Transcript OCM BOCES
APPR
Regulations
As of 3.22.12
OCM BOCES
APPR
60%
Multiple
Measures
20%
Student
Growth
20%
Student
Achievement
APPR
Learning
Environment
60%
Multiple
Measures
20%
Student
Growth
20%
Student
Achievement
Growth 20%
Key ideas:
SED’s part; SED’s rules
When SED-provided score,
must use SLOs
Defined HEDI point ranges
60%
Multiple
Measures
20%
Student
Growth
Growth 20%
Growth 20%
State
• Determines
SLO process District
• District goals &
• Identifies
School
priorities
required
• LE & teacher
elements
collaborate
• Match
• Requires use requirements
• LE approval
to
teachers
of State test
• Ensure
•
Define
• Provides
security
processes for
training to
before & after • LE monitor &
NTs prior to
evaluation
2012-13.
• Identify
• Provides
guidance,
webinars &
videos
expectations
Teacher
• Works with
colleagues &
LE
SLOs
Local 20%
Key ideas:
A process must be locally determined
(many districts using SLO process)
HEDI definitions (well-above, meet,
below, well-below)
Several options, including state
assessments in a different way
School-wide measures permitted
20%
Student
Growth
60%
Multiple
20%
Score distribution monitored by SED
Measures
Student
Achievement
Multiple Measures 60%
Key ideas:
Learning
Environment
60%
Multiple
Measures
At least 31 points
based on observations
(out of the total 60)
At least one
observation
unannounced (of the
multiple observations)
Score distribution
monitored by SED
Feedback gathering
from parents or
students must use
approved tool
Stand alone goals not
permitted
Multiple Measures 60%
Rubrics:
In
our BOCES, one of
these three being used
(so far):
Learning
Environment
60%
Multiple
Measures
FFT 2007 (ASCD)
FFT 2011
(Teachscape)
Professional Practice
(NYSUT & NYSED)
Multiple Measures 60%
Points:
31-60 points
Based
on
multiple
observations
Use an
approved rubric
<29 points
Outside,
impartial
observation
Peer observation
Student feedback
Parent feedback
Other evidence of student
development and
performance (lesson plans,
portfolios, other artifacts)
Multiple Measures 60%
Points:
60 points
Could
all be
from the rubric
Multiple Measures 60%
Points:
From
the rubric
from multiple
observations
>31 points
From
<29 points
the list of
other
possibilities,
would need
system of point
determination
Multiple Measures 60%
Rubrics:
FFT 2007
Four
Domains
No cost to use
rubrics
Can be used
with 3rd party
electronic
systems
FFT 2011
Four
Domains
No cost to use
rubrics
Can only be
used with
Teachscape
electronic
system
NYS Practice
NYS
Teaching
Standards (7)
No cost to use
rubrics
Can be used
with 3rd party
electronic
systems
Revised Regulations
Overall Requirements
Submit
plans (prescribed form?) to SED for
approval by July 1st (but no penalty until January
withhold aid action)
Subcomponent scores provided by last day of
school; summative by September 1st
Appeals must be timely and expeditious
SED will monitor scores (low correlation,
inadequate differentiation)
HEDI points (91-100, 75-90, 65-74, 0-64)
Revised Regulations
Content of APPR Plan
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Plan to ensure SED gets all the data they require,
including teacher subcomponent scores
Assessment development, securing, and scoring
procedures
Describe how 60% are determined
Describe “timely feedback” and provision of
subcomponent and summative scores
Appeals process
Improvement plan process
Required certifications (Lead Evaluator, etc.) and
process for ensuring reliability over time
Steps to APPR
Steps to the APPR Plan
1.
2.
3.
4.
Understand Big Picture & Components
Understand Growth 20%
Determine Local 20% Process
Multiple Measures
Rubric
Evidence
collection methods & frequency
Timely feedback provisions
Point allocation
5.
6.
7.
8.
Appeals Process
Improvement Plans
Plan Attestations
Approvals
APPR
Regulations
As of 3.22.12
OCM BOCES