Transcript Slide 1

Investigating the Chemical Dynamics of Bimolecular
Reactions of Dicarbon and Tricarbon Molecules
with Unsaturated Hydrocarbons
Ralf I. Kaiser
Department of Chemistry
University of Hawai’i at Manoa
Honolulu, HI 96822
[email protected]
Introduction
H
C
C
HC
CH
HC
CH
HC
CH
HC
CH
C
H
HC
CH
HC
CH
C
H
C
H
CHx
C2Hx
C3Hx
C4Hx
C5Hx
Objectives
Investigate the Formation of Hydrogen-Deficient, Carbon-Bearing
Molecules via Reactions of C2(X1g+/a3u) and C3(X1g+) with
H
H
H
H
H
H
acetylene
ethylene
H
H3C
H
•
H
H
methylacetylene
H
allene
benzene
Requirements
1. Preparation of Highly Reactive Reactants
C2(X1g+/a3u) and C3(X1g+)
2. Identify Reaction Products and Infer Reaction Intermediates
3. Obtain Information on Energetics and Reaction Mechanisms
↓
Single Collision Conditions
Crossed Molecular Beams Experiments
Crossed Molecular Beams Setup
Requirements
1. Hydrocarbon Free
Oil Free Pumps
(Maglev, Scroll, DryVac)
2. Extremely Low Pressures
Copper Gaskets
Cryo Cooling
(LN2; Cold Heads)
Main Chamber = 10-9 torr
Detector = 10-11 - < 10-12 torr
3. Signal Maximization
Sources
Ionizer, QMS, Ion Counter
Crossed Molecular Beams Setup
Crossed Molecular Beams Experiments
10 – 50 kJmol-1
20
9
1,500 – 2,600 K
peak collision energy
72 - 175 kJmol-1
collision energies
14
labeling experiments
5
3,000 – 3,800 K
C2(X1g+/a3u) + C2H2(X1g+)
TOF at m/z = 49 (C4H+) and m/z = 48 (C4+) superimposable
C4H Isomer
C2(X1g+/a3u) + C2H2(X1g+)
1.211
1.365
1.206
1.063
p1, Cv, 2+
[0.0]
1.078
136.7
149.5
155.7
1.407
1.322
1.340
58.3
156.4
1.529
[118.0]
p2, Cs, 2A"
1.403
1.080
77.0 81.0
139.1
89.9
1.464
1.408
1.463
131.3
1.603
54.4
1.085
[171.4]
[140.2]
p3, Cs, 2A"
1.457
p4, Cs, 2A'
1.306
1.394
1.072
1.510
147.1
1.402
1.235
163.8
120.7
98.6
1.113
[74.8]
p5, C2v, 2B1
p6, Cs, 2A'
[230.6]
C2(X1g+) + C2H2(X1g+)  C4H(X2+) + H(2S1/2) RG = - 33.3 kJmol-1
C2(a3u) + C2H2(X1g+)  C4H(X2+) + H(2S1/2) RG = - 41.9 kJmol-1
RG(experimental) = - 40  5 kJmol-1
C2(X1g+/a3u) + C2H2(X1g+)
33  3 %
3 – 17 kJmol-1
indirect reaction mechanism(s) via C4H2 complexe(s)
one channel could have exit barrier
C2(X1g+/a3u) + C2H2(X1g+)
intensity over complete angular range
indirect reaction dynamics
switch from forward to backward peaking as collision energy increases
could suggest multiple reaction channels
C2(X1g+/a3u) + C2H2(X1g+)
- H2
-H
products
reaction enthalpy, kJmol-1
C4H(X2+) + H(2S1/2)
- 33
c-C3H2(X1A1) + C(3Pj)
+ 152
C4(X3u) + H2(X1g+)
-
10
c-C3H(X2B1) + CH(X2)
+ 246
CH2(X3B1) + C3(X1g+)
+ 142
C2H(X2+) + C2H(X2+)
+ 68
C2(X1g+) + C2H2(X1g+)
forward-backward
symmetric center-of-mass
angular distributions
C2(X1g+/a3u) + C2H2(X1g+)
C2(a3u)+C2H2(X1g+)
1. exit barrier
0.0
-14.6
2. shallow potential energy wells asymmetric center-of-mass
angular distributions
HCCCC(X2+)+H
-41.9
relative energy, kJmol-1
3. switch from forward to backward impact parameter dependence ?
