Transcript Part 1 Operations, Facilities & Costs January 28 -- February 4, 2003 Meeting Purpose & Agenda • Meeting Purpose – Review and discuss a potential.

Part 1
Operations, Facilities & Costs
January 28 -- February 4, 2003
Meeting Purpose & Agenda
• Meeting Purpose
– Review and discuss a potential CALFED Los
Vaqueros Reservoir expansion project -- the facilities
required and how it would operate
• Agenda
– 2003 Studies: Information and Schedule
– Current Delta Operations
– Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Operations
• CCWD and Bay Area Water Quality and Reliability
• Delta Enhancement
– Facilities, Construction Schedule, and Costs
2
Meeting Guidelines
• Ensure Everyone's Participation
– One speaker at a time
– Minimize side conversations
• Honor Our Time Limits
– Keep comments concise and avoid redundancy – Use ditto to agree with
others
• Commit to Being Fully Present
– No cell phones, pagers, voicemail, etc.
– Ask for what you need from the meeting process
• Respect Each Other
– Listen carefully to other participants and try other opinions on for size
– Respond to ideas and issues, not individuals
• Identify Yourself
– State your name and organization or community
3
2003 Study Activities
•Extensive public outreach
Where we are now….
–Now through June 2003
•Provide facts & information
•Key dates
–CCWD Board decision -- July
2003
–Potential vote -- November 2003
4
Public Workshops
• Today’s Discussion
– Potential Project -- How would an expanded reservoir
operate, what facilities are needed, and what would they
cost?
• Future Workshops
– Part 2 -- Partners, Benefits & Payments – benefits to
CCWD, CALFED, and Bay Area water agencies; potential
organizational structure and agreements among partners
– Part 3 -- Environmental Effects & Mitigation – Impacts and
strategies for addressing potential adverse effects
– Part 4 -- Review of CCWD Principles and responses to
comments
5
Information Available Now
OPERATIONS
Delta Water System - How the Delta water system works and how an expanded
reservoir would operate with other partners
Potential Partners - List of potential partners, their needs, and the benefits an expanded
reservoir could provide them
Water Rights - Description of water rights changes needed
Water Quality - Benefits for CCWD and other Bay Area water agencies
Reliability - Benefits for CCWD and other Bay Area water agencies
Delta Environment - Environmental benefits for the Delta
FACILITIES & COSTS
Delta Intakes - Size of facilities, possible facility layouts for fish screens, and pumping
capacity
Pipelines - Capacity, corridors, and length
Dam - Size, location, safety features, construction schedule, reservoir inundation area,
and interim water supply plan
Cost Estimates - Planning level construction and operation & maintenance costs
CCWD Principles for Participation
• The project improves water quality and reliability for CCWD
• The project enhances the Delta environment
• The project protects and enhances the fisheries and terrestrial species
benefits provided by the existing Los Vaqueros Project
• The project preserves and increases the recreational opportunities of the
Los Vaqueros Project
• CCWD must maintain control of watershed and operation of the reservoir
• The project protects and reimburses the financial investment made by the
CCWD customers who financed the existing $450 million Los Vaqueros
Project
• The proposal would be placed before the voters of the Contra Costa
7
Water District
Project Overview
• CALFED is studying
whether an expanded Los
Vaqueros Reservoir can
meet CALFED and Bay
Area water agencies’
objectives
• Water Quality
• Reliability
• Environmental
Enhancement
• Expansion from 100,000 acre-feet up to 500,000 acre-feet
maximum capacity
8
What are Important Water Quality
Parameters?
• Salts
– From seawater intrusion or other discharges -- Cause
taste and corrosion problems; impede water recycling
• Organics and Bromide
– Harmful chemical by-products can be formed when water
is disinfected
• Pathogens (bacteria or viruses)
– From runoff, discharges, or human activities -- Treated
with filters and disinfection
9
What is Reliability?
