November 2007 IEEE 802 Emergency Services (ES) Call for Interest (CFI) Date: 2007-11-13 Stephen McCann [email protected] Submissions Slide 1 Stephen McCann, NSN.

Download Report

Transcript November 2007 IEEE 802 Emergency Services (ES) Call for Interest (CFI) Date: 2007-11-13 Stephen McCann [email protected] Submissions Slide 1 Stephen McCann, NSN.

November 2007
IEEE 802 Emergency Services (ES) Call for
Interest (CFI)
Date: 2007-11-13
Stephen McCann
[email protected]
Submissions
Slide 1
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
Abstract
The purpose of this presentation is to
determine interest in the formation of an
IEEE 802 Study Group about
Emergency Service (ES) provision
Submissions
Slide 2
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
IEEE 802 ES Background
• Maturing IEEE 802 technologies carry VoIP traffic and it’s only a
matter of time before regulations insist they support emergency
services. (FCC & EU commission proposals)
• IEEE 802 technologies by themselves cannot ensure that all factors are
compatible for Emergency Service sessions to actually take place.
• Therefore, it’s essential to distinguish between the minimum level of
support provided by IEEE 802 emergency services, and support of
emergency services at higher layers.
• By “IEEE 802 Emergency Services” we refer to the direct support in
IEEE 802 of such services, independently of what solutions are
adopted at higher protocol layers.
• Under all circumstances, changes to IEEE 802 should be kept to the
minimum necessary.
Submissions
Slide 3
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
Do What?
• To initiate a Study Group
– WGSG: Technology specific, 802.1, 802.21?
– ECSG: Harmonized approach to ES in all 802 groups
• This study will take into account regulatory issues and
the architecture requirements of NENA i2 & i3, IETF
ECRIT and 3GPP/3GPP2 architecture requirements on
radio access technologies.
• Attempt to pre-empt upcoming regulatory issues
• Determine what aspects of ES would benefit from a
harmonized approach across all IEEE 802.
• Prepare a PAR for ES provision enhancements, if study
shows there is a need.
Submissions
Slide 4
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
Relevant Requirements
• Ability to support ES calls
– (various media types)
• Support for callback
• Unauthenticated calls (no credentials in terminal)
– Roaming and non roaming
• Emergency Alert System (EAS) service
• Authority – authority communications
• Citizen – citizen communications
• Location (Automatic Location Identifier)
– Common Approach
• Note: This is not a location provisioning study group
Submissions
Slide 5
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
ES Interest
• Initial interest in ES within 802.11
• Other interest from 802.1
– LLDP-MED is a adopted wired solution with location support.
• Subsequent interest from 802.21 (802 handover)
– Provision of ES Information Server
• Some interest from 802.15 (15.4) and 802.16
– ZigBee and 802.16d (fixed) community
• Additional Information
– IEEE 802 Tutorials at March and July 2007 plenary meetings.
Attendance ~150
– Liaisons between IEEE 802.11u, NENA and IETF ECRIT
• e.g. <draft-tschofenig-ecrit-unauthenticated-access-00.txt>
Submissions
Slide 6
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
ES Study Group
• Future work
– Study group will consider
•
•
•
•
existing work in this area
industry input
network and service provider input
what do regulators require
• Defined Goals and Timeframe
– To determine what work, if any, is necessary to enable
an 802 harmonized approach to emergency service
provision
• Timeframe
– 2 plenary cycles, to investigate PAR definition
Submissions
Slide 7
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
Background/Relevant Aspects
IEEE 802.1
• LLDP-MED currently supports automatic physical
location discovery suitable for wired 802 networks
• 802.1AB-Rev work in process could allow location
discovery to be leveraged across all 802 technologies
Submissions
Slide 8
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
IEEE 802.11p
• Supports Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
applications. This includes data exchange between
high-speed vehicles and between the vehicles and the
roadside infrastructure in the licensed ITS band of 5.9
GHz.
• ES from vehicles to authority (eCALL blackbox)
• Authority – authority vehicle comms
Submissions
Slide 9
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
IEEE 802.11u
• New QoS features
– expedited bandwidth request
– QoS mapping
• Generic Advertising Service (GAS)
• Emergency services recommendations (informative)
– Use case #1: open network
– Use case #2: public credentials
Submissions
Slide 10
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
IEEE 802.11v
• Reliable Location Determination
• Capability information includes
– Format (Civic, Geo – shapes not points, Location by
Reference…etc)
– Encoding and Resolution
– Capable of providing
• self-location
• remote-location
Submissions
Slide 11
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
IEEE 802.21
•
Information Server
– logical place to support a comprehensive list of all ES support options.
•
Mobility support
– assisting handovers during an ES session
•
Location
– Service providers need flexibility on how location services are offered in
their network
– Provides help in determining or provide the location to the clients at
various layers
•
•
Submissions
Link layer specific ones (Layer 2)
Link layer agnostic ones (Layer 3+)
Slide 12
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
Other Requirements?
• 802.16/20/22
– Location Determination
• NG911
– Support for non-voice ES connections (e.g. text messaging, email,
video)
Submissions
Slide 13
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
Summary
• Study group
– ECSG/WGSG
• Scope
– Provision of Emergency Service Capability throughout 802
• Purpose
– To determine what work, if any, is necessary to enable an 802
harmonized approach to emergency service provision
• Timeframe
– 2 plenary cycles, to investigate PAR definition
Submissions
Slide 14
Stephen McCann, NSN
November 2007
Call for Interest Polls (115 in room)
• Support formation of a study group
– Yes/No/Abstain 41/4/26
• Formation of an EC study group
– Yes/No/Abstain 23/13/28
• Formation of an WG study group
– 802.1
Yes/No/Abstain 11/15.25
– 802.21
Yes/No/Abstain 17/16/27
– Other, than .1,.21
Yes/No/Abstain 17/14/30
• How many people intend to participate?
– 24
• How many companies intend to participate?
– 16
Submissions
Slide 15
Stephen McCann, NSN