Transcript Slide 1

A-F School Report Cards

Kerri White, EdD Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educational Support Oklahoma State Department of Education

A-F School Report Cards: Raise the Grade Together Kerri White, EdD Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educational Support Oklahoma State Department of Education

Session Objective

The A-F School Report Cards provide information and an opportunity for counselors to assist teachers, principals, and families in identifying strengths and weaknesses of schools. Learn how to take the next steps with the A-F School Report Cards and “Raise the Grade Together.”

Resources

A-F Report Card Guide

Resources

Resources

Oklahoma’s A-F School Grading System Frequently Asked Questions

Raise the Grade Together Resource Guide For School Districts

Resources

Raise the Grade Together Quick Reference Guide for Parents

Resources

A-F Report Card Components

Comprised of three main sections each worth one-third of the overall grade: – Student Achievement – Student Growth – Whole School Performance

Student Achievement Section

Includes all Oklahoma State Testing Program (OSTP) exams administered during the most recent school year

Student Achievement Section

• • The 3% cap for OMAAP and OAAP are applied. At least thirty (30) students tested before a performance index is reported.

GRADES DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICT

2012 Student Achievement (33%) Subject

English II/English III Algebra I/Algebra II/Geometry Biology I US History

Overall 2012 Student Performance Grade

09–12

# of Students

47 64 29 15 155 SCHOOL:

Performance Index

86 78 *** *** 80 HIGH SCHOOL

Letter Grade

B C *** *** B

Student Growth Section

Growth is divided into two sub-categories: – All students – Bottom twenty-five percent of students, if those students have not attained a proficient or advanced score.

(A proposal has been submitted changing this to a true bottom 25% of students, regardless of their prior test score.)

Growth Index

30 “matched scores” needed to receive a grade for each growth section.

– If less than 30 scores for the bottom 25% section, grade is based on total growth.

– If there are less than 30 scores for the total growth section, the report card grade is computed using 50% Student Achievement and 50% Whole School Performance.

GRADES DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICT

Overall Student Growth (17%) Subject

English II Algebra I

Overall 2012 Student Growth Grade Bottom Quartile Student Growth (17%) Subject

English II Algebra I

Overall 2012 Bottom Quartile Growth Grade

09–12 78 68

146

16 15

31

SCHOOL: 96 83

90

*** ***

76

HIGH SCHOOL A B

A

*** ***

C

Whole School Performance Section

Components vary by grade span: elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools.

– Grade span is determined based on the highest grade level included in the school site/district.

(A proposal has been submitted to move buildings where the highest grade is 10 th grade to middle/junior high criteria.)

Whole School Performance Section

Elementary Schools Middle Schools/Junior Highs

GRADES DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICT

Whole School Performance (33%)****

Student Attendance Rate Advanced Coursework Dropout Rate BONUS School Climate Survey Parent & Community Engagement 06-08 A F A

Total Whole School Performance

SCHOOL: MIDDLE SCHOOL 98.2% 0.0% 0.0% 4(.90) =3.6

0(.06)=0 4(.04)=0.16

N Y 3.6+0+0.16+0+0.06=3.82

A

Whole School Performance Section

High Schools (A proposal has been submitted to combine some of these components and distribute the weights accordingly.)

GRADES DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICT

Whole School Performance (33%)****

Graduation Rate Advanced Coursework Participation AP/IB Exam Performance Advanced Courses Performance College Entrance Exam Participation College Entrance Exam Performance Eighth Grade Graduation Rate Five Year Graduation Rate BONUS School Climate Survey Parent & Community Engagement ACE Graduation Participation College Remediation

Total Whole School Performance

09–12 95.5% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 93.0% 38.0% 83.1% 95.5% SCHOOL: A F F F A D B A EXAMPLE SCHOOL 4(.79)=3.16

0(.03)=0 0(.03)=0 0(.03)=0 4(.03)=0.12

1(.03)=0.03

3(.03)=0.09

4(.03)=0.12

N Y Y N 3.16+0+0+0+0.12+0.03+0.09+ 0.12+0+0.06+0.06+0=3.64

B

School Grades and Designations can be Powerful for Schoolwide Improvement

SAMPLE SCHOOL

SAMPLE SCHOOL

SAMPLE SCHOOL

SAMPLE SCHOOL

SAMPLE SCHOOL

The Way to an A: Common Practice #1 Organize Data in a Meaningful Way Types of Data – Demographics – Student Performance Results – – Additional Student Achievement Data Student Growth – – Whole School Performance Data Teacher Attendance and Other Teacher Characteristics – Student Behavior – – Other Student Characteristics Budgetary Data – Survey Data

The Way to an A: Common Practice #1 Organize Data in a Meaningful Way Comprehensive Needs Assessment – Step 1: Establish a Planning Team – Step 2: Discuss the Vision for Reform – Step 3: Identify Data Sources to Utilize for the Needs Assessment – Step 4: Create a School Profile – Step 5: Analyze the Data

The Way to an A: Common Practice #2 Develop a Written Plan

Written plans get followed!

Potential Improvement Strategies – Quarterly Benchmark Assessments – Professional Learning Communities – Increased Learning Time – Building Capacity – Community Schools Initiative – Family Engagement/Parental Involvement

Menu of Interventions

1. Schoolwide Interventions & Supports 2. Leadership Interventions & Supports 3. Teacher Interventions & Supports 4. Classroom Interventions & Supports 5. Parent and Community Interventions & Supports

Menu of Interventions

The Way to an A: Common Practice #3 Monitor the Implementation of the Plan Questions to Ask: – Are school personnel and other involved stakeholders completing components of the plan in a timely manner?

– Are the action steps in the plan resulting in the required improvements?

– Are there things that need to be removed from the plan?

– Are there other things that need to be added?

Oklahoma Data Reviews

The Way to an A: Common Practice #4 Use of Tools Designed to Support Improvement • • • • • • • WISE Planning Tool Family Engagement Tool What Works in Oklahoma Schools Surveys Oklahoma School Climate Surveys iTunes U REAC 3 H Network REAC 3 H Coaches

• • • The Way to an A: Common Practice #5 Fiscal Analysis Aligning Funds and Resources to Needs Examining Use of Federal, State, and Local Sources of Revenue Grant Opportunities: – School Improvement Grants – Reward School Grants – – 21 st Century Community Learning Center Grants STEM Grants – AP/Pre-AP Grants

Family and Community Engagement • • • • Engaging Key Stakeholders Securing Additional Resources Maximizing on Expertise Communicating: Parent Power

More Information

Raise the Grade Together

[email protected]

405-521-4514

Counselors’ Roles

[email protected]

405-521-3549

Family and Community Engagement

[email protected]

405-522-1113

A-F Report Card Calculations

[email protected]

405-521-3341

School Designations

[email protected]

405-521-4513