Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination Chapter 12 Prepared by S. Saterfield From The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination, Whitley and Kite, 2006 s.saterfield, 2006
Download ReportTranscript Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination Chapter 12 Prepared by S. Saterfield From The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination, Whitley and Kite, 2006 s.saterfield, 2006
Slide 1
Reducing Prejudice
and Discrimination
Chapter 12
Prepared by S. Saterfield
From The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination, Whitley and Kite, 2006
s.saterfield, 2006
1
Slide 2
Individual Level Processes
Changes within the individual Approaches
Stereotype Suppression— replacing
stereotypical thoughts with non-prejudiced
thoughts
Self-regulation—people learn to recognize
situational cues that alert them to possibly acting
prejudice
Value confrontation—people are made aware of
contradictions between egalitarian values and
their prejudiced thoughts or behaviors
s.saterfield, 2006
2
Slide 3
Individual Level Processes
Changes within the individual
Approaches
Stereotype Suppression— replacing
stereotypical thoughts with non-prejudiced
thoughts
Rebound Effect
Stereotype Rebound
s.saterfield, 2006
3
Slide 4
Individual Level Processes
Changes within the individual
Approaches
Self-regulation—people learn to
recognize situational cues that alert them
to possibly acting prejudice
Replace the prejudiced response with an
appropriate responses
Developing cues for the control of prejudice
Using cues to control prejudice
Automatic control of prejudice
s.saterfield, 2006
4
Slide 5
Individual Level Processes
Changes within the individual
Approaches
Value confrontation—people are made
aware of contradictions between
egalitarian values and their prejudiced
thoughts or behaviors
Calls peoples attention to the contradictions
implied by placing a high value on freedom
while placing low value on equality.
s.saterfield, 2006
5
Slide 6
Intergroup Contact
Longest standing approach –Intergroup
contact theory
Contact between members of different
groups can lead to a reduction of prejudice
on both sides
s.saterfield, 2006
6
Slide 7
Intergroup Contact
Contact hypothesis:
Interaction between people changes their
beliefs and feelings toward each
other....thus, if only one had the
opportunity to communicate with others
and appreciate their way of life,
understanding and reduction of prejudice
would follow.
s.saterfield, 2006
7
Slide 8
Intergroup Contact
Conditions of Success for intergroup contact
theory
To reduce prejudice—four conditions must be met
Allport (1954)
1. Members of each group must have equal
status
2. Groups must work cooperatively to achieve
common goals
3. Situation must allow participants to get to
know each other as individuals
4. Intergroup effort must have the support of
authorities, law, or customs
s.saterfield, 2006
8
Slide 9
Intergroup Contact
Conditions of Success for intergroup
contact theory
Equal status
Cooperation
Acquaintance potential
Institutional Support
s.saterfield, 2006
9
Slide 10
Intergroup Contact
Effectiveness of Intergroup Contact
Types of changes produced
Reducing cognitive and emotional changes
Reducing expectations of negative interaction
Reducing intergroup anxiety
Cognitive Dissonance
Limiting factors
Meet all necessary conditions for successful
intergroup contact
Limiting preexisting intergroup attitudes
s.saterfield, 2006
10
Slide 11
Intergroup Contact
Intergroup contact theory—three
models
– Personalization model
– Salient categorization model
– Common group identity model
s.saterfield, 2006
11
Slide 12
Educational Interventions
School Desegregation
Cooperative Learning
Multicultural and Anti-Bias
Education
s.saterfield, 2006
12
Slide 13
Workplace Intervention
Affirmative Action
Valuing Diversity
Managing Diversity
s.saterfield, 2006
13
Slide 14
What Should Be Our
Goal?
Color Blindness
Multiculturalism
s.saterfield, 2006
14
Slide 15
What You Can Do To
Reduce Prejudice
Influencing Your Own Attitude
Influencing Other People’s Attitudes
s.saterfield, 2006
15
Reducing Prejudice
and Discrimination
Chapter 12
Prepared by S. Saterfield
From The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination, Whitley and Kite, 2006
s.saterfield, 2006
1
Slide 2
Individual Level Processes
Changes within the individual Approaches
Stereotype Suppression— replacing
stereotypical thoughts with non-prejudiced
thoughts
Self-regulation—people learn to recognize
situational cues that alert them to possibly acting
prejudice
Value confrontation—people are made aware of
contradictions between egalitarian values and
their prejudiced thoughts or behaviors
s.saterfield, 2006
2
Slide 3
Individual Level Processes
Changes within the individual
Approaches
Stereotype Suppression— replacing
stereotypical thoughts with non-prejudiced
thoughts
Rebound Effect
Stereotype Rebound
s.saterfield, 2006
3
Slide 4
Individual Level Processes
Changes within the individual
Approaches
Self-regulation—people learn to
recognize situational cues that alert them
to possibly acting prejudice
Replace the prejudiced response with an
appropriate responses
Developing cues for the control of prejudice
Using cues to control prejudice
Automatic control of prejudice
s.saterfield, 2006
4
Slide 5
Individual Level Processes
Changes within the individual
Approaches
Value confrontation—people are made
aware of contradictions between
egalitarian values and their prejudiced
thoughts or behaviors
Calls peoples attention to the contradictions
implied by placing a high value on freedom
while placing low value on equality.
s.saterfield, 2006
5
Slide 6
Intergroup Contact
Longest standing approach –Intergroup
contact theory
Contact between members of different
groups can lead to a reduction of prejudice
on both sides
s.saterfield, 2006
6
Slide 7
Intergroup Contact
Contact hypothesis:
Interaction between people changes their
beliefs and feelings toward each
other....thus, if only one had the
opportunity to communicate with others
and appreciate their way of life,
understanding and reduction of prejudice
would follow.
s.saterfield, 2006
7
Slide 8
Intergroup Contact
Conditions of Success for intergroup contact
theory
To reduce prejudice—four conditions must be met
Allport (1954)
1. Members of each group must have equal
status
2. Groups must work cooperatively to achieve
common goals
3. Situation must allow participants to get to
know each other as individuals
4. Intergroup effort must have the support of
authorities, law, or customs
s.saterfield, 2006
8
Slide 9
Intergroup Contact
Conditions of Success for intergroup
contact theory
Equal status
Cooperation
Acquaintance potential
Institutional Support
s.saterfield, 2006
9
Slide 10
Intergroup Contact
Effectiveness of Intergroup Contact
Types of changes produced
Reducing cognitive and emotional changes
Reducing expectations of negative interaction
Reducing intergroup anxiety
Cognitive Dissonance
Limiting factors
Meet all necessary conditions for successful
intergroup contact
Limiting preexisting intergroup attitudes
s.saterfield, 2006
10
Slide 11
Intergroup Contact
Intergroup contact theory—three
models
– Personalization model
– Salient categorization model
– Common group identity model
s.saterfield, 2006
11
Slide 12
Educational Interventions
School Desegregation
Cooperative Learning
Multicultural and Anti-Bias
Education
s.saterfield, 2006
12
Slide 13
Workplace Intervention
Affirmative Action
Valuing Diversity
Managing Diversity
s.saterfield, 2006
13
Slide 14
What Should Be Our
Goal?
Color Blindness
Multiculturalism
s.saterfield, 2006
14
Slide 15
What You Can Do To
Reduce Prejudice
Influencing Your Own Attitude
Influencing Other People’s Attitudes
s.saterfield, 2006
15