Transcript Slide 1
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
CARE AND PROTECTION
OF
CHILDREN ACT
Clearance Notices
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
• All people engaged in child related employment to hold a
clearance notice
• Advice on identifying the positions and employees who
may be engaged in child related employment was
circulated some months ago. Contact Lisa Hill in OCPE
for details
• SafeNT is responsible for clearance notices
• Clearance notices required from September 2010
• SafeNT processing applications from February 2010
• Communication campaign in March 2010
• Issues still around payment and record keeping.
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
PUBLIC INTEREST
DISCLOSURE ACT
(WHISTLEBLOWERS)
Investigations under PSEMA
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
• PIDA covers matters that would usually be investigated
under the discipline provisions of PSEMA
• Legal advice sought to clarify how this is resolved.
Advice:
• Not every communication to a CEO revealing ‘improper
conduct’ is a ‘disclosure’
• Has to be either made in express reliance upon the PIDA
or, if it is plain that the person is acting in the capacity of
a “whistleblower” as term generally understood
Intersection of PIDA and PSEMA and
Disclosure of Confidential Information
Disclosure made under the
Public Interest Disclosures Act
Commissioner for Public
Interest Disclosures
(CPID)
CPID investigates
under PIDA
CPID refers the matter
to the CPE under
s22 of PIDA
Commissioner for Public
Employment (CPE)
Additional function under s14 of
PSEMA
CPE may investigate using powers
under s13(p) and s15 of PSEMA
OR pass on to Agency CE
S13(p) of PSEMA allows for the
imposition of functions on the CPE.
S14(1) of PSEMA allows the
Commissioner to do all things
necessary or convenient to be done
for or in connection with or
incidental to the performance of his
or her functions and the exercising
of his or her powers.
S15 provides for special powers of
the CPE.
The CPID may seek the assistance
of staff from the relevant Agency to
assist in the investigation.
The matter remains a Public
Interest Disclosure.
The CPID may authorise the
disclosure of confidential information
in order to facilitate the investigation
of a public interest disclosure. S/he
may only authorise the disclosure of
“identifying information” if it is
relevant and necessary for effective
investigation.
This should be considered on a case
by case basis and be subject to
discussion between the CPID, CPE
and the responsible CE.
Agency Chief Executive
The matter ceases to be
investigated under PIDA
(although the discloser retains the
protections of PIDA)
CE investigates
under Part 8
of PSEMA
Part 8 of PSEMA provides for Chief
Executive action where a breach of
discipline is suspected.
** This flowchart shows the pathway of addressing a PIDA disclosure in the event that the CPID considers a disclosure, after
consultation with the CPE and relevant CE, is properly dealt with under PSEMA.
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Representation of Equal Opportunity Groups in the NTPS
Category
June
June
June
June
June
June
June
June
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Seven-year
change
Indigenous Australians
4.6%
5.0%
5.7%
6.6%
6.9%
7.3%
7.7%
8.1%
3.5% pts.
People with disability
1.4%
1.3%
1.7%
1.8%
2.1%
1.9%
2.0%
1.8%
0.4% pts.
People from culturally diverse
background
2.2%
2.3%
3.6%
4.1%
4.9%
4.7%
4.2%
4.0%
1.8% pts.
Women in executive
management
(EO1 to ECO6)
26%
26%
27%
31%
32%
34%
37%
40%
14% pts.
Insert title of presentation here
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Movements in NT Population and NTPS Staff 1983–2009
Insert title of presentation here
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Employment Status of NTPS Staff 1998–2009
STATUS
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Permanent
78.0%
76.9%
77.6%
78.1%
78.3%
77.0%
75.5%
75.6%
74.0%
72.3%
70.9%
-7.1% pts.
Temporary
19.3%
20.0%
19.5%
18.9%
18.7%
19.6%
21.3%
21.3%
22.1%
23.7%
24.9%
5.6% pts.
Casual
2.5%
2.9%
2.8%
2.8%
2.8%
3.3%
3.2%
3.0%
3.6%
3.7%
4.0%
1.5% pts.
Misc.
0.2%
0.2%
0.1%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
0.1%
0.1%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.1% pts.
