Modeling crop-livestock intensification in Southern Africa AgMIP Sub-Saharan Regional Workshop (September 10-14, 2012) Patricia Masikati++
Download ReportTranscript Modeling crop-livestock intensification in Southern Africa AgMIP Sub-Saharan Regional Workshop (September 10-14, 2012) Patricia Masikati++
Modeling crop-livestock intensification in Southern Africa AgMIP Sub-Saharan Regional Workshop (September 10-14, 2012) Patricia Masikati++ Full title Crop livestock intensification in the face of climate change: Exploring opportunities to reduce risk and increase resilience in southern Africa using an integrated multi-modeling approach Southern Africa: Drastic increases in the demand for agricultural products Strong urbanization and income growth Growing food markets and changes in composition (more meat, dairy, fresh and processed food) 5-6 times the marketed food between 2010 and Source: Adopted from Capacity Development Initiative in Modernizing Food Systems— 2050 Michigan State, Makerere, Stellenbosch and Pretoria Universities, 2010) …vs declining per capita food production Source: Chilonda et al., 2007 Crop production 40 •Water productivity of maize 2 to 3 kg/ha/mm (Potential 9 to 12 kg/ha/mm •Mineralizable N ranges 5 to 15 kg ha -1 •%OC = 2 to 2.2 120 30 Maxt & Mint (oC) •Drought frequences 1 in every 3 years 35 100 25 80 20 60 15 Rainfall (mm) •Rainfall ranges 450-650 mm per year 140 av rain= 562/yr 40 10 20 5 rain mint 0 0 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov maxt Livestock production 40 35 Frequency 30 25 Mortality 20 Sold 15 Slaughter 10 Lost/stolen Predators 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apri May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 80 70 number of respondents 60 Feed shortages 50 40 30 20 10 0 6 jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec Crop livestock systems and interactions feed $ feed fertilisers Investment capacity $ Labor availability? Access to cash/credit? feed draft power $ nutrients crop residues Access to information? manure milk Where to invest? $ What type of crops? feed nutrients draft power crop residues How many animals? fertilisers What type of feed? Returns? Source: Adopted from Rufino (2009) $ On-farm Proportions of income sources Household’s sources of income 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Mzimba Crops Livestock Nkayi Agricultural labour Changara Off farm income Remittances Goal Identify pathways to improve food security and develop adaptive management strategies to reduce climate induced risks and increase systems resilience Objectives • • • Characterize farming systems in Southern Africa in terms of bio-physical and socioeconomic characteristics Develop and evaluate crop-livestock management and climate change adaptation strategies that improve agrodiversity and economic returns Explore the interactions and synergies of increased diversity and integration Methodology Description of current farming systems in terms of biophysical and socio-economic aspects and constraints (model input data), Literature review and data collected from existing projects Bio-physical: crop and livestock productivity, agriculture potential, management interventions and productive resources and use efficiency, location with regards to climate transition zone Socio-economic: household characteristics, crop and livestock production orientation, production resources (prices of inputs and outputs), access to markets, cropping patterns. Methodology ctd Evaluation and application of biophysical (crop livestock and climate) and economic models (regional and global) Secondary and primary data from existing projects (e.g ICRISAT CPWF, SLP ) for model evaluation Crop Models Crop models such as APSIM, DSSAT, AquaCrop Climate models General circulation models Livestock models Livestock modeling tools such as AUSFARM, APSfarm and LIFE-SIM Economic models Tradeoff Analysis model for Multi-Dimensional impact assessment (TOA-MD) Methodology ctd Integrated system analysis tool to assess interactions and synergies A tool to bring together data obtained from the biophysical and economic models and assist to determine profitable management practices that can increase onfarm production and resilience across existing farming typologies. Target alternative crops Dual purpose cereal and grain legume crops e.g maize, sorghum, ground nuts, cowpeas) and forage grasses and legumes (e.g mucuna, lablab, bana, rhodes grass), that have the potential to provide and improve both food and fodder which are the main constraints to improved food security in mixed farming systems of SSA Management practices Crops 1. Conventional practice 2. Conservation agriculture 3. Crop rotations 4. Microdose Management practices evaluated with water harvesting techniques Contribution to: Food security Adaptation Grain yield vs the household size Performance of