Jenny HEATHCOTE Chronic Hepatitis C “The Non Responder”! Jenny Heathcote MD University of Toronto.

Download Report

Transcript Jenny HEATHCOTE Chronic Hepatitis C “The Non Responder”! Jenny Heathcote MD University of Toronto.

Slide 1

Jenny HEATHCOTE


Slide 2

Chronic Hepatitis C
“The Non Responder”!

Jenny Heathcote MD
University of Toronto


Slide 3

Mr R.H. Canadian First Nation’s Person 54 yrs
July 2000

Routine check up: ALT
Tested HCV Ab +ve, (genotype 1a)
Viral titre >106c/ml (3x105iu/ml)

Comorbidities Alcohol 60-80g/d 20 yrs
Generalized psoriasis 25 yrs
BMI 27 (wt 77 kg)
No smoking, depression, HIV
Risk Factors: Blood transfusion in 1976
IDU and cocaine snorting 1983-1985
Examination: Normal
Liver biopsy
Therapy

A 1 F 4 + steatohepatitis
IFN2b 3mu ttw + RBV daily


Slide 4

Mr R.H. – 2002 Referred for re-treatment

Hb146 g/L

ALT 110 iu/mL

Bili 11mmol/L HCVRNA 106

WBC 6 x106

AST 65 iu/mL

Alb 41 g/L

Cryoglobulins
not detected

Pt 158x109

ALP N

INR 1.03

U/S – no focal
lesion (fat)

FBS
5.2mmol/L


Slide 5

Mr. R.H.
May 2003
• Peg IFN2b 1.5 mcg/kg + RBV 1000 mg/d
• EVR (12 wk): >2 log HCVRNA (full dose
therapy continued for 48 wk)

• Wk 24-HCVRNA 253 iu/ml
• EOT (48 wk) HCVRNA 331 iu/ml
• 6m post Rx HCVRNA 8x105 iu/ml


Slide 6

Nomenclature of Initial
Virologic Response

7

Nonresponder
(c < 0.2)

Serum HCV RNA

6

1st

phase

Flat partial responder

5

(0.0  d < 0.05)

4

2nd phase

Slow partial responder
(0.05  d < 0.35)

3
detection limit

2

Rapid responder
1

0

1

2

3

14

7

21

28

(d  0.35)

Days
Zeuzem et al., Gastroenterology 2001;120:1438


Slide 7

Definitions of Non-Response

Null responder:

no fall in HCVRNA with therapy

Flat non responder:

phase I response, no phase 2

Slow responder:

Detectable HCVRNA @ 4 and 8 weeks

Relapser:

> 2 log drop HCVRNA @ 12 weeks
Undetectable HCVRNA @ EOT
HCVRNA detectable 6 months off therapy


Slide 8

Rates of Viral Clearance Predicts SVR
PegIFN/RBV
Patients with SVR (%)

100
91
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
HCVRNA Status
Week 4
Negative

Week 12

Negative

72

60
48

43

2log

<2log

>2log

<2log

Negative

Negative

2log

2log

Negative

Negative

Week 24 Negative Negative Negative
Ferenci P et al., J Hepatol 2005;43:425


Slide 9

Factors Influencing Response to Therapy
PEGIFN + RBV
Therapy

Virus

Host

dose

genotype

hepatic fibrosis

duration

viral load

steatosis/ high BMI

?type Peg
IFN

HIV, HBV &
schistosomiasis
(co-infection)
mutations

ethnicity (genes)

Virus-host
interaction

alcohol (adherence)

adherence

age (adherence)


Slide 10

Ribavirin Dose % Optimal (1000-1200 mg/d)
Response in Genotype 1 Patients
70

720 pts

64%
60%

60

55%

SVR (%)

50
41%

40

35%

30
20
10
0

321

151

225

≥97%

80–<97%

60–<80%

23

720

<60%

Overall

Copegus cumulative exposure levels (weeks 1–12)

Bain et al. Presented at AASLD. Oct 27-31, 2006. Boston, MA. Abstract 388.


Slide 11

Ribavirin Exposure and Virologic Response:
Predictors of EVR and SVR

EVR

SVR

RBV exposure (%)

P=0.0173*

P<0.001*

Bodyweight

P=0.0125

NS

Baseline HCV-RNA

NS

P<0.001

Race

NS

P<0.001

Metavir F4

NS

P<0.001

Age

NS

P<0.001

*Variables in MLR which showed significance in 1 or both models
Bain et al. Presented at AASLD. Oct 27-31, 2006. Boston, MA. Abstract 388.


Slide 12

Geno 1 HVL: PegIFN2a 180mcg/wk + high dose
RBV: (1660-3600mg/d)
Mean baseline VL (n=10)
4 wk EVR

2.5x106 iu/mL
0% (<50 iu/mL)

12 wk EVR

50% (<50 iu/mL)

24 wk EVR

80% (<50 iu/mL)

72 wk SVR

90%

NB: Erythropoetin 100% - all severe fatigue
Lindhal et al., Hepatology 2005;41:275


Slide 13

Dynamically Individualized vs. Standard Treatment
Chronic Hepatitis C
Patients categorized:• Rapid (64 %)
• Slow (24 %)
• Flat (3.7 %)

responders at 6
weeks

• Null (8.2 %)

SVR
Individualized dose

Randomized at 6
weeks

60%

Peg IFN 2a + RBV

Standard regimen

Zeuzem, J. Hepatol 2005; 43:250

66%


Slide 14

72-wk Peg-IFN + RBV for HCV
Genotype 1
• Extending PegIFN2a + RBV from 48 to 72 weeks
– Similar SVR rates in unselected cohort of HCV infected pts
–  SVR,  relapse rate in pts without rapid virologic response
Unselected population

