Field-test of nacelle-based lidar to explore its applications for Vattenfall as wind park operator Monday, 18 May 2015 Stefan Goossens Challenge the future Introduction Challenge the.

Download Report

Transcript Field-test of nacelle-based lidar to explore its applications for Vattenfall as wind park operator Monday, 18 May 2015 Stefan Goossens Challenge the future Introduction Challenge the.

Field-test of nacelle-based lidar to explore its applications
for Vattenfall as wind park operator
Monday, 18 May 2015
Stefan Goossens
Challenge the future
1
Introduction
Challenge the future
2
Applications
1. Power curve
2. Yaw misalignment
3. Blockage effect
Challenge the future
3
Content
Measurement campaign
Working principle
Experience
(Research
Validation
1. Power curve
(Research
2. Yaw misalignment
(Research
3. Blockage effect
(Research
Financial feasibility
(Research
Conclusions and Recommendations
Questions
objective I)
objective
objective
objective
objective
II)
III)
IV)
V)
Challenge the future
4
Measurement campaign
•
•
•
•
Slufterdam West
Wind Iris installed 18 September 2014
Sodar installed 13 October 2014
Campaign length: 3 months
Photo: Havenbedrijf Rotterdam N.V., Projectorganisatie Maasvlakte 2
Challenge the future
5
Working principle
Challenge the future
6
Experience
•
•
•
•
•
Installation ~8 hours by 4 technicians, no major issues
Easy access to data; good availability (90%)
Data processing relatively straightforward
Good support during the campaign from Oldbaum
Plenty of literature and guidelines for comparison and
verification
Challenge the future
7
Validation
Comparison to on-site sodar
• Wind Iris is able to measure 10-min wind
speed accurately: good correlation, in
accordance with literature
• Turbulence intensity questionable
• YM measurement less accurate than
anticipated: 4°vs 0.5°
Challenge the future
8
1. Power curve
•
•
•
•
Wind speed at hub height and 2.5D
Power measurement requires more certainty to be IEC compliant
Density correction
Shear & Veer
Challenge the future
9
2. Yaw misalignment
Challenge the future
10
2. Yaw misalignment
What is the ideal yaw misalignment when it comes to the power curve?
A small angle (~5 degrees)
As close to zero as possible
90 degrees
?
Challenge the future
11
2. Yaw misalignment
• Mean yaw misalignment: 1.5 degrees
• 0 degrees yaw misalignment not necessarily best?
Challenge the future
12
2. Yaw misalignment
Challenge the future
13
2. Yaw misalignment
What is the ideal yaw misalignment when it comes to the power curve?
A small angle (~5 degrees)
As close to zero as possible
90 degrees
?
Challenge the future
14
3. Blockage effect
Challenge the future
15
3. Blockage effect
Good fit with theory (average and filtered)
Challenge the future
16
Financial feasibility
Challenge the future
17
Financial feasibility
• Strongest drivers of ROI:
• Purchase costs
• PV improvement factor
• Break even point (ROI 0%) for PV improvement of 1.2%
• Implementation not recommended due to uncertainty in PV
improvement
• Financially attractive if power curve improvement can be
quantified
Challenge the future
18
Conclusions
• Wind Iris advantages:
• Power curve measurement
• R&D applications (e.g. blockage)
• Wind Iris disadvantages:
• Yaw misalignment measurement less accurate than anticipated
• No density, shear and veer measurements (yet)
Challenge the future
19
Recommendations
• Use Wind Iris for PV measurement, R&D and if large yaw
misalignment is suspected
• More research to investigate effect of yaw misalignment on the PV
curve (e.g. intentional YM)
• Implementation recommended if PV improvement can be quantified
Challenge the future
20
The future
• Power curve measurement
• Feed-forward control
• R&D
Challenge the future
21
Questions
Challenge the future
22
Research objectives
I.
Gain experience with the installation and operation of the Avent Wind Iris,
as well as the collection and analysis of the data, considering that a good
dataset is a prerequisite for further analysis.
II. Determine the power curve based on lidar.
III. Determine how much Slufterdam West 09 and the park can gain from the
installation of a nacelle-based lidar.
a.
(Rotor speed dependent) wind vane calibration.
b.
Determine if other turbines in the park can benefit from the installation of one nacelle-based lidar.
c.
Match yaw misalignment angle, power and wind speed to estimate the power loss due to yaw misalignment.
IV. Estimate the blockage effect/compression zone in front of the turbine and
compare to models.
V. Determine under what conditions a nacelle-based lidar is financially feasible.
Challenge the future
23
Power and yaw misalignment
Challenge the future
24
Yaw misalignment and RPM/V
Challenge the future
25