Microgrids: A Growing Trend in the Power Industry

Dr. Brian Hirsch Senior Project Leader – Alaska National Renewable Energy Laboratory USAEE Conference - Anchorage, AK July 29, 2013

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Microgrids – Alaska Context

• • • • • Energy is EXPENSIVE: up to $10/gallon & $1/kWh; highly variable throughout state Very limited economies of scale within communities, BUT ~200 communities + remote industrial operations Remote, challenging logistics – limited transportation, communication, infrastructure, human and physical capital, etc.

Heat is not optional, and consumes more primary energy than electricity Some relative success stories in terms of high penetration wind-diesel hybrids, e.g., Kokhanok, Kongiganak, Kwigillingok, Kodiak Icing in Nome 2

• • • •

Village of Ugashik Hybrid Performance Monitoring Project

Working with ACEP at UAF, AEA Monitoring performance of wind-diesel-battery hybrid system to determine relative contribution of various RE inputs and diesel savings for system optimization Results replicable for other projects in region and beyond Very windy site (class 5), but PV performed as well as wind on kWh/kW installed basis, and better on a $/kW installed basis with current pricing 14% 51% 34%

Ugashik Hybrid Power: Wind, Solar, Diesel, Battery

4

Microgrids in Broader Context

• • •

What is a microgrid?

o o

“group of interconnected loads and distributed energy resources that acts as a single controllable entity with respect to the grid. It can operate in both grid-connected and

island-mode” [Office of Electricity, DOE Microgrid Workshop Report, 2011 San Diego, CA] “Best hope for developing world”, according to UN

What is energy security? US Navy:

o o o Source: IEEE 1547.4

“having assured access to reliable and sustainable supplies of energy and the ability to protect and deliver sufficient energy to meet operational needs”

2008 Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Energy Strategy described vulnerability of the nation’s electric power grid The number of large blackouts at a national level is growing in number and severity

Miramar had an eight hour outage in September 2011

o o o o Training missions were canceled and planes grounded Most personnel (both military and civilian) were sent home Marines needed to man electric gates, traffic lights and other facilities Food spoilage in mess halls and commercial outlets 5

Background

• • • • • •

MCAS Miramar

Outside San Diego, CA Primarily flight training and operations Peak loads are summer afternoons o 14 MW peak, 7 MW avg, 5 MW min Track record of successful EE and RE projects Critical loads are Flight-Line and supporting facilities o 6 MW max, 3.5 MW avg, 2.5 MW min Electrical configuration allows for centralized control point • • • • • •

Microgrid Design Criteria

Operate for at least two weeks Power critical loads upon loss of utility grid Incorporate as much renewable energy as feasible Phased approach to include entire base in the microgrid Redundant fuel sources important to enhance reliability Demonstration project for the Marine Corps and DoD 6

Summary

• • •

NREL completed NZEI assessment in 12/2010 MCAS Miramar energy projects to date:

o o o o o o Numerous energy efficiency projects 1 MW of solar PV plus solar parking lot and street lights Solar thermal pool heating 3 MW landfill gas PPA ESTCP energy storage project Currently approximately 50% renewably powered

Miramar received funding to perform microgrid assessment in 03/2011

o o NREL worked with Miramar to complete a conceptual design plan report completed on 09/2012 Awaiting ECIP funding request for microgrid implementation 7

NREL’s Approach to Microgrid Design

• •

Continuously Optimized Reliable Energy (CORE) Microgrids

Differentiating Characteristics:

– Integrates into 24/7 operations – Can optimize on economics or surety – Focuses on fuel diversity – Expands/contracts to provide energy for all load coverage spheres – Phased approach can allow for gradual addition of components over time  Load prioritization and migration with added generation 8

CORE Microgrid Design Process

Step 1:Evaluation of Existing Reports NZEI Assessment Existing Generation Existing Energy Management System Energy Surety Plan Step 2: Data Gathering Grid Infrastructure Generator Specifications Load Profiles Grid Operations/Valuing Energy Security Step 3: Design Analysis Detailed Electrical Model Modeling &Studies:

•

Power Flow

•

Dynamic Stability

•

Short-Circuit Controls Communication/ Cyber security Financial Analysis

•

CORE Microgrid Design Process is replicable

o o Currently being applied at the USAFA Identifies potential solutions for acceptable levels of risk and economic value streams 9