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Insert title of presentation here
Change
99 to 09
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Part-time in the NTPS 1999–2009
STATUS
Part-time staff
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Change
'99 to '09
8.4%
9.4%
10.0%
10.7%
11.3%
11.3%
11.4%
11.5%
12.1%
12.2%
12.8%
4.4% pts.
Insert title of presentation here
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Average Age by Gender NTPS Staff 1994–2009
46
45
Average Age
44
43
42
41
40
Males
39
Overall
38
Females
37
36
94 995 996 997 998 999 000 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009
19
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Insert title of presentation here
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Length of Service by Gender NTPS Staff – 2009
Percentage of Gender
45%
40%
35%
Female
30%
Male
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
r
de
n
u
5
0
5
0
0
r1
r2
r2
r3
r1
e
e
e
e
e
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
du
du
du
du
du
n
n
n
n
n
a
a
a
a
5a
10
15
20
25
5
Le ngth of Se rv ice (ye ars)
Insert title of presentation here
an
30
r
ve
o
d
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
% of Gender
16%
Distribution of Men and Women in the NTPS by Salary Level - June 2009
Females
14%
Males
12%
Trend Females
10%
Trend Males
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
<=
20
>20
- 25
>25
- 30
>30
- 35
>35
- 40
>40
- 45
>45
- 50
>50
- 55
>55
- 60
>60
- 65
>65
-70
>70
- 75
>75
- 80
>80
- 85
>85 > 90
- 90
Length of Service (years)
Distribution of Men and Women in the NTPS by Salary Level - June 1995
25%
Females
20%
% of Gender
Males
Trend Females
15%
Trend Males
10%
5%
0%
<= 20
>20 25
>25 30
>30 35
>35 40
>40 45
>45 50
Length of Service (years)
Insert title of presentation here
>50 55
>55 60
> 60
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
NTPS Separation and Recruitment Rates by Employment Category: 2003–04 to 2008–09 Permanent
Staff
2003-04
2004-05
separ
ation
rate %
recruit
ment
rate %
separ
ation
rate
%
8
5
8
Professional
11
7
Technical
11
Physical
2005-06
2007-08
2008-09
separ
ation
rate %
recruit
ment
rate %
separ
ation
rate
%
recruit
ment
rate %
separ
ation
rate %
recruit
ment
rate %
separ
ation
rate %
recruit
ment
rate %
4
9
3
9
4
10
4
7
4
10
8
15
8
12
8
13
7
11
8
6
9
7
10
7
10
8
13
8
9
7
11
7
12
7
13
10
12
6
10
8
9
9
Teaching
12
9
14
3
10
1
8
0
7
0
8
0
Health Workers
14
9
11
11
15
8
13
6
11
7
11
9
7
12
7
10
8
8
8
9
9
8
7
11
10
7
10
6
11
5
10
5
10
5
8
5
Administrative
Uniformed
TOTAL
HR Forum December 2009
recruit
ment
rate %
2006-07
OFFICE OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
NTPS Separation and Recruitment Rates by Employment Category: 2003–04 to 2008–09 Permanent &
Temporary Staff
2003-04
separ
ation
rate %
2004-05
recruit
ment
rate %
2005-06
separ
ation
rate %
recruitm
ent rate
%
separ
ation
rate %
2006-07
recruit
ment
rate %
separ
ation
rate %
2007-08
recruit
ment
rate %
separ
ation
rate %
2008-09
recruit
ment
rate %
separ
ation
rate %
recruit
ment
rate %
Administrative
25
32
27
32
27
26
27
30
27
31
25
26
Professional
26
28
26
26
29
28
24
28
29
31
25
30
Technical
18
19
18
20
19
19
20
22
22
23
17
24
Physical
27
29
30
33
29
34
29
32
30
35
25
37
Teaching
20
25
26
23
23
24
24
24
25
29
24
28
Health Workers
53
58
48
59
49
48
44
47
42
47
38
48
8
14
7
13
8
12
8
11
10
9
8
11
26
31
27
31
27
28
26
28
27
31
24
29
Uniformed
Total
HR Forum December 2009