• Emergency Storage
– Storing water to protect against a disaster (earthquake,
power failure, levee failure, pipeline failure, or chemical
spill)
• Drought Storage
– Storing water in wet years for use during dry years
• Flexibility
– Ability to stop Delta diversions to protect fish without
disrupting water users
10
Environmental Water
Improves Fisheries & Habitat
• Environmental Water Account (EWA)
– Integral part of CALFED Program to restore the Delta
– Like a bank account: Assets controlled by fisheries agencies to
enhance Delta fisheries and habitat
• Protecting fish by shutting off pumps (changing the timing of diversions)
• Providing flows to enhance fisheries
• Assets can include water, storage, conveyance capacity, and
operational flexibility
• Federal Wildlife Refuges
– Water supply to 10 wildlife refuges in the San Joaquin Valley
• In-stream Flows
– Water supply to provide stream flows for fish at critical times
11
Bay Area Water Agencies
12
Delta Water Diversion Facilities
13
Bay Area Water Use
Delta System
35.6 MAF/yr
Bay Area
0.8 MAF/yr
EBMUD
SFPUC
Outflow
Bay
Area
Upstream
Users
SCVWD
SWP Exports
CCWD
ACWD
Zone 7
CVP Exports
In-Delta Users
Potential Partners
14
Bay Area Water Agencies Use a Small Piece of the Delta Water System
Existing Los Vaqueros Project
• Provides Emergency Storage
– Protects against a catastrophe in the Delta
• Improves Water Quality
– Changes the timing and location of diversions
– Stores water for blending when Delta water quality is
poor
• Enhances Delta Environment
– State-of-the-art fish screens
– Flexible timing and location of diversion
15
Existing Los Vaqueros Project
Contra Costa Canal
Rock Slough
Intake Facility
CCWD
Service Area
Los Vaqueros
Reservoir & Watershed
Old River
Intake Facility
16
Existing Los Vaqueros Project
Typical annual Los Vaqueros operation
Reservoir
Level
(thousand
acre-feet)
Reservoir level
depends on year
type (dry, wet)
100
80
a
60
a
40
Reserved for Emergency
20
0
January
HIGH
Delta Water Quality
Action at Reservoir
Delivered Water Quality
July
FILL
CHANGE
STOP FILL / RELEASE
FOR FISH
December
LOW
FILL HOLD RELEASE
CHANGE
HOLD
HIGH
17
Existing Los Vaqueros Project
Storage in Los
Vaqueros Reservoir
Los Vaqueros
Reservoir
storage lowered
lowered chlorides
delivered
to CCWD
customersin 1999
chlorides
delivered
to CCWD
customer
300
Without Blending from
Los Vaqueros
Chlorides, mg/L
250
200
150
100
50
0
7/1
1999
8/1
9/1
10/2
Date
Rock Slough
Delivered
11/2
With
Blending from
Los Vaqueros
18
Existing Los Vaqueros Project
Fisheries agencies concluded that the Los Vaqueros
Project improved the Delta environment for current
and future CCWD diversions
2002 Fish Monitoring at
CCWD Old River Intake
Species
Number
entrained
Winter run chinook salmon 0
Spring run chinook salmon 0
Steelhead
0
Delta smelt
0
Splittail
0
Other
775
Source: CA Dept. of Fish and Game
19
Questions and Discussion
• Workshop Process and Public Review
• Project Purposes and CALFED Goals
• Improve Bay Area water quality and reliability
• Enhance Delta environment
• Current Operations
– Delta Operations
• Water Quality
• Reliability
• Delta Enhancement
– Existing Los Vaqueros Project
20
Meeting Agenda
• Agenda
– 2003 Studies Activities and Available Information
– Current Delta Operations
– Los Vaqueros Expansion Operations
• Operating Scenarios
• CCWD and Bay Area Water Quality and Reliability
