Wisdom from the 1920s and the 1960s Student Institutional Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.

Download Report

Transcript Wisdom from the 1920s and the 1960s Student Institutional Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.

Wisdom from the 1920s and the 1960s
Student
Institutional
Human history becomes
more and more a race between education
and catastrophe. ….H. G. Wells
Success
Success
Education
Schwartz
Global is the slowest form of learning. ….Tony
National
Success
The medium is the message. ….MarshallSuccess
McLuhan
ellucian
IMS
The cloud is the message.
2-Nov-15
Humanity’s Challenge to Education
Scale Up and Sustain Social, Environmental, Economic, and Educational Justice
Educational Attainment ≈ Educational Justice
William H. Graves
SVP, Academic Strategy, Ellucian
Board of Governors, Antioch University
Retired Professor, UNC-Chapel Hill
www.institutionalperformance.typepad.com
Title Slide
Education
vs.vs.
Catastrophe
Education
Catastrophe
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Education vs. Catastrophe
Global / Local Puzzle
Think globally,
act locally, but …
All things are interconnected!
Catastrophe
has the lead!
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Education is key!
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Credentialing is a
common good for
all of its investors.
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Policy Perspectives
PolicyPolicy
Perspectives
Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
The Attainment Challenge
Scale up the proportion of adults
with postsecondary credentials.
Barriers to Scaling Up
 The education pipeline is leaky.
 Economic demographics imply
that a growing percentage of
low-income students will require
needs-tested financial aid.
 The growing need for financial
aid will make credentialing
unaffordable to more students,
governments, and educational
institutions.
 There is no evidence that local
successes will add up to global
success!
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Unit Costs Matter!
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs
Unit Matter!
Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
 SHEEO Fact: National average for inflation-adjusted perstudent FTE state subsidies is hovering near 30-year lows.
 NCHEMS Projection: By 2013, every state will suffer a
structural revenue shortfall. 2013 arrived a few years ago!
 Delta Cost Project: Assuming current trends for per-student
E&R expenses in constant dollars, the future is disturbing!
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Other
Culture and Productivity
Other
Other
Private
Public Higher
Higher Education
Education
Per-Student
Per-StudentE&R
E&RCosts
Costs
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Tuition
Tuition
Tuition
Tuition
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Affordability will continue to suffer!
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Economic Governance Issues
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic
EconomicGovernance
GovernanceIssues
Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
 If credentialing at scale is a common good, then why do:
 Education providers find government funding to be inadequate,
unreliable, and intrusive?
 Governments find higher education unaccountable and its “credit-hoursattempted” revenue model costly and wasteful?
 Needy students and families find higher education unaffordable,
inflexible, inaccessible, and “slow?”
Core Redesign Models
 Think like 2009 Economics Nobel Laureate Elinor Ostrom!
Core Redesign Results
 Don’t leave the economic governance of a common good to
governments or other powerful interests!
 Be guided by Ostrom-style open economic governance models that are
so far avoiding a tragedy of the commons: Internet Society, World
Wide Web Consortium, Wikipedia, ...
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
 Possible solution: Create a global economic governance
cooperative, the Education Leadership Commons, to rebalance
economic rights and responsibilities among education providers
and their external investors.
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Education Leadership Commons
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
ELC
Global nonprofit
nongovernmental
organization
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
Education
Integrators
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
Learning
Evaluators
Open economic
governance
processes
Students
Families
Economic
Beneficiaries
Governance
of the
for
the
Credentialing
Marketplace
Governments
Employers
Donors
Education
Suppliers
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Credentialing
Providers
Quotations
ellucian
Economic Lever = Needs-Tested, Earned Grants?
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Educational Justice
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational
Justice
Educational
Justice
 All people are born equal – and born to learn!
 Educational justice: scale up the needs-tested right to
earn a credential affordable to all invested parties.
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
 ELC: an economic compact with three-way leverage.
 From birth, estimate the value of needs-tested aid to a student,
who will eventually earn that aid by participating in periodic,
independent, age-appropriate core learning evaluations (OECD).
 Education providers accepting students’ earned aid must account
in peer groupings for credentialing productivity goals.
 In return for funding needy students, governments would have
rights to longitudinal data for research – data follow the student.
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Forces of Change
Policy Perspectives
Technology Acceleration
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
IT-Enabled External Sourcing / Partnering
Educational Justice
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
We are the cloud!
Out-sourcing
Open-sourcing
We are increasingly
In-sourcing
Off-shoring
• first-generation
Scale Up Educational
Justice & Attainment
• underprepared
Work-flowing
In-forming
• financially needy
Supply-chaining
Mobile-ing
Increase the proportion of credentialed adults.
Increase annual credentialing rates.
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
Improve per-credential affordability to all parties.
EPS
Globalization
= Innovation
= Productivity
Account independently
for core
learning.
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Demo-graphics & Psycho-graphics
