automated unidirectional flushing software - PNWS-AWWA
Download
Report
Transcript automated unidirectional flushing software - PNWS-AWWA
Automated Unidirectional
Flushing Software Programs
Proven Technology or Vaporware?
Presented by:
David Stangel, P.E.
[email protected]
Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc.
www.msa-ep.com
1
Engineer as a Designer of the Human Body
Three engineering students were gathered together
discussing the possible designers of the human
body.
One said, ``It was a mechanical engineer. Just look
at all the joints.''
Another said, ``No, it was an electrical engineer. The
nervous systems has many thousands of electrical
connections.''
The last said, ``Actually it was a civil engineer. Who
else would run a toxic waste pipeline through a
recreational area?”
www.msa-ep.com
2
What is Unidirectional Flushing or UDF?
The sequential closing of system valves and
opening of hydrants to obtain adequate pipe
velocities to flush debris, dirty/discolored water
from the system
www.msa-ep.com
3
How is it Different than
Traditional Flushing Methods?
Additional planning is required
Identification of flushing areas using hard copy maps
Typically aided by a hydraulic model to identify valve/hydrant
sequence and simulate velocities and discharge rates
Targets velocities of 5 ft/s (min 3 ft/s)
Traditional flushing doesn’t guarantee adequate
velocities
Normally positive redundancy and looping works against
flushing
Traditional flushing may drop system pressure below
20 psi
Traditional flushing may involve all hydrants
www.msa-ep.com
UDF only flushes strategically placed hydrants
4
UDF Compared with Traditional Flushing
Flushed Hydrant
Flushed Hydrant
Closed Valves
www.msa-ep.com
5
Why Flush?
(other than for obvious personal reasons)
Maintains distribution system water quality
www.msa-ep.com
Restores disinfectant residual
Reduces disinfectant demand
Reduces bacterial growth
Dislodges biofilms
Removes sediments and deposits
Restores flows and pressures
Eliminates taste and odor problems
6
Why Flush?
Other reasons for UDF
www.msa-ep.com
Increases general system understanding for staff
– Integrates new staff
Identifies missing/broken valves/hydrants
Leverages hydraulic model/GIS investment
Uses less water than traditional techniques (up to 40%)
Corrosion control
7
Keys to an Effective UDF Program
Plan, plan, plan
Quality maps with pertinent information for field
crews
Operations staff input
Incorporate parts of existing flushing programs where
possible
Public notification
Yearly or bi-yearly flushing schedule
www.msa-ep.com
8
What Information is Required
to Develop a UDF Plan?
Hydraulic model
Requires a calibrated model
Steady state or extended period mode
Hydrant/valve GIS layers
CAD information can be utilized if available
Assumptions for locations can be made if layers don’t exist
Firm understanding of system operation
www.msa-ep.com
9
UDF Software
Recent releases by software vendors suggest that
developing a UDF plan using their tools is an easy next
step.
Should we believe it?
www.msa-ep.com
10
UDF Software cont.
It is relatively straightforward with completely clean
data in exactly the required format.
We all know how often that is the case.
www.msa-ep.com
11
Available Tools
MWH Soft & Bentley
Systems
MWH Soft
UDF - separate module
Requires InfoWater (ArcGIS)
license
Bentley
www.msa-ep.com
Includes UDF with all platforms
(stand alone, CAD, ArcGIS)
12
Available Tools
Pricing dependent on number of pipes
Example List Prices for 5000 pipe model
Bentley – WaterGEMS $12k + cost of AV
MWH Soft - InfoWater $8k + UDF $7k + cost of AV
MWH Soft
Valves and hydrant laterals do not increase pipe count
Pipes are not split
Bentley
www.msa-ep.com
Requires a split where hydrants intersect pipes
Laterals must be entered
No split for valves
13
Approaches to UDF
MWH Soft
UDF focus
– Can automatically close all valves along pipe
alignment
Bentley
Starts with conventional flushing
Progresses to UDF
– Valves open as default
– User closes
www.msa-ep.com
14
UDF Model Building Process
Add valves/hydrants
Was the model created from GIS?
Valves/hydrants to be operated should be provided
QA/QC
– Are hydrant and valve numbers populated and
unique?
– Valves
○
Does layer “register” with model?