• Delta Enhancement
– Facilities, Construction Schedule, and Costs
21
Operating Scenarios
• Developed full range of possible ways to operate
an expanded reservoir
– Environmental water priority
– Bay Area reliability priority
– Multi-purpose (combination)
• Compared to future conditions without an
expansion
• Determined there are projects that could meet
CALFED objectives and CCWD Principles 22
Operating Scenarios Constraints
• Delta Protection
– Operate within all regulatory requirements
– Use only surplus flow and existing water rights / contracts to fill
reservoir
• Fishery Protection: conservative
– Assumed two month “no-fill” period in spring for fish protection
– Operate within all fish protections measures
• Protection for Other Users
– No injury to water right holders or contractors
• Analyzed 70 years of rainfall patterns
– Including critically dry (1977) and extended drought (192823
1934 and 1987-1992) years
Opportunities to Fill an Expanded
Reservoir
Typical Delta Water Quality
Seasonal Variation
Best Water Quality - Best
Time to Fill Reservoir
500
400
300
200
100
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan
Dec
Nov
0
Oct
Total Dissolved
Solids (ppm)
Possible
pumping
restrictions to
protect fish
Months
24
Operating Scenarios
Single-Purpose Scenarios
Environmental
Reliability
– EWA Program uses reservoir
capacity to deliver SBA water
– EWA Program uses
flexibility to shut down
export pumps to
protect fish
– Reservoir stores water
for use in dry years by
SBA agencies
ENV.
WATER
ENV.
WATER
DROUGHT
STORAGE
& WQ
& WQ
& WQ
CCWD
WQ
CCWD
WQ
CCWD
WQ
CCWD
WQ
CCWD
ES
CCWD
CCWD
ES
ES
CCWD
CCWD
ES
ES
CCWD
CCWD
ES
ES
Future w/o
Expansion
25
Operating Scenarios
Multi-purpose Scenarios
Federal Benefits
Drought Storage &
Environmental Water
ENV.
WATER
– Reservoir stores water
& WQ
for use in dry years by
SBA agencies
– EWA Program uses
DROUGHT
reservoir capacity to
STORAGE
deliver SBA water
– EWA Program uses
flexibility to shut down
CCWD
export pumps to protect
WQ
fish
CCWD
ES
ENV.
WATER
ENV.
WATER
& WQ
& WQ
CCWD DROUGHT
STORAGE
DROUGHT
STORAGE
DROUGHT
STORAGE
CCWD
WQ
CCWD
WQ
CCWD
ES
CCWD
ES
– Federal agency uses
reservoir capacity to
deliver SBA water
– Federal agency uses
flexibility to
• shut down export pumps
to protect fish
• provide water supplies for
wildlife refuges
26
Drinking Water Quality Benefits
• Major Findings
– Water Quality
• All scenarios would improve drinking water quality
for CCWD
• All scenarios would improve drinking water quality
for Bay Area agencies served by the South Bay
Aqueduct
27
Drinking Water Quality Benefits
• As the state continues to grow there will be increased
pressure on the Delta and declining water quality
• Expanded Los Vaqueros Reservoir would improve water
quality for CCWD and Bay Area water agencies
– New intakes would reduce salts and bromide
– Larger intakes allow faster reservoir filling when quality is better
– Deeper reservoir with multiple intakes reduces organics
• These improvements result in
– Reduced public health risks
– Improved taste – customer satisfaction
– Reduced treatment costs and improved ability to meet existing
28
and future water quality regulations
Drinking Water Quality
Benefits for CCWD
More high quality water delivered to CCWD
customers during extended droughts
• Before the existing reservoir, CCWD could not provide high
quality water during droughts or in any dry periods
