Transcript OCM BOCES
APPR Regulations As of 3.22.12 OCM BOCES APPR 60% Multiple Measures 20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement APPR Learning Environment 60% Multiple Measures 20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement Growth 20% Key ideas: SED’s part; SED’s rules When SED-provided score, must use SLOs Defined HEDI point ranges 60% Multiple Measures 20% Student Growth Growth 20% Growth 20% State • Determines SLO process District • District goals & • Identifies School priorities required • LE & teacher elements collaborate • Match • Requires use requirements • LE approval to teachers of State test • Ensure • Define • Provides security processes for training to before & after • LE monitor & NTs prior to evaluation 2012-13. • Identify • Provides guidance, webinars & videos expectations Teacher • Works with colleagues & LE SLOs Local 20% Key ideas: A process must be locally determined (many districts using SLO process) HEDI definitions (well-above, meet, below, well-below) Several options, including state assessments in a different way School-wide measures permitted 20% Student Growth 60% Multiple 20% Score distribution monitored by SED Measures Student Achievement Multiple Measures 60% Key ideas: Learning Environment 60% Multiple Measures At least 31 points based on observations (out of the total 60) At least one observation unannounced (of the multiple observations) Score distribution monitored by SED Feedback gathering from parents or students must use approved tool Stand alone goals not permitted Multiple Measures 60% Rubrics: In our BOCES, one of these three being used (so far): Learning Environment 60% Multiple Measures FFT 2007 (ASCD) FFT 2011 (Teachscape) Professional Practice (NYSUT & NYSED) Multiple Measures 60% Points: 31-60 points Based on multiple observations Use an approved rubric <29 points Outside, impartial observation Peer observation Student feedback Parent feedback Other evidence of student development and performance (lesson plans, portfolios, other artifacts) Multiple Measures 60% Points: 60 points Could all be from the rubric Multiple Measures 60% Points: From the rubric from multiple observations >31 points From <29 points the list of other possibilities, would need system of point determination Multiple Measures 60% Rubrics: FFT 2007 Four Domains No cost to use rubrics Can be used with 3rd party electronic systems FFT 2011 Four Domains No cost to use rubrics Can only be used with Teachscape electronic system NYS Practice NYS Teaching Standards (7) No cost to use rubrics Can be used with 3rd party electronic systems Revised Regulations Overall Requirements Submit plans (prescribed form?) to SED for approval by July 1st (but no penalty until January withhold aid action) Subcomponent scores provided by last day of school; summative by September 1st Appeals must be timely and expeditious SED will monitor scores (low correlation, inadequate differentiation) HEDI points (91-100, 75-90, 65-74, 0-64) Revised Regulations Content of APPR Plan 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Plan to ensure SED gets all the data they require, including teacher subcomponent scores Assessment development, securing, and scoring procedures Describe how 60% are determined Describe “timely feedback” and provision of subcomponent and summative scores Appeals process Improvement plan process Required certifications (Lead Evaluator, etc.) and process for ensuring reliability over time Steps to APPR Steps to the APPR Plan 1. 2. 3. 4. Understand Big Picture & Components Understand Growth 20% Determine Local 20% Process Multiple Measures Rubric Evidence collection methods & frequency Timely feedback provisions Point allocation 5. 6. 7. 8. Appeals Process Improvement Plans Plan Attestations Approvals APPR Regulations As of 3.22.12 OCM BOCES