Evening Talk at EFTC-11 MAGNETIC GEOMETRY, PLASMA PROFILES AND STABILITY J W Connor UKAEA/EURATOM Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK A story.

Download Report

Transcript Evening Talk at EFTC-11 MAGNETIC GEOMETRY, PLASMA PROFILES AND STABILITY J W Connor UKAEA/EURATOM Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK A story.

Slide 1

Evening Talk at EFTC-11

MAGNETIC GEOMETRY, PLASMA PROFILES
AND STABILITY
J W Connor
UKAEA/EURATOM Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre,
Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK

A story about mode structures with the ‘Universal Mode’ providing a
‘Case History’


Slide 2

1. INTRODUCTION
The Universal Mode
● Anomalous transport associated with micro-instabilities such as the
electron drift wave
● Early theory for a homogeneous plasma slab or cylinder (with dn/dx =
constant) showed that in a shear free situation one could always find an
unstable mode
– driven by electron Landau resonance, with long parallel wavelengths
to minimise ion Landau damping
VT i 


k ||

 VT e

– the so-called Universal Mode
● This talk will explore how the stability and mode structure responds to
more realistic magnetic geometry and radial profiles
– leads to ballooning theory and more recent developments in this topic


Slide 3

Geometry
Cylinder
● n(r), q(r):

rB z

q =

RB

● Fourier analyse:  = (r)e-i(m-nz/R)



k|| 

1
Rq

 m  nq(r) 

● For electron Landau drive and to minimise ion Landau damping
VT i 

● Shear

s


k ||

r dq

 VT e

 long parallel wavelength

 0  mode localised around resonant surface

q dr

r0 : m = nq(r0)

 k||  

 nq   r - r0 
r

Ls

,

1
Ls



s
Rq


Slide 4

Axisymmetric Torus, B(r,)

●  =  (r, )ein
● 2D (r,) – periodic in  ; different poloidal m coupled
● High-n – simplify with eikonal
~
inS( r ,)
(r, ) ~ (r, )e

● Problem is to reconcile this with small k|| and periodicity
B  S  0  S    q(r )

but not periodic! ; shear  q(r)  q(r0)


Slide 5

Preview of Model Eigenvalue Equation
2
  2

 


2 
2
 2     iX   1X  2X  2  cos   issin    i e    (X, )  0
X 
 


 X


FLR

Ion Sound

Radial variation
due to * or E

Toroidicity

Electron
Drive

Eigenvalue
()

- X = nq′ (r – r0)



Resonant surfaces

M



M+1

M+2

Different cases, depending on magnitudes of , 1, 2

M+3

X


Slide 6

2. SHEARED SLAB/CYLINDER
● Include magnetic shear, s  0, and density profile n(r)
● Eigenvalue equation

 d2

2 2
2
  X   2 X  i e (X)   ()  (X)  0

2
 dX

FLR

shear

density
profile

electron Landau
drive

Potential Q(X)
● Treat e as perturbation

eigenvalue


Slide 7

MARSHALL ROSENBLUTH – 1927-2003


Slide 8

Low shear (or rapidly varying n(r))
● Localised in potential well (Krall-Rosenbluth)
– Im e : UNSTABLE
Increased shear
● Well becomes ‘hill’: no localised mode
– shear stabilisation criterion?
Ls
Ln



L
i

 STABLE

Outgoing waves
● But, Pearlstein-Berk realised these are acceptable solutions (wave
propagates to ion Landau damping region where it becomes evanescent)!
e

 ioX

2

, | X| 
   -i  -

iL n
Ls

● Radiative or shear damping


Slide 9



Outgoing wave

(Ls/Ln)1/2

X

Q

● Balancing against e gives stability criterion
Ln
Ls

  e  STABLE

● ‘Confirmed’ by erroneous numerical calculations!

Ls/Ln
Potential ‘hill’


Slide 10

Aside
● But later numerical (Ross-Mahajan) and analytic (Tsang-Catto et al;
Antonsen, Liu Chen) treatments with full Plasma Dispersion function Z for
electrons showed

UNIVERSAL MODEL ALWAYS STABLE!
● Traced to fact that Z has a crucial effect on mode structure in narrow
region
X

me
mi

affecting e
 perturbation treatment inadequate!