– No water available for blending
• With the existing reservoir, CCWD can deliver high quality
water through a 3-year drought
• With an expansion, CCWD could deliver high quality water
through a 6-year drought
29
Drinking Water Quality
Benefits for CCWD
CCWD can improve water quality delivered to
customers with an expansion
Future Conditions without an Expansion
Water Quality Benefits to CCWD as Delivered Chlorides (ppm)
250
225
200
175
Without
Expansion
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
0%
10%
Wet
20%
30%
40%
50%
Normal
60%
70%
Dry
80%
90%
30 100%
Extended Dry
Drinking Water Quality
Benefits for CCWD
CCWD can improve water quality delivered to
customers with an expansion
Future Conditions w ith an Expanded Reservoir
Water Quality Benefits to CCWD as Delivered Chlorides (ppm)
250
Water Quality
Improvement
for CCWD
225
200
175
150
Without
Expansion
125
100
75
50
With
Expansion
25
0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
31
Wet
Normal
Dry
Extended Dry
Benefits to Potential Partners
Water Quality
30%
• An expanded reservoir
could reduce the times
that South Bay Aqueduct
agencies taste salts in
the water
• An expanded reservoir
would reduce the
maximum day salt levels
Percent of time delivered water
would exceed 100 ppm Chlorides
25%
20%
Future with
an Expansion
15%
10%
5%
25%
Future without
an Expansion
0%
5%
100 ppm Chlorides
– Now: 250 ppm
– With expansion: 150 ppm
32
Night Day Night Day Night Day Night Day
Raw Water Temperature
Raw Water pH
– Los Vaqueros would be deeper pool than Clifton Court
Source: ACWD
• Reduced temperature variation
• Reduced algae blooms
• Reduced pH variation
– Improved quality of deliveries to treatment plants means:
• Improved treatment stability
• Decreased cost
pH
13:22:00
7:32:00
1:42:00
6
19:52:00
66
14:02:00
6.5
8:12:00
68
2:22:00
7
20:32:00
70
14:42:00
7.5
8:52:00
72
3:02:00
8
21:12:00
74
15:22:00
8.5
9:32:00
76
3:42:00
9
21:52:00
78
16:02:00
An expanded Los
Vaqueros Reservoir
would reduce variation in
deliveries to treatment
plants
°F
Reduced Daily Variability for
Potential Partners
33
Reliability Benefits
• Major Findings
– An expanded Los Vaqueros Reservoir could be
operated to provide more reliable water
supplies
• 60,000 to 120,000 acre-feet of water in drought
years for CCWD (as alternative to current drought
year plans)
• 110,000 to 300,000 acre-feet of water to South Bay
Aqueduct agencies in drought years
34
Reliability Benefits for CCWD
How water needs are met in normal and dry years
Future Need
Conservation
Conservation
Conservation
Purchases
Other
Voluntary
Conservation
Spot Purchases &
Drought Mgmt
Purchases
Voluntary
Conservation
Other
Purchases
(e.g. Recycling)
(e.g. Recycling)
Other
Other
(GW)
Future
Demand
Expanded Los Vaqueros could
reduce the need for spot
purchases and rationing in dry
periods (with higher quality)
(e.g. Recycling)
CVP
Contract
(Federal)
CVP
Contract
(Federal)
Normal Year
Single Dry
Year
CVP
Contract
(Federal)
Multi-Year
Drought
35
Reliability Benefits for
Potential Partners
How water needs are met in normal and dry years
Future Need
Conservation
Conservation
Conservation
Local Storage
Voluntary
Conservation
Spot Purchases &
Drought Mgmt
Non-local
Storage
Voluntary
Conservation
Other
(e.g. Recycling)
Local Storage
Other
(e.g. Recycling)
Local Storage
Future
Demand
Expanded Los Vaqueros
