library fulfilment options We need to put library resources in users’ workflow We need to place library resources in places which aggregate demand Need more robust machine interfaces for the ILS so that we can put its functionality in other places (medium term) Programs and research 49 And OCLC …. Programs and research 50