Transcript Document

Models for Monitoring
Digital Accessibility
Compliance
Tim Springer
Tammy Cosseboom
Agenda
• Compliance Programs
• Monitoring Plans
• Process Monitoring and
Auditing
• Asset Monitoring
• Asset Audits
Compliance
Programs
What is Compliance?
Conforming to the controls
and procedures imposed on
your organization by
appropriate laws or rulings
Compliance Elements
Seven Elements of Effective Compliance Programs
1. Policies, Procedures and Controls
2. Compliance and Ethics Oversight
3. Exercise Due Diligence
4. Educate Employees
5. Monitor and Audit Compliance
6. Consistent Enforcement and Discipline
7. Respond Appropriately
Conceptual Framework
Accessibility program maturity is measured along ten key
dimensions:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance
Communications
Policy and Standards
Legal
Fiscal Management
Development Lifecycle
Testing and Validation
Support and Documentation
Procurement
Training
Risk Prioritization
• Not all technology is warrants the same level of scrutiny
• Worry more about technology that:
– Is necessary for completion of core functionality
– Pertains specifically to users with disabilities
– Receives the highest amount of traffic
– Concerns job postings / applications
– Utilizes third party vendors
– Contains maps or other extensive graphics
• Higher Risk = Higher Priority
Risk Management
Prioritization Levels
• Enterprise
• Asset
• Best Practice
Risk Model
• Identify core factors for each
level
• Weight core factors
• Rank
Legal Research
• Legal research is a continuous compliance
process
• Must be executed at many levels:
– Federal
– State
– Local
• New laws/regulations should be
immediately analyzed for impact and
tracked
• Know your rulemaking process
• Know your OIRA
Compliance Cross-Pollination
• Compliance processes can be
executed the “hard” way or the
“easy” way
• Integrating accessibility into the
existing compliance program gets
you on the path to the “easy way”
Reporting, Metrics, Trends
• Center of the feedback loop
• Risk Management, Risk
Assessment, Legal Research and
Compliance Cross-Pollination feed
the data
• Produce actionable summaries
which can be turned into
compliance process improvement
programs
Monitoring
Plans
It All Starts with a Monitoring Plan
• Who is involved?
• What is being monitored?
• What resources are required?
• When is plan to be executed?
• Which compliance plan is
monitoring associated with?
• What types of test methods are
being utilized?
Monitoring Plan Goals
• Ensure that the program policies
are being followed
• Periodically evaluate the
effectiveness of the program
• Have and publicize a system to
report violations
Monitoring Plan – Ad Hoc or Formal?
Issues with Ad-hoc plans
• Sample size not consistent or riskassessed
• Testing staff lacks knowledge to
identify key work flow structures
• False negatives or positives if not
utilizing users with disabilities
• Doesn’t leverage automatic testing
• Doesn’t provide metrics
Monitoring Types
• Process monitoring – operations are conforming to the
accessibility policy in practice
• Asset monitoring – ICT being produced or utilized is
accessible
– Monitoring = High level ongoing tests
– Auditing = Detailed point in time tests
• Some concepts apply to both types
– Monitoring Plan Creation
– Risk Prioritization
– Risk Management
Process
Monitoring
and Auditing
Process Monitoring Approach
Roughly:
• Define
• Train
• Measure, Manage, Coach
• Report
Bulletproofing
• Automate that which can be
automated
• Use software
• Setup notifications
• Define process variance
tolerances
Process Auditing Methodology
•
•
•
•
Process Walkthrough
Artifact Review
Operations Review
Analysis
•
•
•
•
•
Draft Findings Review
Primary Draft Development
Primary Draft Review
Secondary Changes
Delivery
Asset
Monitoring
Accessibility Monitoring Test Types
• Automated Tests
• Global Tests
• Manual Tests
• Manual Tests with AT
Accessibility Compliance Levels - Minimum
• Automated ICT scan only
• Pages are rendered in a browser
and tested directly against the
DOM
• Results in roughly 25% testing
coverage
Accessibility Compliance Levels - Baseline
• Extends minimum level to include
manual tests of sample portions of
the site
• Sample tests are extrapolated to
remainder of the site
• Results in roughly 85% testing
coverage
Accessibility Compliance Levels - Complete
• Extends base level to include
functional use case testing by
individuals with disabilities using
assistive technology
• Focuses on key transaction paths
in the system
• Increases compliance coverage to
as close to 100% as possible
Asset Audits
Is My ICT Accessible?