could provide this water
(with higher quality)
Other
Contract
Sources
Contract
Sources
Normal Year
Single Dry
Year
(e.g. Recycling)
Contract
Sources
Multi-Year
Drought
36
South Bay Aqueduct (SBA)
Reliability
100%
220
80%
176
60%
132
40%
88
20%
44
0%
0
0%
20%
WET
YEARS
(SWP Delta Water Delivery Study 2021B)
40%
60%
Percent of Time At or Above
NORMAL
YEARS
80%
DRY
YEARS
100%
CRITICALLY DRY
YEARS
37
SBA SWP Contracts (1,000 AF/YR)
Percent of Contract Amount
SBA Agencies Contract for 220,000 acre-feet/year
of Water from the State Water Project
South Bay Aqueduct (SBA)
Reliability
100%
220
SWP Availability
80%
176
60%
132
Reliable Supply
40%
88
20%
44
0%
0
0%
20%
WET
YEARS
(SWP Delta Water Delivery Study 2021B)
40%
60%
Percent of Time At or Above
NORMAL
YEARS
80%
DRY
YEARS
100%
CRITICALLY DRY
YEARS
38
SBA SWP Contracts (1,000 AF/YR)
Percent of Contract Amount
State Water Project Provides Full Contract Amount
Only in the Wet Years
South Bay Aqueduct (SBA)
Reliability
100%
220
SWP Availability
80%
176
60%
132
Reliable Supply
40%
88
Repeat of 1987 to 1992 Drought = 40% Supply
20%
44
0%
0
0%
20%
WET
YEARS
(SWP Delta Water Delivery Study 2021B)
40%
60%
Percent of Time At or Above
NORMAL
YEARS
80%
DRY
YEARS
100%
CRITICALLY DRY
YEARS
39
SBA SWP Contracts (1,000 AF/YR)
Percent of Contract Amount
In Dry Years SBA Agencies Could Get
40% of Their Contract Amount
South Bay Aqueduct (SBA)
Reliability
100%
220
SWP Availability
80%
176
60%
132
Reliable Supply
40%
88
Repeat of 1987 to 1992 Drought = 40% Supply
20%
44
Repeat of 1977 Critical Dry Year - 20% Supply
0%
0
0%
20%
WET
YEARS
(SWP Delta Water Delivery Study 2021B)
40%
60%
Percent of Time At or Above
NORMAL
YEARS
80%
DRY
YEARS
100%
CRITICALLY DRY
YEARS
40
SBA SWP Contracts (1,000 AF/YR)
Percent of Contract Amount
In Critically Dry Years SBA Agencies Could Only Get
20% of Their Contract Amount
South Bay Aqueduct (SBA)
Need for SWP Water
100%
80%
Excess Water
Available
220
SWP Availability
Conservation/Other
176
SBA Agencies Average
Need for SWP Water
60%
Supply
Gap
132
40%
88
20%
44
0%
0
0%
20%
WET
YEARS
(SWP Delta Water Delivery Study 2021B)
40%
60%
Percent of Time At or Above
NORMAL
YEARS
80%
DRY
YEARS
100%
CRITICALLY DRY
YEARS
41
SBA SWP Contracts (1,000 AF/YR)
Percent of Contract Amount
SBA Agencies Have Excess Water in Wet Years
and a Supply Gap in Dry Years
Potential Drought Protection
Benefits for SBA Agencies
(Averages 25,000 AF/year)
100%
80%
Deliver Water From
Delta to Storage
220
SWP Availability
176
SBA Needs
for SWP Water
60%
Supply
Gap
132
40%
88
20%
44
0%
0
0%
20%
WET
YEARS
(SWP Delta Water Delivery Study 2021B)
40%
60%
Percent of Time At or Above
NORMAL
YEARS
80%
DRY
YEARS
100%
CRITICALLY DRY
YEARS
42
SBA SWP Contracts (1,000 AF/YR)
Percent of Contract Amount
SWP Water is Available, In Wet Years,
to Put into Storage
Potential Drought Protection
Benefits for SBA Agencies
100%
80%
Deliver Water From
Delta to Storage
SWP Availability
176
Deliver Water
From
Storage
to SBA
SBA Needs
for SWP Water
60%
220
132
40%
88
20%
44
0%
0
0%
20%
WET
YEARS
(SWP Delta Water Delivery Study 2021B)
40%
60%
Percent of Time At or Above
NORMAL
YEARS
80%
DRY
YEARS
100%
CRITICALLY DRY
YEARS
43
SBA SWP Contracts (1,000 AF/YR)
Percent of Contract Amount
Expanded Los Vaqueros Reservoir could provide up to 110,000 AF in
a critically dry year and up to 300,000 AF in an extended drought
Potential Benefits
Delta Enhancement
