Transcript Slide 1

Agenda item 4:
Work modalities of the revised
ISDR system to support the
implementation of Hyogo
FrameworkElements to be reviewed in groups- & prepare for
decision
Workdoc3
1
www.unisdr.org
IATF/DR to adopt a process and
prepare for the new system

Expected outcome: Roadmap for first Global
Platform & a mechanism to prepare first workprogramme for the ISDR system

Three groups to define framework & scope of
 Integrated work-programme;
 reporting on progress; and
 clusters-thematic work (responsibilities and
accountability)
2
Annex 3: Clustering
Based on matrix and Hyogo Framework priorities
 Organization & action of clusters, thematic
groups/platforms. Use existing inter-agency
mechanisms when applicable.
 Based on what themes/tasks? How should they
work, management mechanisms?

– Clearer distribution of responsibilities, accountability
– Support setting of objectives, work-programming,
identify gaps and coordinate reporting on progress
– Usefulness and role of convening/lead agency
3
Suggested tasks, initial division annex 3
“Thematic clustering - for discussion
 Launch process for first “cluster planning”time frames and definition of work priorities

Expected outcome:
Agreement on process and initial thematic
clustering
4
Annex 1: Integrated workprogramming
(proposal based on UNAIDS experience)
Goal:
 Coordinated & effective support, &
coherence, for implementation of the Hyogo
Framework
 Strive for increased national capacities and
benefits

5
Benefits must be clear / costs minimized
ISDR System implementation
(coming out of the ISDR stakeholder workshop)

“Blueprint” of the system
– Roles / contributions
– Expected results

“Fuelling” the system
– Requirements
– Sources

“Monitoring” the system
– Management
– Feedback / corrections
6
ISDR System implementation

“Blueprint”
Joint Workplan

“Fuelling”
Resources (all)

7
“Monitoring”
Governance
management
M&E
Hyogo Framework
Outcomes:
Actors:
* Governments
* Regional
bodies
* UN
•Civil Society
•* Business
* Academia
8
* National priority &
institutions
* Risk assessment
& warning
* Knowledge
* Reduction in risk
factors
* Strengthened
preparedness
Impact:
* Lives
* Livelihoods
* Infrastructure
* Environment
Workplanning Scope (tbd)
ISDR secretariat
 UN Agencies at global & regional levels
 ISDR System Infrastructure

– Thematic (clusters), regional, strengthened RC
capacity
UN Country Programmes (alt.)
 National priority setting support (alt.)

9
Result-based approach
Actor
Intermediate
outcome
ISDR System
Outcome
Sub-regional Network of experts Effective support
organization
to countries to
develop human
UNDP
National experts
capacity
trained
Expert panel
Technical
Good practice
standards
disseminated &
used by countries
ISDR
Clearing house
Secretariat
10
National Programmes
UN (Joint) Country Programmes
Thematic, Regional
UN Country Capacity
UN Agencies
Global & Regional
ISDR
Secretariat
11
National Programmes
UN (Joint) Country Programmes
Thematic, Regional
UN Country Capacity
UN Agencies
Global & Regional
ISDR
Secretariat
12
National Programmes
UN (Joint) Country Programmes
Thematic, Regional
UN Country Capacity
UN Agencies
Global & Regional
ISDR
Secretariat
13
National Programmes
UN (Joint) Country Programmes
Thematic, Regional
UN Country Capacity
UN Agencies
Global & Regional
ISDR
Secretariat
14
National Programmes
UN (Joint) Country Programmes
ISDR Infrastructure
* Global
* Regional /Thematic
* Country
15
Governance, Management,
Monitoring & Evaluation






16
Preparation of work-programme (clusters, PAC)
Approval of work-programme (Global Platform)
Approval of budget (MOB)
Monitoring & revisions of workprogramme
implementation
Evaluation
Reporting
Pending: Trust Fund Option 1
National Programmes
UN (Joint) Country Programmes
ISDR Infrastructure
* Global
* Regional / Thematic
17
Trust fund Option 2
National Programmes
18
UN (Joint) Country Programmes
and
ISDR Infrastructure
•* Global
•* Regional / Thematic
* Country
ISDR Trust Fund - Under discussion
Management oversight board
* Joint
workprogramme
Progamme advisory committee
Donors
Trust fund
19
Supplemental
&
agencies own
funds
To be discussed
Level of workplan/s- usefulness and needs? Scope
of the system (consolidated or network)
 What should be the scope: actors, geographic,
time scale?
 Should the workplan be results-based and costed?
Or only define joint objectives?
 Use of ISDR trust fund? Funding the ISDR
“infrastructure” (secretariat, platforms etc.)?
Country programmes?

20
Annex 2: A common progress
reporting process



Strive for expanded understanding, national leadership,
and motivate self-directed reporting by entities involved
Success determined by engagement & achievements of
actors at all levels (national, regional international): link
to existing reporting mechanisms as much as possible
Linked to objectives and expected results (indicators)
21
Current efforts- towards common
reporting




22
Compilation of Matrix of Commitments and
Initiatives- implementation HFA
On-going discussions with experts for guiding
identification of benchmarks and indicators
Consolidated report/s: SG report to UNGA, &
posting on website of source material: national,
regional, international. Use of web-bsed Infromation
Platform
Prepare for periodic review (timeframes?): Living
with Risk format
Modalities





23
National reporting (voluntary): core element
Engage with national platforms/systems, existing
related reporting (sust dev, climate change, poverty
reduction, health)
UN RC system and country teams
Regional bodies to support countries and regional
reviews
Global reporting: draw from the above- consolidate
by clusters, include resource allocation for DRR
To discuss
Modalities for common reporting- part of
cluster responsibilities.
 Existing reporting mechanisms and links to
common reporting on HFA
 Group of IATF to develop reporting
guidelines
 Follow-up steps

24