Transcript Enterprise PI – The Value of an Enterprise Agreement Presented by Ron Kolz.

Enterprise PI –
The Value of an Enterprise Agreement
Presented by
Ron Kolz
Overview
• What is OSIsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA)?
• Shell, Bayer MaterialScience and Centocor
– Consistent Infrastructure
– Need for Standards
– EA Business Case & Justification
• Presentation: RockTenn’s EA Project
Enterprise Agreement (EA)
Software
Support
•
•
•
PI Infrastructure Deployment Enterprise-wide
Asset-based Licensing
Simplified Contract & Procurement Processes

Automatic Download of New Versions
Remote Monitoring and Alerting via NOC
Help Desk, vCampus and Training


Services




Managed Rollout
Remote PI Management
Center of Excellence (CoE) Application Design
PI Architectural Design
OSIsoft’s Enterprise Agreement Program is designed to “Get PI done right” and ensure
customers “Get value out of PI”
EA Customer Examples
• From OSIsoft 2008 User Conference in Amsterdam
• Bayer MaterialScience
– Dr. Felix Hanisch
• Centocor (part of Johnson & Johnson)
– Terry Murphy
• Shell
– John de Koning
Consistent Infrastructure
Shell - John de Koning
Bayer MaterialScience – Dr. Felix Hanisch
Need for Standards
Shell - John de Koning
Bayer MaterialScience – Dr. Felix Hanisch
EA Justification
Centocor – Terry Murphy
Shell - John de Koning
Bayer MaterialScience
• Energy Project Example
• How OSIsoft EA enabled this project
Bayer MaterialScience – Dr. Felix Hanisch
Bayer MaterialScience – Dr. Felix Hanisch
EA Summary
• Bayer MaterialScience
– Before EA, purchased PI one at a time, limited use, not consistent
– Can’t standardize on application level due to high maintenance effort of
interfaces
• Shell
– Need single & consistent PI data layer for applications to integrate with
operations
– Standard PI install, architecture and business processes
• Centocor
– Need data in common format to support MES and SAP at enterprise layer
RockTenn Gaining
Value Now with
Enterprise Agreement
Presented by
Bob Anderson
Overview
•
•
•
•
•
•
RockTenn - Who & Why
Justification
Implementation
Adoption and Utilization
Results
What’s Next for PI at RockTenn
Who is RockTenn?
• One of North America’s leading manufacturers of paperboard,
containerboard, consumer and corrugated packaging and merchandising
displays
• Annual net sales of approximately $3 billion
• Founded in 1936 and operates manufacturing facilities throughout the
United States, Canada, Mexico, Argentina and Chile
• 11 Recycle Paperboard Mills, 1 Recycle Container-board Mill, 1 Bleached
Board Mill
• 90+ Converting Plants
• Headquartered in Norcross, Georgia
Challenges and Obstacles
Our Challenges
–
–
–
–
Controlling Costs (Energy, Fiber, Labor, and Maintenance)
Producing Consistent, High Quality Paperboard
Operating at Maximum Reliability and Efficiency
Using Data to Drive Process Improvement – Six Sigma
The Obstacles
– Mis- & Missing Information
– No History, No Visibility, No Real-Time Feedback
– You don’t know you need the data, until you need the data
“The discouraging part of process improvement is trying to get a complete set of data together in one
place. When it is too hard to get, you have to leave it out of the analysis. We are missing opportunities to
act on information and save money” - General Manager, Cincinnati Mill
How Do We Remove Obstacles?
Implement a highly flexible and configurable
enterprise-wide information system to:
– Collect and archive detailed, actionable data from all
existing processes and systems
– Put data on any desktop, laptop or monitor across the
company
– Provide tools for reporting and analysis
– Empower users to make informed decisions
Home Grown?
Third Party? .
The Proposed Solution . . .
PI System
Enterprise Agreement
How Do We Justify the Investment?
Energy!
Actively pursue energy cost reduction through the capture
and review of data to:
–
–
–
–
Monitor and adjust process to run at higher efficiency
Alert to energy excursions and correct them quickly
Create an energy balance to find heat recovery opportunities
Monitor and analyze energy market pricing to adjust plant
consumption patterns
– Optimize energy per ton with other process inputs
– Determine unit ops energy cost and benchmark all mills
Why Energy?
•
One of the top three costs
Fuel – Fiber – Folks
•
•
•
$170 million per year
19 million MMBtu equivalents per year
90% used by the 12 paperboard mills
We can’t control the energy markets
We Can Control Our Energy Usage
Implementation Strategy
• Business Unit driven, not IT
• Deploy rapidly, 10 locations in 12 months
• 11th installed March’09, 12th to be installed Q2'09
• Scope: Connect to what’s available
• Initially one of three types of process data
•
•
•
•
Single internal resource = reliance on OSIsoft EPM & FSE
“Install it and they will come.”
Standardize or Customize?
EPM - Enterprise Project Manager
Plant-led development and adoption
FSE - Field Service Engineer
RockTenn PI Installations
St. Paul
Missisquoi
Aurora (2Q’09)
Battle Creek
Eaton
Stroudsburg
Chattanooga
Cincinnati
Dallas
Seven Hills
Demopolis
Norcross
Installation Summary
• 10 Mill Locations + Corp. Office in first 12 Months
– OSIsoft Field Service Engineer On Site 11 weeks
• 1 installed Q1 2009, 1 remaining in Q2 2009
– OSIsoft Field Service Engineer Remote
