Field-test of nacelle-based lidar to explore its applications for Vattenfall as wind park operator Monday, 18 May 2015 Stefan Goossens Challenge the future Introduction Challenge the.
Download ReportTranscript Field-test of nacelle-based lidar to explore its applications for Vattenfall as wind park operator Monday, 18 May 2015 Stefan Goossens Challenge the future Introduction Challenge the.
Field-test of nacelle-based lidar to explore its applications for Vattenfall as wind park operator Monday, 18 May 2015 Stefan Goossens Challenge the future 1 Introduction Challenge the future 2 Applications 1. Power curve 2. Yaw misalignment 3. Blockage effect Challenge the future 3 Content Measurement campaign Working principle Experience (Research Validation 1. Power curve (Research 2. Yaw misalignment (Research 3. Blockage effect (Research Financial feasibility (Research Conclusions and Recommendations Questions objective I) objective objective objective objective II) III) IV) V) Challenge the future 4 Measurement campaign • • • • Slufterdam West Wind Iris installed 18 September 2014 Sodar installed 13 October 2014 Campaign length: 3 months Photo: Havenbedrijf Rotterdam N.V., Projectorganisatie Maasvlakte 2 Challenge the future 5 Working principle Challenge the future 6 Experience • • • • • Installation ~8 hours by 4 technicians, no major issues Easy access to data; good availability (90%) Data processing relatively straightforward Good support during the campaign from Oldbaum Plenty of literature and guidelines for comparison and verification Challenge the future 7 Validation Comparison to on-site sodar • Wind Iris is able to measure 10-min wind speed accurately: good correlation, in accordance with literature • Turbulence intensity questionable • YM measurement less accurate than anticipated: 4°vs 0.5° Challenge the future 8 1. Power curve • • • • Wind speed at hub height and 2.5D Power measurement requires more certainty to be IEC compliant Density correction Shear & Veer Challenge the future 9 2. Yaw misalignment Challenge the future 10 2. Yaw misalignment What is the ideal yaw misalignment when it comes to the power curve? A small angle (~5 degrees) As close to zero as possible 90 degrees ? Challenge the future 11 2. Yaw misalignment • Mean yaw misalignment: 1.5 degrees • 0 degrees yaw misalignment not necessarily best? Challenge the future 12 2. Yaw misalignment Challenge the future 13 2. Yaw misalignment What is the ideal yaw misalignment when it comes to the power curve? A small angle (~5 degrees) As close to zero as possible 90 degrees ? Challenge the future 14 3. Blockage effect Challenge the future 15 3. Blockage effect Good fit with theory (average and filtered) Challenge the future 16 Financial feasibility Challenge the future 17 Financial feasibility • Strongest drivers of ROI: • Purchase costs • PV improvement factor • Break even point (ROI 0%) for PV improvement of 1.2% • Implementation not recommended due to uncertainty in PV improvement • Financially attractive if power curve improvement can be quantified Challenge the future 18 Conclusions • Wind Iris advantages: • Power curve measurement • R&D applications (e.g. blockage) • Wind Iris disadvantages: • Yaw misalignment measurement less accurate than anticipated • No density, shear and veer measurements (yet) Challenge the future 19 Recommendations • Use Wind Iris for PV measurement, R&D and if large yaw misalignment is suspected • More research to investigate effect of yaw misalignment on the PV curve (e.g. intentional YM) • Implementation recommended if PV improvement can be quantified Challenge the future 20 The future • Power curve measurement • Feed-forward control • R&D Challenge the future 21 Questions Challenge the future 22 Research objectives I. Gain experience with the installation and operation of the Avent Wind Iris, as well as the collection and analysis of the data, considering that a good dataset is a prerequisite for further analysis. II. Determine the power curve based on lidar. III. Determine how much Slufterdam West 09 and the park can gain from the installation of a nacelle-based lidar. a. (Rotor speed dependent) wind vane calibration. b. Determine if other turbines in the park can benefit from the installation of one nacelle-based lidar. c. Match yaw misalignment angle, power and wind speed to estimate the power loss due to yaw misalignment. IV. Estimate the blockage effect/compression zone in front of the turbine and compare to models. V. Determine under what conditions a nacelle-based lidar is financially feasible. Challenge the future 23 Power and yaw misalignment Challenge the future 24 Yaw misalignment and RPM/V Challenge the future 25