-123.9
-123.9
-163.1
t1
-176.8
-180.1
t2
t3
Remaining Questions
can heavy isotopes induce ISC?
C2D2(X1g+)
13C H (X1 +)
2 2
g
C2HD(X1+)
symmetry or long-lived
C2(X1g+/a3u) + C2D2(X1g+)/13C2H2(X1g+)/C2HD(X1+)
solely atomic hydrogen/deuterium loss pathways
no induced ISC
C2(X1g+/a3u) + C2D2(X1g+)/13C2H2(X1g+)/C2HD(X1+)
Ec = 29 kJmol-1
no induced ISC
long lived diacetylene intermediate
identical CM functions
compared to non-labeled reactant
H
D
13
13
Summary C2(X1g+/a3u) Reactions
1. identification of dicarbon vs. atomic hydrogen exchange pathway
+ CH3
C6H6 PES
+ C5H5
C10H8 PES
JCP 113, 9622 (2000)
JCP 113, 9637 (2000)
JCP 115, 5107 (2001)
Summary C2(X1g+/a3u) Reactions
2. indirect reaction dynamics via barrier less addition of
dicarbon to the -bond of the hydrocarbon yielding initially
acyclic/cyclic collision complexes
3. reactions are exoergic
4. assignment of intermediates
Summary C2(X1g+/a3u) Reactions
Summary C3(X1g+) Reactions
1. identification of tricarbon versus
atomic/molecular hydrogen exchange
+ CH3
C6H6 PES
+ C4H5
C10H8 PES
Summary C3(X1g+) Reactions
2. reactions have pronounced entrance barriers
molecule
entrance barrier Eo, kJmol-1
acetylene
ethylene
methylacetylene
allene
benzene
95  20
42  4
42  6
42  6
in progress
(E) ~ [1- Eo/E]
3. borderline of direct/indirect reaction dynamics via addition
of tricarbon to the -bond of the hydrocarbon
4. reactions are endo (acetylene) / exoergic
5. assignment of intermediates
Summary C3(X1g+) Reactions
Summary
1.conducted crossed beams experiments of dicarbon and tricarbon
with small unsaturated hydrocarbons (10 – 175 kJmol-1)
2.inferred reaction dynamics and energetics of the reactions
3. identification of building blocks and precursors
to PAHs in combustion flames
C4Hx (x = 1 -4)
C6H6 PES
C5Hx (x = 1 - 4)
C6Hx (x = 3, 4)
C10H8 PES
Summary
Outlook I
A Mechanism of Aromatics Formation and Growth in
Laminar Premixed Acetylene and Ethylene Flames
http://www.me.berkeley.edu/soot/mechanisms/mechanisms.html
(Michael Frenklach)
C4Hx
1
2
3
4
C5Hx
1
2
3
4
3
4
C6Hx
experiments suggest inclusion of distinct isomers and additional molecules
Outlook II
soft electron impact ionization
1. Brink type ionizer made of Alloy 718 (Nickel Alloy w/o H2
& CO outgassing; strongly reduced CO2 background)
2. Thoriated Iridium vs LaB6 Filament
(1,600 K vs. 1,200 K )
10 mA @200 eV, Utotal= 2.4 V, IH= 5.5 A
4 mA @ 80 eV, Utotal= 2.1 V, IH= 5.2 A
Emssion Current (mA)
10
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0.9 mA @ 8 eV
10
20
30
40
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Electron Energy (eV)
160
180
200
Acknowledgements
Xibin Gu, Ying Guo, Fangtong Zhang (UH)
Alexander M. Mebel (FIU)