Transcript AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey • November 2000 AQIP admission • 2002 First action projects submitted • September 2003

AQIP Status Report
An Overview and Discussion
Timeline for SJC’s AQIP
Journey
• November 2000 AQIP admission
• 2002 First action projects
submitted
• September 2003 AQIP Portfolio
• February 2004 AQIP Feedback
• November 2007 new Portfolio due
Strategic Issues
• Lack of a process focus
• Lack of a centralized data
collection methodology
• Lack of a leadership development
system
Lack of a Process
Focus
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Annual operating plan and budget integration
Academic program review
Grants development system
Small facilities needs process
Board policy review system
Program Audits
Work Load definition and documentation
Lack of a Centralized
Data Collection System
•
•
•
•
•
Full implementation of Datatel
User groups and training for Datatel
Upgrade to version 18
Implementation of FRX reporting
Established Vice President for
Institutional Research and Planning
• Active participation in CQIN
Lack of a Leadership
Development Program
• Presidential Leadership Academy
• Leadership reading series
• Student support services program review
process
• Grants program
• CTX and Organizational Development
• Transcript process for training
• Focus in Strategic Plan
Criterion 1
Helping Students Learn
•
•
•
•
•
•
Academic advising center
CSLOs established and used
On-line tutorial models
Welding pilot curriculum
New program approval process
Adjunct faculty development process
Criterion 2
Accomplishing Other
Distinctive Objectives
• Improving our advisory committees
• External program accreditation
• LERN and FAS assistance in
program improvement
• New facilities Master Plan
Criterion 3
Understanding Student
and Other Stakeholder
Needs
•
•
•
•
Licensure rate achievement rate review
CCSSE and Noel Levitz data use
Lumina and student data use
Focus groups with students and community
Criterion 4
Valuing People
•
•
•
•
•
•
Strategic plan
Center for Teaching Excellence (CTX)
Office of Organizational Development
FT Technology Trainer
PEARLS
Workload documentation and
clarification
Criterion 5
Leading and
Communicating
• Use of a Cabinet
• Presidential Advisory Committees
• Tell it to the President and Vice
Presidents
• Learning Leadership Handbook for
Deans
• New Employee Orientation
Criterion 6
Supporting
Institutional Objectives
• Wide use of data sources
• Lumina participation
• Performance objectives and
scorecard
• State performance targets
• Integration of planning
Criterion 7
Measuring
Effectiveness
•
•
•
•
Benchmarking
Online scorecard
Board presentations
Vice President of Institutional Research
and Planning
• Achieving the Dream
• Quality Council research focus
Criterion 8
Planning for
Continuous
Improvement
• New Mexico Performance
Objectives
• Quick Quality Checks
• Linkage of all planning and
budgeting systems
Criterion 9
Building Collaborative
Relationships
• Strategic plan focus
• Large number of active
partnerships
• Placement rates
• Employer satisfaction
• Support for SJC Foundation
Lessons Learned
• Evaluation needs to feed back into
planning
• Systems must be documented
• Need a better system for leading the
quality initiatives
• Action projects need to be linked and
focused to the strategic plan
Next Steps
• Develop a Quality Champion
Team
• Institutionalize and document
procedures for annual AQIP
portfolio update
• Build sustainability in all systems