• Expanded Los Vaqueros Reservoir Enhances
Delta Environment
– Reduces impacts to fisheries from existing SBA
Diversion
• State-of-the-art fish screens
• Flexible timing of diversion
– Creates storage and flexibility for Environmental
Water that could allow
• Shut downs at state and federal pumps when fish are
present (up to 158,000 acre-feet per year)
• Water for wildlife refuges
44
• Water for in-stream flows upstream of Delta
Potential Benefits
Delta Enhancement
Existing State Pumps
– High volume
– No outlet for fish
– High fish losses
Fish Screen
Existing & Potential Los Vaqueros Diversions
– Low volume and velocity
– Fish can swim past screens
– Very low fish losses
45
Potential Benefits
Delta Enhancement
When Fish are not Present
• Expanded Reservoir
creates opportunity to
store Environmental Water
– EWA owns capacity in an
expanded Los Vaqueros
Reservoir
– Fill reservoir when no fish are
near pumps and water quality
is good
– Normal export pumping
– Deliveries to South Bay
agencies out of Los Vaqueros
Reservoir
46
Potential Benefits
Delta Enhancement
When Fish are near Pumps
• Expanded Reservoir
Creates Opportunity for
Environmental Water
– No filling Los Vaqueros
– Deliveries to South Bay
agencies out of Los
Vaqueros Reservoir
– EWA reduces or stops
export pumps
47
Potential Benefits
Conclusions
• An expanded Los Vaqueros Reservoir could meet CCWD
Principles 1 & 2
– The project improves water quality and reliability for CCWD
– The project enhances the Delta environment
• The project could meet CALFED objectives
– Provide substantial water quality and reliability benefits for Bay
Area water agencies, including CCWD
– Provide state and federal resource agencies with water for the
environment
48
Questions and Discussion
• Expanded Los Vaqueros Reservoir Operations
– Operating Scenarios
– Range of Benefits for CCWD and Potential Partners
• Improve Bay Area water quality and reliability
• Enhance Delta environment
49
Meeting Agenda
• Agenda
–
–
–
–
2003 Studies Activities and Available Information
Current Delta Operations and CALFED Goals
Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Operations
Facilities, Construction Schedule, and Costs
•
•
•
•
Delta Intakes and Fish Screens
Pumps and Pipelines
Dam and Watershed
Estimated Costs
50
Potential Facilities for an
Expansion Project
Delta Intake and
Conveyance
Delta-Los Vaqueros
Pipeline & Pump Station
Dam and
Recreation
LV-SBA Pump Station &
Pipeline
51
Delta Intakes
• 1-3 intakes on Old River
• 250 or 500 cfs each
• Approximately 1-2 acres each
Intake Locations Range of Capacities
Existing Old River 250 cfs 250 cfs
New Old River
250 cfs 500 cfs
New Middle River 500 cfs 1,000 cfs
Total Capacity
1,000 cfs 1,750 cfs
cfs = cubic feet per second
• 1-4 intakes on Middle River
• 250 or 500 cfs each
• Approximately 1-2 acres each
52
Delta Intakes and Fish Screens
Fish
Screen
Water
Flow
53
Pumps and Pipelines
• New Delta Pump Station
to fill reservoir
• New pipeline(s) to fill reservoir
• 9 miles, mostly in existing rightof-way
• Up to 12 ft. diameter
• 25 acre site
• 1,000 to 1,750 cfs
• New pumps & pipeline to
deliver water to South Bay
Aqueduct (SBA)
• 7 miles
• Up to 8 ft. diameter
• 430 cfs (same as SBA
capacity)
54
Dam & Watershed
• New dam upstream of
existing dam
– Materials reused from
existing dam
– New materials from within
reservoir area
– 13 acre staging area
