Critical Perspectives A Doll’s House Henrik Ibsen • Coupling close reading with an informed understanding of key ideas, related texts and background information READING CRITICALLY • No view.
Download ReportTranscript Critical Perspectives A Doll’s House Henrik Ibsen • Coupling close reading with an informed understanding of key ideas, related texts and background information READING CRITICALLY • No view.
Critical Perspectives A Doll’s House Henrik Ibsen • Coupling close reading with an informed understanding of key ideas, related texts and background information READING CRITICALLY • No view of the text is dominant • Representation of the ending as: • Unrealistic [M. W Burn] • A dramatic flaw [F. Petersen] EARLY CRITICS • Early responses focused on the play’s ending “Loving the repulsive” “Illogical and immoral” “Our own life, our own everyday life, has here been placed on stage and condemned!” EARLY CRITICS • Germany – Ibsen pressured into writing a happy ending VICTORIAN ENGLAND “IBSEN IN BRIXTON” CARTOON PUNCH 1891 VICTORIAN ENGLAND “How Torvald Helmer could by any possiblity have treated his restless, illogical, fractious, and babyish little wife otherwise than he did; why Nora should ever adore with such abandonment and passion wthis conceited prig… are points that… require a considerable amount of argument… to convince the commonsense playgoer.” (C. Scott, Daily Telegraph, 8 June 1889) “beware of confounding the feelings of men who look to them for nothing better than pleasant sensations and mental distractions, with the feelings of men who look to them to raise their ideal of mental and moral grace and beauty.” (Spectator, 1989). … “sharpshooting at the audience…we are not flattered spectators killing the idle hour with an ingenious and amusing entertainment: we are ‘guilty creatures sitting at a play’”… VICTORIAN ENGLAND The Quintessence of Ibsenism (G. Bernard, 1891) Naturalism – Ibsen came to be known for it LATER CRITICS Ibsen’s naturalism had been necessary at the time in order to show the psychological and political limitation of bourgeois domestic life, it was a stage the theatre needed to outgrow. Ibsen is not naturalistic enough Ibsen as a pioneer of modernism…an “invitiation to reflect on the nature of theatre” LATER CRITICS The relationship of Ibsen’s plays – and A Doll’s House in particular – to notions of theatricality and performance is precisely what makes them interesting LATER CRITICS The interpreters of Nora – an essential dimension to understanding of how different generations have understood Ibsen. Sign Systems • Convey meaning between people • Gestures • Clothing • Codes of manners SIGNS & SEMIOTICS Semiotics is the study of signs. • Helmer – Nora prefers his first name • Helmer considers use of his first name to be on a friendship level, hence his anger towards Krogstad’s informality SIGNS & SEMIOTICS Names are most obviously arbitrary labels of all The Christmas Tree Clothing • Tension Door Slam SIGNS & SEMIOTICS • Christian ideals • Festivity and fun • Nora’s state of being a play that allowed the audience to become absorbed in the action as if they were watching real life was in danger of lulling them into accepting the society shown in the play instead of wanting to change it. MARXIST CRITICISM For Brecht, • Whose story does this tell? • Is it told at the expense of lower economic groups? MARXIST CRITICISM The current preoccupation of Marxist criticism is with what a text does not say – because the text itself has been produced on a set of assumptions about the world seen as ‘natural’ by author and audience alike. • Nora as a reward • Nora as a pet / possession • Mrs Linde as an object of exchange MARXIST CRITICISM Nora and Mrs Linde as commodities • She is no longer an object Who is right? MARXIST CRITICISM Nora challenges her world GENDERED CRITICISM A Doll’s House remains one of the most powerful refutations ever written of the theory of separate spheres which underpinned nineteenth-century society – the idea that men and women belonged in the workplace and the home respectively. • Gender is not something we are • Gender is something we do Gender roles are apparent even within costumes GENDERED CRITICISM Gender is performative Nora and Helmer - Gender stereotypes Helmer • Is attracted to her helplessness • Acts as protector GENDERED CRITICISM Nora • Submissive • Flattering of her husband • Seeing work as beyond her due to intellect Critical Perspectives • • • • Early Critics Victorian England Later Critics Contemporary Approaches • Signs and Semiotics • Marxist Criticism • Gendered Criticism Sourced from York Notes Advanced – A Doll’s House, by Frances Gray, York Press, London 2008