management practice under current and projected climatic Income generated changes (variable and decreased Stover production (quality and rainfall, increased temperature and quantity) vs feed requirements of carbon dioxide livestock per household and feed Production and economic uncertainty shortage period, stover for conservation agriculture Adoptability (e.g., returns in the short term) Using improved crop varieties of different food and fodder crops Livestock 1. Conventional practice 2. Improved feeding systems using crop residues from the different crop management practices 3. Commercial feed system Beneficial products and services As above Study countries and Co-PIs Country Co-PI Institute Malawi Elizabeth Bandson Bunda College of Agriculture Mozambique Sebastiao Famba Universidad Eduardo Mondlane South Africa Olivier Crespo & Chris Lennard Sue Walker University of Cape Town University of the Free State Kenya* Lieven Claessens ICRISAT, Nairobi Zimbabwe Patricia Masikati Andre van Rooyen Sabine Homann-Kee Tui ICRISAT, Bulawayo * Kenya excluded, also key staff Activities by teams Crop-livestock • • • • • Characterize the current farming systems in terms of biophysical and socio-economic aspects with assistance of students from study countries (Malawi, Zimbabwe, South Africa and Mozambique) Compile crop-livestock data bases for model evaluation and application. Develop management practices for targeting and scaling out Evaluate and apply bio-physical (crop and livestock) models at regional level, ex-ante analysis of relevant management practices for different typologies and their long term production and climatic risks Generate crop-livestock production data to be used as input data for the TAO-MD model Develop bio-physical and economic modelling training manuals for students and NARs in collaboration with coPIs Economic • • • • • Analysis of the current and alternative mixed systems and to assess climate change and adaptation strategies and their impacts on livelihoods, using the Tradeoff Analysis model for Multi-Dimensional impact assessment (TOAMD) Simulating spatial variability in economic returns that represents heterogeneity in the farm population Together with the AgMIP leaders, familiarize the southern Africa team with the TOA-MD methodology during project training workshops. Link the TOA-MD model applications with the appropriate data and multiple model simulations for crops and climate. Integrate the socio-economic scenarios being developed within AgMIP (RAPs) in TOA-MD and initiate interactions with the global economic modelling team Climate • • • • • • • Collection and analysis of CMIP3 (and CMIP5 when available) GCMs data Downscaling (statistical and dynamical where possible) of these data at the station level Production of daily minimum, maximum temperature and rainfall project, as well as estimation of solar radiation and/or potential evapotranspiration for various SRES emission scenarios Development of computing tools that will allow other teams (in southern Africa as well as in Africa), to reproduce the solar radiation process Development of computing tools that will allow other teams (in southern Africa as well as in Africa) to translate the climate data format to other models Participation in workshops Participating in training workshops and develop a training manual in collaboration with the other co-PIs Outputs 1. Biophysical and socio-economic characteristics of crop-livestock systems, constraints and pathways for sustainable • Maps with the main characteristics compiled and documented • Detailed description of farming systems • Complied list of farmer profiles and detailed constraints and development pathways for different typologies • Framework for systems simulation and analysis • Draft training manual on biophysical and economic models for students and NARs staff Outputs ctd 2. Management strategies relevant to the identified typologies for improved food security; illustrate interactions and synergies •Detailed report on relevant management strategies for the different typologies and their longterm production trends and risks • Training manual on biophysical and economic models for students and NARs staff •Report on interactions and synergies that increase systems diversity and integration Capacity Building With Assistance from co-PIs from diff Universities Training of MSc students and NARs MSc students Training workshops Outcomes Greater understanding of challenges and opportunities in the current mixed farming systems of southern Africa for better targeting of interventions to increase systems resilience and reduce climate induced risk. Improved understanding of the interactions and synergies of production system components (sub-systems); which combinations bring about profitable production systems and how to use these to facilitate development along sustainable pathways Thank you