College Algebra Course Redesign

Download Report

Transcript College Algebra Course Redesign

College Algebra Course
Redesign
Evolution or Revolution?
The process of change….
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
1
2
4
Tammy Muhs-University of Central Florida
Orlando, Florida
[email protected]
Motivation for Redesign
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
College Algebra:
Annual enrollment approximately 4,000
1
Why did we consider a mathematics course
redesign?
2
– Success Rates: Pass rates were down,
withdrawal rates were up
– Space Concerns: Too many students, not
enough classrooms
– Budget Concerns: We needed to do more, with
less
4
Redesign Goals
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
Increase learning outcomes and success rates
while decreasing cost and withdrawal rates.
– Create a student-centered learning environment
– Students spend one hour in class where they review
concepts from the previous week, highlight
upcoming material, and receive administration
information
– Students spend a required three hours in the lab
Mathematical Assistance and Learning Lab
(MALL)
1
2
4
Mathematical Assistance and
Learning Lab (MALL)
From Renovation to Completion
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001
0100
1011
Phase
I - 95
computers (Spring 2010)
Phase II - 100 computers (Summer 2010)
Phase III - 120 computers (Fall 2010)
1
2
4
Instructional Assistance in the
MALL
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
• Peer tutors, undergraduate and graduate
mathematics students work in the lab
–
–
–
–
–
Peer and undergraduate tutors paid $8 per hour
Graduate tutors (not GTAs) paid $12 per hour
Required to complete online homework
Become test proctors during testing weeks
Tutor training about 14 hours a semester
1
2
4
• College Reading & Learning Association International Tutor
Program Certification
• Top GTAs are called Mentors
–
–
–
–
Meet with teaching team weekly
Communicate with students
Hold seminars and test reviews
Help with classroom management
Online Testing in the MALL
0011 0010
1010
1101 0001
0100 1011
• Test
Scheduling
System
(Testing Cal- Pearson Custom Product)
– Scheduling is open for a week, students have multiple time and day
options available, they receive automatically generated reminder
emails
– Intermediate Algebra, College Algebra, Trigonometry, Precalculus,
Finite Math, and Explorations in Math (enrollment up to 4,500 per
semester)
1
2
• Testing is completed online in a proctored environment using a
password system (MyMathLab)
–
–
–
–
–
–
Immediate feedback
Bluebook system to assign computers and scratch paper
Free response questions, multiple choice, or combination
Challenge week for formatting errors
Integrity violations almost non-existent
Print Cost savings (College Algebra tests in 2007-08 cost more than
$7000)
4
Redesign Pilot Fall 2008
Decreased cost from $70 to $49 per student
0011 0010
1101 0001 0100 1011 as of spring 2010
Full1010
implementation
Success Rate
76%
74%
74%
65%
64%
62%
60%
Fall 2006 Prior to the partial
redesign
n=2250
Fall 2006
Total course
Mean score
63.4%
Standard
deviation
18.9%
Number of
students who
took the
common
final exam
1277
72%
Percentage
of students 70%
earning a 68%
C or
higher in 66%
the course
Final Exam
scores
Fall 2008 Redesign pilot
completed
n=941
Fall 2008
Pilot
Sections
1
2
80.6%
15.3%
4
802
Presidents Class Size Initiative
(PCSI)
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
• Provided support for Instructors and Lecturers
to work in the MALL in addition to the peer
tutors, graduate tutors, and GTAs
• Created Small Within Large Class Environment
• Students register in sections of 19 students
• Between 16 and 20 of these sections meet
together once per week in a large lecture hall
1
2
4
– Sections form both an in-class and virtual
community
• Communication has been shown to have an important role in
learning and understanding mathematics (Knuth & Peressini,
2001)
Course Grade
Summer 2009
Summer 2009
Distribution
Traditional Section Redesigned
and Final
n=226 students
Sections n=162
Exam Scores
students
Success Rate
61.5%
75.3%
A
11.9%
20.4%
B
26.1%
36.4%
C
23.5%
18.5%
NC
(no credit)
10.6%
2.5%
F
18.1%
9.9%
W
9.7%
12.3%
71.0%
15.9%
Mean Score
Standard
Deviation
Fall 2009
Traditional Sections
n=851 students
72.3%
Fall 2009
Redesigned
Sections n=1174
students
78.4%
28.7%
27.9%
26.8%
34.1%
16.8%
16.4%
9.3%
0.7%
13.9%
14.7%
4.6%
6.2%
77.5%
78.2%
80.4%
13.9%
16.3%
14.0%
Future Work and Conclusions
0011 0010 1010 1101 0001 0100 1011
• Producing favorable results
– Increasing the number of students advised by
mentors and faculty
– Improving student learning outcomes
– Increasing course offerings
• Intermediate Algebra starting fall 2010
• Precalculus starting spring 2011
1
2
4
• Future studies
– Look at retention and graduation rates
– Look at success in later courses (STEM)