Transcript MR12ABTuesday13h00AlfHartzenburgx

Industrial Energy Efficiency Project - SA
Overview of Phase I Outcomes
Alfred Hartzenburg
21 July 2015
IEE – A Global Programme
Operational in 17 countries
Planned activities in 10 countries
Operational
South Africa
Moldova
Russia
Turkey
Ecuador
Malaysia
Thailand
Viet Nam
India
Philippines
Egypt
Indonesia
Iran
Ukraine
Colombia
Macedonia
Myanmar
Planned
Other donors
activities
 Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs
 UK Department for International Development
 Government of South Africa
 Government of Italy
1
Training Statistics
 >210 Training
workshops conducted
 >3 000 Engineers,
technicians and
managers trained
 119 National Experts
 46 National Trainers
 29 ISO 50001 Lead
Auditors
Industry Engagement
Participating Large Companies
153
SME Energy Assessments Conducted
231
Companies Reporting Savings
41
Host Training Companies
22
Candidate Companies
90
Demonstration Plants
77
Case studies developed
32
* Some of the 54 Actively Reporting Companies has signed to be Demo Plant for more than 1 Discipline
Industry Engagement
Demonstration
Projects
Case Studies
Developed
77 20%
32
8%
SME Energy Audit Trends
Implementation Savings Reported
Actual Savings
EnMS / ESO Implementation Savings Achieved
System
kWh
CO2 (tonnes)
Rand Value
EnMS
901 098 244
857 336
889 608 205
ESO
440 524 889
394 132
237 538 706
1 341 623 133
1 251 468
1 127 146 911
Total
(Payback Period less than 2 years)
Performance Summary
Project Outputs
Achievements
EnMP benchmarking assessment/study (national
and international).
Formulation of 2nd review of NEES
Completed June 2012
Industrial Sector Consultation workshop on EnMP.
Not Achieved
Adequate numbers of institutions and personnnel
accreditated for verification of compliance
29 ISO 50001 Lead Auditors
Qualified
Not Achieved
Advanced (40) and Expert (41) and Vendor (2) Level i. >210 Workshops
EnMS and ESO Training courses conducted
ii. < 3000 Persons trained
(cumulative). Total trained perons - est 2,000
iii. 119 Experts qualified
(cumulative). Establish 3 TRC's.
iv. 46 National trainers
v. 1 (PTA) established and 1 (DBN)
under development.
i. 205 energy audits completed
i. 231 energy audits completed
ii. 17 enterprises implement EnMS
ii. 49 enterprises implemented
iii. 8 enterprises implement ESO
EnMS
iii. 58 enterprises implemented ESO
25 case studies documented and widely circulated i. 32 Case studies documented and
ii. 29 Case studies in progress
Direct Energy Savings - 500 GWh
Direct CO2e Savings - 478 500 tonnes
1 341 GWh saved
1 251 tonnes CO2e saved
Implementation Drivers
ECM Implementation Drivers
R²
P-Value Significance F
Size (%) annual electricity tariff
Increase
0.9920
0.0040
0.0040
No of Companies implementing ECM's
0.9005
0.0511
0.0511
Electricity tariffs
0.8930
0.0550
0.0550
Cooling Degree Days
0.7473
0.1356
0.1356
Heating Degree Days
0.7345
0.1430
0.1430
IEE Project Team Size
0.6093
0.2194
0.2194
No of training workshops
0.5049
0.2895
0.2895
Implementation Reality
Accelerants to Implementation
Management
Commitment
Other
stakeholder
interest and
support
Required
Implementation
Aid
Familiarity
with
principles of
EnM
Familiarity
with ISO
Management
Systems eg.
9000 & 14000
Behavioural Economics
Reflections
 Sub-metering pays dividends when verifying the
performance of energy conservation measures (esp for
bottom-up sanity checks)
 Develop a strong measurement plan to verify results and
see that it gets implemented
 Energy savings from operational improvements are not
permanent. Savings when plants are down evaporate
when plants get busy.
