CA Esophagus – Role of Chemoirradiation

Download Report

Transcript CA Esophagus – Role of Chemoirradiation

CA Esophagus

Chemoirradiation Role of

WH Chan Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital

Ca Esophagus

    Incidence: 4.5 cases per 100,000 in one year in Europe 1 8th commonest cause of cancer death in 2011 in HK (4.8 per 100,000) 2 Squamous cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma 1.

2.

Esophageal Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up. M. Stahl; C. Mariette; K. Haustermans; A. Cervantes & D. Arnold, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Groups. Annals of Oncology 24 (Supplement 6), vi51-vi56, 2013 Hong Kong Cancer Registry

Surgery

 High morbidity and mortality  Worsened physical function, social function, long lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life 3  Recurrence  Complete Resection may not be possible 3. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. M. Jacobs; R.C. Macefield; R.G. Elbers; M.A.G. Sprangers. Qual Life Res (2014) 23: 1155-1176

• 286 patients had surgery alone • Median FU period: 49 months • 30-day mortality: 3.7% • Recurrence: - Stage I: 7.1%; Stage II/III/IV: 50.5% • 5 year disease free survival: - Stage I: 76.3%; Stage II/III/IV: 30.8%

Chemoirradiation

 Introduced in 1980s  5-FU, cisplatin  Radiation of 40-50 Gy  Improves survival, complete resection rate  Surgically not fit patient  ?Increase surgical morbidity

 20 RCTs were included  9 comparing neoadjuvant CRT vs surgery  8 comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery  3 comparing definitive CRT vs surgery

Neoadjuvant CRT vs surgery alone

 9 RCTs included  1099 patients: 554 received neoadjuvant CRT, 545 received surgery alone  Mean age 60.8

 Surgery performed 2-8 weeks after CRT (mean 3 weeks)  Median FU time: 10-98 months

R0 resection rate

p-value = 0.043

Morbidity

p-value = 0.363

30-day mortality

p-value = 0.692

Overall survival

p-value = 0.008

Conclusion

 Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improved R0 resection and overall survival, but does not increase post-op morbidity or mortality

Definitive chemoRT vs surgery

 3 RCTs included  All squamous cell carcinoma  512 patients: 252 received definitive chemoRT; 260 received surgery

Morbidity

p-value = 0.332

30-day mortality

p-value = 0.007

Overall survival

Conclusion

 Definitive chemoRT has lower 30-day mortality compared with surgery, but overall survival is similar

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery

 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved R0 resection rate, but no improvement in overall survival

Definitive chemoirradiation

 Efficacy  Tolerance and toxicity  Any new regimen

 Traditionally is radiotherapy + 5-FU + cisplatin  Cisplatin is difficult to administer as requiring prolonged hydration, nephrotoxic, emetogenic

 Study period 2004-2011  Exclusion:  Metastasis  Contraindication to chemoRT: tracheoesophageal fistula, recent AMI, etc  131 patients in FOLFOX; 128 patients in 5 FU + cisplatin

Regimen

 Radiotherapy: 50Gy in 25 fractions  Chemotherapy:   FOLFOX: 6 cycles (each cycle 2 days), one cycle every 2 week, first 3 cycles concurrent with RT 5-FU + cisplatin: 4 cycles (each cycle 4 days), first 2 cycles with RT  Completion rate:  FOLFOX: 90/131 (68.7%)  5-FU + cisplatin: 96/128 (75%)

No difference in progression free or overall survival Median survival: FOLFOX 20.2 months 5-FU + cisplatin 17.5 months P = 0.70

Morbidity

 FOLFOX group:  More paraesthesia, sensory neuropathy, elevation of liver enzyme  5-FU + cisplatin group:  More mucositis, alopecia, renal impairment

Mortality

 1 in FOLFOX group (0.76%): pneumopathy plus denutrition  6 in 5-FU + cisplatin group (4.69%): 5 neutropenic sepsis, 1 cardiac ischemia  p-value = 0.066

Conclusion

 FOLFOX is a more convenient option, similar efficacy to 5-FU + cisplatin, with probably lower mortality

New development

 Retrospective review  204 patients: 75 had neoadjuvant chemoRT, 129 had surgery alone  Propensity score matching: 75 patients in each group with similar demographics and tumor staging  41.4 Gy, Paclitaxel and carboplatin

Neoadjuvant chemoRT had better disease free and overall survival

Locoregional recurrence Complete Response Distant recurrence

 Neoadjuvant chemoRT could improve disease free survival, overall survival and locoregional recurrence free survival  Not improved distant recurrence free survival

Future Development

 Any method to predict complete response to chemoRT  EGFR inhibitors, HER-2 receptor inhibitors  Adjuvant agents to reduce distant metastases

Conclusion

 Neoadjuvant chemoirradiation improves survival of CA esophagus without increasing post-op morbidities  Definitive chemoRT is an effective alternative to patients who are not fit for surgery  New agents are needed to improve the complete response rate and survival of patients

Reference

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Esophageal Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up. M. Stahl; C. Mariette; K. Haustermans; A. Cervantes & D. Arnold, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Groups. Annals of Oncology 24 (Supplement 6), vi51 vi56, 2013 Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. M. Jacobs; R.C. Macefield; R.G. Elbers; M.A.G. Sprangers. Qual Life Res (2014) 23: 1155-1176 Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant treatment modalities and definitive non-surgical therapy for esophageal squamous cell cancer. M. Kranzfelder; T. Schuster; H. Geinitz; H. Friess; P. Buchler. British Journal of Surgery 2011; 98: 768-783 Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with esophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): final results of a randomized phase 2/3 trial. Thierry Conroy; Marie-Pierre Galais; Antonie Adenis. Lancet Onco 2014; 15: 305-14 Different Recurrence Pattern After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Compared to Surgery Alone in Esophageal Cancer Patients. Justin K. Smit, MD; Sahin Guler, Bsc; John Th. M. Plukker, MD, PhD. Annals of Surgical Oncology (2013) 20; 4008-4015

Thank You

Staging method: CT scan, PET, EUS 752 clinical staging of T2N0 disease 482 underwent surgery directly 27.4% confirmed T2N0 disease 25.9% downstaged 46.7% upstaged