downstream of dam
55
Dam Construction
Schedule
4 years of dam construction
Range of Sizes
Reservoir Capacity
300 500
(thousands of acre-feet)
Dam Height (FT)
290 360
Dam Crest Length (FT) 1,850 2,300
Volume (million cubic yards) 10.8 18.5
56
Dam Construction
Dam Safety
Constructed to withstand maximum
credible earthquake
Redundant safety features
Continuously monitored for safety
57
Recreation Facility
Site Options
• Recreation facilities will be
replaced and enhanced
–
–
–
–
–
The Marina
Fishing Piers
The Interpretive Center
Picnic Areas
Trails
• Many options identified for
facility locations
– Details to be presented in
Part 3 (April)
58
Project Cost Estimate
– Intake Facilities
– Pipeline/Pumping
Facilities
– New Dam/Reservoir
Facilities
Range of Estimated Project Costs
Cost ($millions)
• Cost includes the
size of project
elements:
$2,000
Inflation to Mid
Point Construction
Contingency (20%)
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
300 TAF 500 TAF 500 TAF
Other Project Costs
(22%)
Construction Costs
1,000 cfs 1,000 cfs 1,750 cfs
59
Project Cost Estimate
Cost
Estimate
Description
Reservoir (TAF)
Diversion (cfs)
Facilities
Intake Facilities
Delta Conveyance
Pipelines
Pump Stations
Appurtenances
Dam
Power Supply
Recreation Facilities
Subtotal
Mobilization (2%)
Construction Cost Estimate
Other Project Costs (22%)
Contingency (20%)
Subtotal
Inflation to Mid-Point Construction
Total Project Cost
300
1,000
Cost ($ million)
500
1,000
29
28
114
153
4
219
11
20
578
12
590
130
144
864
150
30
28
114
165
4
284
11
20
656
13
669
147
163
979
170
53
55
182
248
4
285
16
20
862
17
879
194
215
1,288
224
1,014
1,149
1,512
60
500
1,750
Construction Schedule
Activity
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Middle River Intake
Old River Intake
Dam Construction
Delta-LV Pipeline
Delta Pump Station
LV-SBA Pipeline & Pumps
Recreation Facilities
Interim water supply from Middle River during dam construction
61
Questions and Discussion
• Facilities and Costs
–
–
–
–
Delta Intakes
Pumps and Pipelines
Dam and Watershed
Project Costs & Schedule
62
Available Information
• On project web site: www.lvstudies.com
• In libraries and city offices in CCWD service area
– See web site for list of locations
• On CD by request
63
Contact Information
Marguerite Naillon
Project Manager
CALFED Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Studies
2300 Stanwell Drive
P.O. Box H2O
Concord, CA 94524
Phone: (925) 688-8018
email: [email protected]
www.lvstudies.com
64
Next Steps
• Comments on Today’s Discussion
– Due February 14th by e-mail or regular mail
• Future Workshops (see handout with schedule & locations)
– Early March -- Partners, Benefits, and Payments -Value of benefits and institutional issues
– Mid-April -- Environmental Effects & Mitigation -Strategies for addressing potential adverse effects
– Late May -- Summary and Response to Comments -Review of CCWD Principles and answers to
comments and issues
65
Information Available in
March 2003
PARTNERS, BENEFITS & PAYMENTS
Early March
Reimbursement - Amount other partners would need to
reimburse CCWD for shared facilities
Benefits - Value of benefits for CCWD and potential partners
(water quality, reliability, environmental, other)
Institutional - Models for how other similar projects are owned
and operated by participating agencies
Financing - Financing costs and methods