Winning Culture and Environment
• Demonstrable and visible top management
commitment
• An ISO / WCM environment promotes a culture
conducive to sustainability
• After exhausting no cost improvements a
willingness to spend in order to save
• Plant stability and reliability
• Allocation of resources
Sustainability Failure
• Energy cost proportionately low
• Limited resource allocation
• Low level of operator awareness and interest
• Top management unaware and / or disinterested
in energy team achievements and challenges
• Competing and disruptive reporting priorities
• Savings not sustained
Sustainability Failure
”…energy efficiency
initiatives that are not
monitored and maintained
typically have a six-month
half-life of their benefits.
That is, they lose half of
their economic benefits
every six months if left
largely untouched.”
Emerson’s James Beall, a principal process control consultant who helps
manufacturers optimize their processes
Results of SA IEE Project interventions
Solomon Coatings:
Sockit Manufacturing:
Willard Batteries:
Mittal Saldanha:
The company implemented
the IEE Project SME energy
assessment findings which
turned the company back
to profitability. The
company saved around
R 6,500 per month over a
period 10 months in
electricity costs with a
resultant increase in
production output of 40%.
The IEE Project identified
four energy system
optimisation opportunities
and a fuel switch, all of
which the Company
implemented. The
Company installed a
paraffin boiler which
allowed it to increased its
machine pool by 30% .
By implementing an EnMs,
supported by the IEE
Project, the Plant has saved
over R 3 million between
2012 and 2013. As a result
of the energy savings the
Plant has been expanded
with 20% in production
capacity.
The IEE Project has
directly assisted Mittal
Saldanha to improve its
energy efficiency and
reduce production costs.
It has facilitated the
company saving
approximately R 89 million
n 2011 in energy costs,
helping them to remain in
business.
SA IEE Project Outcomes
SA IEE Project Outcomes
SA IEE Project Outcomes
SA IEE Project Outcomes
1
4
0
20
416
66
1 237
0
Direct Jobs retained
Direct Jobs created
5
20
482
1 237
Total Direct Jobs
*Outcomes largely attributed to the IEE Project’s interventions, but acknowledging that other
variables would have influenced the outcomes to varying degrees across the study sites.
17
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy
Tot Direct Jobs retained = 1654
Tot Direct Jobs created= 90
Overall Direct Jobs = 1744
Mapping Disposable Income*
*Calculations in this slide
are based on IEE Direct Local Employment = jobs crated/retained as a direct consequence of the IEE Project interventions.
Disposable annual income
earned by workers (IEE direct
employment) living in the
local community
$
(excluding bonuses and overtime and after
deductions and tax)
Percentage earnings
within local community
R 25 mill
Income retained p.a. in local
community to generate further
economic activity
1
2
Disposable
Earnings
R 206.3 mill
72%
$
R 42 000
R 90 000
Arcelor Mittal Steel
Saldanha Works
R 5 mill
Disposable Earnings
R 0.25 mill
1
Solomon Coatings
2
Disposable Earnings
R 0.7 mill
Disposable
Earnings
R 64.6 mill
48%
75%
Sockit Manufacturing
Willard Batteries
18
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy
Acknowledgements
•
•
•
•
•
Project Funders: dti, DoE, Seco, UKAid
Implementing Agent: UNIDO
Project Host: CSIR
Project Custodian: NCPC-SA
Skills Development: Wynand Van Der Merwe, Sybil
Rowles, Phyllis Manamela
• Marketing & Comms: Julie Wells, Fatimah Boltman,
Constance Mokhoantle
• IEEP Project Team: Faith Mkhacwa, Sashay
Ramdharee, Milisha Pillay, Ngoanathari Maja, Bianca
Latchman, Ajay Trikam, Brent Goliath, Adrian Rudolph,
Phumla Makae
Key Milestones & Challenges
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
IEEP Phase II
National Energy Act 2008: Energy reporting
National Energy Strategy
Carbon Tax
ISO 50002, 50002, 50006, 15015
Reliable Power Supply
…
thank you
any questions?
Alf Hartzenburg
[email protected]
www.iee-sa.co.za