Three components need to
be reviewed to answer this
question:
• Technical Compliance
• Functional Compliance
• Support Compliance
Technical Requirements
Does the technology conform to the coding
requirements in the relevant standards?
• Requires up-to-date standards
• Requires the ICT be substantially conformant with
standards
• Requirements are assessed for risk and divided between
those that can be tested:
˗ Automatically (24.8%)
˗ Manually (48.3%)
˗ Globally (26.9%)
Functional Requirements
Can people with disabilities use the application to
complete its core tasks?
• Requires system be usable to people with disabilities
using current AT
• Technical requirements focus on the trees – functional
requirements on the forest
Support Requirements
Is the deployment context of the ICT accessible?
• Is the ICT documentation accessible?
• Can the organization provide accessible support for the
ICT to its employees and the public? (TTY/TDD,
accessible online chat)
• Is the ICT training accessible?
• Does the organization have a periodic audit program
which assesses the compliance and ethics program?
Questions?
Thank You
Contact Us
Tim Springer
Follow Us
@SSBBARTGroup
[email protected]
Tammy Cosseboom
linkedin.com/company/
SSB-BART-Group
[email protected]
Download Slide Deck
facebook.com/
SSBBARTGroup
Info.ssbbartgroup.com/CSUN2015
SSBBARTGroup.com/blog
About SSB BART Group
•
•
•
•
•
Unmatched Experience
Focus on Accessibility
Solutions That Manage Risk
Real-World Strategy
Organizational Strength and
Continuity
• Dynamic, Forward-Thinking
Intelligence
• Fourteen hundred organizations
(1445)
• Fifteen hundred individual
accessibility best practices
(1595)
• Twenty-two core technology
platforms (22)
• Fifty-five thousand audits
(55,930)
• One hundred fifty million
accessibility violations
(152,351,725)
• Three hundred sixty-six thousand
human validated accessibility
violations (366,096)
Appendix A –
Compliance
Programs
Policies, Procedures and Controls
• Publish an accessibility statement
• Modify existing policies (HR, Customer Support)
• Set internal controls
–
–
–
–
Protect resources
Ensure accuracy and reliability
Secure compliance with policies
Evaluate performance
Oversight
•
•
•
•
•
Visibility, knowledge, and oversight
High-level sponsorship
Roles and responsibilities clearly identified
Clearly assigned responsibilities
Day-to-day operations have resources, authority and access
to governing authority
– Resources == budgets
– Authority == compliance can tell other departments what to do
• In accessibility? Really?
– Direct access to the governing authority == if compliance thinks
there is a problem, but their leadership is stonewalling them,
they can do an end run straight to the BoD
RACI Matrix
Educate Employees on Programs
• Communicate policies, standards and procedures of
compliance and ethics program
• Conduct effective training programs
• Disseminate information appropriate to respective roles
Consistent Enforcement and Discipline
• Policies, Procedures, and Controls need to include
disciplinary steps for all levels of employees/agents
• If retraining is an option:
– Maintain metrics on improvement after retraining
– Document all training
• If termination is potential outcome, update contracts to define
penalties
Respond to/Prevent Future Incidents
Two elements must be implemented:
• Accessibility Issue Resolution Policy / Procedures
– Reasonable Accommodation must be provided
– Why did the accessibility violation get overlooked?
• Root Cause Analysis
– Why did the accessibility violation get overlooked?
– What improvements can be made to procedures?