ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Outline Automated Change Detection and Classification (ACDC) System Computer-Aided Detection (CAD), Classification (CAC), Search (CAS), and Change Detection. Clustering NRL 6.2 FY05 New.
Download ReportTranscript ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Outline Automated Change Detection and Classification (ACDC) System Computer-Aided Detection (CAD), Classification (CAC), Search (CAS), and Change Detection. Clustering NRL 6.2 FY05 New.
ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Outline Automated Change Detection and Classification (ACDC) System Computer-Aided Detection (CAD), Classification (CAC), Search (CAS), and Change Detection. Clustering NRL 6.2 FY05 New Start Automated declutter mechanism for electronic displays Summary ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY ACDC Ability to automatically detect / classify / identify objects in imagery and perform change detection Current project: Side-scan imagery (SSI) for mine counter-measures (MCM) Future/potential applications Real-time Imagery in Cockpit (RTIC) ECDIS Weather / meteorological Common Operational Picture (COP) ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Change Detection (using SSI) 1. Detect seafloor features (shadows, bright spots) 2. Classify detections (mines, rocks, sand waves, etc.) 3. Search historical database (position error) 4. Match new feature (to ideal features) 5. Perform area matching (uses clustering) 6. Identify features that don’t match: change detection ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Computer Aided Detection MILECs found by: Bright spots Sizes Shapes Type of Mines Mine-Like Echoes (MILECs) Automatically detected in SSI Shadows Length (look angle) Correct side Proximity to bright spot ACDC ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Real-Time CAD SSI stored in UNISIPS format as separate records (Lat/Lon, Altitude, Heading). Thresholded using a hard limiting transfer function to find Bright Spots: a = func(n) | a = 1 if a > min_bright_spot_value 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 Thresholded using a hard limiting transfer function to find Shadows: Bright Spot Bitmap 00000000000000000000000 00000010000000000000000 00011100000000000000000 00001100000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 Shadow Bitmap 00000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 00000001111111111100000 00000001111111111100000 00000000000000000000000 a = func(n) | a = 1 if a < max_shadow_value Shadows & Bright Spots Marked ACDC ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING Computer Aided Classification CAD SNIPPET ADAPTIVE FILTERING AUTO-COMPLETE SUMMARY ACDC ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Historical SSI Database (historical survey area) Imagery Features Snippets Classification Attributes ACDC ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Vector Searchable Database (Handles position error!) CAD / CAC new features (N) in areas where historical features (H) exist Populate search database with H’s Query search database for each N “ANDing” position error ellipses H2 N1 Spatial Query H 10 H3 New: N = N1, N2, …, Nn Historical: H = H1, H2, …, Hn Results: N1 = H3 | H10 ACDC ACDC CLUSTERING SUMMARY DECLUTTERING Wavelet Networks for Feature Matching rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle triangle triangle triangle triangle triangle triangle ask = wavelet coefficients triangle circle circle circle circle wsk = basis functions circle circle circle unknown unknown Training Set EXAMPLE: N1 y(x,y) = Σ ask wsk(x,y) Neural Network H10 ACDC ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Wavelet Networks for Area Matching N1 N4 N2 N1 NEW N3 N2 H2 N4 H5 Cluster Region H10 N3 New Survey Data Historical Database ACDC CLUSTERING SUMMARY DECLUTTERING Clustering for MCM NRL has transitioned new algorithm to NAVO to cluster MILECs detected in SSI, in support of MCM efforts. I. Detect / classify / search for / identify mine-like objects (MILECs) in SSI. II. Cluster objects into regions. III. Smooth clusters, calculate density. 3 MILECs Clutter / km2 category x<4 1 4 < x < 12 2 x > 12 3 1 2 ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Clustering algorithm NRL algorithm clusters mine-like objects detected in SSI NRL 7440.1 invention disclosed June 2003. Uses geospatial bitmapping technique patented by Code 7440.1 in 2001 (U.S. Patent 6218965). Unique method of clustering objects in 2D / 3D space: computationally efficient, single-pass, repeatable, operates on user-defined space, autonomous. Latitude (Y) Longitude (X) Collection of points in geographic space (here, 2D) Represent points as a geospatial bitmap. Each bit containing a point is “set;” all other bits are cleared. Bit size depends on scale. “Grow” each set bit (representing each point) by setting the surrounding bits to form a predefined expansion shape. Expansion shape dictated by data characteristics and user requirements. Can use any shape that can be mathematically defined. Size of expansion shape determines density of resultant clusters. Points that are geographically close to each other will grow or cluster together. Result: new geospatial bitmaps. Traverse each bitmap (in a consistent direction) to get vertices. Smooth the bitmaps by dropping vertices if the resulting polygon still contains all the original points and has an area equal to or less than the unsmoothed bitmap. Result of final iteration. Density of region = # original points / area of smoothed polygon. ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY FY05 6.2 New Start Internally funded by NRL 6.2 program (FY05-07) After FY07, will need transition sponsors to implement in fleet systems (NGA / VVOD, NGA / DNC2, NAVAIR / TAMMAC, others) Leveraging ongoing work from ACDC and other projects Collaborating with Dr. Greg Trafton (Engineering Research Psychologist) Clutter a confused multitude of objects Clutter as it pertains to this project: when additional information would result in performance degradation. ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY The Clutter Problem Our ability to collect data & “create” information is outpacing our ability to use and visualize the results. Clutter in all types of electronic displays is a massive and rapidly escalating problem. Many researchers have documented link between increased clutter and degraded performance. E.g., in cockpit displays, visual clutter can disrupt a pilot's visual attention, resulting in greater uncertainty concerning target locations.1 1Aretz (1988), Wickens (1993), Wickens & Carswell (1995) ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Problem (cont.) Pilots want ability to declutter displays (e.g., driven by vector-based GIS-like databases) but such “flexibility means integration complexity and added pilot workload. Pilots should be flying, not building a map!" 1 "If the map display is too cluttered, I just turn it off!" 1 Automated decluttering requires good clutter metrics. Reasonably good clutter metrics exist for text displays, but not for graphical displays. We propose to apply NRL detection / clustering algorithms and human factors principles to quantify clutter in electronic displays. 1 Quotes of F/A-18 pilots, from Lohrenz, et al. (1999) ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Relevance to COP charts imagery obstructions terrain NGA data recon. routes troops targets C4I data Over the past decade, the COP has grown in functional complexity … (DISA, 1998) ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Current declutter method Sample display downloaded from Nobeltec company website. Warfighter must manually remove an entire layer at once (brute-force filtering). Need a more “intelligent” way to declutter electronic displays. Warfighters and decision-makers should see all that is needed – but only what is needed – without extraneous data obscuring critical information. ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Measuring Clutter Considerations: Display type: aviation, meteorological, ECDIS, etc. User expertise: novice vs. expert Task: read-off, integrate, infer, working-memory Incorporate established cognitive theory into new / enhanced clutter metrics: “Global” vs. “local” information density “Salience” (e.g., M. Zuschlag, 2004) #Colors, color contrasts among adjacent objects #Features of each “type” (points, lines, areas, text) #Clusters of features, cluster density - NRL algorithm ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Clustering Algorithm Expand technique to cluster objects in N x 2d (2d geospatial location + other attributes) Primary challenges: Mathematically define meaningful expansion shapes for feature layers and attributes. Determine how clusters of various display feature types (points, lines, areas, text) interact with each other. Apply established theories of human visual attention and search strategies to our methodology. Bound the problem: focus on clustering features in NGA Vector Product Format (VPF) databases Standard database for many DoD applications Can be tailored with mission-specific data sets ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY Validate Clutter Metrics Can our metrics predict good display design (subjective / user preference)? Interview technical experts Compare clutter metrics with subjective evaluations Can our metrics predict user performance and workload? Requires experimentation … Independent variables • • • • Display type (aeronautical; nautical; meteorological; etc.) Clutter metric (uncluttered very cluttered) User expertise (novice, expert) Task performed (read-off, integrate, infer, working memory, etc.) Dependent variables • Performance: time, accuracy, method/logic (e.g., w/ eye-tracker) • Workload: subjective evaluation, secondary task, pupil dilation ACDC CLUSTERING DECLUTTERING SUMMARY SUMMARY Summary NRL developing ACDC system with algorithms to autonomously detect, classify, and cluster mine-like objects in SSI, and perform change detection via historical contact databases. ACDC concepts/functions applicable to other types of imagery and objects COP. Detection and clustering algorithms will be exploited for new NRL project (FY05-07) to develop clutter metrics for electronic displays. Will attempt to validate clutter metrics by comparing with measures of user performance and workload, and subjective evaluations of display design. Results should be significant for future geospatial databases, db upgrades and display designs COP.