Public Policy
IT-Enabled Strategies
Globalization
ForcesForces
of Change
of Change
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
IT-Enabled Strategies
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled
Strategies
IT-Enabled
Strategies
• Increase attainment proportions.
• Increase credential completion rates.
• Improve per-degree production costs.
• Improve reporting and analytics.
External
Sourcing/Partnering
Redesign
Strategy
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Maximum
Leverage
from
Technology
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Flex
Program
Redesign
Strategy
Common
Core
Redesign
Strategy
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Common Core Redesign
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common
Core
Redesign
Common
Core
Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
 National Center for Academic Transformation pioneered
course redesign in the ‘90s.
 In order of enrollments, the top 20-30 courses account
for enrollments totaling 40% at 4-year schools and 50%
at 2-year schools.
 These high-enrollment courses consume 20% to 25% of
annual operating costs (because direct instructional
costs are around 50%).
 These courses are common (core) to all campuses.
 Common exams, including nationally normative learning
evaluations, are possible across all course sections.
 Can these courses be redesigned using IT, both to
measurably improve learning outcomes and to reduce
per-enrollment costs?
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Common Core Redesign Models
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
Supplemental
Online
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
 U New Mexico (psychology)
 Rio Salado CC (basic math)
 U Colorado (astronomy)
 U So. Mississippi (world lit)
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
CoreCore
Redesign
Models
Redesign
Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Replacement
Buffet
 Penn State (statistics)
 Ohio State (statistics)
 Tallahassee CC (writing)
 Florida Gulf Coast U (arts)
Emporium
Linked Workshop
 Virginia Tech (linear algebra)
 Austin Peay State (math)
 U Alabama (pre-calculus)
 Ferris State
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Common Core Redesign Results
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
 Actual: Pew Trust-funded pilot involved 30
institutions, each using IT and principles of
active learning to redesign a large-enrollment
course. All accounted for equal or improved
learning results, and reported per-enrollment
cost offsets averaging 40%.
CoreCore
Redesign
Results
Redesign
Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
 Potential: Do the math!!! A systemic effort to
redesign the top 20-30 highest enrollment
courses could offset 8%-10% of annual
operating costs.
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Faculty Role
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Learning as an Expedition
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Instructor-Facilitated Active Leaning
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Organize
Learning
Resources
Design & Guide
Active & Social
Learning
Guide
Self
Learning
Syllabus
flipped classrooms
special projects
course packs
individualized help
papers
faculty expertise
team projects
labs
The Productivity Question
video lectures
internships
tests
EPS
leaningware
field trips
tutor others
Profiles in Productivity
OER
MOOCs
teach classes
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
Quotations
ellucian
Faculty teams are responsible for program redesign
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Culture and Productivity
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
External Sourcing / Partnering Strategies
ELC
Educational Justice
Culture of Performance
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Credentialing
Productivity
Core Redesign Models
•
•
•
•
Academic / admin process redesign
Enrollment mgmt. outsourcing
IR mgmt. outsourcing
Grant mgmt. outsourcing
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture
andand
Productivity
Culture
Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Information Productivity
Culture of Evidence
Evidence-Driven
Executive Leadership
• Assessment
• Performance consulting
• Performance reporting / analytics
Individual Productivity
Culture of “Satisficing”
High-Performing Digital Utility
Satisfaction vs. Costs
• Applications
• IT mgmt. & leadership
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Return on IT Investment
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
ROI = Accountability + Accessibility
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Learning Accountability
Program Accountability
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
AccountabilityCosts
ScaleExpense
Down Per-Credential
Increase Credentialing Productivity
Accessibility
Scale UpAffordable
Affordability
of Student Success
Return
on IT
Return
onInvestment
IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Scalable Accessibility
Flexible Accessibility
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Is Yours a Culture of Productivity?
A High Productivity Institution?
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Systemic Credentialing Productivity?
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Random Acts of Productivity?
Return on IT Investment
The
Productivity
Question
The
Productivity
Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Progress requires
• order where there is change &
• change where there is order.
… Alfred North Whitehead
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Educational Positioning System
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
• IT and
interoperability market!
•Reduce
GPS-like technology
for credentialing
frictions and
costs to expand
thedata
credentianling
• Trustand
– security,
• Interoperable
credentialing
marketplace
(Nobel
Laureates
Ronald Coase
Elinorauthenticity,
Ostrom)metrics
ELC
Educational Justice
students
families
donors
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Education’s
External
Investors
governments
employers
suppliers
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
ELC ≈ EPS
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
institutions
evaluators
professions
Education
Providers,
Credentialers
Education
Leadership
Commons
Ostrom-like
open
cooperative
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Profiles in Productivity
Tennessee Board of Regents Online Degree Program

Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice

Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models




Over thirty 2- and 4-year institutions partnered to increase the
tertiary credential-holding proportion of the state’s workforce.
 Enabled working adults to complete previous work
 Increased college-going rate
Developed universal AA curriculum and many credentialing
programs – all in online flex format
Current net new “profitable “enrollments of at least 16,000
Inter-institution credit- and revenue-sharing in place
Externally sourced planning, development, and delivery support
Unified single ERP and single LMS several years ago
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Antioch University

Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles
in Productivity
Profiles
in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian

Ph.D in Leadership and change
 Course-less program
 Quarterly “residencies” of a few days around the nation
 Online high-touch individualized mentoring continuously
 External mentors for quality assurance and applied
learning
Coursera/Antioch MOOC partnership
 Antioch credit for Duke and Penn Coursera MOOCs.
 All parties benefit academically and financially.
Title Slide
Education vs. Catastrophe
Mixing and Matching
Policy Perspectives
Unit Costs Matter!
Economic Governance Issues
ELC
Educational Justice
Forces of Change
IT-Enabled Strategies
Common Core Redesign
Core Redesign Models
Core Redesign Results
Faculty Role
Culture and Productivity
Return on IT Investment
The Productivity Question
EPS
Profiles in Productivity
Quotations
ellucian
Flex Program Strategy
Course Redesign Strategy
Redesign programs/services
for flexibility.
Redesign large courses for
improved learning and costs.
– Maximize “high tech,” both
academic & administrative.
• More self-service – time shifted
(asynchronous) learning &
other services
• Less contact-hour instruction &
other scheduled services
– Individualize “high touch”
expert help to retain and
graduate students.
– Increase classroom & office
capacity of the existing plant.
– Reduce dependency on the
classroom & semester models.
– Focus on the course, not its
course sections.
– Emphasize active learning &
mastery feed-back testing.
– Use common tests.
– Document learning differences
via assessment.
– Realign faculty tasks without
increasing faculty labor to:
• Offload some functions to
software & assistants.
• Optimize faculty expertise &
interventions with students.
• Increase student/instructor ratio
• Reduce per-student costs.