Slide 11

Quasi-modes
● In periodic cylinder
k||  m – nq (r)
● Fix n, different m have resonant surfaces rm: n = q(rm)
● For large n, m they are only separated by
X
r

~

1
nq

 1

 2

0( 1

n

2)

1

● Then each radially localised ‘m-mode’ ‘looks the same’ about its own
resonant surface

● Each mode has almost same frequency – ie almost degenerate and
satisfies
k ||
k

~

i
Ln

 1


Slide 12

JOHN BRYAN TAYLOR


Slide 13

● Roberts and Taylor realised it was possible to superimpose them to form a
radially extended mode
– the twisted slicing or quasi-mode which maintains k|| << k


Slide 14

BORIS KADOMTSEV – 1928-1998


Slide 15

3. TOROIDAL GEOMETRY
● In a torus two new effects arise from inhomogeneous magnetic fields
– new drives from trapped electrons (Kadomtsev & Pogutse):
DESTABILISES universal mode: trapped particle modes
– changes in mode structure from magnetic drifts: affects shear
damping


B ~

B0
R



a vertical drift
Z

VD ~

mv

2

eBR

B

r



R
R0


Slide 16

● Doppler shift:    - k . vD
 

 T  cos   is sin 

x 

normal

;

T 

r

 1

R

geodesic

●  (r)  (r,): two-dimensional
 k || 

1  i
  i



m

nq
(
r
)



X

 

Rq  


 


● Eigenvalue equation (absorb e into )
2
 2

 


2 
2
 
 iX   2 cos   is sin 

   2 X   ()    0
2
X 
 


 X


 ~ 0(1)


Slide 17

Suppression of Shear Damping (Taylor)

Reflect

X = 1
Xm

Xm+1

● Seek periodic solution    m u m (X)e im
● Approximate translational invariance of rational surfaces  2 << 1
● Model equation: ignore geodesic drift
 d2

2
2


(
X

m
)



 u m  (u m 1  u m 1 )  0
2
 dX



Slide 18

● Cylindrical limit:  = 0
 u m  A me

i( Xm) / 2
2

– independent shear damped Fourier modes
● Strong toroidal coupling limit:  > 1
 um slowly varying ‘functions’ of m
u m 1  u m 
 u m  Ae

du m

2



dm

1 d um
2 dm 2

 ( X  m ) /
2



– each um is localised about x = m: no shear damping
iX  / 

  ~ Ae

2

– decays before  ~ 2, so periodicity not an issue


Slide 19

●  is a quasi-mode
– ‘balloons’ in 
– ‘m’ varies with X
– radially extended
 determine slowly varying radial envelope A(m) by reintroducing
2 << 1
– seen in gyrokinetic simulations (eg W Lee)


Slide 20

● Arbitrary 
X
iXi  kdX
Try
 ~ ()e
2


 2 
2
2
 (  k )  2[cos   s(  k ) sin ]  ()   2 X   0

2






2 <<  - one-dimensional equation in 
But solution must be periodic in  over 2
- must reconcile with secular terms!
● Solve problem with Ballooning Transformation (Connor, Hastie, Taylor)



m

e

im



i ( X  m  k )  ~
de
 (, X; k )

 



u m (X)


Slide 21

Aside
● The ballooning transformation was first developed for ideal MHD
ballooning modes, leading to the s- diagram
● Interesting to contrast published and actual diagrams!

● Lack of trust in
– numerical computation (confirmed by two-scale analysis for low s)
– ability to find access to 2nd stability (eg raise q0)


Slide 22



Alternatively (Lee, Van Dam)
Translational invariance limit, 2  0
 system invariant under
XX+1 , mm+1
Bloch Theorem  um(x) = eimk u(x – m)
Fourier Transform of u leads to ballooning equation


Slide 23



Return to drift wave:
 2 2

2
2
 (   k )  2  (cos   s(   k ) sin  )     2 X   (  , X , k )  0

2






Potential Q()
-  <  <   no longer need periodic solution!

