Mentor Case - Cleveland State University

Download Report

Transcript Mentor Case - Cleveland State University

Framings of the
Mentor Lagoons Dispute
Sanda Kaufman
Symposium
FRAMING ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTES:
THEORY, EXPERIMENTATION & CASE STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL & PUBLIC RESOURCEs CONFLICT Track
Story
Method
Findings
Next
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
1
Environmental Disputes
Appearance of intractability


IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
Extended in time
 process
 consequences
Complex in:
 issues (resources, values, risk preferences)
 stakeholders
 technical/expert content
 process
 FRAMING
01/20/98
2
Framing in a Real Case



IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
Theory & experiments:
 frames affect decisions
Intractable conflicts:
 frame differences a factor
Environmental conflicts:
 can frames be assessed?
 do frames play a role?
 how do frames change?
01/20/98
3
The Mentor Lagoons
400 acres
Area in dispute
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
4
Mentor Lagoons timeline





1970: Beginning of cleanup/ownership disputes.
1993: Mentor bids for property (rejected, 1995).
1995: Osbornes buy property, Blue Heron, for $7.7 million;
» Mentor declares intent of taking by eminent domain.
1996: Mentor begins eminent domain proceedings;
» Blue Heron tries to negotiate with Mentor.
» Blue Heron sues against eminent domain;
» Residents petition for a vote; Mentor halts proceedings;
» Residents vote to pursue eminent domain.
» Mentor restarts eminent domain proceedings
1997: Court estimates compensation to Osbornes;
» Osbornes settle for $8.5 million + $500,000 property.
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
5
Mentor Lagoons Parties

Private contenders



Nozik-original owner/ex-wife/son (at odds)
Osborne-new owner/wife/nephew (monolithic)
Public contenders





IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
Mayor Walsh
City Council factions-Hennig, Struna, Micchia, Thorne
Resident interests - Kresnye; Crawford, Prosek
(Environmental interests/Council/residents)
(Regional recreation interests/Council)
01/20/98
6
Frames in the News

Plain Dealer (Cleveland):





1 main reporter, Section B
few details & quotes, mainly facts (little space)
process & characterization dominate
little affected by stakeholders, critical
News Herald (Lake County):




1 main reporter, Section A
visual (pictures, descriptions), quotes
process & characterization dominate
susceptible to stakeholder wrath
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
7
Content analysis



2 newspapers/~30 articles each:
6/1992 - 6/1997
Paragraph as unit of analysis
Gray & Donnellon +1 frame categories:
Substantive
Outcome
Loss/Gain
Aspiration

Characterization
Process
Complexity
Gray/Putnam categories &
subcategories:
Choice (6)
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
Process (3)
01/20/98
Content (4)
8
Frames in Time
Frames
Residents
Osborne
Council
M
W
S
K
C
Substantive
Loss/Gain
Aspiration
Characterization
Outcome
Process
Complexity
Choice
Process
Content
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
9
Upside & Downside


Newspapers as sources:
 limited especially around sensitive issues
 better when combined (2 or more)
 more useful with interviews
Capturing frames and their change:
 mainly descriptive
 in need of stronger theoretical basis
 work-intensive
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
10
Next
Explore frame diagnostic & change tools:
 Case information
Theory
development
 Comparative studies
 similar stakes, scale
 across stakes
 Follow case in time through
interviews/news
 Intervention
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
 Focus on information patterns in time
11
The Mentor Lagoons Case
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
12
The Mentor Lagoons Case
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
13
The Mentor Lagoons Case
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
01/20/98
14
The Mentor Lagoons Case
T o ta l P o p u la tio n
W h it e
B la c k
A m e r . I n d ia n
A s ia n
4 7 ,3 5 8
4 6 ,8 6 5
53
40
355
E d u c a tio n
L e s s th a n 9 th
984
9 th to 1 2 th
3 ,3 0 1
H .S .
1 0 ,0 6 4
S o m e C o lle g e
7 ,3 2 8
A s s . D e g re e
2 ,0 3 5
B a c h e lo r s
4 ,7 3 0
G ra d u a te /P ro f. D e g re e 2 ,0 8 5
T o ta l
3 0 ,5 2 7
In c o m e L e v e ls
L e s s th a n 1 4 ,9 9 9
$ 1 5 ,0 0 0 to $ 2 9 ,9 9 9
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0 to $ 4 4 ,9 9 9
$ 5 0 ,0 0 0 to $ 5 9 ,9 9 9
$ 6 0 ,0 0 0 to $ 7 4 ,9 9 9
$ 7 5 ,0 0 0 to $ 9 9 ,9 9 9
$ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 to $ 1 4 9 ,9 9 9
O v e r $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0
T o ta l 1 5 ,8 5 2
IACM Conference, Bonn, 1997
1 ,7 3 6
3 ,2 2 5
4 ,5 5 9
2 ,2 9 4
2 ,1 6 4
1 ,4 9 5
134
245
99%
0%
0%
1%
3%
11%
33%
24%
7%
15%
7%
11%
20%
29%
14%
14%
9%
1%
01/20/98
O c c u p a tio n
M a n a g e r ia l
T e c h n ic a l a n d S a le s
S e r v ic e
F a r m in g
P e r c is io n p r o d u c t io n
O p e ra to rs , L a b o re rs
T o ta l
Age
U nder 25
2 5 to 3 4
3 5 to 4 9
5 0 to 5 9
6 0 to 6 5
65 and over
T o ta l
47358
P e r C a p ita In c o m e
7404
8600
2517
167
3011
2973
24672
30%
35%
10%
1%
12%
12%
16831
7828
11930
4463
1873
4433
36%
17%
25%
9%
4%
9%
$ 1 6 ,7 1 7 .0 0
15