Hospital Acquired Infections in Canada, and how to stop them
Download
Report
Transcript Hospital Acquired Infections in Canada, and how to stop them
Poor collection of Hospital Acquired Infection (HAI) data
in Canada
10.5% of admissions result in a HAI (Public Health
Agency of Canada)
This means:
330,000 HAIs in Canada each year
12,000-18,000 deaths
3rd leading cause of death, after cancer and heart disease
Annual cost to Canadian health system: $1—9 Billion
WHY? OVERCROWDING
Academic literature shows that high occupancy rates increase
risks of superbug infection
Specifically, occupancy rates below 82% have been associated
with significantly decreased levels of infection
Canada has hospital occupancy rate of 89%, higher than any
other Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) country
Less hospital beds than any other OECD country, after Mexico.
ONTARIO? WORST PROVINCE
Ontario has less hospital beds than any other province, less
than Mexico, about the same number as Haiti (the poorest
country in the Western Hemisphere).
When 91 patients died at Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital it was
regularly operating at 105% capacity
WHY? CUTS TO CLEANING
Academic literature shows that:
Superbugs can survive in hospital environment
Can be transferred from environment to hands
Exposure to contaminated environment is associated with colonization
Environment cleaning can reduce risk of infection
Yet governments and hospitals look to cleaning for cost-savings
“Just because it’s a public
healthcare system doesn’t
mean that we…should expect
to pay more to sweep the floor
in a hospital.”
When there’s an outbreak, hospitals end up hiring more cleaners (after
the fact):
Honoré Mercier, QC: 16 deaths. Hospital hired ten additional cleaners to
control outbreak
Nanaimo General Regional Hospital, BC: 8 deaths, hospital tried to get out
of contract with private cleaning firm Compass due to negligence, but was
contractually unable
Niagara Health System, ON: 16 deaths, NHS cut ties with private cleaning
firm Aramark after allegations they cut staff and cleaning supplies resulting
in outbreak
Burnaby Hospital, BC: 84 deaths, hospital department heads wrote open
letter to government demanding enhanced cleaning to stop outbreaks
Housekeeping as a proportion of total hospital budget
3.50%
3.00%
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Housekeeping as a proportion of total hospital budget
From 2000 to 2009 the proportion of hospital
budgets going to cleaning dropped by 25%
10.00%
Annual % Increase in Hospital and Houseekeping Funding
5.00%
0.00%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
-5.00%
-10.00%
-15.00%
Hospital Funding
Housekeeping Funding
Erratic increases and cuts to cleaning
reflect attempts to cut costs, only to have to
reinvest after outbreaks or other cleaning
needs’ spike.
B.C. government legislates contracting-out of hospital cleaners in 2003,
proportion of cleaning budgets diverted to private contracts has jumped
from 3% to 60% since 2003
Privatization nearly halved wages for BC hospital cleaners, rolling them
back to pre-1968 levels
Those working for private contractors are now the lowest paid health
services support workers in all of Canada, earning 26 per cent below the
national average.
One study of contract cleaners found 75% were understaffed,
1/3 did work without training, were limited to only one pair of
gloves per shift
Cleaning is a labour-intensive job: staff account for about 93%
of cleaning budgets, so when cleaning budgets are cut it
translates directly into fewer cleaning hours
In 2004-05 rates of MRSA doubled in B.C./Alberta
Since 2008, B.C. has highest rate of C.diff in country
After a 2008 outbreak at Nanaimo General Regional Hospital BC
Centre for Disease Control conducted an investigation
They found that private cleaning company Compass Group failed to:
Provide adquate training to cleaners
Sufficient cleaners to meet agreed standards in their contract
Sufficient cleaners to meet needs during outbreak
Poor training and limited cleaning supplies resulted in cleaners overdiluting bleach (1:1000 bleach to water, instead of 1:10), which was
determined to have contributed to the outbreak
WHO DOES IT BETTER? NETHERLANDS
“Search & Destroy” strategy involving screening,
cohorting and intensive disinfection has kept MRSA
infections very low in Netherlands
“Search & Destroy” is also cheaper even though it is
labour intensive (because prevented infections save
health system $millions)
At only 64%, Netherlands has one of lowest hospital
occupancy rates in OECD
WHO DOES IT BETTER? SCOTLAND
Health ministry bringing all hospital cleaning back in-house
Added 1,000 extra cleaners
Have added staff and have involved them in infection-control
Strategy has reduced C.diff 37% in patients over 65, and 42% in
those under 65
SO, WHAT IS OCHU DOING ABOUT IT?!