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Average 750 connections per day
>100,000 Tags
10 Different Interfaces
66 Interface Instances
OSIsoft Network Operations Center (NOC)
Quarterly Reviews
Center of Excellence (CoE)
Getting Started
• Training and Awareness
– What is PI?
– Initial training during installation week
– Individual user specific training with CBTs & EA
Vouchers
– On-site group training with EPM, CoE & Learning Labs
– Power Users: tag admin and advanced topics
What is PI?
Pie? Mmmm. Blackberry.
An Irrational Number?
Something Greek?
A Private Investigator? Sort of . . .
Like Magnum P.I.?
No!
PI = Plant Information
Bringing Data Together
Internet /
JDE Financials
•Accounts Payable
•Accounts Receivable
•P&L Data
•Time & Attendance
Intranet
•Energy prices
•Invoice Search
•Backlog
•Sales
Front Office
Systems
AS/400 Mill System
Business / MES
•Order Entry
•Customer Service
•Scheduling
•Production
•Roll Labeling and Tracking
•Quality Lab
•Shipping / Inventory / Backlog
•Invoicing / Sales
OSI PI
Data Historian
Scanners &
Gauging Systems
Plant Floor
Systems
Power House
•Gas, Oil
•Steam
•Electricity
Process Controls
and Metering
•DCS, PLCs
•Recorders
•Meters
Commonly Used Features
• PI DataLink
• PI ProcessBook
• PI ProfileView - 3D display of paperboard sheet
• RtAlerts
• Transpara Visual KPIs
Acceptance & Utilization
•
•
•
•
Mixed mill management support
At least one “early adopter” at each mill
Application development driven by local needs
Divisional priorities identified with CoE Value Realization
Process (VRP)
• Requires both Subject
Matter Experts and
PI Experts
• Utilization?
Ease versus Return on Investment
Eas
e
10
Low ROI, Easy
High ROI, Easy
Corporate staffing
9
Product Awareness
8
Training Strategy
Common Displays
Equipment Condition
Monitoring
X-Y Charts
for KPI
7
Statistical Quality
Control
mP and
Interface monitoring
Reel Browser
Real time Reel
Reporting
PI Profile
6
Winder and Roll Slitting
Streak detection
Pulping
Reporting
MP2Process
Integration
5
KPI Implementation
Electric energy useage
Rovisys Rollout
AS/400 Integration Roadmap
Preventive Maintenance
4
3
Low ROI, Hard
High ROI, Hard
2
1
0
0
1
2
3
4
ROI
5
6
7
8
9
10
DevNet Utilization Tool
Results
•
•
•
•
•
Energy Reductions > $1,000,000
Fewer Customer Complaints
Improved Paper Machine Efficiency
Standardized Visualization & Benchmarking
Six Sigma Process Capability Analysis
The PI Effect: Energy Reduction
•
•
•
•
•
•
Initial PI installation, Oct. 2005
Began using PI trends to monitor pulper steam usage
Made procedure changes to limit pulper steam usage
Reduced steam usage 41%
Reduced boiler gas consumption 23%
Half of gas reduction attributable to pulper steam
> $1,000,000 savings
Visibility of Steam Usage…
Beater Room Steam Flow
TAG0105
9834.4
PPH
25000
20000
15000
After
10000
Beater R oom Steam Flow
TAG0105
9916.7
PPH
25000
5000
20000
0
11/19/2005 12:00:00 AM
Beater Room Steam Flow R03 CH05
Before
35.00 days
12/24/2005 12:00:00 AM
15000
10000
5000
0
6/7/2008 12:00:00 AM
Beater R oom Steam Flow R03 CH 05
27.00 days
7/4/2008 12:00:00 AM
...Lowers Boiler Gas Consumption
#1 Boiler Gas Flow
TAG0055
3.7366
MCFH
100
90
80
70
55%
60
After
50
40
#1 Boiler Gas Flow
TAG0055
40.156
MC FH
100
30
90
20
80
10
70
0
11/19/2005 12:00:00 AM
35.00 days
12/24/2005 12:00:00 AM
#1 Boiler Gas Flow R02 CH05
60
Before
50
42%
40
30
20
10
0
6/7/2008 12:00:00 AM
#1 Boiler Gas Flow R 02 CH05
27.00 days
7/4/2008 12:00:00 AM
Customer Complaint Reduction
• Plant received a warp complaint
• Manually researching quality and process data was time
consuming and inconclusive
• Reviewing the PI ProfileView images revealed back edge
caliper and moisture streaks
• Corrective action
– Use PI process trends and RtAlerts to notify supervisors of variances
– Created a spreadsheet that captures all quality and process data for
each reel in real-time
• Results – reduced warp complaints and claims
PM Profile
Caliper
Basis Wt
Moisture
Paper Machine Efficiency
• PM experienced more breaks and lost time due to
draw variations
• Developed a dashboard with R-Y-G indicators for
tight and loose draws
• PM efficiency has improved by one percentage point
• 1% efficiency improvement equals 2.5 TPD
Draw Indicators
1% Improvement in Efficiency
Standardize Displays & Benchmark
Buy / Gen Decision Tool
Visual KPI Add on Display
Power Users
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Monthly conference calls
Semi-annual face-to-face meetings
SharePoint portal for collaboration & information
Share and leverage applications across all mills
Discuss standards and naming conventions
Learn new tools and software
Create RtAlerts
Access to OSI-RT Extranet
CoE involved in many of the above items
How was IT Involved?
•
•
•
•
•
Project justification
Hardware and networking strategy, spec, and install
Archiving strategy with OSIsoft
Rolling out OSIsoft applications to users
Application development
Future involvement:
• System Architecture design with CoE
• Application Development
• Using PI tools to monitor IT environment
Lessons Learned
• Planning vs. Speed – It’s a tradeoff
• Specialized resource needs
• Create a project plan
What is the Future of PI?
• Build an asset-based Module DB
• RtWebParts
• rCAAM
• Integrate more data/systems
• Extend to other divisions
• Move it to the board room - Corporate Dashboard
Thank You