– Hydrants
○
○
Number of ports and size
Elevations
– Hydrant laterals
○
www.msa-ep.com
Length and diameter
15
UDF Model Building Process
Valves & Hydrants are key for building the UDF
database
www.msa-ep.com
16
Hydrants
Pertinent attributes
associated with hydrant
Requires preprocessing
“Pipe” attributes not normally
associated with hydrants
– Length, roughness,
diameter
Non-hydraulic information
can be tracked
www.msa-ep.com
17
Hydrants
Auto-associated to model
pipes in InfoWater UDF
Auto-calcs mainline
distance
Hydrants can be associated
“mid-pipe”
Must be “built” into
Bentley’s network
www.msa-ep.com
Generated by
InfoWater UDF
Includes splits at hydrant
laterals
18
Valves
Ensure correct valve/pipe
association
Auto-associated
InfoWater UDF
Bentley
Non-hydraulic information
can be tracked
www.msa-ep.com
19
Valve Registration
What we want to see
www.msa-ep.com
Making our life interesting
20
Registration Issues
Valve registration can be critical
www.msa-ep.com
If the user wants to use valve ids for closing in the field
21
Model Tools
Many InfoWater QA/QC and data building tools are
unavailable in UDF
www.msa-ep.com
Unique valve/hydrant identifiers
Hydrant elevation interpolation
Association of lateral attributes to hydrants
– Lateral length and diameter
Visual check for valve associations
General editing of valve/hydrant databases
Cannot fully leverage Domain Manager in UDF
22
Model Tools cont.
In general the Bentley flushing tools are integrated
into the modeling platform
Biggest limitation is the requirement for building hydrants
and laterals into the model database
– Adds pipes to model increasing price
– Adds unneeded complexity for most modeling
procedures
www.msa-ep.com
23
UDF Model Building
Don’t underestimate the effort
Can be significant depending on input data quality
Particularly if the model has not been created from GIS
When old data is put to a new use, previously
unknown “issues” arise
www.msa-ep.com
Plan for it
24
UDF Analysis Criteria
Typical flushing
velocity
Min 3 ft/s
Target 5 ft/s
Shear stress
criteria can be
used in
InfoWater
Min system
pressure
typically 20 psi
www.msa-ep.com
25
Analysis Process
Using large format
system map:
www.msa-ep.com
Mark up flush zones
– Typically pressure
zones or smaller
– Each zone
associated with a
“primary” source
– Each zone includes
a number of flush
sequences
– Work from source to
system periphery
26
Analysis Process
In the model:
Identify initial flush pipeline(s)
Identify what hydrant(s) will be opened
Identify valves to be closed
– Take care not to isolate portions of the system from
water
– Minimize valve closures
○
www.msa-ep.com
Labor intensive for field crews
27
Example InfoWater
UDF Flushing Sequence
Sequence 1
Sequence 2
Sequence 3
Sequence 4
www.msa-ep.com
28
Tabular InfoWater UDF Output
www.msa-ep.com
29
What Does the Field Crew Use?
They need to know:
www.msa-ep.com
What system sources should be operating
What valves should be closed and when they should be
reopened
– Identify valve number and/or street intersection
What hydrants should be opened
– Identify hydrant number
– Identify flow to target
– Identify how long to run hydrant
They need a series of maps clearly showing the
sequences and associated information
30
What is Currently Available
for Field Maps?
www.msa-ep.com
31
Field Maps
Bentley does not offer field map template
Utilities are turning to in house or consulted ArcGIS
programming to develop field maps
Some utilities want maps in the same format as
their standard field books
www.msa-ep.com
32
So What Should You Do?
Software vendors focus on “first to release” rather
than the product’s “polish”
www.msa-ep.com
Positive
– Vendors willing to work with users to enhance
products
Negative
– Enhancement turnaround time can be slow due to
large number of software packages supported
What level of usability and beta testing should users
expect?
– Price dependant
33
Who Should Purchase these Tools?
Developing a flushing program
Not like modeling tools that are used regularly
Takes an initial focused effort
No need to redo on a weekly/monthly basis
– unless growing rapidly
If utilities use Bentley then they already own it
www.msa-ep.com
Otherwise:
– Utilities – No
– Consultants – Yes
34
Additional Development
Primary areas for further development
www.msa-ep.com
InfoWater UDF
– Model building and QA/QC
– Field map customization capability
Bentley
– Associate hydrants without permanent pipe splits
– A field map generator
35
Future Enhancements
MWH Soft
Committed to more than 20 enhancements
More incentive
– UDF module sold separately
Bentley
www.msa-ep.com
Open to suggestions for enhancements
Less incentive
– Included in modeling suite
36
Summary
UDF
www.msa-ep.com
Ensures adequate flushing velocities are being achieved
Can reduce the number of hydrants operated
Can reduce the amount of flushed water used
Can reduce the frequency of required flushing
– Does a more effective job of removing debris, biofilm
and dirty water
Provides a target flow rate for flushing
– Should minimize unnecessary low pressures
37
Summary cont.
AWWA and industry supports UDF plan
development beyond traditional flushing
Software tools will be more valuable/usable once
additional enhancements have been made
If a utility has:
Invested in a hydraulic model
Accurate valve/hydrant information
they can develop a UDF plan with reasonable effort
www.msa-ep.com
38
So Flush Away!
Special Thanks to:
Sammamish Plateau Water and Sewer District
City of Redmond, Oregon
Matt Caldwell, Bentley Systems
Erick Heath, MWH Soft
Questions?
[email protected]
www.msa-ep.com
39