Transcript Slide 1
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN ACT Clearance Notices OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT • All people engaged in child related employment to hold a clearance notice • Advice on identifying the positions and employees who may be engaged in child related employment was circulated some months ago. Contact Lisa Hill in OCPE for details • SafeNT is responsible for clearance notices • Clearance notices required from September 2010 • SafeNT processing applications from February 2010 • Communication campaign in March 2010 • Issues still around payment and record keeping. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE ACT (WHISTLEBLOWERS) Investigations under PSEMA OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT • PIDA covers matters that would usually be investigated under the discipline provisions of PSEMA • Legal advice sought to clarify how this is resolved. Advice: • Not every communication to a CEO revealing ‘improper conduct’ is a ‘disclosure’ • Has to be either made in express reliance upon the PIDA or, if it is plain that the person is acting in the capacity of a “whistleblower” as term generally understood Intersection of PIDA and PSEMA and Disclosure of Confidential Information Disclosure made under the Public Interest Disclosures Act Commissioner for Public Interest Disclosures (CPID) CPID investigates under PIDA CPID refers the matter to the CPE under s22 of PIDA Commissioner for Public Employment (CPE) Additional function under s14 of PSEMA CPE may investigate using powers under s13(p) and s15 of PSEMA OR pass on to Agency CE S13(p) of PSEMA allows for the imposition of functions on the CPE. S14(1) of PSEMA allows the Commissioner to do all things necessary or convenient to be done for or in connection with or incidental to the performance of his or her functions and the exercising of his or her powers. S15 provides for special powers of the CPE. The CPID may seek the assistance of staff from the relevant Agency to assist in the investigation. The matter remains a Public Interest Disclosure. The CPID may authorise the disclosure of confidential information in order to facilitate the investigation of a public interest disclosure. S/he may only authorise the disclosure of “identifying information” if it is relevant and necessary for effective investigation. This should be considered on a case by case basis and be subject to discussion between the CPID, CPE and the responsible CE. Agency Chief Executive The matter ceases to be investigated under PIDA (although the discloser retains the protections of PIDA) CE investigates under Part 8 of PSEMA Part 8 of PSEMA provides for Chief Executive action where a breach of discipline is suspected. ** This flowchart shows the pathway of addressing a PIDA disclosure in the event that the CPID considers a disclosure, after consultation with the CPE and relevant CE, is properly dealt with under PSEMA. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Representation of Equal Opportunity Groups in the NTPS Category June June June June June June June June 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Seven-year change Indigenous Australians 4.6% 5.0% 5.7% 6.6% 6.9% 7.3% 7.7% 8.1% 3.5% pts. People with disability 1.4% 1.3% 1.7% 1.8% 2.1% 1.9% 2.0% 1.8% 0.4% pts. People from culturally diverse background 2.2% 2.3% 3.6% 4.1% 4.9% 4.7% 4.2% 4.0% 1.8% pts. Women in executive management (EO1 to ECO6) 26% 26% 27% 31% 32% 34% 37% 40% 14% pts. Insert title of presentation here OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Movements in NT Population and NTPS Staff 1983–2009 Insert title of presentation here OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Employment Status of NTPS Staff 1998–2009 STATUS 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Permanent 78.0% 76.9% 77.6% 78.1% 78.3% 77.0% 75.5% 75.6% 74.0% 72.3% 70.9% -7.1% pts. Temporary 19.3% 20.0% 19.5% 18.9% 18.7% 19.6% 21.3% 21.3% 22.1% 23.7% 24.9% 5.6% pts. Casual 2.5% 2.9% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 3.3% 3.2% 3.0% 3.6% 3.7% 4.0% 1.5% pts. Misc. 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% pts. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Insert title of presentation here Change 99 to 09 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Part-time in the NTPS 1999–2009 STATUS Part-time staff 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Change '99 to '09 8.4% 9.4% 10.0% 10.7% 11.3% 11.3% 11.4% 11.5% 12.1% 12.2% 12.8% 4.4% pts. Insert title of presentation here OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Average Age by Gender NTPS Staff 1994–2009 46 45 Average Age 44 43 42 41 40 Males 39 Overall 38 Females 37 36 94 995 996 997 998 999 000 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 19 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Insert title of presentation here OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Length of Service by Gender NTPS Staff – 2009 Percentage of Gender 45% 40% 35% Female 30% Male 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% r de n u 5 0 5 0 0 r1 r2 r2 r3 r1 e e e e e nd nd nd nd nd du du du du du n n n n n a a a a 5a 10 15 20 25 5 Le ngth of Se rv ice (ye ars) Insert title of presentation here an 30 r ve o d OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT % of Gender 16% Distribution of Men and Women in the NTPS by Salary Level - June 2009 Females 14% Males 12% Trend Females 10% Trend Males 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% <= 20 >20 - 25 >25 - 30 >30 - 35 >35 - 40 >40 - 45 >45 - 50 >50 - 55 >55 - 60 >60 - 65 >65 -70 >70 - 75 >75 - 80 >80 - 85 >85 > 90 - 90 Length of Service (years) Distribution of Men and Women in the NTPS by Salary Level - June 1995 25% Females 20% % of Gender Males Trend Females 15% Trend Males 10% 5% 0% <= 20 >20 25 >25 30 >30 35 >35 40 >40 45 >45 50 Length of Service (years) Insert title of presentation here >50 55 >55 60 > 60 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT NTPS Separation and Recruitment Rates by Employment Category: 2003–04 to 2008–09 Permanent Staff 2003-04 2004-05 separ ation rate % recruit ment rate % separ ation rate % 8 5 8 Professional 11 7 Technical 11 Physical 2005-06 2007-08 2008-09 separ ation rate % recruit ment rate % separ ation rate % recruit ment rate % separ ation rate % recruit ment rate % separ ation rate % recruit ment rate % 4 9 3 9 4 10 4 7 4 10 8 15 8 12 8 13 7 11 8 6 9 7 10 7 10 8 13 8 9 7 11 7 12 7 13 10 12 6 10 8 9 9 Teaching 12 9 14 3 10 1 8 0 7 0 8 0 Health Workers 14 9 11 11 15 8 13 6 11 7 11 9 7 12 7 10 8 8 8 9 9 8 7 11 10 7 10 6 11 5 10 5 10 5 8 5 Administrative Uniformed TOTAL HR Forum December 2009 recruit ment rate % 2006-07 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT NTPS Separation and Recruitment Rates by Employment Category: 2003–04 to 2008–09 Permanent & Temporary Staff 2003-04 separ ation rate % 2004-05 recruit ment rate % 2005-06 separ ation rate % recruitm ent rate % separ ation rate % 2006-07 recruit ment rate % separ ation rate % 2007-08 recruit ment rate % separ ation rate % 2008-09 recruit ment rate % separ ation rate % recruit ment rate % Administrative 25 32 27 32 27 26 27 30 27 31 25 26 Professional 26 28 26 26 29 28 24 28 29 31 25 30 Technical 18 19 18 20 19 19 20 22 22 23 17 24 Physical 27 29 30 33 29 34 29 32 30 35 25 37 Teaching 20 25 26 23 23 24 24 24 25 29 24 28 Health Workers 53 58 48 59 49 48 44 47 42 47 38 48 8 14 7 13 8 12 8 11 10 9 8 11 26 31 27 31 27 28 26 28 27 31 24 29 Uniformed Total HR Forum December 2009