Step 4:Installation and Monitoring Inform RFP/Cost Estimating Selection of Integrator Construction Independent Verification & Validation

Modeling Overview

• • • •

Modeling is needed because Microgrids present unique design challenges

o Self regulation for voltage and frequency o Advanced controls and protection schemes o Fossil fuel and alternative energy generation resources o Need to analyze start up sequence

What do you Model:

o Electrical distribution system, generation equipment, loads, and control system response

Use the model to simulate operating scenarios and predict performance

o Microgrid start up, feeder loss, faults, different generation options

Modeling conclusions can be used to inform

o Generation type/sizes, supervisory controls, operating procedures 10

Modeling Summary and Recommendations

• • • • •

A minimum of 4 MW of diesel is recommended

o This is needed for adequate load pick-up

As expected, an all-diesel solution would work The 4 MW diesel, combined with 2 MW gas may work

o Transient voltage/frequency excursions would be larger, and would likely require subdivision of feeders and/or auxiliary assets for transient support

It is unlikely that an all-gas solution could work without energy storage and/or load control due to large load steps The best solution for cost and performance may be a hybrid system, with PV, diesel, LFG, storage, and natural gas

o Optimization needs to be done as part of formal design 11

Financial Analysis

• • • •

Capital costs were estimated for a variety of scenarios

o Selected design ~$25 M o Excludes costs associated with cyber security certification

Revenue streams from peak shaving, demand response, and offsetting grid purchases

o Offsetting grid has most value but has operations and air permitting challenges o SDG&E demand response program is established revenue stream and increasing need for the utility

Operation and maintenance costs still need to be estimated

o Will vary substantially based on selected O&M scenario

Most scenarios don’t have a positive NPV

o Still a better value than a system that can only be used for backup power (diesel) o Energy security value 12

Lessons Learned

• • • •

CORE microgrid design process identified a workable solution to inform an RFP with performance specifications and verification and validation options

o o An acceptable level of risk is needed to determine the appropriate costs for a given level of increased reliability Continuous operation decisions related to revenue streams impact the design – Single fuel generators are cheaper and more functional option than dual fuel options

Microgrid operations decisions are critical and heavily influence design

o Operating and maintenance responsibility decisions are complex and may need to be determined as the project evolves

Cyber security certification will be a challenge Demonstration microgrid projects are needed at DoD sites:

o o Further develop the technology, identify applications, and determine total costs Commercially available technologies are out there 13

Microgrid Market Is Global Phenomenon

Microgrid Capacity by Region, World Markets: 2Q 2013 Rest of World, 393.68 Asia Pacific, 390.24 Europe, 508.13 North America, 2,473.54

(Source: Navigant Research)

(MW)

14

Five Primary Market Segments

Microgrid Capacity by Segment, World Markets: 2Q 2013

Commercial/ Industrial, 439.29 Remote Systems, 754.52 Community/ Utility, 928.80 Military, 614.27 Institutional/ Campus, 1,028.71 (MW)

Source: Navigant Research 15

Microgrid Capacity Scenarios

Microgrid Capacity by Forecast Scenario, World Markets: 2013-2020 14,000 12,000 Base Scenario Average Scenario Aggressive Scenario 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Source: Navigant Research 16

Microgrid Capacity: North America is Global Leader Now, and Projected 2020

•

Microgrid Capacity, Average Scenario, World Markets: 2013-2020 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 North America Europe Asia Pacific Rest of World 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Source: Navigant Research 17

Microgrids, but NOT micro dollars

•

Microgrid Revenue by Forecast Scenario, World Markets: 2013-2020 $70,000 $60,000 Base Scenario Average Scenario Aggressive Scenario $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $ 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Source: Navigant Research 18

Large Obstacles Remain

• • • •

Policies: No integrated approach, in part because of diversity of applications, resources, settings – No “one size fits all” Costs: wholesale power is still cheap; energy storage and niche/small generation is still expensive Technology: Advanced controls, smart grid, system integration still evolving Value Propositions: All energy is not created equal (surety, reliability, power quality), but is often priced the same

19

Examples of campus microgrids

• • •

BC-Hydro/British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT) microgrid: http://www.bcit.ca/microgrid/ University California San Diego campus: http://ssi.ucsd.edu/ Illinois Institute of Technology: http://www.iit.edu/perfect_power/

Thank You and Questions?

[email protected] or 907-299-0268 21