● Often consider ‘Lowest Order’ equation, 2 =0
– Schrődinger equation with potential Q() with k a parameter, () a
‘local’ eigenvalue
– k usually chosen to be 0 or  (to give most unstable mode)
– increasing  removes shear damping; vanishes for  > 4: more
UNSTABLE


Slide 24

Potential Q

0

0

Marginal

s
-0.5

Shear damping
-1.0

-1.3

1.0

2.0

3.0


4.0

5.0


Slide 25

4. RADIAL MODE STRUCTURE
● ‘Higher order’ theory: determines radial envelope A(X) (Taylor, Connor,
Wilson)
● Reintroduce 1,2 << 1  k = k(X)
– yields radial envelope in WKB approximation
X

A( X)  e

i  k(X)dX

 kdX

– eigenvalue condition

 (  1 )
2

Conventional Version: * has a maximum

● Lowest order theory gives ‘local’ eigenvalue
2

  * (0)   2 X






'local' * ( x )

i s (k )

shear damping

● Expand  about k0 where shear damping is minimum
2

  (0)   2 X  i kk (k  k 0 )
 k (X, )

2

(  kk ~ )


Slide 26

(a)

Quadratic profile

(b)

Linear profile

1/ 4
● Implications
  
a
1/ 2
– mode width X ~ 
 ~ n ,  r~ 1/2  a
M
n
 2 
– mode localised about X = 0, ie *max, , but covers many resonant
surfaces
– spread in k: k ~ n-1/2 << 1
 k  k0 (minimum shear damping)


Slide 27

Limitations
1. Low magnetic shear
2. High velocity shear
3. The edge

-

unfortunately characteristics of transport barriers!

ITB

H-mode


Slide 28

Low Magnetic Shear, s << 1
● Two-scale analysis of ballooning equations   (, u):  periodic
equilibrium scale, u = s
‘averaged’ eqn, independent of k   independent of k!
– corresponds to uncoupled Fourier harmonics at each mth surface,
localised within X ~ |s|: ie non-overlapping radially
● Recover k-dependence by using these as trial functions in variational
approach (Romanelli and Zonca)
– exponentially weak contribution
2
2
  * (0)   2 X  i exp( c / | s |) ˆ kk (k  k 0 )
1

  4
 s crit 
 XM ~ 
 exp  


|
s
|


 2
– becomes very narrow as |s|  0, or ki  0

s crit  (ki )

2


Slide 29

● Estimate anomalous transport:   Lin XM2

suggests link between low
shear and ITBs
(Romanelli, Zonca)

scrit

1

s

● Presence of qmin acts as barrier to mode structures
Gyrokinetic simulation by Kishimoto


Slide 30

Modelling of Impurity Diffusion in JET with Dz ~ (iL)1/2 exp (-c/s), V = D/R

L Lauro-Taroni


Slide 31

● Ballooning mode theory fails for sufficiently low s (or long wavelength)
– reverts to weakly coupled Fourier harmonics, amplitude Am, when
ni
r

– spectrum of A m



Ln
2

4sq R

narrows as mode centre moves towards qmin

● In practice, ballooning theory holds to quite low n
eg ITG modes with kI ~ 0(1) largely unaffected by qmin


Slide 32

The Wavenumber Representation
● More general contours of k (X, )

(Romanelli, Zonca)

● ‘Closed’ contours already discussed; ‘passing’ contours sample all k
– WKB treatment in X-space still possible
– easier to use alternative, but entirely equivalent, Wavenumber
Representation (Dewar, Mahajan)


Slide 33



● (X, ) 

 dk(, k) exp iX (  k )  S(k )
ˆ



● ˆ (, k ) satisfies ballooning eqn on - <  < , ie not periodic in 
ˆ (  2, k  2)  
ˆ (, k)
● 
–  is periodic in  if S(k) is periodic in k: eigenvalue condition