90

Patients (%)

80
70

72

48 weeks
72 weeks

HCVRNA positive pts at wk 4

100
90

81

80

67

60

52

50

53

40
30

Patients (%)

100

70
60
50

32

30
20

10

10

0

0

SVR

40

40

20

EOT

52

EOT

Berg T et al., Gastroenterology 2006;130:1086
Sanchez-Tapias et al, Gastroenterology 2006;131:451

SVR


Slide 15

Daily Consensus IFN + RBV: NR to Rebetron/standard IFN
Induction dose 18 mc vs. standard 9 mc
All patients (n=77)

30%

32%

High viral load (n=44)

19%

Liver cirrhosis (n=16)
HCV-genotype 1 (n=69)

30%

IFN+RBV non-responder, all HCV
genotype 1 (n=41)

22%
39%

IFN non responder (n=36)

0

10

20

30

SVR Rates
Cornberg et al., J Hepatology 2006;44:291

40

50


Slide 16

PegIFN2b1.5g/kg + RBV1-1.2g in Rebetron NR
ETR and SVR: ITT
No. of
Patients

Week 24,
n (%)

Week 48,
n (%)

End of
follow-up,
n (%)

Genotype 1

110

24 (22)

33 (30)

21 (19)

Genotype 2

7

4 (57)

4 (57)

4 (57)

Genotype 3

13

3 (23)

4 (31)

2 (15)

Genotype 4

10

1 (10)

1 (10)

1 (10)

All patients

140

32 (23)

42 (30)

28 (20)

Taliani et al, Gastroenterology 2006;130:1098


Slide 17

SVR Rates According to Adherence
80

ITT
80/80/80
<80/<80/>80

71
70
62

60

60

56
52

51

% SVR

50

51

47
43

40
30
20
10
0
IFN+RBV

PegIFN+RBV

PegIFN+RBV>10.6 mg/kg

McHutchison et al., Gastroenterol 2002: 123(4): 1061-9


Slide 18

Proportion of Patients Dispensed >12, 24 or 48
PegIntron Injections:
BIC Enrollees vs. Controls (matched groups)
100%
P= 0.0005

80%

72%

Percent of patients

64%
60%

P<0.001

52%
41%

40%

P=0.0020

22%
20%

0%

13%

n=780

n=780

n=638

12+

n=638

24+

n=333

n=333

48+

Number of Peg-Intron Injections Dispensed

BIC

Control

Hussein et al, Schering-Plough data presented at ISPOR,
Philadelphia, PA, USA, May 20-24, 2006


Slide 19

Predicted Probability (95% CI) of SVR
Viral Genotype, Presence of Cirrhosis, BMI
(1990-2000)
Genotype

Cirrhosis

Obese (>30kg/m2)

Predicted probability
(95% CI)

1

No

No

0.22 (0.15-0.32)

1

No

Yes

0.062 (0.019-0.18)

1

Yes

No

0.054 (0.017-0.16)

1

Yes

Yes

0.013 (0.0023-0.069)

2 or 3

No

No

0.75 (0.56-0.87)

2 or 3

No

Yes

0.40 (0.18-0.67)

2 or 3

Yes

No

0.36 (0.15-0.66)

2 or 3

Yes

Yes

0.12 (0.029-0.37)

Adapted from Bressler et al., Hepatology 2003;38:641


Slide 20

Viral Factors that Influence Response to
Therapy
• Genotype 2>3>4>1
• Baseline viral load (HVL v LVL)
• Viral load decline (RVR v SVR)
• Co-infection (HIV/HBV)
• Quasispecies development

• Virus interferes with function of crucial
genes in several antiviral pathways
– ? Host dependent


Slide 21

Host Factors that influence Response to
Therapy
• Ethnicity (Blacks(genes governing immune response)
– eg: IP-10 level
– IL polymorphisms
– MHC

• Steatosis/ high BMI / insulin resistance
• Cirrhosis
• ‘Gene signature’ – pre-treatment interferon
pathway already upregulated (liver tissue)
Mr. R.H. has a gene signature indicating responsiveness to IFN Rx


Slide 22

Non Response to PegIFN + RBV
Summary
• Potentially reversible factors:
– dose, duration, adherence, IR, BMI

• Viral interruption of viral clearance
mechanisms
– Can enzyme inhibitors abrogate viral
‘interference’?

• Host “gene signature”:
– may explain ‘null’ response


Slide 23

QUESTIONS


Slide 24

A “Null” Responder: CHC
1. Has a > 2 log fall in HCVRNA @ 12 weeks

2. Has undetectable HCVRNA @ 12 weeks
3. Has < 2 log fall in HCVRNA @ 12 weeks


Slide 25

Not a Risk Factor for Treatment Failure: CHC

1. High viral load
2. Marijuana
3. Hepatic steatosis
4. Cirrhosis


Slide 26

Slow Responder to PegIFN  + Ribavirin: CHC

1. HCVRNA undetectable @12 weeks
2. Can enhance SVR rate with larger doses
of PegIFN
3. Can enhance SVR rate with longer
treatment PEGIFN + RBV


Slide 27

Retreatment of Standard IFN+RBV failures
(Genotype 1) with PEGIFN + RBV leads to
SVR rate of:1. 50%

2. 30%
3. 20%
4. 0%