Example

● Suppose linear profile:   * (0)  1X  i s (k )
  dS  i(   (0)  i (k ))  0
1
*
s
dk

● Periodicity of S yields eigenvalue condition

 dk[  *  i s (k)]  21

,

1 ~

1
~ 0 
nqL
n
1


Slide 34


Slide 35

Implications
● Re  related to local *(x):
● Im  



*

 2  1

1

dk s (k)

2

– k not restricted to near k0, all k contribute to give an average of the
shear damping!
– some shear damping restored: more STABLE
eg  = 4: s(0) = - 0.02,

● k  2  X ~

1
1

 (k ) ~

1
2

1

  s (k)dk  0.35
 1 if   1

● Mode width:
(i)  real  X ~ n, or r ~ a
(ii)  complex  X ~ n1/2 1/2, or r ~ (/n)1/2a


Slide 36

Sheared Radial Electric Fields
● Believed to reduce instability and turbulence – prominent near ITBs
●    - n E (x) (Doppler Shift); suppose E = x
 1   E 



dE
dq

 q ~ 0(1) !

X ~  / q

 mode narrows as dE/dq increases, reducing estimates of X and
transport

● Are these modes related to conventional ballooning modes?
– introduce density profile variation
● Model:   * (0)  i 0  i xx X 2  i k cos k  q X
ie  has maximum at X = 0


Slide 37

● Wavenumber representation produces quadratic eqn for dS/dk
– exp (in S)  (k)
- periodic S(k)   (k ) is Floquet solution of Mathieu eqn: yields
eigenvalue 
Analytic solution for transition region
possible (Connor)

crit
q

 1 / 2
~ 0 T
n






 continuous evolution from conventional mode to more STABLE
‘passing’ mode


X ~


(d E / dq )

 1 for large dE/dq

 reverts to Fourier modes!

FULL CIRCLE?


Slide 38

5. EXTENSIONS TO BALLOONING THEORY
● Have seen limitations imposed by low magnetic shear and high flow shear
● The presence of a plasma edge clearly breaks translational invariance
– have used 2D MHD code to study high-n edge ballooning modes;
mode structure resembles ballooning theory ‘prediction’


Slide 39

● Non-linear theory
– the ‘twisted slices’ of Roberts and Taylor form a basis for flux-tube
gyrokinetic simulations

y
x


Conventional
Tokamak

ST


Slide 40

– introducing non-linearities into the theory of high-n MHD ballooning
modes predicts explosively growing filamentary structures, seen on
MAST

Simulation

Experiment


Slide 41

6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
● Have used the story of the ‘Universal Mode’ to illustrate developments in
the theory of toroidal mode structures and stability
– the universal mode is stable, but plenty of other toroidal modes are
available to provide anomalous transport!
● Problems of toroidal periodicity in the presence of magnetic shear
resolved by Ballooning theory
● Ballooning theory provides a robust and widely used tool, but its validity
can break down for:
– Low magnetic shear
– Rotation shear
– Plasma edge
when the higher order theory is considered
● Re-emergence of Fourier modes in the torus for low s and high dE/dq

● Ballooning theory also provides a basis for some non-linear theories and
simulations


Slide 42

UNSTABLE
Universal
Mode
(Galeev et al)
1963
Outgoing
Waves
(PearlsteinBerk 1969)

Loss of
shear
damping in
Torus
(Taylor) 1976

Toroidally Induced mode
(Chen-Cheng) 1980
(Hesketh, Hastie, Taylor)
1979

Time

1960

1970

Shear stabilisation
(Krall-Rosenbluth)
1965

STABLE

‘Correct’ calculation
(Tsang, Catto,
Ross, Mahajan:
Antonsen, Liu
Chen) 1978

2000

1990

1980

Steep
gradients
in torus
(Connor,
Taylor)
1987

Not at *MAX
(Connor,
Taylor,
Wilson)
1992, 1996

Low magnetic
shear
(Romanelli,
Zonca 1993;
Connor,
Hastie, 2003)

Velocity
shear
(Taylor,
Wilson;
Dewar)
1996-7